The Legend of Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom is soon releasing. After seemingly years of waiting and a lot of delays, the new open-world adventure taking part in The Legend of Zelda franchise is at our fingertips again. And I won't be supporting it. There are several reasons why, so let's start with a bit of backstory.
Like many other older gamers, I started my gaming journey with The Legend of Zelda. I closely followed and supported Nintendo in my videogaming infancy. I played, rebought, and replayed every iteration of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time, spent far too much time sailing across the Great Sea in The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker, and even went out of my way to play all of the games "chronologically" (because let's be real, chronology is used very loosely in this franchise).
How Long Does It Take To Download Legend Of Zelda Tears Of The Kingdom
DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://bytlly.com/2yGB6z 🔥
I got what you were saying. But I have to blame the fans entirely. Nintendo has always done this and the fans put up with it. Nintendo keep doing it because the fans never take a stand. All they do is cry and moan on Twitter on how bad Nintendo or you have the defenders who defined Nintendo's nonsense. Once the community stood reviewing or buying their games, they will learb
I'm definitely agreeing with the Arthur on this. I'm a huge fan of Zelda as well ever since my earliest gaming days and I loved the formula. However Breath of the Wild felt a bit too different for me as a Zelda game. I still loved it to death but it was a bit of a drastic change to get used to. However, I've never been more excited for a game in my life like TOTK because the trailers maked it look amazing and it seems they've included everything, and I'm hoping they mixed some of the older elements of traditional Zelda with new ones.Regarding PointCrow, I have been a fan of him before BOTW, and unfortunately I have to side with you on me going against Nintendo for this because PointCrow is an amazing YouTuber and his mods are the reason I still play BOTW today. I will still play TOTK but I'm not going to just keep on with Nintendo, but I'm not blaming the game developers for other Nintendo games such as Miyamoto and Sakurai because they have just about no involvement or fault in this, and I'm not sure if Zelda's developer (His name is not present in my head right now) is too involved with this yet as this is a separate department. Of course PointCrow doesn't deserve this hell and I hope it gets better, and as shitty as Nintendo can be as a company, they did make my childhood, and as a result, I will give them 70 dollars for their newest title. If you do end up playing TOTK, I hope you enjoy it, and I hope I get more articles on your actually respectable opinions
Thanks for responding, and I'm glad it did. I keep getting emails seeing a bunch of people hate on you for making this article, even though you're just letting them know your opinion (Internet is not the best place for that anymore) but I'm glad you're not taking their shit. I don't know if you or your wife will end up playing the game, but if so, I hope you guys enjoy it. It does look great.
Even though I'm techniclly doing it too it's best if we ignore clickbaity articles like this, stop giving them attention (which we all know is the main reasons they make shit articles like this), and move on
Yeah TOTALLY CLICKBAIT HERE THE BUSTER DOES ASSUME GAME MAKERS ARE OBLIGATED TO BEAR THEIR VERY WORKED ON GAMES ARE GETTING MODDED AND STILL INVENTS PATHETIC AND FOOLISH EXCUSES AND the more amazing is so many others agree he's not wrong with large comments
Great article by the way. It seems Nintendo is far from what it used to be. My love for them is really starting to grow cold and distant. I'm truly afraid of switching to PC or another console without them retaliating.
So you're going to boycott a game from a series you claim to love... Because a content creator making money off a property he legally doesn't own is having their content removed by the rightful owner? How entitled are you?Did the content creator ask for permission to use said property for profit? No, Nintendo is in the right. You're supporting theft, plain and simple, black and white. Just because other game companies let it slide with THEIR properties, doesn't mean Nintendo is required to do the same.You might let your friend borrow something of yours, but I won't let your friend borrow something of mine. That's kind of how ownership of property works, the OWNER gets to decide how it's used and nobody has any say so on the matter whatsoever.
I wouldn't say standing for fellow fans and those that support the company and games for years to come is me being "entitled" and a far cry from being "theft". Content creators keep games alive for years after their expiration date, the same way that modders do. Publishers and developers also thrive off of this relationship because they are getting free publicity.
This is the first in a long line of transgressions that Nintendo has had against fans, communities that support their games, and anything to do with their IP. If they don't want content creators to support them and help them with these things, then it is quite clear where they stand when it comes to their fans.
Not to mention that this isn't Nintendo "protecting" its IP but brutally making an example of one content creator and putting their livelihood at risk. And PointCrow doesn't legally own it, but in the Nintendo Game Content Guidelines for Online Video & Image Sharing Platforms, you can clearly see that the content creator is within their rights to post.
A content creator making money of property he doesn't own... Hum, so all those guy making videos in a gym own the gym? If i make a video review about my car i guess i have ownership of the brand? How about video of a city tour, taking advantage of the tax payers for keeping the city clean. This BS can go for 90% of content. The rest is videos of my dog in my garden. Man, wait until you hear about all those shops making a profit out of the poor farmers do they own the farm? Crazy of economic works. how dare they. I own the game i bought and if i want to make a video with it the same way i own my car where is the difference. Will they take my car away if i change the exhaust of give a copyright strike?
You're 100% incorrect. When purchasing a game you are essentially renting it from the owner. Think of it as leasing a car vs financing a car. Renting an apartment vs obtaining a mortgage. You own nothing by renting - plain and simple. Nintendo has 100% every right to ensure their IP is protected how they see fit, no matter how ridiculous YOU think that is. Nintendo does not require the assistance of the community for mods or various support. Nintendo has the largest IP's on the planet over 40 years old in the making. And as far as out author is concerned here? This is an opinion piece article. Do whatever you please but how childish are you to continue to fight in the comments? "They didn't agree with me so I'm going to tell them they are wrong and wait until someone agrees with me." I'm sure you're mother is proud...
I'm not continuing the fight! I'm giving out my opinion and allowing a debate to be formed, but under no means is this supposed to be a "me right; you wrong" sort of scenario! I like answering to all comments, but I feel that answering things that are non-sensical is disrespectful to those that bother to leave a comment. I take my time with each one because it's important to me and meaningful that people leave their opinions and perspectives, and the last thing I want to do is dismiss it with a simple "Thanks for reading!".
Something like this coming from somebody called "Poopybuttholejr" shouldn't be too surprising, but it is what it is. I believe they meant to apply the whole analogy about purchasing a car or renting an apartment over usage of the IP within the game itself. Clearly they haven't actually gone through the nitty gritty things EULAs for things as particular as Breath of The Wild, as well as the content creator opportunities companies like Nintendo have outlined by presenting withing their content sharing guidelines. What people like them are missing is that striking videos from the content creators that support them is far from protecticlng their IP, especially with a game that generates thousands of videos that more than easily drive more people to buy it than Nintendo's advertising alone. Any company who does this to their own fans (content creators or not) has to be pretty callous and immoral to do so. Simply stating they have a legal standing in it doesn't make them a righteous entity. Though this isn't the first time Nintendo has done something this scummy. What makes this more notable is that even through the guidelines they've pointed out, they're more than willing to breach them, and enforce YouTube to strike videos they simply don't like, for any given reason. Just sayin', to tell somebody they're wrong for having a reasonable opinion over something like this is pretty ignorant.
Just kidding, Nintendo's legal team has obviously run out of people to sue, so they're trawling through YouTube for something to do while they look for a children's hospital ward to take to court over a painting of Yoshi.
Look, Nintendo doesn't take down the vast majority of content creators. It's an interesting balance. But it does aggressively protect it's IP from modding and hacks. Some are harmless and they let is slide, some though may risk sales of future plans/titles. See AM2R or the Pokmon fan games. Maybe Nintendo is looking to do a multi-player Zelda in a few years.The point is, changing the source code of a game and distributing it in some way, Nintendo has every legal right to pursue this.
I understand Nintendo might maybe want to make a multiplayer Zelda game, and I understand how that might hurt their sales (though oftentimes it's just free publicity), but they don't update guidelines, don't respond to content creators, and don't communicate with those that want to support them. I just wish that the company would try to do better by those that have covered their games and those that have tried to keep them alive almost six years after the original release without rampantly attacking content creators and hoping that sends a message enough. 152ee80cbc
cine hollidy 1 temporada download