“When we’re afraid, we shoot; when we’re nostalgic, we take photographs.” —Susan Sontag
This collection began during the pandemic—quarantined on a campus far from home, with time suspended and the world outside both unreachable and unfamiliar. In that stillness, I came to understand nostalgia not merely as memory, but as a lens—an act of imagining. To be nostalgic is to reconstruct the past, often romantically, to contrast the present. It is a wistful self-distancing from the now.
Nostalgia, in this sense, is both shelter and illusion: it wraps us in warmth, but also blinds us to the texture of the present. It is a memory rewritten in softer light—a longing that hums in quiet rebellion against impermanence. It can be comforting, even necessary, but nostalgia is not neutral. It oversimplifies. It distorts. At its worst, it can be manipulated, weaponized by the desire to return to a “former glory” that never truly existed.
And yet, nostalgia offers something else too: a way to anchor ourselves in time, to soothe the dissonance between then and now, to make meaning from what slips away. Perhaps nostalgia is not a return, but a reaching—a gesture of continuity in a world that forgets faster than it remembers. It asks: what do we hold on to, when the present slips through our fingers like sand?
Photography is one such way of holding on. It preserves a moment with the illusion of objectivity—an image etched in light, a trace that says: this was real. But a photograph is never neutral. Its frame is a decision, its silence filled with interpretation. What it shows is only part of what it means. A photograph, like nostalgia, chooses what to remember.
The word “image” shares its roots with “imagination,” and rightly so. A photograph is not proof—it is vision. A paradox. Its stillness speaks of motion; its silence echoes with feeling. It documents not only what was seen, but how it was felt. In this way, photography becomes an emotional act—a way of freezing not just time, but consciousness.
Still, nostalgia cannot survive on memory alone. It demands grounding—those unexpected moments when past and present collapse into one another. These connections are elusive, often illogical, sparked by a shadow, a sound, a texture, a mood. They do not emerge from what we consciously see, but from the quieter, more mysterious parts of the mind—the places where recognition precedes reason.
It is as though the body remembers before the mind does. A flicker of light, a fold in fabric, a slant of architecture—and suddenly we are elsewhere. Nostalgia is this flicker: brief, luminous, impossibly alive.
This collection is a documentation of such flickers—these nodes of nostalgia. Each photograph captures a scene or object that stirred in me a memory or longing I could not always name. These images are not just records of COVID-era solitude; they trace the emotional terrain where memory, time, and imagination overlap. They show how memory bends light, how even the most ordinary moments can become sacred in retrospect.
Some of these images are quiet. Some confused. Others hold a melancholy too subtle to name. And yet, with time, even the harshest scenes softened. Even the masks—once symbols of fear and fragility—now resemble relics tucked into dusty museum drawers. Time alters the texture of things. The difficult becomes distant; the distant becomes tender.
Photography does not glorify the past. It preserves it—not as it was, but as we remember it becoming. These images are not attempts to beautify what happened. They are simply faithful to the feeling of connection—between moment and memory, isolation and longing.
Nostalgia doesn’t promise truth. But it does offer meaning. And in a world where meaning is often fleeting, that may be enough. These photographs are honest attempts at capturing that elusive, shifting thing: the way memory reimagines the present, and the way photography allows us to witness that transformation.
If nothing else, they are an archive of longing—not for perfection, but for continuity. A quiet mapping of where I have been, and what remained luminous even in absence.