Research Economist at Bank of Spain
Fields: Macroeconomics, Firm Dynamics
Blocking the Blockers? Defensive Investment and Aggregate Productivity, R&R JEDC
I study the effect of firms’ defensive investment on aggregate total factor productivity (TFP) in a dynamic general-equilibrium model with heterogeneous firms, where incumbents can invest to deter both imitation and entry, while entrants either enter existing product markets or lead entirely new ones. I derive a decomposition of aggregate TFP into allocative and net technical efficiency, the latter capturing average firm-level productivity and variety. I calibrate the model to U.S. Compustat data to match the joint relationships between intangible investment, firm productivity, market share, and firm size. I find that defensive investment reduces aggregate TFP by 4 percent, primarily by lowering firm-level productivity, and that higher product variety partially offsets the loss—absent which the TFP cost would double. Firm-level evidence supports the model’s predictions.
2. Investment Irreversibility in a Granular World (with Tatsuro Senga), R&R JME
We show that investment irreversibility plays a prominent role in shaping aggregate fluctuations in a granular economy, characterized by a fat-tailed distribution of non-atomistic firms. Such an economy satisfies two conditions necessary for irreversibility to matter for aggregate fluctuations: idiosyncratic shocks volatile enough to bind the irreversibility constraint cyclically for a mass of large firms, and a failure of the law of large numbers that prevents firm-level fluctuations from washing out in the aggregate. Through both a direct misallocation channel and an indirect general equilibrium channel, irreversibility dampens the volatility of output, investment, and hours while amplifying the volatility of consumption. Eliminating the friction yields a consumption-equivalent welfare gain of 2.49%; however, merely subsidizing capital liquidation yields only modest welfare gains of 0.32%, because firms, compensated by the government, do not internalize the aggregate resource losses and therefore over-disinvest.
3. The Macroeconomic Effects of Defence Expenditure: Evidence from Spain (with Alloza, Domínguez-Díaz and Durá)
We estimate the macroeconomic effects of defence expenditure using a novel dataset covering the universe of defence procurement contracts in Spain over 30 years. Our defence procurement data overcomes identification challenges posed by implementation lags inherent in traditional government spending, as contracts are awarded years before production begins and spending is recorded in government national accounts only upon delivery. Using local projections, we find that GDP effects take time to materialise, become sizeable, but remain transitory. That is, while defence investment has relevant economic consequences, these are bound to occur in the medium run insofar as the spending process is hindered by implementation lags. A DSGE model calibrated to our empirical setting yields two main findings. First, reducing implementation lags to US levels would meaningfully frontload macroeconomic effects. Second, defence spending delivers more transient and smaller long-run effects than general public investment projects.
WORK IN PROGRESS
1. Defense R&D and Productivity Growth (with Basso, Pozzetti and Rachedi)
Draft coming soon.
2. Firms payouts and Innovation Under Asymetric Information (with Bonelli, Errico and Pollio)
Draft upon request.
3. Heterogeneous Firms, Rational Inattention, and the Business Cycle (with Tatsuro Senga)
Draft coming soon.
Public Investment in a Production Network: Aggregate and Sectoral Implications (with Alessandro Peri and Omar Rachedi )
The Review of Economics and Statistics, 2023
Aggregate and sectoral effects of public investment crucially depend on the interaction between the output elasticity to public capital and intermediate inputs. We uncover this fact through the lens of a New Keynesian production network. This setting doubles the socially optimal amount of public capital relative to the one-sector model without intermediate inputs, leading to a substantial amplification of the public-investment multiplier. We also document novel sectoral implications of public investment. Although public investment is concentrated in far fewer sectors than public consumption, its effects are relatively more evenly distributed across industries. We validate this model implication in the data.