Episode notes: 

• Background: Theatrical release in 2011, directed by James Wan, written by Leigh Whannell, and starring Patrick Wilson, Rose Byrne, and Barbara Hershey. The movie is noted for its low budget, around $1 million.

• Analysis of Patrick Wilson's performance: His supposedly "wooden" acting is seen as a deliberate choice to portray an emotionally detached character who avoids his problems, especially in his role as an absent father.

• Praise for the effective camerawork and its contribution to creating tension in the film. 

• Appreciation for the deliberate use of close shots and unconventional camera angles.

• Discussion of the audio stings, their purpose, and if they are effective.

• Favorite scenes discussed include the haunting child in a sailor suit and the séance scene featuring a gas mask-wearing medium.

• Critique of the Further's Aesthetic: The Further is likened to a bad haunted house, with fog and darkness making it feel unimpressive and uninteresting. Some scenes in the Further are perceived as overly long and unengaging, particularly when the characters fight the spirits, which reduces tension.

• Analysis of Movie's Themes: The discussion delves into themes of coping with trauma and generational trauma, with a focus on the character of Patrick Wilson's dad, who is portrayed as an emotionally avoidant individual due to his traumatic experiences, leading to the twist at the end where he fails to overcome his repression. The ending is seen as a reflection of his inability to learn better coping skills.

• Coping Skills and Self-Healing: Discussion of the contrast in coping skills between the characters, with the mother actively seeking help and using self-healing techniques like music, while the father relies on avoidance.

• Ratings of 6 and 6.9 out of 10 are given, with the latter influenced by nostalgia.

Episode notes:

• Background: The film is produced, co-composed, and directed by Tobe Hooper, who co-wrote it with Kim Henkel.The film is loosely based on real-life murderer Ed Gein, known for wearing a human's scalp and face. The movie was produced on a budget of less than $140,000 and used relatively unknown actors, forcing them to film for long hours, seven days a week.

• Despite the low budget and challenging filming conditions, the movie's gritty and authentic look and feel are praised.

• The film succeeds in creating a sense of unease and dread, with disturbing elements and tension-building that make viewers feel uncomfortable. The opening sequence, where a dead body is shown, immediately sets the tone for tension and discomfort. The tension increases as the characters go a long time without interacting with other humans and are gradually led into the terror-filled environment. The chase scenes, especially when Sally's hair gets stuck in the bushes, create intense and tense moments, making it one of the best chase scenes in the slasher genre.

• Analysis of the movie's themes: 

  1. Vegetarianism: The film prominently portrays or discusses the mistreatment of animals (or, in the film's case, people) and the gruesome practices in slaughterhouses, making a case for vegetarianism. 

  2. Technological Advancement: The movie highlights the consequences of technological progress and the impact it can have on traditional industries and jobs. 

  3. Gender Roles: The film plays on gender stereotypes, with the sexualized female characters meeting more gruesome fates, while the final girl, Sally, emerges as morally superior. 

  4. Family and Maternal Absence: The absence of maternal figures in the family is notable, and Leatherface's role, sometimes wearing female masks, adds complexity to the family dynamic and raises questions about traditional family structures.

  5. Changes in the cultural and political landscape of the time: Hooper intentionally used misinformation, such as claiming the film was true, as a response to being lied to by the government about events like Watergate, the oil crisis, and the Vietnam War. Hooper's observations of brutality and a lack of sentimentality in the media, specifically in graphic news coverage, led him to believe that humanity, rather than any supernatural entity, is the real monster. 

• Matt gave the film a 9 out of 10, emphasizing its artistic and cultural importance, while acknowledging it might not be for everyone. Hannah gave it a mixed rating of 8.4 for its artistic merits and a 5.6 for personal enjoyment.

Episode Notes: 

• Themes of Dependency: The first act establishes a recurring theme of Dani's dependency on Christian, despite his lack of emotional support. The conflict intensifies as they embark on the Sweden trip with Christian's friends. 

• The hosts feel that the first act concludes with the group's arrival in Sweden, where they decide to take psychedelic mushrooms. Dani, hesitant, is guilted into taking them to synchronize with the group, highlighting her constant compromise for the sake of the relationship. The podcast will delve into these dynamics, setting the stage for the film's exploration of psychological horror and relationships in the subsequent acts.

• The podcast discusses the inspiration behind the movie "Midsommar," with the director, Ari Aster, drawing from his personal relationships for the storyline. 

• Act Two delves into the unsettling discovery of the cult's rituals in the Swedish village, culminating in a shocking suicide ritual. The hosts dissect the insensitivity of the characters surrounding the ritual, as Christian's friends know what will happen and do not warn Dani, and the graphic nature of certain scenes. 

• The podcast hosts express conflicted feelings toward Christian, questioning whether he deserves sympathy for being in an unhappy relationship despite being portrayed as a flawed partner - hosts determine that he ultimately deserves to die in the film.

• The cult members exhibit radical empathy, pretending to feel what each other feels, which make it feel inclusive for Dani. Pele, a member of the cult, shows concern for the protagonist, Dani, explaining his perspective and emphasizing the cult as his chosen family and how the cult will "hold" Dani. 

• Ratings: 9.5 and 10

Episode summary

• This episode features hosts Hannah and Matt discussing the movie "The Babadook" with special guest Preston, a self-described scaredy cat. 

• The film, released in 2014 and directed by Jennifer Kent, stars Essie Davis and has a high rating of 98% on Rotten Tomatoes. 

• Preston, relatively new to horror movies, found "The Babadook" to be genuinely scary, especially scenes involving the Babadook entity, while Hannah has seen the movie multiple times and still finds it frightening. 

• The hosts discussed their experiences of hiding during certain scenes, the effectiveness of the film's scares, and the impact of the lack of sleep theme in the movie.

Join Horror Hour with the Hanna's, a horror movie review podcast, to discuss all your favorite scary films! This week the Hanna's discuss this week's flick: The Sixth Sense. The Sixth, released in 1999 sense, was M. Night Shyamalan's breakout smash hit, best known for its daring twist. The movie stars Bruce Willis as a Philadelphia based award winning child psychologist and Haley Joel Osment as his newest patient. Join us to discuss what we liked (or didn't like), how many times this movie got us to scream or hide, our hot takes, what the movie means, and MORE.

Join Horror Hour with the Hanna's, a horror movie review podcast, to discuss all your favorite scary films! This week the Hanna's discuss this week's flick: The Conjuring. The Conjuring, released in 2013, began what we now know as "The Conjuring Universe". The movie was directed by James Wan who at the time was known for Saw and Insidious fame. The movie stars Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga as Ed and Lorraine Warren, real life self proclaimed paranormal investigators. Join us to discuss what we liked (or didn't like), how many times this movie got us to scream or hide, our hot takes what the movie means, and MORE.

Join Horror Hour with the Hanna's, a horror movie review podcast hosted by an engaged couple, to discuss all your favorite scary films! This week the Hanna(h)s discuss this week's flick: Drag Me To Hell. Drag me to hell is an "eat the rich" horror, starring Alison Lohman and Justin Long. The film is written and directed by king of camp himself, Sam Rami, of Evil Dead and Spiderman fame. Drag Me to Hell focuses on bank teller Christine, who is cursed with eternal damnation when she denies an old woman's request for an extension on her home loan. Will she be dragged to hell? Does she deserve damnation? Join us to discuss what we liked (or didn't), how many times this movie got us to scream or hide, and what we thought the movie's purpose was.

Episode Notes:

• The episode features special guests Sara and David from the podcast Paranormal in Pennsylvania, a show discussing history and hauntings in the state of Pennsylvania.

• Movie Background: 2014 horror film directed by John R. Leonetti, written by Gary Dauberman and produced by Peter Safran and James Wan. It is a prequel to the 2013 film The Conjuring and the second installment in The Conjuring Universe franchise. The film was inspired by a story of a doll named Annabelle told by Ed and Lorraine Warren.

• They express disappointment with the movie Annabelle, noting that it deviates significantly from the real Annabelle case and lacks the heart of the previous "Conjuring" films. 

• They critique the predictability of the movie's plot, the overemphasis on the cult storyline, and the lack of involvement of Ed and Lorraine Warren, ultimately concluding that the movie is a cash grab within the Conjuring universe.

• They criticize the movie for using suicide as a plot device without handling it tastefully, and they question the movie's overall message and portrayal of grief and loss. 

• The hosts express their dissatisfaction with the characters in the movie, feeling that they were underdeveloped and uninteresting. They point out missed opportunities to make the characters more compelling.

• The hosts question the movie's overall message, with one interpretation being that it focuses on themes of sacrifice, while also highlighting the emphasis on motherhood. They share some aspects they liked, such as the tense elevator scene, the writing on the ceiling, and certain shots that linger on the doll, but overall express their dissatisfaction with the film.

Join Horror Hour with the Hanna's, a horror movie review podcast hosted by an engaged couple, to discuss all your favorite scary films! This week the Hanna(h)s are getting Married! So we decided to cover the only marriage themed horror film we could think of: Ready or Not. Ready or Not is a comedy-horror film staring scream Queen Samara Weaving as Grace, a woman who has gotten more than she bargained for after marrying into the wealthy Le Domas family. Join us to discuss what we liked (or didn't), how many times this movie got us to scream or hide, and what we thought the movie's purpose was.

Join Horror Hour with the Hanna's, a horror movie review podcast hosted by a married couple, to discuss all your favorite scary films! This week we are continuing our James Wan journey by watching what might be his most polarizing film: Malignant. At time of recording Malignant is Wan's most recent directorial feature. This film is beloved and loathed by many with very few fence sitters. So is it a misunderstood masterpiece or a bizarre bomb? Tune in to find out what we thought!

Episode notes:

• Background: 1980 film by Director Sean S. Cunningham, and Writers Victor Miller and Ron Kurz

• Discussion of the excessive use of filler shots and scenes, which led to a slow and uninteresting pace throughout the film. Additionally, the performances from the actors were generally lackluster, with no standout portrayals to engage the audience. The prolonged suspense buildup often didn't lead to satisfying payoffs, contributing to a lack of genuine scares or thrills. Moreover, some scenes, while intended to build tension, ended up feeling disconnected and unnecessary, failing to serve the narrative in any meaningful way. 

• The movie being lacks character development, and the characters' motivations are unclear. The Hanna's did not care about any of the characters, and at times, they wanted the characters to be killed off.

• Underlying themes and messages in the film: the idea that characters who engage in sex, drinking, and drug use are more likely to die in slasher films.

• They mentioned how movies like "Scream" and "Cabin in the Woods" serve as critiques and parodies of older slasher films, making them more appreciative of those movies.

• The hosts expressed their disappointment with the movie, noting its lack of purpose and entertainment value. They considered the possibility of watching other lesser-known slashers from the same era to compare them to this film.

• Favorite scene: the one and only appearance of Jason Voorhees

• Ratings: 2.5 and 1

The Maureen Ponderosa Wedding Massacre, It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia: Season 8, Episode 3

• Introduction to It's Always Sunny in Philadelphia: The show follows the lives of a group of degenerate characters who own an unsuccessful bar. It's now the longest-running sitcom.

• Episode Plot Summary: The gang is arrested following Dennis's ex-wife's wedding on Friday the 13th. Chaos ensues as Dennis, Frank, and Dee have their own motives for crashing the wedding, leading to bizarre occurrences and zombie-like behavior among the wedding guests.

• Thematic Elements: The zombie concept (via the use of bath salts), and the real life horror behind Dennis's alimony payments. They also discussed how the episode incorporated horror tropes while staying true to the show's unique style and humor.

• Favorite Scenes: Dennis's ominous confession, the scene where the gang first encounters the drugged wedding guests, and a humorous moment involving the characters Ryan and Liam.

Halloween, The Office: Season 2, Episode 5

• Favorite scenes: Michael Scott practicing getting fired with Jim Halpert, Michael's interaction with the trick-or-treaters, Michael's conversation with his costume head, and his interactions with the various employees.

• This episode is known for its focus on Michael's character, his struggles with firing someone, and the Halloween backdrop. It also touches on the theme of workplace dynamics and the impact of decision-making on employees.

• Discussion of commentary on costumes, and what makes for a socially appropriate costume, along with discussion of what makes the episode scary enough to be fitting for Halloween

• Behind the scenes discussion of the development of the episode

Epidemiology, Community: Season 2, Episode 6

• Plot summary: The Halloween party at Greendale Community College turns chaotic as attendees become infected by a hazardous substance, turning into zombies. 

• The hosts agree that this is one of the best Halloween episodes of a sitcom, praising the elements that make it perfect.

• The episode includes discussion of the zombie tropes, costumes, and character dynamics in the Community episode

Episode Notes: 

• Background: "Halloween," directed and scored by John Carpenter, is a 1978 slasher film co-written by Carpenter and producer Deborah Hill. It stars Donald Pleasence and Jamie Lee Curtis in her film debut. Made on a small budget of $300,000, the film's iconic mask worn by Michael Myers was a repurposed William Shatner mask, painted and altered to create the emotionless, chilling visage.

• Michael Myers' character was intended to be unkillable due to contractual agreements, which led to various sequels and alternate timelines within the franchise..

• While "Halloween" was originally conceived with the title "The Babysitter Murders," it was rebranded to fit the Halloween theme, leading to its iconic tagline, "Halloween: The Night He Came Home." This simple change had a significant impact on the film's legacy.

• The movie "Halloween" is often misinterpreted as a warning against promiscuity, with the idea that sexually active characters are punished by the killer. However, the director John Carpenter has clarified that this interpretation is not his intention. Carpenter stated that the characters are portrayed as normal teenagers, and the movie is more about the revenge of the repressed. Laurie, the final girl, is also depicted as sexually repressed, and her character's behavior is a manifestation of her pent-up frustrations. Michael Myers, the antagonist, is portrayed as pure evil, driven by a primal urge to kill. However, there is an element of psychosexual voyeurism in his character, as he watches his victims before eventually killing them. This element adds depth to his character and establishes a connection with Laurie, who is also repressed in her own way. 

• The stalking scenes in the movie are crucial in establishing the tension and the psychosexual elements. Carpenter's focus on building suspense before the killings contributes to the psychological complexity of the film. 

• The discussion also delves into comparisons between "Halloween" and other slasher films, such as "Friday the 13th," and highlights the distinctive elements that set "Halloween" apart in terms of its themes and character development.

• Themes:

  • • Evil: Michael Myers in "Halloween" represents pure evil and is an embodiment of fear, similar to the boogeyman under the bed. They pointed out that the character is not meant to have a psychological backstory but rather serves as a symbol of evil.

    • Fear in Suburbia: The hosts explored the theme that "Halloween" subverts the idea of safe, suburban communities by depicting violence and terror occurring in a quiet neighborhood. The film suggests that danger can be present anywhere, even in what appears to be a peaceful suburb.

•  Ratings: Matt rated it as an 8 and Hannah gave it an 8.3, emphasizing that it's a good film and mentioning their potential interest in revisiting it with a deeper analysis of themes in the future.

Episode Summary 

• Background of the Film: The hosts provide a brief introduction to the film, explaining its origin as a 1973 musical stage production called "The Rocky Horror Show" with music, book, and lyrics by Richard O'Brien. Film features O'Brien, as well as stars like Tim Curry, Susan Sarandon, and Meat Loaf. 

• Filming Locations and Props: The hosts highlight that the film was shot in the United Kingdom and was filmed at an old country estate known as Oakley Court. This location was famous for its use in Hammer film Productions, known for classic horror movies like "Dracula" and "The Mummy." They note that props and set pieces from earlier horror films were used in The Rocky Horror Picture Show.

• Longest Running Theatrical Release: They mention that the film is still in limited release in 2023, making it the longest-running theatrical release in film history, primarily due to its cult following and the enthusiasm it generates during midnight screenings. 

• Audience Participation and Shadow Casts: The hosts discuss how The Rocky Horror Picture Show encourages audience participation, including heckling actors and using props. They share their personal experiences of performing the film as part of a shadow cast during home screenings and the fun it brings. 

• Additionally, the episode features interviews with cast members from their own shadow cast performances, capturing their first experiences with the film and their thoughts on its content. Throughout the podcast, the hosts express their love for The Rocky Horror Picture Show and its unique blend of campy humor and cult following, making it an essential part of their Halloween traditions.

• The hosts express their personal affinity for different songs from the musical, highlighting their favorite musical moments (such as Damn It, Janet and Touch-A-Touch-A-Touch-A-Touch Me) and the significance of these songs in the context of the storyline.

• The podcast hosts discuss their love for the movie, praising its use of color, costumes, makeup, and vibrant characters. 

• They mention that the UK version of the film contains extended scenes and black-and-white elements that add to the thematic richness. 

• The hosts delve into the film's themes of sexuality and gender identity, focusing on how the characters' experiences awaken and change them. The hosts highlight the importance of the song "Superheroes" in the movie, which underscores the themes of self-discovery and transformation among the characters. 

• Discussion of Frank-N-Furter's Character: The podcast delves into the complex character of Frank-N-Furter, who is both the "villain" of the show and a proponent of sexual liberation. They analyze how his actions, particularly his use and abuse of others, are his true crimes, rather than his open sexuality. 

• Nuanced Themes: The hosts appreciate the nuanced themes presented in The Rocky Horror Picture Show, highlighting that it's not a straightforward good vs. bad narrative. They discuss how the film explores the idea of using sex and love as escapism, ultimately emphasizing that Frank's crimes are related to his misuse of relationships and emotions. 

• Representation of Changing Times: The podcast acknowledges how the characters of Brad and Janet represent the 1950s, and as they enter Frank-N-Furter's mansion, the film symbolizes the transition into the more sexually liberated era of the 1960s and 70s. This transition reflects changing societal norms. 

• Why It's a Perfect Halloween Movie: The hosts explore why "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" makes a great Halloween movie. They mention the film's humorous take on horror, the spooky vibes created by the mansion setting, and its inclusivity, which draws a diverse audience. The hosts also touch upon the film's overt references to classic horror and science fiction films, and how it embodies the spirit of Halloween with its costumes and larger-than-life energy. According to Matt, the film encompasses everything associated with Halloween, from costumes and murder to diversity and camp. 

• The podcast concludes with a high rating of "69 out of 10" as both hosts find it challenging to rate the movie due to their immense love for it and a promise to revisit it annually.

Episode Summary

• The podcast guests introduce themselves as Twice the Terror and describe their show as a horror-themed morning zoo show, covering topics like movies, ghosts, haunted places, and spooky subjects with a chaotic and rambling style.

• The hosts discuss their first-time experiences watching the 2004 film "Saw" and its unusual marketing as a horror movie. They share their background and connections to the film franchise.

• They analyze the low budget of the original "Saw" film and its reliance on one primary location.

• The hosts express their opinions on the characters' motives in the "Saw" series, particularly Jigsaw's choice of victims and whether their actions justified their brutal fates (FOR THE RECORD, THEY DON'T). The selection of victims is discussed, with the observation that most of them seem to have underlying mental health issues, raising questions about Jigsaw's moral code in the first film, as many modern viewers typically see Jigsaw as primarily selecting bad people for his tests.

• Appreciation for the film's puzzle-driven nature, highlighting its cerebral aspects and the tension it builds through the characters' struggles and the intense, well-crafted scenes.

• Acknowledgment of the movie's gritty and grimy feel, likening it to the style of the original "Texas Chainsaw Massacre" and praising its raw, authentic aesthetic and overall atmosphere. 

• Hosts discuss the filming style, indicating the shots serve as a way to increase anxiety and tension. Gruesome images, such as Dr. Gordon sawing off his foot, tend to be avoided, which allows the viewer to imagine it in their own head. 

• The ending montage is the favorite scene for all participants, with its invigorating and impactful conclusion, including Adam's fate, the door slamming, and the twist reveal, leaving a lasting impression. Specific praise for Adam smashing Zep's head with a toilet lid and the emotional intensity in that scene. The ending montage is seen as the perfect wrap-up that ties everything together, making the flaws in the movie less noticeable.

• Themes: The podcast discusses the purpose of the movie "Saw" and its portrayal of morality. It questions the film's message about right and wrong, as it shows a character making a positive choice but still ending up in a trap. The hosts express their opinions on the character of John, known as Jigsaw, and how he is depicted as a petty psychopath who enforces his own version of morality. They raise questions about the fairness of the traps and wonder if the overall theme of the movie may be that life isn't fair.

• The podcast delves into the potential influences on the film, such as real-world events like 9/11 and the overall nihilistic themes present in "Saw"

• Ratings: They conclude with their personal ratings for the film, with one host giving it an 8 out of 10 and the other a 7.5 out of 10. 

Episode Summary:

• The hosts welcome their guest, Jason, who is a librarian and a master of Library Sciences. Jason discusses his history with horror movies, mentioning that he was a latecomer to the genre due to childhood fears of trailers and nightmares.

• The podcast focuses on the movie "Event Horizon," a 1997 science fiction horror film, with discussions about expectations, Lovecraftian influences, and the concept of cosmic horror.

• The hosts discuss the film's effective use of exposition, praising Weir's character for providing clear explanations of complex science while cleverly incorporating it into the plot. 

• The podcast touches on the lack of scares in the movie, with one host expressing surprise at the minimal level of fear. They highlight specific scenes, such as a character decompressing, as the most tense and engaging. 

• A content warning is issued for the depiction and mention of suicide in the film. The hosts acknowledge the inclusion of this sensitive content and express discomfort with its presence in the movie. 

• There is a difference in opinions among the hosts regarding the overall enjoyment of the film. One host finds it to be extremely fine, expressing a desire for more varied threats and tension, while another appreciates the film's sustained sense of dread and the imaginative representation of 90s sci-fi technology.

• The airlock scene is highlighted as a favorite, praised for its construction, tension, and the visceral fear of death by decompression. However, one host mentions a lack of emotional connection to the characters, affecting their overall engagement with the film.

• The hosts share their favorite scenes, including the spooky moment with Dr. Weir fading into darkness and the initial discovery of blood on the ship's walls. 

• Criticisms include a desire for more subtlety in the portrayal of disturbing scenes and a suggestion that the movie could have explored the theme of guilt more deeply. 

• The hosts express mixed opinions on recommending the movie, with one not finding it compelling enough and another acknowledging its merits in psychological horror while suggesting it may not hold up compared to modern films.

• Ratings: 7, 6 and 5.5

Episode Summary:

• The hosts attended a Broadway production of "Sweeney Todd" in September and were excited about the experience. They saw some members of the original cast, including Josh Groban as Sweeney Todd and Annaleigh Ashford as Mrs. Lovett. The hosts share their background with the musical, having seen it in various formats, and express a preference for this Broadway version over the movie.

• The humor in the show is praised, particularly the performance of Annaleigh Ashford, who is described as "hysterical" and "unbelievable."

• Josh Groban's portrayal of Sweeney Todd is appreciated, with a focus on his subdued moments that make the intense scenes more impactful. 

• The hosts express disappointment in missing out on seeing Gaten Matarazzo as Toby, but they have high praise for him based on other performances. 

• The hosts share their favorite songs from the musical, highlighting "Epiphany" and "A Little Priest," expressing their overall enjoyment of the production, despite some criticisms from others.

• They discuss transitions to the staging of a musical, emphasizing the modern choreography, including a Thriller-esque dance sequence and a clever use of platforms to represent different locations. 

• The hosts lament the limited accessibility of Broadway shows for a broader audience.

• The hosts praise the use of red lighting in the production, particularly during intense or violent scenes.

• Revenge Theme and Tragedy: The podcast discusses the theme of revenge in "Sweeney Todd" and how the main character's pursuit of revenge ultimately defines and destroys him. It delves into the tragedy aspect, highlighting how revenge can blind one to potential happiness and lead to devastating consequences. 

• Exploration of Greed: The hosts explore the theme of greed in the musical, citing examples such as Mrs. Lovett's actions to improve her economic status and the judge's extreme possessiveness over his ward/daughter. The characters' selfish motivations and actions contribute to the overall narrative. 

• Class Dynamics and Social Commentary: The podcast touches on the portrayal of class dynamics in the musical, emphasizing the contrast between the upper class and the suffering masses. It discusses how the upper class exploits and mistreats the lower class, adding a layer of social commentary to the narrative.

Episode Summary:

• The episode features special guest Olivia, bookstagrammer @No__ShelfControl, a self-professed non-horror movie watcher and a teacher with expertise in English literature

• The episode sheds light on the historical context in which "Silence of the Lambs" emerged, drawing connections to real-life criminal profiling and notorious cases like Ted Bundy and Ed Gein. The hosts highlight Thomas Harris's research into criminal profiling and how these influences shaped the narrative.

• The hosts discuss their contrasting experiences with the source material, sharing their thoughts on how the adaptation fared. 

  • • The hosts express dissatisfaction with the book, highlighting the lack of compelling characters and an unengaging writing style. They discuss the static nature of the narrative, describing it as moving from one event to the next without evoking much imagination. The hosts share their struggle to connect with the characters and criticize the dryness of the text, drawing comparisons to more interesting textbooks.

    • hosts discuss the film's successful adaptation from the book, commending the screenplay for skillfully incorporating key plot points, themes, and information while streamlining sections that didn't need extended focus. Despite acknowledging some issues, the hosts appreciate the screenplay's ability to capture the essence of the book's interesting elements and themes.

• A significant portion of the discussion centers around the transphobic representation in both the book and the movie. The hosts emphasize instances where characters explicitly state that Buffalo Bill is not transgender, yet acknowledge the strong coding and stereotypes associated with transgender individuals. They explore the unintentional harmful consequences of the narrative, discussing the potential impact on public perceptions and the importance of acknowledging and critiquing such problematic elements. The hosts conclude by asserting that while valid critiques exist, it's still acceptable to enjoy the movie while being aware of its flaws.

• The hosts discuss their reactions to the movie, with guest Olivia revealing that she did not scream but walked away during a specific scene involving violence against women. They delve into the fear evoked by the relatability of the situation, mentioning how the fear of being unsafe or someone lurking nearby is a universal experience for women. The realistic portrayal of violence against women in the movie is emphasized, and the impact of such themes is discussed, making the movie too real for Olivia.

• Hosts acknowledge positive aspects of the movie, praising Anthony Hopkins' exceptional performance as Hannibal Lecter. The discussion revolves around the portrayal of Lecter, with a focus on the framing of his character and the lighting used in specific scenes. The hosts appreciate the movie's technical proficiency, effective storytelling, and its ability to maintain suspense and mystery.

• Olivia criticizes the gratuitous violence in the scene with Migs assaulting Clarice, questioning its necessity for the plot. Matt sees it as a thematic element reflecting the mistreatment of women, but Liv questions if such scenes are essential.

• Olivia points out the transphobic portrayal of Buffalo Bill, emphasizing the scene where he dances in women's clothes. She argues that it exaggerates and mocks his gender identity, questioning its contribution to the narrative.

• Olivia and Hannah discuss the fat-phobic elements in the movie, noting how it reflects the limitations of 1980s feminism. Hosts criticize the unrealistic depiction of women's sizes, highlighting a lack of inclusivity in the feminist perspective presented in the story.

• Themes:

  • • The podcast delves into the movie's portrayal of gender dynamics, emphasizing how it reflects a woman's struggle in a male-dominated field. The hosts praise the elevator scene as a powerful shot, symbolizing the challenges Clarice faces as a woman in a male-centric environment. The podcast suggests this scene encapsulates the essence of the entire movie. The autopsy scene is highlighted as a crucial thematic moment, portraying Clarice's unique perspective on the crimes against women. The discussion underscores the impact of her role as the only woman investigating such crimes.

    • The discussion notes the subtle class distinctions and how the protagonist, Clarice Starling, navigates them.

Matt's ranking

1. The Haunting of Hill House

2. The Haunting of Bly Manor

3. Midnight Mass

4. Midnight Club

5. The Fall of the House of Usher

Hannah's ranking

1. The Haunting of Hill House

2. Midnight Mass

3. The Fall of the House of Usher

4. The Haunting of Bly Manor

5. Midnight Club

Listen to the episode for a full explaination as to why we have ranked where we did! 

Episode Summary

• The episode features special guests from the "Is It Horror" Podcast, Steve and Briana, a podcast which involves analyzing non-traditional horror media to define the horror genre. 

• The hosts appreciate the film's humor, clever writing, and the unique backdrop of an underground laboratory controlling the events at the cabin. They highlight the genius of having the lab's story run parallel to the main narrative, creating a distinctive and engaging movie experience. 

• Hosts discuss a fun fact about the film's connection to the video game "Left for Dead 2," where some creatures from the game make an appearance in the movie's underground facility.

• Hosts highlight Marty's comedic delivery, praising his memorable quotes and noting his standout performance in the movie

  • • Marty is considered the audience's commentary and the "peanut gallery" in the film

    • The hosts express admiration for the concept of coffee bongs that double as blunt force trauma weapons and suggest selling them as merchandise

• The hosts express their enjoyment of the well-crafted script, praising the likability of characters in the facility despite their roles as potential monsters. They note that, in the hands of other filmmakers, the characters might have been less appealing.

• The podcast delves into the satirical aspect of the film, with a discussion on the creators' analysis of the horror genre. However, there is a slight criticism of what is perceived as judgmental tones toward certain horror sub-genres and their fans.

• The hosts appreciate how the film turns traditional horror tropes on their heads, creating unexpected character twists and utilizing clever narrative devices, such as the early hints at manipulation and the parody of classic horror elements.

• The elevator slaughter montage receives high praise as a favorite scene from 2 hosts

• The hosts discuss their favorite monsters, including the unicorn and merman, praising the creativity and horror elements.

• Themes of the movie are explored, including the idea that the gods represent the audience, the director as the director, and the lab as those involved in making movies.

• The hosts touch on the film's message about breaking away from conventional horror tropes, advocating for artistic freedom, and the need to let certain aspects of the industry crumble for creative growth.

Episode Summary

• "Hereditary" is a 2018 horror film directed by Ari Aster, starring Tony Collette, Alex Wolf, and Millie Shapiro, which grossed over $82 million on a $10 million budget. 

• Despite critical acclaim, audience opinions were divided, with CinemaScore giving it a low grade, attributing this to different reactions from horror fans, non-horror fans, and those who found it unsettling. 

• The hosts share personal experiences with the movie, including initial reluctance, multiple viewings, and the film's disturbing scenes, highlighting its effectiveness in generating fear. 

• Tony Collette's performance is praised, with disappointment expressed over her lack of recognition during award season. The hosts also praise the performance of Alex Wolff, and the film is characterized as a horror movie that goes beyond typical possession tropes, offering a unique and elevated experience.

• The hosts praise the cinematography in the film, lighting, and movement of the camera, and discuss how the design elements of the minis are symbolic of how the family is being puppeted by the coven

• Hosts discuss the foreshadowing in the film, including the symbol of the cult being shown on the telephone poll that Charlie is inevitably decapitated on and the individual's attending the funeral

• The episode discusses the interpretation of the characters in a movie having either legitimate mental illnesses or being influenced by a coven trying to put a demon in them. The speaker mentions specific instances of family members being diagnosed with hallucinations, dissociative identity disorder (DID), psychotic depression, and schizophrenia. The conversation delves into the dual perspectives of mental illness and supernatural influence, highlighting the themes of generational trauma and hereditary mental illness in the film.

• The podcast mentions the unexpected twist in a movie where, initially perceived as a horror film about grief and loss, it takes a dramatic turn when the character Charlie dies as well. The host emphasizes the surprising revelation that Charlie's death is linked to possession and a seance. The discussion highlights the shocking scene involving Charlie's decapitation, which defied the initial marketing portrayal of Charlie as a significant part of the movie.

• Grief is identified as a central theme, emphasizing how different characters process it in various ways. 

• The dollhouse symbolism is discussed as a representation of characters being manipulated, lacking agency in their lives. 

• The podcast delves into the themes of free will and the cult's influence on the characters, ultimately leading to their tragic fate. 

Episode Summary

• The hosts and guest Michaela discuss their expectations and experiences with Nightmare Before Christmas, including its impact on them as children. 

• The hosts give their overall impressions of the movie, praising its music, animation style, and considering it a good, though not annual, watch.

• Matt discussing how the character of Jack Skellington is well designed and meets the silhouette rule

• The hosts discuss their enjoyment of the creative interpretations of stereotypical Halloween characters, citing examples like vampires with umbrellas and Zero, the dog, being both a ghost and reminiscent of Rudolph. 

• The podcast hosts highlight the importance and enjoyment of the movie's songs, considering them a key driving force in the narrative.

• The hosts express conflicting interpretations of the movie's themes, especially regarding the resolution of characters like Jack and Sally. They touch upon the notion of finding contentment in one's current situation and discuss the abruptness of the movie's ending, feeling it lacks a complete resolution. The hosts also humorously discuss the potential for rewriting the movie.

• The hosts discuss the theme of poisoning an abusive parent in a children's movie, expressing confusion and concern about its message. 

• The hosts analyze Sally's transition from being under her abusive father's control to seeking support from another man, discussing the film's themes of resilience and self-fulfillment. 

• The podcast hosts explore the unclear message about the spirit of Christmas in the movie, questioning its lack of coherence and discussing their interpretations of the film's themes.

Episode Summary

• Matt and Hannah discuss their favorite films from Season 1

  • • Matt's favorites: Midsommar, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, The Babadook, Silence of the Lambs, The Sixth Sense

    • Hannah's favorites: The Witch, Midsommar, Hereditary, The Babadook, Insidious 

• The Hanna's favorite episodes from Season 1: Malignant, The Nightmare Before Christmas, The Silence of the Lambs, Saw, Insidious

• The Scariest films from Season 1 (statistically): 

  • • The Babadook - 12 screams and hides

    • Insidious - 11 screams and hides

    • Hereditary - 11 screams and hides 

• Least scary films from Season 1, with no screams or hides: Carrie, Ready or Not, and Halloween

• The Hanna's are joined by fan favorite guests including Preston "The Resident Scardy-Cat", Professional Actor Matt, Jason "The Librarian", Paranormal in Pennsylvania, and Twice the Terror. Preston chooses his fate for next season. Matt pitches us a brand new cinematic experience. Jason enlightens us on the "Even Horizon" companion novel. Paranormal in Pennsylvania recommends a haunting that should be a movie. And Twice the Terror sends a recording from the Saw 11 writers room.

Episode Summary

• Jordan Peele's "Nope" is discussed as Matt's favorite scary movie of the year 2022

• Fun Facts About the Film: 

  • • Jordan Peele specifically wrote the lead role of OJ for Daniel Kaluuya. 

    • Peele consulted with a jellyfish expert for the design of a jean jacket in the movie. 

    • The title "Nope" is explained to reflect the audience's reaction to the idea of a scary movie, capturing the essence of people saying "nope" when confronted with horror.

• Personal Experience and Initial Reactions: The hosts share their experiences of watching the movie, mentioning that they saw it in theaters together. The initial marketing was cryptic, revealing little about the plot, which added to the intrigue for the hosts.

• The hosts commend the movie's simple yet effective plot, allowing for exploration of complex themes and impressive performances, particularly the chemistry between the lead actors.

• The podcast discussion delves into the themes of exploitation, particularly focusing on animal and human exploitation, as well as the exploitation of spectacle or tragedy, specifically within the context of Hollywood content creation.

• The hosts draw a parallel between a jean jacket in the discussed movie and a camera, symbolizing the act of watching and exploiting people, drawing attention to Hollywood's role in the process.

• The conversation touches on the concept that the only way to address exploitation is to avoid looking at it, drawing connections to the constant exposure to violence in the 24-hour news cycle.

• The conversation touches on the concept of spectacle, emphasizing society's fascination with tragedy and morbid events, as well as the tendency to exploit such events for entertainment purposes.

• The movie's characters' motivations are linked to the desire to leave a legacy and be remembered, especially in contrast to historical exploitation and lack of proper credit for people of color in the industry.

• The hosts discuss how the film addresses the exploitation of trauma, referencing the character Jupe's flawed attempts to deal with his own trauma and the broader societal trend of exploiting tragedy for media. 

• The podcast hosts relate the movie's exploration of spectacle, emphasizing the fascination with morbid and tragic events, drawing parallels to real-world instances like the 9/11 footage and the impact of news media. 

• A deeper analysis is presented, suggesting that the movie may serve as Jordan Peele's reflection on his previous film "Get Out" and the potential exploitation of real-life trauma for artistic purposes, leading to a discussion on the ethical aspects of consuming such content under capitalism.

• The podcasters express admiration for Jordan Peele and find his movie visually stunning, anticipating more projects from him.

• The podcasters vehemently criticize Logan Paul's negative comments about the film, highlighting his lack of understanding and misinterpretation of key elements

• The hosts rate the film highly, with one giving it a 9.5 out of 10 and the other a 9.3 out of 10, acknowledging its brilliance while noting it may not be a personal favorite.

Episode Summary

• This episode features special guest, Will, from the podcast The Horror Lab.

• The movie revolves around Kevin Wendell Crumb, a character with Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID), portrayed by James McAvoy. 

• The portrayal of the therapist has been criticized for its inaccuracies and potential reinforcement of stigmas related to mental health professionals. 

• One major concern for the hosts is the violent portrayal of DID. The film suggests a link between DID and harmful actions, which is not representative of the reality of this mental health condition. Most individuals with DID are not prone to violence. 

• Hannah and Will explain that DID itself is a debated and under-researched diagnosis in the mental health field. The movie's representation adds to the existing misconceptions and fails to provide an accurate understanding of the condition. The film's popularity means its portrayal can influence public perceptions of DID. Misleading depictions can contribute to stigma and hinder efforts to raise awareness about mental health. 

• Despite the potential impact on public understanding, the director, M. Night Shyamalan, did not consult extensively with mental health professionals. This lack of consultation raises questions about the responsibility of filmmakers when dealing with sensitive topics. 

• Hosts praise the movie for its horror elements, suspenseful storytelling, and James McAvoy's performance. However, these positive aspects should not overshadow the problematic representation of mental health

• Advocates for mental health awareness emphasize the importance of responsible filmmaking when portraying mental health conditions. Consultation with mental health professionals and accurate representation can contribute to a more informed and empathetic public discourse.

• Matt mentions developing a soft spot for Shyamalan's work, particularly appreciating films like "Signs" and "The Sixth Sense."

Episode Summary

• Hannah and Matt review the new release "Night Swim," a 2024 supernatural horror film directed by Bryce Maguire, starring Wyatt Russell and Carrie Condon. The film follows a suburban family discovering their backyard pool is haunted due to a sacrificed child's spirit. 

• Initial expectations were mixed, with Hannah anticipating goofiness and potential scares. Matt expected a January release vibe (aka, not good). 

• They find the movie to be "extremely mid," with good scares, some laughs, but lacking commitment to its unique premise. It looks fine but falls back on familiar horror tropes. 

• The hosts share spoiler-free thoughts and recommend it for a laugh rather than a serious watch.

• In the spoiler section, Hannah and Matt discuss plot details, criticize certain elements like the portrayal of suicide, and express disappointment in missed opportunities for a more unique and fun experience. The ending sets up a potential sequel, but the hosts agree it's unnecessary. They conclude that "Night Swim" is not worth watching in theaters and might be suitable for a casual, at-home viewing. 

• Wyatt Russell's performance is praised in a specific scene where he is possessed, but overall, it is suggested that he wasn't given enough to work with in the script. 

• The hosts discuss the scares in the movie, specifically praising the scenes with entity-like creatures in the haunted pool. 

• The podcast delves into the problematic themes perceived in the movie, including the portrayal of suicide related to a disability and gender bias favoring boys over girls. 

• The hosts mention their frustration with the lack of clear and well-developed themes in the film, emphasizing the importance of proper representation in movies dealing with sensitive topics.

Episode Summary:

• Matt and Hannah are joined by return guest Matthew Dalton, known for previous appearances on the show. 

• The episode focuses on reviewing and discussing scary episodes from childhood TV shows, including "Courage the Cowardly Dog" and "SpongeBob SquarePants." 

• SpongeBob's "Graveyard Shift" (Season 2, Episode 36a)

  • • They dive into a detailed plot description of the episode, highlighting the humor and absurdity of the "hash-slinging slasher" storyline and how it cleverly addresses themes of capitalism and workplace dynamics. They also discuss the voice acting talent and the show's artistic style, expressing appreciation for its quality. 

    • The hosts reflect on their own experiences and reactions to the episode, with Hannah admitting she relates more to Squidward as an adult and appreciating the show's nuanced humor. 

    • They discuss various elements of the episode, including the ending with "Nosferatu," and remark on how SpongeBob SquarePants effectively combines comedy with mild horror elements suitable for children. 

    • The hosts wrap up their discussion of the episode, expressing overall enjoyment and appreciation for SpongeBob SquarePants' ability to entertain both children and adults with its smart writing and clever humor.

• Courage the Cowardly Dog - "The Curse of King Ramses"

  • • The hosts provide a brief synopsis of the episode, where Courage encounters King Ramses, who demands the return of his stolen slab, leading to a series of frightening events and plagues. 

    • Hosts reflect on their childhood experiences watching "Courage the Cowardly Dog" and how this particular episode left a lasting impact. They share anecdotes of hiding or changing channels whenever King Ramses appeared due to his eerie CGI animation and unsettling presence. 

    • The hosts discuss the show's effectiveness in addressing serious themes and introducing children to elements of horror in a lighter, more accessible manner. They appreciate how the series tackles subjects like courage, standing up to fears, and addressing abusive behavior in relationships.

    • Despite its creepy content, the hosts praise the visually stunning and creatively animated sequences in the episode. They highlight specific shots, such as the locusts encircling the house, as examples of the show's artistic excellence. 

    • The hosts lament the decline of traditional hand-drawn animation in favor of CGI and discuss how networks like Cartoon Network provided a platform for unique, unconventional shows like "Courage." They criticize Disney's role in the demise of 2D animation studios and express hope for a resurgence of the art form.

• "Goosebumps" - "The Haunted Mask"

  • • The speakers discuss Carly Beth's character arc, highlighting her journey from a timid individual to someone who embraces her true self, as symbolized by her confrontation with the bullies while wearing the haunted mask. 

    • They explore the themes of identity, confidence, and self-acceptance portrayed in the episode, drawing parallels between Carly Beth's experience and that of the shopkeeper, who hides his true self behind multiple masks. 

    • The speakers commend the production quality of the episode, particularly praising the effectiveness of the mask effects and the overall atmosphere created for a children's horror show. 

Episode Summary 

• "When Evil Lurks," was a co-production between Argentina and the United States, and Shudder's first Spanish-language film. 

• Hosts discuss the film's director, Damen Rugna, and his inspiration for the movie, drawn from news stories about farm pesticides in Argentina causing health issues. 

• Matt and Hannah highlight notable scenes, including the tension-building sequence with a possessed dog attacking a young girl, and the disturbing moments involving possession and violence against children. 

• Praise for the film's practical effects and makeup, particularly in portraying the grotesque and terrifying aspects of demonic possession. 

• Critique of certain aspects of the plot, such as the sudden introduction of the school subplot, and the underdevelopment of certain characters like Merta, the former cleaner.

• The discussion includes an analogy drawn between the plot of a movie or series and real-world events, particularly regarding the handling of a sick person on one's land. This analogy is seen as reflecting societal attitudes during the pandemic, where there was a focus on protecting oneself without considering the broader impact on others.

• Government Failures: The conversation delves into criticisms of government responses during the pandemic, citing failures in preparation, inconsistent messaging on safety measures like mask-wearing, and inadequate financial support for individuals and small businesses. 

• Corporate Misconduct: Criticism extends to corporations taking advantage of relief funds intended for small businesses, with some companies misusing funds for personal gain rather than genuine need, contributing to economic issues like inflation. 

• Racism and Othering: The discussion touches on increased racism during the pandemic, particularly targeting people of Asian descent due to the virus's origins in China. This reflects broader societal issues of racism and xenophobia. 

• Government Conspiracy: One perspective suggests a character's belief in a government conspiracy against them, highlighting a lack of trust in authority figures and institutions. 

• Individualism vs. Community: Themes of individualism versus community care emerge, with characters prioritizing personal interests over collective well-being, mirroring societal trends of self-preservation at the expense of others. 

• Property Rights and Responsibility: The conversation explores themes of property rights and individual responsibility, as characters make decisions that ultimately endanger others while attempting to protect their own interests. 

• The podcast discusses the effectiveness of "mean" horror movies, where characters' actions lead to deservedly negative outcomes, contrasting with horror films that rely on unearned shock value

Episode Summary

• "The Thing," directed by John Carpenter in 1982, stars Kurt Russell and features a large supporting cast, initially received negative reviews but later gained cult classic status. 

• Despite initial budget constraints, the film's budget grew substantially during production due to the intricate creature design and set construction, allowing for practical effects that still hold up today. 

• The film underwent multiple ending revisions, including a controversial alternate ending involving a rescued character. Ultimately, Carpenter opted for an ambiguous conclusion, enhancing the film's lasting impact. 

• "The Thing" is praised for its atmospheric tension and suspense, relying more on psychological horror and the fear of assimilation rather than traditional jump scares. 

• Kurt Russell's charismatic performance and the film's effective character introductions showcase the lost art of building movie stars, highlighting the importance of strong character development in filmmaking.

• The discussion emphasizes the effectiveness of practical effects in film, contrasting them with CGI. Practical effects, demonstrated in "The Thing," are praised for their ability to maintain realism and stand the test of time, offering a tangible and weighty presence that CGI often lacks.

• The filmmakers' decision to shoot on location in Alaska and build sets during the summer to utilize real snowfall adds authenticity to the film. This attention to detail and preparation is highlighted as a key factor in creating a visually striking and immersive cinematic experience. 

• The assimilation concept explored in "The Thing" is highlighted as a psychologically terrifying aspect of the film. The fear of not knowing who is human and who is the alien creature creates tension and intrigue, keeping viewers guessing throughout the movie. 

• Isolation and Paranoia: The podcast discusses how the film effectively portrays the psychological effects of isolation and paranoia, exacerbated by the harsh Antarctic environment. The all-male cast and the buildup of tension among characters underscore the themes of mistrust and fear. 

  • • They speculate on how the presence of women might have altered the outcome, suggesting that diverse perspectives could have changed the dynamics of the group.

    • The hosts appreciate the ambiguity of the movie's ending, emphasizing that it reinforces the theme of paranoia. They discuss Kurt Russell's commentary on the ending, emphasizing the importance of leaving the audience in uncertainty to convey the movie's message effectively.

• Echoes of Historical Events: Drawing parallels to McCarthyism and the Red Scare, the podcast suggests that "The Thing" reflects broader themes of suspicion, betrayal, and societal paranoia. The fear of infiltration and betrayal by an unseen enemy resonates with historical events and cultural anxieties surrounding communism and espionage.

• They explore potential allegorical readings of the movie, including parallels to the AIDS epidemic and the fear of nuclear annihilation. While some allegorical interpretations, like the STD allegory, seem less likely, they acknowledge the possibility of subtextual layers enhancing the movie's themes.

Episode Summary

• "Barbarian" is a horror film directed by Zach Cregger, known for his work with The Whitest Kids U' Know, starring Georgina Campbell, Bill Skarsgård, and Justin Long. The film follows Tess, who encounters disturbing events in a rental house in a rundown Detroit neighborhood, uncovering a hidden corridor and encountering a deformed woman referred to as "the mother." 

• Hosts discuss how the story is divided into three acts, each with a distinct filmmaking style: Tess and Keith's unnerving encounter, Justin Long's oblivious exploration, and flashbacks to the house's original owner, Frank, a monstrous rapist. 

• The film's technical aspects, including lighting and cinematography, enhance its tension and atmosphere, with creative cuts adding to the suspense and relief throughout. 

• Justin Long's character, AJ, serves as a stark contrast to Tess's hypervigilance, highlighting themes of misogyny and male obliviousness, ultimately failing a moral test compared to Tess's resilience. 

• Despite mixed opinions, the film's risk-taking and unique storytelling, coupled with strong performances, make it a standout horror experience, with themes of trauma, survival, and societal commentary woven throughout.

• The podcast discussion delves into the significance of dialogue in the film, highlighting its poignancy and relevance to real-life situations involving consent and power dynamics. 

• It emphasizes the portrayal of a character who represents the archetype of a problematic individual, delving into themes of male entitlement, manipulation, and lack of accountability. 

• The analysis explores how the film effectively captures female anxiety through subtle cues and situations, illustrating the constant vigilance and fear experienced by women in everyday interactions. There is a thematic exploration of exterior appearances versus interior realities, showcasing how danger can lurk beneath seemingly benign facades and challenging preconceived notions of who poses a threat. 

• The discussion also touches on broader societal issues such as the failure of institutions to protect victims and the prevalence of harmful stereotypes that perpetuate gender-based violence. The film also critiques the police, portraying them as dangerous despite their facade of protection and service.

• The main theme of the podcast discussion is the anxiety of being a woman, although other themes like economic inequality are touched upon but not thoroughly explored. 

• The podcast hosts encourage deeper analysis of movies beyond surface-level reactions, urging viewers to consider the filmmaker's intentions and underlying themes. 

• Favorite scenes include tense moments in the tunnel, the 1980s section depicting real-life horror, and AJ's journey through the tunnel, showcasing different emotional perspectives. 

• Overall, the podcast hosts rate the film positively, with ratings ranging from 8 to 9.5 out of 10, recommending it to viewers.

Episode Summary

• Background and Production: The film, made with a mere $15,000 budget over seven days, is a testament to efficient filmmaking. Director Kyle Edward Ball drew inspiration from his YouTube channel, where he recreated viewers' childhood nightmares.

•  Title Inspiration: Surprisingly, the film's title, "Skinnamarink," is not directly mentioned in the movie but is derived from a nostalgic children's song. This choice adds a creepy undertone, capturing the essence of childhood fears. 

• The hosts had mixed expectations going in, unsure of how the film would affect them. However, they were all deeply impacted, with one host admitting it was the scariest movie they had seen on the podcast. 

• The film's grainy visuals, distorted audio, and unconventional framing contribute to its unsettling atmosphere. Shots linger on walls and corners, creating a sense of claustrophobia and disorientation, while the lighting effectively enhances the tension. 

• The hosts discuss how the film effectively taps into primal fears, with unsettling imagery and prolonged moments of discomfort. Despite its minimalistic approach, "Skinnamarink" leaves a lasting impression, evoking genuine fear and unease in its audience.

• They highlight moments where they noticed unsettling details in the shots, such as seeing a person that others missed, emphasizing the effectiveness of the cinematography in evoking fear. 

• Despite finding the movie terrifying, they appreciate its deliberate filmmaking choices, including the slow pacing that intensifies the fear and the ambiguity surrounding certain elements of the plot. 

• They discuss how the movie's focus on children experiencing terror adds to its impact, noting that horror involving kids is relatively rare and can be especially unsettling. 

• While acknowledging that the movie may not be for everyone and admitting to moments of discomfort and fear, they ultimately praise it for its ability to evoke strong emotional reactions and provoke deep discussions about its themes and execution.

• The hosts explore possible interpretations of the movie's themes, including themes of child abuse, abandonment, and domestic suffering, drawing from their own experiences and analyses from the internet. 

• They critique and respond to various takes on the movie, including dismissing claims that the film's darkness and ambiguity make it less scary or enjoyable.

Episode Summary

• Hannah and Matt discuss the episode theme of exploring horror elements in non-horror movies, emphasizing the diversity within the horror genre. 

• Definition of horror: They debate the definition of horror, acknowledging its subjective nature and diverse subgenres that elicit various emotions such as fear, terror, disgust, shock, and suspense. 

• Analysis of "Jurassic Park"

  • • They explore several horror moments in the film, including the intense opening scene with the Raptor attack, the iconic T-Rex encounter, and the terrifying kitchen scene with the Raptors hunting the children. 

    • Impact of suspense and withholding imagery: They discuss the effectiveness of suspense and the technique of withholding imagery, citing examples from "Jurassic Park" and comparing it to other horror films where the monster is shown on screen and removes the fear

    • Exploration of primal fears: They delve into the primal fears evoked by "Jurassic Park," such as being hunted by predators and the fear of being eaten alive, which contribute to the overall horror experience. 

    • Theme of hubris and playing God: They analyze the thematic significance of the horror elements in "Jurassic Park," emphasizing the cautionary tale of human hubris and the consequences of playing God with genetic engineering. 

    • Conclusion: Despite the film's non-horror classification, they argue that the horror elements are crucial for enhancing the emotional impact and thematic depth of "Jurassic Park," making it a timeless classic with enduring appeal.

• "Spider-Man 2" 

  • • Regarded as the best superhero movie ever made, according to the podcast hosts. 

    • The hospital scene in "Spider-Man 2" is described as a horror scene directed by Sam Raimi, known for his horror background. The scene depicts doctors attempting to surgically remove Dr. Octavius's arms, which have become sentient and defend themselves violently. 

    • The use of practical effects, sound design, and shadows creates a tense and frightening atmosphere, emphasizing Doc Ock's transformation into a formidable villain.

• "Nocturnal Animals"

  • • "Nocturnal Animals" is a 2016 psychological thriller directed by fashion designer Tom Ford, starring Amy Adams and Jake Gyllenhaal. The film's plot follows an art gallery owner who begins to see parallels between her former relationship and the novel written by her first husband. 

    • A pivotal scene from the novel is depicted on screen, where Jake Gyllenhaal's character is forced off the road and his family is kidnapped by three men. 

    • The scene is marked by a sense of helplessness and isolation, heightened by the remote setting and lack of cell service, which adds to the tension and fear. 

    • Through masterful acting, lighting, and use of silence, the scene effectively conveys the horror of the situation, leaving a lasting impact on the viewer and prompting discussions about themes such as powerlessness, revenge, and the unpredictability of human nature.

Episode Summary

• Hannah and Matt host Horror Hour, joined by WTF is That podcast, Jess and Jenn. The latter discuss their podcast, covering paranormal, true crime, and spooky topics, directing listeners to their Instagram for more. 

•  The podcast collaboration centers on discussing the movie "The Conjuring 2," which aligns with an episode of "WTF is That podcast covering the Enfield Poltergeist haunting, the inspiration for the film. 

• Released in 2016, directed by James Wan, the film was a sequel to 2013's "The Conjuring," starring Patrick Wilson and Vera Farmiga as Ed and Lorraine Warren, respectively. Notably, it was the highest-grossing horror film of that year.

• Actor Javier Botet, who portrayed the Crooked Man, previously appeared in "REC" and "Mama." 

• The original design for Valak, the nun, was initially a demonic figure with wings, later revised to fit the grounded tone of the film. 

• The movie explores themes of faith, with Lorraine Warren questioning hers amidst the paranormal investigations. However, the execution of this theme in the film was criticized for being more tell than show, lacking subtlety. 

• The hosts mention the clever opening scene of the movie, which references the Amityville Horror case and sets up the skepticism faced by the Warrens in the Enfield haunting case. 

• They appreciate the well-crafted jump scares in the film, noting how they effectively build tension and create scary moments. 

• Another host praises a particular continuous shot early in the film that navigates through the house, setting up the atmosphere and characters before delving into the horror elements. 

• They express some criticisms of the film, particularly regarding its pacing and lack of connection between the scary moments, suggesting that the interpersonal moments were not as impactful as in the first movie.

• The highest rating given to this film is a 6/10

Episode Summary

• "The Lighthouse" is a 2019 film directed by Robert Eggers and stars Willem Dafoe and Robert Pattinson. It's noted that both actors were interested in working with Eggers after seeing his previous film, "The Witch."

• The podcast highlights various production details, including Pattinson's commitment to his role, which involved intense scenes like drunkenness and vomiting. The actors' relationship on set is discussed, with suggestions of tension between them mirroring their characters' dynamic.

• The podcast praises the film's visual style, particularly its use of black and white cinematography and the striking contrast and lighting. The aspect ratio and setting contribute to the eerie atmosphere.

• Discussion revolves around the characters' interactions and psychological states, with emphasis on their unreliable narration and the ambiguity surrounding their motives and sanity.

• The podcast discusses different theories about the psychological underpinnings of the characters in the film "The Lighthouse". One theory proposes that William Defoe's character, Thomas, deliberately manipulates Robert Pattinson's character, Ephraim, into doubting himself and succumbing to madness by instilling superstitions and doubts in his mind. Another theory suggests that Ephraim may have actually murdered his foreman and is repressing or suppressing the memory, leading to his descent into madness. 

• The discussion delves into Freudian psychoanalytic concepts such as the id, ego, and superego, suggesting that Ephraim's actions may be driven by primal instincts and repressed desires. The podcast hosts also explore the Oedipus complex, speculating on the dynamics between Ephraim and Thomas as representing aspects of rivalry and intimacy akin to a parent-child relationship. 

• Additionally, Carl Jung's concept of the shadow is discussed, proposing that Ephraim may be grappling with aspects of his personality that he rejects or represses, leading to inner turmoil and psychological distress.

• They appreciate the isolation of the setting, emphasizing how the lack of outside influence strips away societal norms and reveals the true nature of the characters. 

• The hosts discuss the transformative nature of Robert Pattinson's character throughout the film, speculating on themes of sanity and identity. 

• Despite praising the performances and technical aspects, they acknowledge that the slow pace of the film might not be engaging for everyone, with some moments feeling like a "slog." 

• The hosts share favorite scenes, including the iconic "hark monologue" and the intense character-driven interactions between the Thomases. They also mention memorable moments like Rob cleaning the poop and the shot of Willem Dafoe's eyes resembling the lighthouse.

Episode Summary

• The hosts share their personal experiences with the film, revealing that it's one of the rare horror movies Hannah had seen previously but not Matt. They reminisce about their viewing experiences, including interruptions and incomplete viewings, leading to mixed feelings.

• They explore the film's production, discussing its low budget, handheld camera filming style, and the innovative internet-based marketing campaign, which blurred the lines between fiction and reality, adding to its impact. 

• Critically acclaimed but also receiving backlash, they reflect on the film's legacy as one of the first widely successful found footage horror movies that popularized the genre. While acknowledging its significance, the hosts offer a nuanced review, expressing appreciation for certain aspects like the tense atmosphere and authentic performances, while also critiquing elements like character dynamics and the minimal focus on the titular Blair Witch herself. Despite mixed feelings, they ultimately respect its place in horror cinema history.

• The podcast hosts appreciate the documentary aspect and emotional ending of the film, praising the realistic improvised dialogue by the actors. They find certain scenes unsettling, such as the singing of "America the Beautiful," and discuss the rapid descent into panic portrayed in the movie. 

• They critique the slow pacing of the film, comparing it unfavorably to other slow-paced horror movies like "The Witch." 

• Themes of isolation, inner turmoil, and insecurity are discussed, particularly in relation to the protagonist's gender. 

• Despite acknowledging the film's historical significance in horror, the hosts personally find it lacking in suspense and overall enjoyment, rating it a 6 out of 10.

Episode Summary

• The episode features special guests Sara and David from the podcast Paranormal in Pennsylvania, a show discussing history and hauntings in the state of Pennsylvania.

• Poltergeist

  • • The conversation delves into the infamous "Poltergeist curse," detailing the unfortunate accidents and tragic deaths associated with the film series. They explore incidents like the use of real human skeletons on set, eerie occurrences during filming, and cast members' experiences of hauntings.

    • The discussion takes a somber turn as they recount the tragic deaths of Dominique Dunn and Heather O'Rourke, cast members of the Poltergeist series. They express shock and sadness at the circumstances surrounding these deaths, including abusive relationships and mysterious medical conditions.

    • Discussion includes that all 5 members of the main family in the film experienced some sort of paranormal event

    • The hosts reflect on the impact of knowing behind-the-scenes details on viewers' perceptions of the movie, with some finding it enhances the scariness factor while others see it as a reminder of the era's filmmaking practices.

  • The Omen

    • • The hosts recount instances of strange animal behavior during the filming of "The Omen," including trained dogs attacking their handlers, baboons exhibiting violent reactions, and a tragic incident where a large cat killed a zookeeper. These occurrences suggest a possible haunting or disturbance on the film set.

      • The discussion delves into the eerie coincidences surrounding car accidents involving members of the film crew, notably the decapitation of an assistant special effects designer. The accident occurred on Friday the 13th, near a sign indicating they were 66.6 km from the town of Omenn, adding a chilling layer of coincidence to the film's ominous themes.

      • The hosts reflect on how the real-life incidents surrounding the film, such as the car accidents and animal disturbances, influence their perception and enjoyment of the movie. Despite critiques of pacing and character decisions, the haunting occurrences associated with the production add depth and intrigue to their viewing experience.

  • The Exorcist 

    • • The hosts discuss the numerous challenges faced during filming, including a fire on set, extended filming duration, and a mix-up with a Pazuzu statue being shipped to the wrong location.

      • They detail the injuries that occurred during filming, including a carpenter losing a thumb and a lighting technician losing a toe. Additionally, two actors suffered back injuries during intense scenes.

      • The hosts discuss the deaths that occurred during production, including actors and crew members. They mention incidents like influenza and the passing away of family members.

      • The hosts compare "The Exorcist" to other horror films like "Poltergeist" and "The Omen," expressing their preferences. Despite the challenges faced during production, they acknowledge the film's lasting impact and status as a horror classic.

Episode Summary

• "Late Night with the Devil" was a highly anticipated horror release of 2024, generating excitement since its premiere at South by Southwest in March 2023. 

• The film features David Dastmalchian, known for roles in "Dune" and "The Suicide Squad," who delivers a standout performance as the late-night host, oozing charisma and carrying the movie with confidence. 

• Despite its modest $2 million budget and involvement of multiple production companies, the film has surpassed expectations, grossing over $3 million since its release. 

• Controversy surrounds the use of AI art in the movie in brief stills, prompting discussion about the ethics of AI usage in filmmaking

• With its unique premise, nostalgic 1970s late-night show aesthetic, and compelling performances, "Late Night with the Devil" offers an enjoyable blend of horror and drama, though it may not deliver traditional scares.

• Hannah and Matt found the presentation of the movie unique and engaging, particularly appreciating how it was framed as a documentary within the movie itself. While we were initially uncertain about the movie's corny narrative setup, the we were pleasantly surprised by its clever execution and thematic depth. 

• Hannah and Matt praised the film's innovative use of found footage, blending behind-the-scenes moments with the main show to provide context and suspense. 

• While Matt felt that a particular scene broke the established rules of the movie, Hannah saw it as necessary for conveying crucial plot details, sparking a debate about its effectiveness.

• Hannah expresses praise for certain artistic choices in the movie, such as changes in aspect ratio and picture quality

• They express admiration for specific performances in the movie, particularly praising the unsettling performance of David Dastmalchian and Ingrid Torelli, and acknowledging the effort put in by the cast.

• The hosts dissect the movie's themes, finding it primarily focused on cautionary messages like "be careful what you wish for" and a critique of Hollywood elitism, especially concerning selfish behavior for fame.

• Despite some criticisms, they give the movie relatively positive ratings, hovering around 8 out of 10, appreciating its creativity and setup but acknowledging it lacks the profound impact of other horror films they've experienced.

March Madness may be over, but luckily the Hanna's are here to bring you an April Madness A24 movie bracket. We selected the eight A24 movies with the lowest box office earnings and are pitting them against each other. While they may not have not had much love in the money making department there are some amazing films on this list. The bracket consists of the following: Green Room, Tusk, High Life, The Killing of the Sacred Deer, Hole in the Ground, Climax, Lamb, and Men. Tune in to find out which one will come out on top.

This week the Hanna's delve deep into the twisted world of Jordan Peele's "Us." Joined by our guest Jason "The Hater", we dissect every aspect of the film, from its mesmerizing performances to its spine-tingling soundtrack. Unraveling the layers of fear and fascination, we explore how "Us" seamlessly blends horror with social commentary, delving into themes of identity, privilege, and the shadows lurking beneath society's surface. Join us as we confront our own reflections and unravel the mysteries hidden within Peele's masterful storytelling, offering insightful analysis and thought-provoking discussions along the way. Whether you're a horror aficionado or a casual moviegoer, prepare to be captivated by the sinister brilliance of "Us."

Listen to the Hanna's plunge into the darkness of the supernatural thriller "Sinister." From its unsettling found footage to its spooky soundtrack, we explore the terrifying world created by director Scott Derrickson that landed this movie as the "scariest of all time according to science". So is it really the scariest movie of all time or is science a liar sometimes? Tune in to find out.

Today the Hanna's will be reviewing newly released movie "Abigail" which was directed by Matt Bettinelli-Olpin and Tyler Gillett of Scream and V/H/S fame. The film follows six criminals who kidnap a ballet loving little girl and hold her for ransom. Unknowing to them Abigail is a blood sucking vampire trapped with her next meal. Tune in to hear what we think of this charming new release.

In this gripping episode, we venture into the dark and twisted world of "Shutter Island," a psychological thriller that keeps viewers on the edge of their seats from start to finish. Through in-depth analysis and thought-provoking discussion, we delve into the mind of protagonist Teddy Daniels and dissect the layers of deception and paranoia that shroud the eponymous island. Tune in as we dissect both Scorsese's adaptation and Dennis Lehane's Original Novel "Shutter Island".

Episode Description: In this heart-pounding episode, we dive into the terrifying world of "[REC]," a found-footage horror film that delivers relentless scares and unrelenting tension. Join us as we dissect the chilling atmosphere, claustrophobic setting, and innovative storytelling that make this Spanish horror gem a standout in the genre. From its gripping premise of a TV reporter trapped inside a quarantined apartment building with a mysterious infection to its spine-chilling moments of visceral horror, "[REC]" keeps viewers on the edge of their seats until the very end. Don't miss out as we delve deep into the darkness of "[REC]" and uncover the secrets lurking within its walls.

This week we watched 2024's "Immaculate" staring and produced by Sydney Sweeney. The movie follows a novice Nun who moves to a convent in Italy that specializes in taking care of dying nuns, but as you would suspect this covenant is not exactly what it seems.

In this episode, we dive into the eerie and atmospheric world of "I Saw the TV Glow," the 2024 horror thriller that has been making waves for its unique premise and chilling execution. We dissect the film's unsettling narrative, which follows two teenagers who become obsessed with a mysterious TV show that blurs the line between reality and fiction. Join us as we explore the film's effective use of suspense, its thought-provoking themes, and the standout performances that bring this haunting story to life. We'll also discuss the director's vision and how the film's cinematography and sound design contribute to its overall sense of dread. Tune in for an in-depth review of why "I Saw the TV Glow" is a must-watch for horror enthusiasts and how it leaves a lasting impact on its audience.

Episode Description: In this episode, we delve into the gripping world of "A Quiet Place" and its equally thrilling sequel, "A Quiet Place Part 2." Join us as we analyze how these films masterfully blend suspense and emotion, creating a nerve-wracking experience where silence is both a tool for survival and a source of tension. We'll discuss the stellar performances and the innovative sound design that immerses viewers in a world where the slightest noise can mean life or death. Additionally, we'll explore the themes of family, resilience, and the human spirit's unyielding fight for survival in the face of unimaginable horror.

In this episode, we take a deep dive into the intricacies of "Stopmotion," a meticulously crafted film that showcases the artistry and dedication behind this unique animation technique and the horror it can create. Join us as we discuss what we loved and hated, and what we think this film is trying to say about trauma and its effect on creativity.

In this episode, we take a critical look at "The Dark and the Wicked," a 2020 horror film. Join us as we dissect Bryan Bertino's direction and the film's narrative structure, highlighting the moments where the story feels disjointed or the scares may not be effective. We'll explore why the movie's reliance on redundant imagery ultimately undermines its thematic purpose. If you're wondering whether this film is worth your time, tune in to hear our in-depth analysis and why "The Dark and the Wicked" may or may not live up to its chilling reputation.

Episode Summary:

• Hannah and Matt Dalton start by expressing their reluctance to discuss the film Smile, with Hannah noting that the film left them with strong negative feelings. 

• Smile is a 2022 horror film written and directed by Parker Finn, based on his 2020 short film Laura Hasn't Slept. The short film won awards at South by Southwest but is noted to have a different plot from the feature film. P

• The main actress in Smile is Sosie Bacon, who is the daughter of Kevin Bacon. The hosts discuss Bacon’s performance and other actors in the film, noting that while the performances were competent, the film’s issues were not due to acting quality. 

• The hosts reflect on their personal connections to the movie, including a humorous anecdote about one of them being a clown ghoul at Six Flags, which they feel is related to the movie’s themes of creepy smiles. 

• The hosts express their disappointment with the film, describing it as uninspired and not living up to its hype. They criticize it for relying on cheap jump scares and a poor mental health allegory. The hosts agree that the movie is not particularly scary, with only a few startling moments. 

• The discussion concludes with a critique of how the movie handles serious themes like suicide, arguing that it does so poorly and without sensitivity, ultimately failing to deliver a meaningful horror experience.

• The podcast criticizes the movie for its confusing thematic elements, especially the disconnect between the supposed message about trauma and the plot devices like suicide and murder used to resolve the conflict.

•  The review expresses frustration with the film’s reliance on hallucinations, which are considered a lazy trope. The hallucinations are seen as predictable and detracting from the story’s impact. 

• Visuals vs. Storytelling: While the movie features impressive visuals and creature design, such as a striking climax scene with a skinless creature, these elements are criticized for lacking relevance to the film's narrative, making them feel like superficial additions. 

• The movie is described as using a hodgepodge of cinematic techniques—like Dutch angles and unnecessary transitions—that ultimately detract from the storytelling rather than enhancing it. 

• The podcast criticizes the film for relying on the trope of miscommunication and characters not explaining their situations clearly, which is seen as a lazy storytelling device. 

• The film’s attempt to address isolation and grief is seen as ineffective, as it fails to acknowledge the existence of support systems and resources for dealing with trauma. 

• The movie is criticized for lacking a distinctive style or art direction, making it visually unremarkable and contributing to a sense of corporate, generic filmmaking.

Episode Description: In this episode we turn our attention to the dark and unforgettable world of David Fincher's 1995 masterpiece, Se7en. Join us as we delve into the twisted mind of John Doe and the harrowing journey of detectives Mills and Somerset. We'll explore the film's chilling atmosphere, groundbreaking storytelling, and the profound impact it's had on the genre. From the meticulous depiction of the seven deadly sins to the unforgettable climax, we leave no stone unturned. Whether you're a long-time fan or a first-time viewer, this episode promises an in-depth analysis that will make you appreciate the sinister brilliance of Se7en even more.

Episode Summary:

• The film is compared to Knives Out, with opinions that it’s a smart film but not as well-executed as Knives Out. 

• The movie’s food and restaurant setting were designed with input from real fine dining professionals. The style of the film is praised for its cohesive and deliberate design.

• The s’mores course in the movie is inspired by Dominique Crenn’s real-life restaurant dishes. The film also draws from Greek mythology, particularly the story of Tantalus, to underline the chef's motivations. 

• The hosts praise the film's distinct and cohesive style, noting that it complements the kitchen and culinary themes. They appreciate the sharp editing and deliberate visual style.

• The podcast highlights a film's respectful portrayal of sex workers, contrasting it with the typical vilification seen in movies. The characters are depicted as service providers, akin to waiters, reflecting solidarity among workers. 

• Nicholas Hoult’s character is noted for his surprising twist and the revelation that he was aware of the impending tragedy. This unexpected plot development adds depth to his role and is seen as a standout moment. Ray Fiennes is appreciated for his serious and charismatic portrayal of his character, making the film more engaging. His role is compared to his performance in "The Grand Budapest Hotel," emphasizing his range and talent. 

• The podcast discusses the film’s setting, which remains confined to the kitchen, avoiding typical horror tropes like slasher elements. This single-location setting is praised for its effectiveness in creating a compelling and original story. 

• Critique of "Eat the Rich" Trend: The film’s attempt to critique the "Eat the Rich" trend is viewed as less impactful compared to films like "Parasite" and "Knives Out." The podcast notes that the film doesn’t quite reach the same level of critique or nuance. 

• There’s a discussion about the film’s commentary on art's accessibility. The podcast suggests the film effectively critiques how passion and creativity can be stifled by commercialization and exclusivity in the art world. 

• The podcast explores how the film uses dishes served during the meal to symbolize various themes, such as the disconnect between high cuisine and the common people, and the impact of trends and critics on artistic expression. 

• The podcast appreciates the humor and satire in the film, particularly how it pokes fun at fine dining culture and the pretentiousness of food critics, with specific examples like the "breadless bread plate." 

• "Man's Folly" Dish: This dish symbolizes the challenges women face in creative fields, particularly the lack of respect and prevalence of sexual harassment. The men in the scene have to endure humiliation as a form of reparation for the women. 

• Tyler represents people who criticize from the sidelines without genuine understanding or skill. His passion for cooking is superficial, lacking the true art and depth of the craft, which leads to his downfall. The discussion touches on how social media influencers impact food culture, focusing more on status and image rather than the genuine experience or quality of the food.

• The final dish, a cheeseburger, is significant because it allows the main character to express a genuine appreciation for food, which resonates with Chef and ultimately helps her escape. This moment highlights the contrast between true appreciation and superficial consumption. 

• Anya Taylor-Joy's character's genuine appreciation for Chef’s craft is a pivotal moment that earns her survival. The ending where she takes the cheeseburger and escapes is seen as both a clever and fitting resolution.

Episode Summary:

• The hosts praise the movie's marketing, highlighting its creative approach, especially given director Oz Perkins' decision to keep Nicolas Cage out of the posters and trailers. The marketing strategy resulted in Long Legs becoming Neon’s highest-grossing weekend debut, with $22.6 million domestically. 

• The hosts compare the movie's dread-filled atmosphere to that of Hereditary, with both films leaving the audience with a sense of unease. They note that while Long Legs may not be the scariest movie of the year, it excels in creating tension and discomfort. 

• Nicolas Cage's performance is discussed in detail, with the hosts debating whether his portrayal is classic Cage or if he subverts expectations. They admire his ability to bring intensity to his roles, even in films that might not be considered critically successful. 

• The film is directed by Oz Perkins, son of Anthony Perkins who is known for playing Norman Bates in Psycho. The hosts acknowledge his previous work, such as The Blackcoat's Daughter, and how his unique style contributes to the eerie atmosphere of Long Legs. 

• Maika Monroe, who plays the FBI agent, is praised for delivering the best performance in the film. The hosts emphasize her status as a modern-day "Scream Queen" and her ability to choose strong scripts, indicating trust in her judgment for quality projects. 

• The movie's distinct style and aesthetic are highlighted, with the hosts noting the use of older footage, aspect ratio changes, and textured visuals that enhance the film's unsettling tone. 

• Before diving into spoilers, the hosts strongly recommend seeing the movie in theaters, emphasizing its worthiness of the big-screen experience and how it provides a thrilling and unsettling ride. 

• The dolls in the film are inspired by voodoo dolls and the idea of using effigies to harm others. Although different from traditional voodoo practices, the dolls in the film symbolize a way to introduce evil into the home. 

• The ending of the film is criticized for being rushed, particularly regarding the reveal of the mother’s involvement. The host feels that the final part of the movie was less creative and wrapped up too neatly. The film’s incorporation of supernatural elements and themes of inherent evil are compared to the TV show Twin Peaks, with some disappointment over the film’s more straightforward resolution. 

• The podcast explores the film’s critical view of Christianity, suggesting that it portrays Christianity as a source of evil, especially when used to justify harmful actions. The host shares a personal anecdote about experiencing religious intolerance, connecting it to the film’s themes of using religious beliefs to justify evil actions.

Episode Summary:

• The hosts polled their Instagram followers about their favorite horror movies of the year. While responses included films like "Abigail," "Late Night with the Devil," and "Long Legs," both hosts expressed their strong preference for "I Saw the TV Glow," which they consider a top movie of the year. 

• The hosts discuss the background of "A Quiet Place: Day One," highlighting that Michael Sarnoski was chosen to direct after his work on "Pig." They praise the cast, including Lupita Nyong'o, Joseph Quinn, and Alex Wolff, and note that Wolff also starred in "Pig." 

• A significant part of the discussion focuses on the character Sam's cat, Frodo, in the movie. The hosts reveal that the cat was played by two real cats, Nico and Schnitzel, despite initial suggestions to use CGI. They also share that Lupita Nyong'o overcame her fear of cats through exposure therapy for the role.

• The hosts mention that "A Quiet Place: Day One" has an 87% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, which is the lowest of the three "Quiet Place" movies. They find it interesting that even the lowest-rated film in the series still received a relatively high score. 

• Hannah and Matt share their personal reactions to the movie. Matt, who doesn't generally love "A Quiet Place" movies as much as Hannah, found this installment more enjoyable than the previous two. They discuss the effectiveness of the film's setting, the creatures, and the decision to move away from the complete silence that defined earlier films in the series. 

• The hosts praise the film's atmosphere, particularly the scenes involving the creatures. They highlight how the creatures are scarier when appearing in swarms, especially in a city setting. 

• The hosts discuss the film's ending where Sam sacrifices herself by distracting creatures, ensuring Frodo and Eric's safety. The moment where she unplugs her headphones and faces the creature is highlighted as deeply impactful, symbolizing her acceptance of death on her own terms. 

• Sam's journey from pessimism to peace is a central theme. Her final moments, accompanied by Nina Simone’s "Feeling Good," illustrate her embracing her fate after a fulfilling last day. The ending of the film is praised for elevating the overall experience, making the hosts appreciate the movie more. The final act is seen as a powerful conclusion that ties the story together. 

• The relationship between Sam and Eric is described as more than romantic tension; it's a deep connection between two people, which becomes the emotional core of the film. 

• The hosts appreciate the film's use of real New York locations, such as the burned-down pizzeria, which adds authenticity to the story. The quest for pizza becomes a relatable and endearing subplot. 

• The film explores themes of mortality, terminal illness, and the acceptance of death, particularly through Sam’s terminal cancer. The hosts discuss how these themes are handled with nuance and emotional weight.

•  Sam’s relationship with her cat, Frodo, is emphasized as a crucial element that humanizes her and makes her more relatable. The cat also plays a significant role in the plot, creating emotional bonds between characters. 

• The discussion touches on the challenges of being a prequel, where the film had to meet certain expectations while still trying to carve out its own identity. This leads to some scenes feeling obligatory rather than organic. 

Episode Summary:

• The episode opens with a light-hearted discussion about Hogwarts houses, where Kiana identifies as Slytherin, Hannah also identifies as Slytherin, and Matt aligns with Gryffindor, though he is also considered a Hufflepuff by the others. 

• The trio discusses their favorite characters from the Harry Potter series, with Kiana favoring Neville Longbottom for his significant character growth, Hannah favoring Lupin and Sirius Black for their heroism and depth, and Matt choosing Snape, though he acknowledges the character's controversial nature. They delve into the nuances of these characters, particularly how the books provide more context for their development, which the movies sometimes lack. 

• Kiana shares her evolving preference for favorite books in the series, initially favoring "Goblet of Fire" for its competition aspect, but later appreciating "Order of the Phoenix" for its emotional depth and well-written villains like Umbridge. Hannah's favorite book is "Half-Blood Prince," particularly for its exploration of Voldemort's backstory and how it sets up the final act of the series.

• The podcast emphasizes their stance against the author J.K. Rowling's controversial comments, especially regarding the transgender community, and expresses solidarity with the LGBTQ+ community. They appreciate the hard work of the creatives and actors involved in the films, who have also spoken out against Rowling's views. 

• The discussion moves into the rankings of the Harry Potter films, with "Deathly Hallows Part 1" and "Half-Blood Prince" receiving criticism for being less engaging, with issues like poor chemistry between characters, unnecessary scenes, and the challenges of adapting books into movies. Deathly Hallows Part 1 faced criticism for its dark and hard-to-see visuals, as well as its slow pacing. However, the "Tale of the Three Brothers" scene was praised for its creative storytelling and beautiful animation. 

• The hosts express their dissatisfaction with "Deathly Hallows Part 2," particularly with the depiction of Voldemort's death, which deviates from the book's thematic message, and criticize the film for its liberties that don't align with the source material's tone and message.

• Hosts agreed that "Chamber of Secrets" is overly long, especially given it's based on one of the shorter books. They felt that the movie tried too hard to be faithful to the book, resulting in unnecessary scenes like the extended basilisk chase. While "Chamber of Secrets" had its issues, the introduction of Dobby was a highlight. 

• The hosts placed "Goblet of Fire" in their top four, noting its solid adaptation, excellent special effects, and strong performances, particularly highlighting the Triwizard Tournament and the return of Voldemort. However, they criticized the film's separation from the main plot. 

• Ranked highly for its perfect introduction to the magical world of Harry Potter, the hosts praised Sorcerer's Stone movie for its strong performances from the young actors, tight storytelling, and impressive world-building that set the stage for the entire series. 

• The hosts ranked "Order of the Phoenix" as their second favorite movie, praising Imelda Staunton's portrayal of Umbridge and the visually stunning battle at the Ministry of Magic. They also appreciated the emotional depth of Harry's grief over Sirius' death. The climactic duel between Dumbledore and Voldemort in "Order of the Phoenix" was highlighted as one of the best moments in the series, with the movie successfully capturing the intensity of their confrontation. Despite some critiques of potential corniness, the hosts agreed that the emotional resonance of scenes like Harry fighting off Voldemort's possession due to his love for his friends was thematically important and well-executed in the film.

• Prisoner of Azkaban was ultimately rated as the best film of the series

Episode Summary

• Introduction and Guest Introduction: The hosts, Hannah and Matt, introduce themselves and their special guest, Rick, from Rick's Horror Review Show. They express their excitement for finally having Rick on the podcast after months of planning. Rick's Background: Rick shares about his podcast, where he reviews horror films, often incorporating comedic elements and improv. He mentions his presence on Instagram, TikTok, YouTube, and Spotify.

• Movie Review Introduction: The group discusses the movie they watched for this episode, "In a Violent Nature," a horror thriller that was released in theaters at the end of May. The movie is written and directed by Chris Nash, featuring mostly unknown actors, except for Lauren Marie Taylor. 

• Discussion of the Movie's Background: Hannah provides some background on the movie, including that it’s Chris Nash’s first feature film and that it had the widest theatrical release for any IFC film. She also mentions production challenges, including location issues and a major recasting, which led to 70% of the movie being reshot. 

• Initial Impressions: The hosts and Rick discuss their initial impressions of the movie. They appreciate the concept of the movie being from the killer's perspective but feel that the execution was lacking. They express disappointment, especially given the intriguing premise. 

• Cinematography and Technical Issues: They critique the cinematography and technical aspects of the movie, noting that while the film had some beautiful outdoor scenes, the overall production quality felt amateurish, reminiscent of a student film. They also discuss issues with shot selection and inconsistent camera work. 

• Lack of Tension and Engagement: The group agrees that the movie failed to build tension or engage the audience, mainly due to the killer’s perspective removing the suspense. They felt disconnected from the victims and uninterested in their fates, which lessened the impact of the horror elements. 

• Discussion on Story and Character Development: The hosts and Rick discuss the movie’s weak story and lack of character development. They mention that the characters were not well-developed, which made it difficult to care about their survival. They also critique the movie's attempt to gain sympathy for the victims midway through, which felt inconsistent. 

• Comparison to Other Slashers: They compare "In a Violent Nature" to other slasher films, particularly the "Friday the 13th" series, which they are not fond of. They mention how this movie failed to stand out in the slasher genre and did not live up to the potential of its unique concept.

• The hosts discuss the director's intention to treat the film like a nature documentary, drawing comparisons between unsuspecting tourists approaching dangerous animals and characters in horror films underestimating threats. There’s humor in how the film's depiction of the killer resembles a wild animal, with the hosts noting the absurdity of tourists getting too close to dangerous creatures, likening it to the characters' behavior in the movie. 

• The film's tone was inconsistent, failing to fully commit to either a serious or comedic approach. The hosts felt it should have leaned more into the humor, possibly with a Snoop Dogg narration (LOL). A particular scene where the killer plays with a toy car is highlighted as a moment that worked, portraying the killer as having a childlike mentality, reminiscent of Jason Voorhees from the "Friday the 13th" series. The hosts express frustration that the film didn’t fully embrace this childlike depiction of the killer, which could have made the movie more entertaining and innovative. 

• The hosts discuss the tension in the film, particularly in a scene with the final girl in a car, noting it was unsettling despite the film not being conventionally scary. 

• The hosts critique the film's writing, especially a lengthy and poorly executed monologue towards the end, which they felt was unnecessary and detracted from the overall experience.

Episode Summary

• The hosts discuss the fact that Trap was allowed to film during the SAG-AFTRA strikes because Shyamalan independently financed the movie. They also share some background on how Josh Hartnett was cast, with Shyamalan choosing him after bonding over their shared experiences as fathers of daughters. 

• Matt emphasizes his strong admiration for M. Night Shyamalan, describing himself as a "Shyamalan truther." He enjoys most of Shyamalan’s work, particularly Signs, The Sixth Sense, Old, and Knock at the Cabin. He discusses how Shyamalan creates a heightened reality in his films, similar to David Lynch’s style. 

• The hosts highlight the unique stylistic choices Shyamalan makes in Trap, such as using extreme close-ups and avoiding typical shot-reverse-shot techniques. 

• They praise the film's cinematography, which helps create an intimate and immersive experience for the audience. 

• The discussion shifts to the movie’s reception, with the hosts expressing surprise at the film's mixed reviews. They argue that Trap successfully balances Shyamalan’s signature style with a more accessible narrative, making it enjoyable for both fans and non-fans of the director. 

• The hosts reflect on the film's portrayal of the serial killer protagonist, noting how the movie stays focused on his perspective throughout. 

• They appreciate Josh Hartnett's performance, particularly his ability to convey the character’s emotions and thoughts subtly. 

• The hosts debate whether the movie slows down after the concert scene, with one feeling the post-concert events elevate the film, while the other feels it loses momentum. 

• There is criticism of the film's portrayal of the killer's hallucinations and psychological motivations, with one host finding these elements unnecessary and poorly executed. There is a discussion on the portrayal of OCD in the film, with one host appreciating how it explains the killer's meticulousness, while the other criticizes the tendency to depict people with mental illnesses as villains. 

• The podcast explores the theme of parenthood in the film, noting that the killer is attempting to be a good parent while grappling with his own traumatic past, which adds depth to his character. 

• The hosts appreciate the film's ability to make the audience sympathize with the killer despite his actions, noting the director's skill in creating this moral conflict. 

• The film's structure is praised for its decision to drop the audience into the story without much backstory, allowing the tension to build naturally without relying on extensive exposition. 

• The hosts enjoy the film's unique approach of setting the horror in daylight and confining the story to a single day, which they find adds to the tension and intensity. 

• They highlight the film's balance of tension and humor, particularly praising Josh Hartnett's performance for its sincerity and the comedic interactions with other characters. 

• The podcast ends with a discussion on the film's themes, particularly the parallels between the serial killer's struggle with work-life balance and the director's own experiences, adding a meta layer to the narrative.

Horror thriller movie Psychological horror film Suspense thriller movie

Episode Summary

• The hosts criticize the movie's trailers for not accurately representing the film, making it seem like a gaslighting psychological thriller 

• Behind the scenes facts: The movie was shot on film, which the hosts praise for adding a textured and beautiful visual style, enhanced by the stunning backdrop of the German Alps. ASL is used throughout the movie, with Hunter Schafer already familiar with the language due to her experiences in middle school, only needing a refresher for her role. 

• The hosts highlight Dan Stevens' role as a "weirdo character" with a strong German accent, adding that Stevens is almost fluent in German, which is evident in his performance.

• The hosts emphasize the uniqueness of the movie’s story and praise its tight script, where every plot point has a cause and effect, and even seemingly minor details have thematic relevance. 

• Schafer’s performance is described as compelling and central to the movie's success, while Stevens is noted for his effective supporting role. The family members are considered serviceable, with Alma, the mute sister, being particularly endearing. 

• The hosts acknowledge that while the movie has clear themes, it sometimes lacks nuance or could be more explicit in its messaging - specifically the theme about forced birth. Despite this, they appreciate the film's entertainment value, visual appeal, and performances.

In this spine-chilling episode, we delve into the bizarre and haunting world of Cuckoo (2024). Directed by Tilman Singer, this high-concept horror film takes us to a remote Bavarian resort where 17-year-old Gretchen, played by Hunter Schafer, confronts unimaginable terrors. We’ll explore the film’s eerie atmosphere, disturbing imagery, and the deep psychological themes rooted in grief and identity. Join us as we dissect the performances, particularly Schafer’s intense portrayal, and unravel the mysteries behind the enigmatic Mr. König and the horrifying creature lurking in the shadows. Is Cuckoo a masterpiece of experimental horror, or does its unconventional narrative leave too much to the imagination? Tune in as we give our verdict on this polarizing film.

This week we are covering the top 10 through 6 scariest movies of all time....according to science!

The top 10 scariest horror movies comes from a study that
Broadband Choices conducts every year. Viewers heart rates are monitored, while watch the movie, with multiple variables being tracked that are ultimately turned into a "Scare Score".

In this episode we go through each movie on the list and provide our opinions and some insight into why we think these movies deserve or don't deserve to be in the Top 10.

We are joined by Horror experts Suzie and Lonely from No Bodies.

⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5uvLq8T42VxmGW29xCQtp9?si=216cf9f2343449a8

This week we are covering the top 5 through 1 scariest movies of all time....according to science!

The top 10 scariest horror movies comes from a study that
Broadband Choices conducts every year. Viewers heart rates are monitored, while watch the movie, with multiple variables being tracked that are ultimately turned into a "Scare Score".

In this episode we go through each movie on the list and provide our opinions and some insight into why we think these movies deserve or don't deserve to be in the Top 10.

We are joined by Horror experts Suzie and Lonely from No Bodies.

⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5uvLq8T42VxmGW29xCQtp9?si=216cf9f2343449a8

In this episode we delve into the supernatural world of Oddity, Damian McCarthy's latest psychological horror. Join us as we explore the unsettling story of Darcy, a blind psychic haunted by her twin sister's murder. We’ll break down the film’s chilling atmosphere, its use of sound and silence to build tension, and the masterful performance by Carolyn Bracken. Is Oddity a slow-burn triumph, or do its narrative twists leave too much unsaid? Tune in as we dissect the film’s unsettling themes of grief, revenge, and the fine line between reality and the supernatural. 

⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5uvLq8T42VxmGW29xCQtp9?si=216cf9f2343449a8

In this terrifying episode we’re venturing into the world of Hell House LLC (2015), a found-footage horror gem that has haunted fans for years. Follow us as we dissect the chilling story of a haunted house attraction gone horribly wrong in an abandoned hotel with a sinister past. We’ll explore the film’s effective use of tension and its memorable jump scares that has made it a cult favorite. Tune in as we discuss how Hell House LLC stacks up in the found-footage genre and whether its low-budget execution makes it even scarier. Ready to face the terror within the Abaddon Hotel? Join us—if you dare. This week we are joined by the Horror Café Podcast. 

⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5uvLq8T42VxmGW29xCQtp9?si=216cf9f2343449a8

In this episode we journey deep beneath the streets of Paris to explore the chilling and claustrophobic world of As Above, So Below. This found-footage horror film combines archaeology, mythology, and the occult as a team of explorers ventures into the Paris catacombs in search of the Philosopher’s Stone—only to be confronted by their own personal demons. We’ll break down the film’s unique blend of historical adventure and supernatural horror, its references to Dante’s Inferno, and how it plays on the audience’s fear of the unknown and the underground. Join us as we dissect the film’s most terrifying moments, the psychological twists, and whether As Above, So Below lives up to its cult status in the world of found-footage horror.

⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5uvLq8T42VxmGW29xCQtp9?si=216cf9f2343449a8

In this episode we dive into the grotesque and hilarious world of The Substance, Coralie Fargeat’s latest body horror spectacle. Starring Demi Moore as an aging fitness star desperate to preserve her youth and Margaret Qualley as her younger, twisted counterpart, the film blends absurd comedy with nightmarish transformations. We’ll break down the biting critique of Hollywood’s obsession with beauty standards, the jaw-dropping practical effects, and the bold performances that drive this campy horror. How does Fargeat’s commentary on vanity and ageism hold up in today’s world? And just how revolting can this film get? Join us as we unpack the madness of The Substance and decide if it’s a new body horror classic.

⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5uvLq8T42VxmGW29xCQtp9?si=216cf9f2343449a8

In this episode we take a hard look at Terrifier (2016), the brutal slasher that’s earned a cult following. Join us as we discuss the movie’s gratuitous violence and lack of emotional depth, questioning whether Terrifier is a true horror gem or simply shock value in disguise. We’ll also dive into its use of tension-building and critique whether the film’s practical effects and relentless kills can make up for its narrative shortcomings. If you’re wondering whether the hype around Terrifier is truly justified, this is the episode for you!

⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5uvLq8T42VxmGW29xCQtp9?si=216cf9f2343449a8

Join us for a spooky podcast episode where we review Halloween-themed sitcom episodes. Get ready for some laughs and scares as we dive into the best of TV's Halloween season. Sit back, relax, and enjoy the entertainment!

⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5uvLq8T42VxmGW29xCQtp9?si=216cf9f2343449a8

In this spooky episode, we return to the wacky, supernatural world of Beetlejuice with Tim Burton’s long-awaited sequel. Join us as we discuss Beetlejuice 2, which brings back Michael Keaton as the mischievous poltergeist and Winona Ryder as Lydia Deetz, while introducing Jenna Ortega as Lydia’s daughter. We’ll dive into the film’s mix of nostalgia and new elements, exploring whether Burton’s signature blend of dark comedy and gothic flair holds up. Is Keaton’s Beetlejuice as iconic as ever, or does the sequel fail to recapture the magic of the original? We break down the performances, the storyline, and the fresh spin on a classic, asking the big question: Was this sequel worth it? Don’t miss this deep dive into the afterlife!

⁠https://open.spotify.com/show/5uvLq8T42VxmGW29xCQtp9?si=216cf9f2343449a8

In this unique episode we’re diving into the dark side of the zodiac with a horror movie tailored to each astrological sign. Whether you’re an impulsive Aries looking for a high-octane slasher, a mysterious Scorpio drawn to psychological thrillers, or a sensitive Cancer craving a spine-chilling ghost story, we’ve got you covered. Join us as we explore horror films that capture the essence of each zodiac sign’s energy, personality, and fears. We’ll break down why each pick resonates with its sign and how the themes of each film align with the astrological traits. If you’re ready to see which horror flick aligns with your stars, tune in for a cosmic journey into the terrifying unknown!449a8

In this episode we are reviewing Smile 2, the unsettling sequel that brings the terrifying “Smile Curse” back to haunt a new victim, pop star Skye Riley (Naomi Scott). With director Parker Finn returning, the movie amplifies both the psychological horror and brutal visuals of the first. We dive into the high-stakes scares, the visceral and violent moments, and the chilling scenes that will keep you looking over your shoulder long after the credits roll. Join us as we break down how Smile 2 captures Skye’s fame-fueled vulnerability, the clever use of sound and camerawork, and if this sequel manages to surpass the original. Whether you’re here for the jump scares, the gross kills, or just curious if Smile 2 lives up to the hype, this is an episode you won’t want to miss!

In this episode of Horror Hour with the Hanna's, we dive into Creep (2014), one of the best-rated horror movies of the 2000s, to unpack what makes this found-footage thriller so memorable. Join us as we break down this unique entry in the horror genre, providing in-depth horror movie recaps, exploring the chilling dynamics between the two main characters and discussing the film techniques that contribute to the film's scares. We’ll analyze the horror movie rating, discuss why Creep ranks highly among modern horror films, and explore how it uses minimalism and tension to create a truly unsettling atmosphere. Perfect for fans looking to deepen their understanding of one of the most unsettling horror films best rated for its disturbing simplicity and iconic performances!