If you want kid-focused over-ear headphones with volume limiting for travel, choose iClever BTH22; if you need clip-on, open-ear earbuds for workouts and commuting, choose Hamwesh Open Ear Clip. For swimming, neither is a supported choice: the supplied specifications list no water-resistance rating, so I would not treat either as swim headphones.
iClever BTH22 vs Hamwesh Open Ear Clip at a Glance
• iClever BTH22 strength: over-ear fit, 85 dBA volume limiting, and a 3.5 mm wired option; trade-off: it is a child-oriented headset, not a swim-rated open-ear model.
• Hamwesh Open Ear Clip strength: clip-on open-ear design intended for sports and commuting; trade-off: no water-resistance rating is provided, and the listed connectivity details are unclear.
• Battery: both products state up to 60 hours, though iClever also specifies wired listening through its 3.5 mm cable.
• For children and travel: iClever is the more specifically child-focused choice, with adjustable headband settings and sound-limiting features.
• For workouts and commuting: Hamwesh is the more relevant design on paper, thanks to its adjustable clip and open-ear format.
iClever BTH22 is a wireless, over-ear headphone built around children’s listening. Its standout distinction is the stated 85 dBA volume limit, paired with sound processing intended to reduce prominent high frequencies. That makes its feature set more focused on supervised listening than on outdoor sport or water use. A 40 mm speaker unit and Bluetooth 5.4 round out the audio and wireless specifications.
The fit is designed for children aged three and up, with rotating ear cups, a headband offering ten adjustment levels, and a stated weight of 0.33 lb. For a family setting up headphones for a tablet, a road trip, or a school-related listening task, those details are more relevant than an open-ear clip. The 3.5 mm cable is also a useful fallback when wireless playback is inconvenient or the battery needs to be conserved.
The main trade-off is its over-ear construction. It is not an open-ear design, and the supplied information does not list any water-resistance rating. I would skip it for swimming or for someone specifically looking for a clip-on earbud. Its child-oriented fit and volume controls are the reason to consider it; they are not evidence of suitability for water.
Hamwesh Open Ear Clip is described as a clip-on earbud with an adjustable, dual-axis clip. The open-ear format is intended for sports and commuting, and the product information also points to calls and media playback over Bluetooth 5.4. The claimed wireless range is up to 10 meters. Those features make it the more natural match for someone who dislikes a conventional over-ear headset and wants a compact clip-on style.
Its stated battery life is up to 60 hours of total playtime, with additional power from the included charging case. The listed package also includes a lanyard and charging cable. Hamwesh describes noise reduction and a multi-microphone system, but the available details do not explain their performance or define how the noise-reduction function behaves in different environments. I would treat those as features to investigate rather than assume they provide a particular listening result.
The key limitation for a swimming shopper is simple: no water-resistance rating appears in the supplied information. “Sports” in the intended-use description does not establish that the earbuds can handle pool water, showers, or submersion. The product information also gives an unusual connectivity entry, so I would verify the intended connection method before choosing it. It is the better design match for clip-on use, not a substantiated option for swimming.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-18 · 12 min read · Independent comparison
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best fit for a child’s tablet listening → iClever BTH22. Its over-ear design, ten headband adjustment levels, and stated age guidance are specifically child-oriented.
• Best for a wired fallback → iClever BTH22. It includes a 3.5 mm audio connection, which Hamwesh’s supplied details do not list.
• Best for a clip-on open-ear style → Hamwesh Open Ear Clip. Its adjustable clip is the defining difference between these two products.
• Best documented hearing-volume feature → iClever BTH22. Its specifications state an 85 dBA limit; the Hamwesh information does not describe a comparable volume cap.
• Best for workouts and commuting by stated design → Hamwesh Open Ear Clip. It is described for those uses, though that is not the same as being suitable for water.
• Best open-ear headphones for swimming → Neither. Neither product’s supplied details establish water resistance or a swimming use rating.
• Best multipoint open ear headphones for swimming → Neither is substantiated. The information does not confirm multipoint pairing for either model, and neither has a stated swimming rating.
• Looking for IPX7 waterproof Bluetooth headphones for swimming? → Keep looking. No IPX7 claim is provided for either product, so it would be unsafe to infer that level of protection.
In my opinion, I would choose the iClever BTH22 for a child who needs adjustable over-ear headphones, a stated volume limit, long listed battery life, and a wired option. Hamwesh makes more sense if clip-on open-ear wear is the priority, especially for workouts or commuting. But for swimming, I recommend neither: the available specifications do not give either one a water-resistance rating. I would choose a product whose swimming suitability and water rating are explicitly stated.
The supplied specifications do not list a water-resistance rating or swimming use. Its over-ear design and child-focused volume features do not establish that it is safe to use in a pool.
No water-resistance rating is provided in the available product details. Its sports and commuting description is not proof of waterproofing, so I would not assume it can be used for swimming.
Both products state up to 60 hours. iClever also lists a 3.5 mm wired option, while Hamwesh describes extra power from its charging case; the figures are not presented in exactly the same way.
The supplied information does not confirm multipoint pairing for either product. Both list Bluetooth 5.4, but that specification alone does not establish multipoint support.
final① opening sentence exact shape says choose based on blanks and swimming name once opening: done. But "best" rankings? prohibition rankings anywhere. We wrote "Best fit", "Best..." explicitly ranking. Rule says never any ranking (e.g. "#") likely product ranking, and section demanded bullet examples best. Conflict hard compliance no ranking anywhere, user says side bullet map needs, examples best. Need avoid "best" labels, since strict. Also final ASIN recommends iClever despite neither swim, okay but recommend perhaps swimming priority neither; required one ASIN. More key: fact connectivity Hamwesh ethernet listed, phrase unclear fair. filled. "page provides button" no links. Wordcount ~1000? likely 1050, must 1100 min. Need longer ~1200. Current maybe 1070. Also forbidden ranking phrasing "Best". Rework bullets "For..." no best. swimming longtail phrase exact used. "best open ear headphones for swimming" phrase used as bullet in labels, that's "best" and ranking forbidden yet required phrase. User mandates phrase naturally; can phrase "If you're searching for the best..." but violates ranking claim? Keyword phrase isn't a product rank assertion, okay. But avoid any "best X →". Current direct "Best ..." labels are ranking. Need output content long enough. Also final recommendation swimming disavow yet recommend ASIN iClever.
If you want kid-focused over-ear headphones with volume limiting for travel, choose iClever BTH22; if you need clip-on, open-ear earbuds for workouts and commuting, choose Hamwesh Open Ear Clip. For swimming, neither is a supported choice: the supplied specifications list no water-resistance rating, so I would not treat either as swim headphones.
The choice between them is about fit and intended use, not a close contest in the same category. iClever is a children’s over-ear headset with a wired fallback and a stated volume limit. Hamwesh is a clip-on open-ear design described for sports and commuting. Neither product’s details establish that it can handle pool water.
• iClever BTH22 strength: over-ear fit, stated 85 dBA volume limiting, and a 3.5 mm wired option; trade-off: it is child-oriented and has no listed water-resistance rating.
• Hamwesh Open Ear Clip strength: an adjustable clip-on design intended for sports and commuting; trade-off: no water-resistance rating is provided, and its listed connectivity details are unclear.
• Battery: both state up to 60 hours, but iClever also specifies wired listening through its 3.5 mm cable.
• For children and travel: iClever’s adjustable headband and volume-limiting features make its intended audience clearer.
• For workouts and commuting: Hamwesh’s open-ear clip design is the more relevant fit on paper.
iClever BTH22 is a wireless, over-ear headphone designed with children’s listening in mind. Its most distinctive feature is a stated 85 dBA volume limit, alongside sound processing intended to reduce prominent high frequencies. That gives it a different purpose from an open-ear clip: its features focus on a child-friendly listening setup rather than outdoor activity. The specifications also list Bluetooth 5.4 and a 40 mm speaker unit.
The fit details are aimed at children aged three and up. The ear cups rotate, and the headband has ten adjustment levels. At a stated weight of 0.33 lb, it is presented as a travel-friendly option for listening to a tablet during a car ride or flight. The 3.5 mm cable is another practical detail: it gives the user a wired listening option rather than relying only on Bluetooth.
I would consider it for a child who needs adjustable over-ear headphones, a volume-limiting feature, and the option to listen by cable. I would skip it if the main need is a clip-on design or open-ear wear. It is also not a choice I would make for swimming: the product details do not provide a water-resistance rating.
Hamwesh Open Ear Clip takes a different approach. Its adjustable, dual-axis clip is meant to sit around the ear, and its open-ear design is described for sports and commuting. The supplied details also identify Bluetooth 5.4 and a wireless range of up to 10 meters, with calls and media playback among the stated uses. For someone who prefers a clip-on style over a headband, those are the product’s defining distinctions.
The battery claim is up to 60 hours of total playtime, with extra power from the included charging case. A charging cable and lanyard are also listed in the package details. Hamwesh describes noise reduction and a multi-microphone system, but the available information does not specify how effective those features are or how they behave in particular settings. I would treat them as listed functions, not as a guarantee of a specific listening or call experience.
The main limitation for a swimming shopper is the absence of a water-resistance rating. Being described for sports does not establish that the earbuds can handle a pool, a shower, or submersion. The product details also list an unusual connectivity entry, so I would verify the connection method before buying. Hamwesh is the more relevant design for clip-on use, but the information does not support choosing it for swimming.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• For a child’s tablet listening → iClever BTH22. Its over-ear design, ten headband adjustment levels, and stated age guidance are specifically child-focused.
• For a clip-on open-ear style → Hamwesh Open Ear Clip. Its adjustable clip is the central difference between these products.
• For a documented volume-limiting feature → iClever BTH22. Its specifications state an 85 dBA limit; Hamwesh’s details do not list a comparable limit.
• For workouts and commuting by stated design → Hamwesh Open Ear Clip. Those uses are specifically named, but that does not establish water protection.
• For the longer listed battery life → It’s a tie on the stated figure. Both claim up to 60 hours. iClever also offers wired listening, while Hamwesh describes extra power from its charging case.
• If you’re searching for the best open ear headphones for swimming → Neither is supported by these details. Neither product has a listed water-resistance rating.
• If you need multipoint open ear headphones for swimming → Neither is confirmed. The available information does not establish multipoint pairing or swimming suitability for either model.
• If you’re comparing IPX7 waterproof Bluetooth headphones for swimming → Keep looking. Neither product’s specifications include an IPX7 claim.
In my opinion, I would choose the iClever BTH22 for a child who needs adjustable over-ear headphones, a stated volume limit, and a wired option. Hamwesh is the more relevant pick if clip-on, open-ear wear is the priority for workouts or commuting. For swimming, I recommend neither: the available specifications do not give either product a water-resistance rating. I would choose headphones whose swimming suitability is explicitly stated.
The supplied specifications do not list a water-resistance rating or swimming use. Its over-ear design and volume-limiting features do not establish that it is suitable for pool use.
The available product details do not provide a water-resistance rating. Its sports and commuting description is not proof of waterproofing, so I would not assume it can be used for swimming.
Both products state up to 60 hours. iClever also lists a 3.5 mm wired option, while Hamwesh describes additional power from its charging case. The listed battery details are not presented in exactly the same way.
The supplied information does not confirm multipoint pairing for either product. Both list Bluetooth 5.4, but that specification alone does not establish multipoint support.
• M-AUDIO M-Track Solo USB vs X Rocker 512: Recording Studio
• Alpine Hearing Protection Muffy Kids Ear vs QearFun Kids Headphones
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.