How To Download [BETTER] Someone Else 39;s Photos From Flickr

Please take a look at my sets John His 50th Year and Karl His 54th Year. I made the calendars by tearing images out of magazines and catalogues, printing them from the internet, etc.

Do you all think my photos of the calendar pages I created violate Flickr's terms of service?

If so, do I still violate copyright laws if the calendars are strictly for private use, and I set the photos to private?

Posted at 1:13PM, 31 July 2008 PST(permalink)

Well, you took the pictures of your calendar, so they are your photos, and do not violate the ToS.

As for the copyright issue, you know, it's all about not making copies of other people's work and putting them on display. So, really, you're asking a legal question from a bunch of people who may or may not have any legal sense.

Should a photographer recognize their work in your photos of their calendar, they might have grounds to... I dunno, ask you not to use their work like that? They can't file an NOI with Flickr (because the photos are yours) but they could contact you and ask you not to make calendars of their work which you found on the internet.

Posted ages ago.( permalink)

How To Download Someone Else 39;s Photos From Flickr

DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://urluso.com/2y2FS3 🔥

Setting the photos to private will not protect you from Flickr penalties if they review your account. All images, public or private, must comply with all the Flickr rules.

If Yahoo! gets a Notice of Infringement about images in your account, they aren't going to be the judges. They have to pull the images and let a real judge sort out whether or not you can use someone else's images that way.

You'll get a chance for your lawyer to make your defense when it goes to court.

Posted ages ago.( permalink)

Note: IANAL.

Making collages (and taking photographs of them) doesn't mean you are necessarily breaking the law and I would feel quite confident in posting any of your photos publicly on flickr, particularly as museums around the world display collages that "technically" infringe the intellectual property rights of individuals and companies. (Warhol's Soup cans and Brillo boxes, for example).

What is good practice, however, is to give credit to the original photographer or the source of the image (e.g. "Getty Images", "Vogue magazine, June 2005") where possible. I very much doubt that anyone will complain about your collages, but if you do receive a cease and desist order from a copyright holder, it is in your best interests to do what you're told, so that lawyers don't get rich over a pointless court action.

Posted ages ago.( permalink)

With CC-BY, does the specific photo (creative work) need attribution on it? Or is it okay for them to just list all the artist at the end on one page, but not provide a way to know which specific photos came from which artists?

i want to download all high quality pics from other people's photostream at once instead of one by one. i used to do it with video/photo downloader before, but since the flicker change about a couple of months ago, i can't do it anymore.

is there another way?

Posted at 6:25AM, 20 August 2015 PST(permalink)

Officially, our support for photos in Flickr and Google+/Picasa has always been intended as a way for people and organizations who are already using those photo sharing systems to easily integrate them into Story Maps, and also provide a way for Story Map authors to access photos that other folks are already sharing publicly using those systems. For example when you access Flickr images from the Story Map builders you can enter the name of any author in order to find albums they are sharing publicly (so if you enter 'Rupert Essinger' you can access my public albums). In addition, in Story Map Cascade you can search Flickr publicly shared photos by keyword to add into your story, the same way you can search and access Unsplash images.

We've never intended Story Map authors to use Flickr or Google+ solely as a way to get photos into Story Maps, Flickr is a really nice place to host and share your photos, and being able to add public photos from Flickr into Story Maps easily is an added benefit of doing that. For example if you add Flickr images into Story Map Tour or Story Map Shortlist we pick up the geolocation, name and caption that is stored in Flicker for each pic. So if you work for , say, a non-profit that maintains a public Flickr album of pics, you can use them directly in your stories, or if you use Flickr already for sharing your own pics it is great. But we don't recommend getting a Flickr account solely as a way to get your pictures into Story Maps.

To add images into a Story Map our recommendation is always to upload your images directly into the Story Map builder. That's the easiest and most secure way to add images into Story Maps: your photos are stored in the story (or, in the case of Story Map Tour, as a layer in an associated web map) and are given the same sharing status as your story (so if your photos are confidential to your organization no one outside your organization will be able to access them if you only share your story within your Org, which is obviously not the case with Flickr/Google+), You also don't have to worry about photos being deleted or unshared in Flickr or Google+, especially if you are not the author, or worry about someone else on the web using one of your publicly shared pics in a way you might not expect or intend. (For example I mark my Flickr pics as public domain which is the most liberal sharing status, but it still felt a bit weird when one of my Hiking Trip to Mammoth Mountain pics was used in an online feature in Elle Decor magazine: they did credit me as the photographer but for public domain pics they don't need to notify you).

My concern and hope is for an easy-to-use photo hosting/storing platform that is friendly with not only story maps but also with general usage. I liked Flickr for its ability to tag photos with location and with text tags, making things easily searchable and able to be categorized. They had a nice uploading feature too. I could share an 'album' with someone based on its tag, or its album/set, and/or I could share a story map the same way. I know that by paying for this service now will give me just that.

Hi,

I had a photo shoot a couple years ago and the images have since been appearing in Google search results. Of more recent times new employers will do google searches on prospective employees before making job offers...rightly or wrongly. Purely for that reason I would prefer if my images no longer appeared in Google search results. From what I can see, the reason they are being picked up is due to my full name appearing in the description section of the photos (six in total).

I have contacted the Flickr user and asked for my last name to be excluded from the description...therefore hoping it will then drop off Google results!?! Unfortunately the Flickr user can no longer access their account and is currently unable to assist.

Can anyone else help? Preferably an admin from Flickr.

Many thanks

Posted at 3:33PM, 30 July 2014 PST(permalink)

DigitalFuture123:

Even if the photos are deleted, they don't instantly disappear from Google. That could take weeks or months. And Google is just one of many search engines. Once something is out there on the web, it's likely to stay there.