Philadelphia is home to many Asian immigrants from varying ethnic backgrounds. From East to South Asia, to South East and Central Asia, cultural hubs exist throughout Philadelphia. Philadelphia’s Chinatown has long been a sanctuary for Asian immigrants, offering cultural familiarity as well as economic opportunities. However, ongoing gentrification and development projects continue to threaten its future. Through an interview with Taryn, a Philly native and member of Student Preservation of Chinatown (SPOC Philly) and Ginger Arts Center, I discuss Philadelphia’s Asian communities and the fight to preserve its identity.
By Kala Summers
When you visit Philadelphia’s Chinatown, how do you perceive its linguistic landscape (its signs, streets, and people)? What do the Chinese characters on shop signs say about the community, and how do they differ between Chinese-owned businesses and chain stores? Philadelphia’s Chinatown is more than just a place, it’s a cultural hub and a symbol of identity for Chinese immigrants, Chinese Americans, and the broader Asian diaspora. Chinatown in itself is the acknowledgment that these ethnic communities exist. However, like many immigrant neighborhoods within Philadelphia, Chinatown faces challenges that threaten its survival.
Chinatowns have long served as places for immigrant groups to establish enterprises, maintain cultural customs, and feel at home. Like Chinatowns across the nation, Philadelphia’s Chinatown is a testament to the resilience of its residents. Yet, its linguistic landscape, where we see signs written in both Chinese and English, reveals deeper issues of power and marginalization. Much like the example of Washington, DC’s Chinatown, the signs in Philadelphia’s Chinatown are increasingly symbolic rather than practical. While bilingual signs may appear to celebrate diversity, their real purpose is often to attract tourists or satisfy city regulations rather than serve the needs of Chinese-speaking residents.
Like in Washington, DC, long-standing Chinese businesses are being forced out of Philadelphia’s Chinatown by the rising cost of real estate and even the proposal of the 76ers arena, which chain stores and restaurants are replacing. As seen in the Washington, DC case study, this social and geographic marginalization demonstrates how economic forces can obliterate a neighborhood’s true cultural character. Fewer places meet their wants and ideals, and older Chinese residents, like those that were studied in Washington, DC, frequently find it difficult to adjust to these changes. As a result, we see a change that is cultural as well as economic.
This process could have been accelerated in Philadelphia if the proposed 76ers basketball arena next to Chinatown went through. If constructed, it might have raised rents and property values, driving out locals who have lived and worked there for decades as well as small businesses. Philadelphia’s Chinatown would have run the risk of becoming a place where Chinese and Asian culture only exists in name and serves more visitors than locals, much like Washington, DC’s Chinatown was altered by gentrification. Through cuisine, celebrations, and cultural customs, Philadelphia’s larger Asian immigrant groups also significantly contribute to the city’s identity. However, Philadelphia as a whole suffers as well as the locals in areas like Chinatown due to gentrification. The city’s past and diversity are enhanced by these communities, and their exclusion would create a cultural vacuum. So, how can neighborhoods like Chinatown preserve their identity in the face of these challenges? Can the cultural and historical value of these spaces be prioritized over profit and development? These are questions we must ask if we are to ensure that immigrant communities continue to thrive and shape the cities they call home.
I had the opportunity to interview Taryn, which gave me a comprehensive understanding of the changing character of Chinatown in Philadelphia. Being a part-Korean and Irish-American resident who is actively involved with the Student Preservation of Chinatown coalition (SPOC Philly) and the Ginger Arts Center, she shed light on how the community's fight for safe, nurturing spaces has been influenced by past neglect in urban infrastructure and education. Taryn shared her personal educational experiences, which highlighted structural flaws and prompted local groups to support the establishment of third spaces and strong youth initiatives. Her observations demonstrate that these community centers' efforts extend well beyond the arts; they are vital investments in the neighborhood's future, encouraging a feeling of community and fortitude in the face of systemic difficulties.
Her reflections also explored the vital role that neighborhood establishments and cultural centers play in maintaining Chinatown's distinct character. According to Taryn, these businesses serve as essential centers for social interaction and cross-cultural communication in addition to offering immigrants financial opportunities. She emphasized how, despite threats from gentrification and urban redevelopment, Chinatown has managed to remain a haven for diverse Asian immigrant groups thanks to long-standing networks and community ties. This viewpoint is crucial to my thesis because it highlights the relationship between cultural preservation and the effects of urban development, highlighting the need to preserve lively, community-centered areas in order to protect immigrant neighborhoods' legacy and future.
Shohamy, E. & Ben-Rafael, E. & Barni, Monica. (2010). Linguistic Landscape in the City.
*All photos on this website are taken by myself, please do not repost without credits*