This is a public domain image of the Cave of the Hands site in Argentina.
THE LATER STONE AGE (~35 ka)
Art
Our prehistoric ancestors made some incredible images of animals on cave walls, and they did this mainly out of respect but also because they thought their art possessed magical qualities. Humans used all kinds of materials and mediums to create art; paint, clay, and even bones. Their masterpieces most often include depictions of human figures, fertility symbols, and especially animals of the hunt (like mammoths, bears, horses, reindeer, and bison). These animal illustrations that are shared below are quite detailed; yet, they were made on the walls of dark caves that were lit up only by torches and soapstone lamps fed with fat. Certainly, these must have been incredibly patient and talented artists. And their beautiful works suggest that they had some degree of respect for animals. Relevantly, cultural historian Gertrude Rachel Levy called this "a participation in the splendour of the beasts which was of the nature of religion itself" (as cited in [1]). Put differently, humans were so infatuated with animals that they thought it was sacred to create images of wildlife in their cavern sanctuaries. However, there's also quite a bit of this artwork that wasn't created solely for the purpose of honoring animals. Instead, it appears malicious intentions were at play for some of these cave drawings and paintings. Just as many modern tribes believe that crafting an image of an animal can subject it to the artist's power, our ancient ancestors probably thought the same thing. This inference is supported by the fact that archaeologists found a clay bear figurine in Montespan, France that was riddled with dart thrusts [2].
A 13,000-year-old depiction of a wooly mammoth.
See "Rouffignac Cave."
These charcoal drawings of a group of bears were crafted almost 36,000 years ago, at the very beginning of the LSA.
See Hammer, "Beauty of France's Chauvet Cave."
These detailed drawings of some horses were also produced using charcoal.
See Hammer, "Beauty of France's Chauvet Cave."
We can tell that children also crafted art in the LSA since many cave drawings and paintings were crudely made, lack any apparent meaning, and are situated on ceilings that could only be reached if a light person was hoisted up by another. A popular form of art among LSA people were finger flutings or lined decals that were created by running their fingers across clay and moonmilk on the surface of cave walls and ceilings. While the meaning behind these "finger flutings" is much debated by anthropologists today, the most probable explanation is that they were simply the product of lively children and graffiti-minded teenagers. Without any structure or clear subject matter, these finger flutings contrast sharply with the detailed portrayals of majestic animals like bison and mammoths that were undoubtedly produced by adults with steady hands. This supports the idea that finger flutings were made by less-talented artists, such as children. Plus, some of them were drawn on cavern ceilings which were too high for the average person to reach. This means that a smaller and lighter person would have to be hoisted up by another in order to doodle on the moonmilk and clay. I don't know about you, but this makes me think of a child pestering their parent until they get to draw on the ceiling! Further, children were busy with other forms of cave art besides finger fluting, including crude drawings of animals and people, as well as handprints made with red ocher (see the cover image for this tab). Fascinatingly, judging by the size of said handprints, most of these artistic children were between 2 to 5 years old [3].
Like the depiction of the mammoth above, these finger flutings came from Rouffignac Cave in France. Notice how this design lacks any real substance. Rather, it looks like the artist just made a bunch of free-flow lines for the fun of it.
See Bower, "Children of Prehistory," p. 264.
These finger fluting designs were likely created by a child who was lifted by someone else since they were drawn on the ceiling of Rouffignac Cave.
See Bower, "Children of Prehistory," p. 265.
See Wynn and Coolidge, "A Stone-Age Meeting of Minds," p. 49.
The Lion-man of Hohlenstein-Stadel may not have a clear meaning, but it still serves as a reminder of just how creative and smart humans were in the LSA. As stated previously, humans sculpted figurines for many different reasons. Sometimes, they did so because they felt they could control animals and better their chances of catching dinner. Other times, it was out of a deep admiration for animals. But what makes the Lion-man of Hohlenstein-Stadel so enigmatic is that it is a depiction of some kind of hybrid creature. The 32,000-year-old ivory figurine from south-western Germany embodies a beast that is part man, part lion, and its meaning is utterly mysterious. Since it's an imaginary creature, it probably wasn't created for the shamanic purpose of assisting in the hunt. Perhaps instead it was a character in some campfire legend that was finally sculpted in ivory. Or maybe the image-maker felt the need to self-actualize through their art and they thought of themself as being lion-like in how strong they were. Either way, that they "could so deftly merge these concepts suggests that he or she must have had mental capacities similar to those of modern peopleā [4]. The fact that humans were creating art which was more complex than anything that came before is a sure mark of their unparalleled intelligence.
Clothing
See Wong, "The Caveman's New Clothes," p. 34.
Humanity's interest in producing other things besides tools that could aid in survival is a sign that, since the dawn of the LSA, they began searching for ways to self-actualize and express themselves. This Venus figurine from Kostenki, Russia is yet another piece of religious iconography as it symbolizes nature worship among humans. But more than that, this Venus can clue us in on how people in the LSA dressed. The first image that typically pops into one's mind when discussing a caveman is a feral, bearded man wearing animal hides. No doubt, there's some truth to this characterization. However, the figurine displayed here does not sport any hide-wear. Rather, she's shown with textiles and a woven cap. And this isn't the only example; other Venuses have string skirts, bandeus, snoods, sashes, and belts as part of their attire. In fact, close examination of these figurines "reveal that all the representations of apparel clearly depict fiber-based items, as opposed to hide-wear" [5]. This means that early humans donned other clothes besides animal hides; and thus, they engaged in more activities than just hunting. This interest in producing other things besides weapons would have been totally foreign to the australopithecines of the ESA. Unlike the hominids that came before them, humans stopped making survival their only priority as they explored new frontiers and went on to form entire civilizations.