Paper 1 requires certain skills. Not only must you understand the text(s), but also you have to express your ideas in a well-structured guided textual analysis. Like any skill, writing a guided textual analysis can be perfected with time and practice. Although the exam is 75 minutes at SL and 2 hours and 15 minutes at HL, there will have been hours of preparation beforehand to refine these skills.
It is not compulsory to answer the guiding question. However, as these questions focus on central aspects of the texts, it is strongly recommended that you use them to your advantage.
If you choose not to address the guiding question, you must state a clear line of thesis as you begin to address your chosen area of analysis.
This is not a commentary. You are not expected to carry out an all-encompassing line by line treatment of all aspects of the text and will not have the time to do so. This is also why the use of the guiding question is strongly recommended as it provides a point of entry and a manageable focus in the time allowed.
There will sometimes be an introductory statement given at the beginning of each text. Make sure you pay attention to this as it will provide valuable information that will help you understand the text, for example, the relationship between characters if it is not obvious.
What is Critical Discourse Analysis and what does it have to do with the Paper 1?
The field of critical discourse analysis (CDA) offers useful tools for Paper 1. Critical discourse analysis is concerned with the description and interpretation of discourse in context. Essentially, if we ask the right questions in the right order, we can critically analyze a text. Most good commentaries attempt to answer three essential questions:
What's being said (i.e. content, theme, ideas)?
How is it being said (i.e. stylistic devices, structural features)?
So what (i.e. for what ends, purposes)?
Framing: What is the angle or perspective of the writer or speaker? This is called the 'framing' of the text because it asks you to look at how the frame influences how we 'see' the text. Think about how different frames change the way a painting looks. Different color frames will pull out different colors, making us notice some things before others. Different materials (wood, gold, paper) will make us interpret the painting with different values.
Foregrounding: What concepts and issues are emphasized? What is the subject of the text or the object of concern? Who is at the foreground of the text?
Background: What concepts and issues are played down in the text?
Audience: Is the intended audience expected to share the views of the text? What is the audience's relation to the author and subject of the text?
Topicalization: What is put at the front of each sentence to show what it is about?
Agent-patient relations: Who has the most authority or power in the sentence? In the case of the passive voice, who is being left out? What degree of formality is there in the text? What words indicate a degree of certainty or attitude?