The following tags categorize responses into separate columns, sorted by the relative number of up and down votes:
%RTAL - Reasons to agree that the statement is logical
%RTAV - Reasons to agree that the statement can be verified (usually includes a reference)
%RTAI - Reasons to agree that the statement is important
%RTAR - Reasons to agree that the statement is relevant
%BWOSST - A better way of expressing the same thing.
The %BWOSST tag connects tweets by topic, ensuring older tweets are organized and remembered. By organizing content by topic instead of time, we promote longer attention spans and a focus on quality over sensationalism.
One major frustration with Twitter is the constant repetition of arguments. It's akin to having to redesign and manufacture every Tesla from scratch. In a similar vein, each tweet seems to require reconstructing Science, Philosophy, and Logic. With the current Twitter system, every conversation starts from zero.
%ITA - Interests of those who agree. Conflict resolution teaches us to focus on interests rather than positions. Problem-solving becomes more effective once we've identified the primary interests of each side.
Note: Substitute "D" for "A" in the tags if you disagree.
Additionally, we want to identify:
%SI - Shared Interests
%OI - Opposing Interests
By refining the way we categorize and view content on Twitter, we can create a more meaningful, efficient, and productive platform for social discourse. Join the conversation on my GroupIntel and contribute your ideas on GitHub. Together, we can redefine social media. #RedefiningTwitter #BetterSocialMedia #DiscourseRevolution
Instead of taking "sides," why can't we aim to better organize and present the arguments, allowing them to stand on their own merits? What we need is a transparent algorithm, one that is based on the balance between reasons to agree and reasons to disagree. Here's what we might consider: