We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-09-23 · 7 min read · Independent comparison
If you want a fully untethered, phone-free swim with open ears and a built-in music library, choose I love e iFecco IP68; if you need a wired, in-ear seal that stays clamped to your head with clips and works with whatever 3.5mm player you already own, choose Naroote Swimming Headphones.
• I love e iFecco IP68 — biggest strength: bone conduction open-ear design plus an 8GB on-board MP3 player, so you can leave your phone on the deck and still hear every lap.
• I love e iFecco IP68 — biggest trade-off: Bluetooth does not work underwater, so you must switch to MP3 mode before you submerge, and there is no noise isolation at all.
• Naroote Swimming Headphones — biggest strength: a deep IP68 seal with four ear-tip sizes and two cord clips, giving a locked-in in-ear fit that blocks water out of the canal.
• Naroote Swimming Headphones — biggest trade-off: it is wired only, with no Bluetooth, no built-in memory and no battery — you need a separate player to plug into.
• Pick I love e iFecco IP68 if you want one self-contained device for laps, runs and rides.
• Pick Naroote Swimming Headphones if you already carry a waterproof 3.5mm player and prefer a sealed in-ear sound.
The headline feature here is independence. With 8GB of built-in storage you can carry roughly 2,000 songs on the headset itself, sync them over a magnetic cable, and never touch a phone. That is a genuinely different way to swim — no armband, no pouch, no waterproof case for a handset. If your main frustration with pool training is fiddling with gear between sets, this design removes the gear entirely.
Then there is the fit philosophy. This is a bone conduction set, so the drivers sit against your cheekbones and your ear canals stay completely open. There is no pressure inside the ear and no muffled feeling. For runners, cyclists and anyone training near traffic or other people, hearing your surroundings while music plays is a real safety argument, not a marketing line. The frame is a lightweight 28g titanium build, and the ABS enclosure plus the included ear plugs suggest the company expects you to occasionally want to block water rather than sound.
In my opinion, buy this if you want one device that covers swimming, running and cycling without accessories, and you value hearing the world around you. Skip it if you crave deep bass isolation, or if you refuse to manage a separate MP3 library.
Naroote Swimming Headphones: Who It's For
Naroote takes the opposite approach: keep everything simple, wired and sealed. The IP68 rating here is rated for full submersion up to 3.6 meters, which is deeper than the iFecco's 3-meter figure, and it is built to shrug off heavy sweat and rain as well. Because the earpieces sit in the canal rather than against the cheekbone, the design leans on a physical seal — and you get four ear-tip sizes to dial that seal in. A proper seal is what keeps water out and bass in, so getting the right tip matters more than any spec on the page.
The other half of the story is the cord. It is a deliberately short 40cm cable with two sturdy clips, which is a smart piece of swim-specific design: short cable means less drag, less tangling and less chance of a loop catching your arm mid-stroke. The clips anchor the wire to your goggles or cap so the earpieces do not get yanked out during flip turns. That combination — sealed in-ear fit plus clipped short cord — is exactly what you want if you swim hard and hate adjusting gear.
What you give up is everything wireless. There is no Bluetooth, no battery and no built-in memory; connectivity is a plain 3.5mm jack, so this headset is only as good as the player you plug into it. It also carries a shorter manufacturer warranty period (90 days) than the iFecco's 2 years, which is worth factoring in if you are rough on your gear.
I recommend Naroote for swimmers who already own a waterproof MP3 player, want a physical noise-isolating seal, and prefer a wired setup that cannot drop a connection mid-lap. Skip it if you want to ditch the player entirely or need calls and wireless streaming on land.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for maximum water depth → Naroote Swimming Headphones. Its IP68 rating covers submersion up to 3.6 meters versus 3 meters on the iFecco.
• Best for open-ear safety and awareness → I love e iFecco IP68. Bone conduction leaves your canals open so you hear traffic and poolmates.
• Best for a locked-in, noise-isolating seal → Naroote Swimming Headphones. In-ear placement plus four ear-tip sizes and two cord clips.
• Best for long sessions without a charge → I love e iFecco IP68. An 8-hour battery with a 2-hour charge covers multiple swims; Naroote has no battery to run down.
• Best if you already own a waterproof 3.5mm player → Naroote Swimming Headphones. It is a pure plug-in headset with no wireless to configure.
• Best for mixed land and water training → I love e iFecco IP68. Bluetooth 6.0 gives a 10-meter wireless range for runs and rides between swims.
• Best for simplicity and fewer failure points → Naroote Swimming Headphones. No battery, no pairing, no mode switching — just plug in and go.
If I were buying for myself, I would take the I love e iFecco IP68. The reason is not that it is better at everything — Naroote wins on depth rating and on a genuinely sealed in-ear fit — but that the iFecco solves the problem I actually have: carrying and protecting a player. One headset with 8GB of music, 8 hours of battery, Bluetooth for land and bone conduction for awareness covers swimming, running and cycling without a single accessory.
The one habit it demands is switching to MP3 mode before you go under, and I would rather remember that than deal with a cable and a separate device every session. That is my call, not a universal truth.
If your priority is a tight, quiet, wired seal and you already own a waterproof player, Naroote is the smarter pick — and it is worth checking the current price on Amazon for both before you commit, since the page button will show you today's numbers.
are headphones waterproof
Not all of them. Waterproofing is a rated spec, not a category. The I love e iFecco IP68 is rated for submersion to 3 meters for 60+ minutes, and the Naroote Swimming Headphones carry an IP68 rating for submersion up to 3.6 meters. Anything without an IP rating should be treated as splash-resistant at best.
are headphones water resistant
Water resistance and waterproofing are different levels of the same idea. A water-resistant set handles sweat and rain but not swimming. Both products here go further: the iFecco handles sweat, rain and pool sessions to 3 meters, while Naroote handles heavy sweat, rain and full submersion to 3.6 meters. For lap swimming you want the higher IP68 tier.
Only one of them has Bluetooth at all, and it will not work below the surface. The I love e iFecco IP68 uses Bluetooth 6.0 with a 10-meter range on land, but underwater you must switch to its built-in MP3 mode. The Naroote Swimming Headphones are wired-only with a 3.5mm jack, so there is no wireless connection to lose in the first place.
It depends on what you want to carry. The I love e iFecco IP68 runs up to 8 hours per charge and stores around 2,000 songs internally, so nothing else is needed. The Naroote Swimming Headphones have no battery or memory, so session length is limited only by your external player and its charge. For total independence, the iFecco is the easier choice.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: RR SPORTS IP68 vs XBONFIRE 5: Open Back Monitor Headphones, Tangxi Cat Ear Headphones vs Sluoch Earbuds, TRIPP LITE USB-C vs Jadebones USB C: Headphones for Macbook