If you want kid-focused volume limits, lighting, and an AUX option, choose iClever BTH12; if you need foldable on-ear headphones with device switching and voice-assistant access, choose JBL Tune 510BT. For a kid’s everyday listening, I’d choose the iClever because its 74 or 85 dBA volume settings are a concrete child-oriented feature. The JBL makes more sense when portability and switching between devices matter more.
iClever BTH12 vs JBL Tune 510BT at a Glance
• JBL Tune 510BT strength: Foldable on-ear design, up to 40 hours of wireless listening, and the ability to switch between two Bluetooth devices. Trade-off: It has no headphone jack and does not list a child-focused volume limit.
• Choose iClever BTH12 for a kid who would benefit from the volume settings, lights, or wired listening option.
• Choose JBL Tune 510BT for someone who values a foldable adult-style headset and voice-assistant access.
The BTH12 is designed specifically for kids. Its standout practical feature is the choice of 74 or 85 dBA volume limits, adjusted with a combination of keys. That gives a parent a way to set a ceiling rather than relying only on a child to manage volume. The headphones also use 40 mm drivers, connect over Bluetooth 5.2, and include a built-in microphone for calls or other voice use.
There is a playful side, too: four LED lighting modes add color on both sides, and a separate button controls them. The lights can be switched off in Bluetooth mode to save battery. Battery life is listed at up to 85 hours, with USB-C charging; the product information also describes a 10-minute charge providing seven hours of playtime. Those figures make the BTH12 appealing for long stretches between charging, though the lighting feature may be less useful to families who prefer a plain-looking headset.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
I’d pick it for a child who listens on a tablet or Chromebook and might also need a wired option: the BTH12 supports both wireless use and a detachable 3.5 mm cable. I’d skip it if the priority is a foldable design or switching easily between two Bluetooth devices; those are features the JBL specifically lists. The BTH12 is over-ear, while the JBL is on-ear, so buyers should choose based on the wearing style they want rather than assuming the two fit the same way.
The Tune 510BT is a simpler, more adult-oriented on-ear pair. JBL lists up to 40 hours of wireless battery life, foldable construction, and an adjustable headband. It also supports switching between two Bluetooth devices, which could be handy for someone moving from a tablet video to a phone call without manually reconnecting each time.
Its controls include a microphone for hands-free calls and a button to activate Siri or Google Assistant on a connected device. JBL describes its sound as Pure Bass, so this model may appeal to listeners who want that bass-forward character. The supplied information does not list a volume cap for children, however, and the Tune 510BT has no headphone jack. Those are meaningful differences if the main shopper is a parent choosing headphones for a kid.
I’d consider the JBL for an older child or adult who wants wireless listening, device switching, and a headset that folds for carrying. I would not choose it over the iClever for a younger kid if a defined volume limit is central to the decision. The JBL’s stated battery life is substantial, but it is shorter than the BTH12’s listed maximum, and its design does not offer the wired fallback the iClever provides.
• Best fit for a kid-focused volume setting → iClever BTH12. It lists selectable limits of 74 or 85 dBA; the JBL sheet does not list a comparable limit.
• Best for longer listed battery life → iClever BTH12. Its stated maximum is 85 hours, compared with up to 40 hours for the JBL. Actual listening time can vary with use and settings.
• Best for switching between two Bluetooth devices → JBL Tune 510BT. That capability is specifically listed for the JBL.
• Best if you want a wired listening option → iClever BTH12. It supports wireless Bluetooth and includes a detachable 3.5 mm audio cable; the JBL has no headphone jack.
• Best for foldable portability → JBL Tune 510BT. Its foldable design is a practical advantage for carrying it between home, school, or travel.
• Best for LED lights → iClever BTH12. It offers four lighting modes, with an option to switch the lights off in Bluetooth mode.
• Best for button-activated Siri or Google Assistant → JBL Tune 510BT. Its multifunction button can call up the connected device’s voice assistant.
• Best for an over-ear kids’ design → iClever BTH12. Choose the JBL instead if you specifically want an on-ear fit.
A few search phrases can lead shoppers toward the wrong category. “Memory foam ear cushions open ear headphones” describes a different combination of features; neither product’s supplied information identifies it as an open-ear model or says its cushions use memory foam. Likewise, “best voice assistant ear clip headphones for webinars” points to ear-clip headphones, not either of these over-ear or on-ear designs. The JBL does offer voice-assistant access, but it is not described as an ear-clip headset. And if you’re searching for “under 30 on ear headphones,” check the current price on Amazon rather than assuming either model falls into that category; the JBL is on-ear, while the iClever is over-ear.
In my opinion, I’d buy the iClever BTH12 for a kid because the selectable volume limits, wired option, and longer listed battery life address everyday family needs directly. The JBL Tune 510BT is the more compelling pick if foldability, two-device switching, or voice-assistant access matters more than kid-specific controls. For a child’s first pair, I’d put the BTH12’s clear volume-setting feature ahead of the JBL’s convenience extras.
For a kid, I’d lean toward the iClever BTH12 because it lists selectable 74 or 85 dBA volume limits. The JBL may suit an older child, but its supplied specifications do not list a similar volume-limit feature.
The iClever BTH12 is listed for up to 85 hours, while the JBL Tune 510BT is listed for up to 40 hours. The iClever also has a stated quick-charge figure of seven hours of playtime after a 10-minute charge; JBL lists two additional hours after five minutes.
The iClever BTH12 supports wired and wireless use and includes a detachable 3.5 mm audio cable. The JBL Tune 510BT is wireless and has no headphone jack.
The JBL Tune 510BT has a multifunction button for activating Siri or Google Assistant on a connected device. The iClever lists a built-in microphone and controls for calls and media, but its supplied features do not specify a voice-assistant button.
• ORANDNOT Silicone Ear Plugs vs PAXA Sleep Headphones
• our LUDOS OMNITONE vs Botesty Sound Headphones pick
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.