2020/12/08
Assignment 3 : Integrated analysis of health issues in Canada
2020/12/08
Assignment 3 : Integrated analysis of health issues in Canada
This last blog post for the course Foundation of health systems in Canada MHST 601 serves as an integrated review of the different topics we looked at during this Fall 2020 semester.
Unit 1: Interprofessional connectedness via digital-social media presence
At the beginning of this semester, we looked at what is a social media presence and what it entails professionally. At the time of my first blog I came across a short article that in my opinion summed up nicely what social media presence means. Haley Schluter (2014) mentions there are three elements to one’s social media presence: frequency, content and engagement. With this definition in mind, I can positively say that since this past September I have been regularly present on social media via my own eportfolio, and Twitter. I have been engaging with different content and topics at each posting, keeping in mind a critical analysis, an objective view about the content of my posts so to act responsibly and accordance to the codes of ethics of both provincial (OIIQ) and national (CNA) order of nurses. As I posted in my first blog I signed up to Twitter for the purpose of this course. I have been following a few classmates, our instructor and a few professional organisations of interest and relevant to my profession (operating room nurse) such as ORNAC, AORN, CNA, OIIQ. I have been using my Twitter account throughout the semester in order to fulfill the weekly learning activities and that of fellow classmates. I must say I am not at all impressed with this application and I do not intend to continue using it either for personal or professional purposes. My professional social identity will remain with LinkedIn which I have had for several years now.
At the start of this course, my intentions were to make use of this eportfolio for educational purposes, and maybe eventually for professional reasons. However, I wish I had known about the limitations of the webpage platform that I selected for my eportfolio. I chose Google Sites and although relatively easy to use it is very limited in the visual presentation aspect of creating a blog page. And if I can make a suggestion, I would not recommend it. Looking at my classmates eportfolios, the Wix app was definitely the most popular and I personally feel it gives a much more polish and professional look and feel, just a thought!
Unit 2: Health systems in Canada
The Government of Canada Health care system website is a good tool to understand the chronology of our health care system in this country. During this course we have looked at the most significant and defining political decisions that have structured our health care system thus far:
And as we have seen, it is also time to renew how we define our universal access to health care. The Ottawa Charter of 1986 is still a transformative platform for healthcare today as recalled by Potvin & Jones (2011) in Twenty-five Years After the Ottawa Charter: The Critical Role of Health Promotion for Public Health:
health promotion has started to permeate and transform public health systems. (... ) the most significant of these trends is the integration of health promotion as a specific function for public health. In the UK, Canada and Quebec, for example, laws and public health policy documents explicitly recognize health promotion as a core public health function, on par with more traditional functions such as protection, prevention or surveillance.
They go on to explain that two more objectives need to support “...health equity as an overarching objective for national public health programs” and “the adoption of (...) instruments that promote health in all policies as a principle of governance.”
From a practical perspective, the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) proposes two key elements for a better health system: reducing the waiting time for access to service while managing a sustainable health system. CNA’s position in Registered Nurses: Stepping Up To Transform Health Care (2013) proposes that by reducing the waiting time for access to health service, Canadians' health will improve. A sustainable healthcare system has to be cost effective, of quality and accessible to all. Nurses have already put into motion that concept by going to the communities, by promoting a multidisciplinary collaborative practice approach and by being more efficient with resources. From the concept of coordination, where nurses hold a liaison position that allows them to better coordinate patient care while facilitating the continuity of care. And, the evolution of the act of prescribing as a means to a more efficient healthcare system for canadians. In the larger scope of things, Flood (2016) states in her presentation Modernizing the Canada Health Act, two main issues that must be addressed: 1- health services must remain universal (i.e. accessible to all) and encompass a broader array of health services such as to include dental, medications (prescription), mental health, community and home base services. Secondly, not all health services should be funded, but all should be based on “fair and open process”.
Units 3 & 4: Multilevel approaches to health: understanding determinants of health
Further than the definition of health by the World Health Organization (WHO), we now acknowledge that health is beyond the absence of disease. Health is multifactorial and encompasses individual and personal elements, geo-socio-economic factors, education, environment, etc. The main determinants of health according to the Government of Canada are
Income and social status
Employment and working conditions
Education and literacy
Childhood experiences
Physical environments
Social supports and coping skills
Healthy behaviours
Access to health services
Biology and genetic endowment
Gender
Culture
Race / Racism
The conceptual framework for health and its determinants as defined by the Ministry of Health and Social Services of Québec encompasses four areas : global context, systems, environment or life settings and individual characteristics; with the main focus being the health status of the population which concerns global health, physical, mental and psychosocial factors.
The fundamental premise of all multilevel models of health is health equity. Defined by the Government of Canada as “(the) absence of unfair systems and policies that cause health inequalities. Health equity seeks to reduce inequalities and to increase access to opportunities and conditions conducive to health for all.” The use of a model or framework is to structure and determine actions and/or interventions concerning the determinants of health. As noted by the Canadian Council in A Review of Frameworks on the Determinants of Health, there are six key points that have been identified “as relevant to advancing action on the determinants of health”. These are: the use of a 1- holistic and 2- intersectoral approach; 3- the recognition of social exclusion; 4- the role of individuals and communities; 5- the importance of upstream action; and 6- the clear identification of interactions between determinants. Furthermore, Magna (2017) discusses in Social Determinants of Health 101 for Health Care: Five Plus Five, that
In our endeavour to create models that help us determine the effectiveness and efficacy of social health interventions, we must take into consideration not to turn every program or action into a medical approach; instead community or local based interventions may ultimately prove to be more cost-effective.
Units 5 & 6: Prevention, management of chronic diseases & Vulnerable populations
In 2017, the Chronic Disease Prevention Alliance of Canada (CDPAC) forecasted that “chronic diseases and other illnesses cost the Canadian economy $190 billion annually, with $122 billion in indirect income and productivity losses, and $68 billion in direct health care costs”. As further discussed by Fortin et al. (2013) “chronic diseases represent a considerable challenge for the health care system owing to their prevalence, their direct and indirect costs, and their effects on patient health outcomes and quality of life”. Their article Evaluating the integration of chronic disease prevention and management services into primary health care explains that chronic disease prevention and management aka CDPM was made a priority by the Quebec Ministry of Health and Social Services
by developing a reference framework for CDPM based on the chronic care model (CCM).The purpose of this framework was very broad: to advocate CDPM as a key feature of primary care, to support best practices in relation to CDPM, to better integrate CDPM into a continuum of services, and to mobilize all stakeholders concerned with chronic diseases.
As we will see in the future directions of health, the prevention and management of chronic diseases remains an health objective by all levels of government.
Vulnerable populations
When looking at vulnerable populations, we see that there is a clear link between chronic diseases and vulnerable populations especially the Indigenous communities in Canada. First Nations suffer disproportionately higher rates of chronic disease such as diabetes and infant mortality when compared to non-Indigenous people. The Kelowna Accord of 2005 had opened a doorway to bridging the gaps in the health inequities with aggressive objectives, as cited by Richmond & Cook (2016):
targets were established to reduce infant mortality, youth suicide, childhood obesity and diabetes by 20 % in five years, and 50 % in 10 years. Targets were also set to double the number of Aboriginal health professionals in 10 years to 300 physicians and 2400 nurses.
With the newly elected conservative government of Stephen Harper in 2006, the accord was pushed aside and instead the Health Council of Canada was established. It too was dismantled by the Conservative government not long after. As pointed out by the Frontline Health Care in Canada: Innovations in Delivering Services to Vulnerable Populations (2006) report, there is jurisdictional ambiguity in the division of power when it comes to indigenous health, a tug-of-war between federal, provincial and territorial governments.
Unit 7: Future directions _ Trends in health
When researching the topic of health trends, I was fascinated by the new technological advancements presented. Even though I truly believe that some of these scientific applications can propel health and medicine to new heights, they also bring forth ethical issues that our society has not dealt with. In practical terms, I think the reality is that we are far from being able to use these technologies in our professional practice any time soon. Wearing personal sensors transmitting data to our physician, artificial intelligence (AI) assisted robots taking vital signs, or DNA sequencing to rule out if we are carriers of a certain disease are fabulous innovations that can certainly revolutionize the way we understand health and the roles of health professionals. Despite the fact that these new technological innovations may be affordable to some; the Canadian reality is that we must deal with an increasing financial burden of our health expenditure, and make the most of our money. Canada's health care system has been faced with challenges that will persist in the near future. These factors are the delivery of services, the financial significance of those services, the aging of our population, and “the cost of new technology”. In order to confront these challenges, the federal government has defined four directions to favor:
1- primary care :
reforms have focused on primary health care delivery, including setting up more community primary health care centres that provide on-call services around-the-clock; creating primary health care teams; placing greater emphasis on promoting health, preventing illness and injury, and managing chronic diseases; increasing coordination and integration of comprehensive health services; and improving the work environments of primary health care providers.
2- ehealth or electronic health records (EHR);
3- reducing the wait times for access to acute care,
4- patient safety: “including the avoidance of medical errors or adverse events, is one of the most significant issues facing health systems globally.
To conclude this integrated analysis of Foundations of Canadian health systems (MHST 601) and in particular when discussing health trends in Canada, we should look at what the federal government decided to focus on. The video Health of Canadians 2019 explains clearly what are the federal government’s health priorities: chronic diseases, vaccination, drug resistant bacteria, sexually transmitted infections, alcohol consumption, vaping, opioid usage, health inequities due to sex, gender, race, sexual orientation, and the impact of climate on health.
We are still trying to manage the unbalanced universal access to health care in this country especially concerning the vulnerable populations. According to the Health and Well-Being of Quebec’s population webpage (2014) “These inequalities (...) related to poverty, result among other things in a lower life expectancy and higher rates of chronic disease, drug and alcohol dependency and Youth Protection interventions”.
Professionally speaking, we have seen in these last few years a shift from tertiary-focus-care to primary care with greater efforts deployed towards home-based health services. In the province of Quebec, the aging population 65 and over is expected to reach 25% by 2031. This projected reality imposes political choices concerning the health priorities of our province knowing fully that an aging population suffers more from “chronic diseases, cognitive disorders and disabilities in daily life”, we need to adapt and evolve our health care services to reflect that upcoming future.
Let us use technology and scientific discoveries to help mind the gap, reduce inequalities to access to health care, and to promote global holistic health care. Subscribe to and apply the “Health in All Policies” framework by the World Health Organization (WHO) both at federal and provincial jurisdictions.
References
Canadian Nurses Association. (2013). Registered Nurses: Stepping Up To Transform Health Care. https://www.cnaaiic.ca/~/media/cna/files/en/registered_nurses_stepping_up_to_transform_health_care.pdf
Canadian Council on Social Determinants of Health (2015). A Review of Frameworks on the Determinants of Health. http://ccsdh.ca/images/uploads/Frameworks_Report_English.pdf
Chronic Disease Prevention Alliance of Canada.(2017). 2018 pre-budget submission to the House of Commons Standing Committee on
Flood, C. M. & Thomas, B. P. (2016). Modernizing the Canada Health Act. Ottawa Faculty of Law Working Paper No.2017-08. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2907029
Fortin, M., Chouinard, M. C., Bouhali, T., Dubois, M. F., Gagnon, C., & Bélanger, M. (2013). Evaluating the integration of chronic disease prevention and management services into primary health care. BMC health services research, 13, 132. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-13-132
Healthy Canadians. ( 2020, February, 06). Health of Canadians 2019. [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/omA3yaruV14
Government of Canada. (2020, October 07). Social determinants of health and health inequalities. https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/health-promotion/population-health/what-determines-health.html
Gouvernement du Québec.(2014,April 10). The Health and Well-Being of Québec's Population. https://www.msss.gouv.qc.ca/en/reseau/systeme-de-sante-et-de-services-sociaux-en-bref/etat-de-sante-et-bien-etre-de-la-population-quebecoise/
Magna, S. (2017, October 9). Social Determinants of Health 101 for Health Care: Five Plus Five. NAM Perspectives. Discussion Paper, National Academy of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.31478/201710c
Potvin, Louise & Jones, Catherine. (2011). Twenty-five Years After the Ottawa Charter: The Critical Role of Health Promotion for Public Health. Canadian journal of public health. Revue canadienne de santé publique. 102. 244-8. 10.1007/BF03404041.
Richmond, C.A.M., Cook, C. (2016). Creating conditions for Canadian aboriginal health equity: the promise of healthy public policy. Public Health Reviews, 37, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-016-0016-5
Schluter, Haley. (2014, June 11). Social Media Presence | What is it?Strategic Revolution.http://strategicrevolution.com/social-media-presence
Digital health - Digital medicine - Genomics - Artificial Intelligence (AI)
For this unit the future of health, I decided to look at what the technological advancements predict for the near future. From different resources in my curated content Unit 7, there is a consistent pattern that appears with regards to the three top technological utilities of the future and their practical application.
- digital medecine/health using sensors that will relay live data to our health professionals. As mentioned in the different resources, the main purpose will serve to monitor patients' condition in real time, communicate the information to the health care professional in a clinic or hospital setting who will then respond to the at home patient. Saving time, and money not to mention reduction of hospital acquired infections and diseases.
- artificial intelligence or AI: AI integrates all the personal, medical, diagnostic data, extract accurate diagnostics, treatment options, monitoring tools and applications. It is a “virtual coach” as stated by Dr. Eric Topol in the YouTube video Is this the future of health? It will also promote patients to take charge of their health, allow health professionals to spend time with patients and not simply filling out paperwork.
- genetic testing: DNA sequencing tests made available to all; results available in hours; can be used for diagnostic purposes, treatments and prevention of disease therefore, cutting short the potential for the development of chronic diseases.
By learning more about this particular aspect of the future of health, I have discovered the works of Leroy Hood, the P4 medicine and the Scientific Wellness program. Professor Aaron Ciechanover in his 2017 Tedx Talks The future of medicine, presented Hood's work, P4 medicine as the “3rd revolution of medicine” for the 21st century. P4 medicine concept is defined by four components: predictive, preventative, personalized, and participatory. As explained by Fiala, Taher & al.,(2018) “Dr. Leroy Hood (...) demonstrate(s) his framework to detect and prevent disease through extensive biomarker testing, close monitoring, deep statistical analysis, and patient health coaching.(P4 Medicine or O4 Medicine? Hippocrates Provides the Answer. p.108–119) . The Scientific Wellness approach according to Dr. Hood, “ will transform health care” and is the gateway to what is now considered Systems Medicine.
References
In 2011, according to the Health Status of Canadians 2016 report, approximately 1.4 million or 4% of Canadians identified themselves as Indigenous. These populations were undoubtedly younger than the general Canadian population with almost 50% being under the age of 25 years compared to 30% of the non-Indigenous population. In 2015 in Québec, the Aboriginal population consisted of approximately 105,000 individuals or just over 1% of the province population.
The Health Status of Canadians 2016 report described the “perceived health (as) a subjective measure of how people feel about their health and can be a good reflection of actual health” (p. 15). On that notion, measures from 2008/2010 indicated that 44% of First Nations on-reserve considered their health as very good or excellent; compared to non-indigenous Canadians, who scored 63%. According to the National Collaborating Centre for Indigenous Health (NCCIH), the social determinants of health for indigenous people of Canada are grouped into the following:
Socio-economic: employment - welfare - Income
Education, culture & language
Housing, living conditions
Family violence
Access to health
Additionally, and as pointed out by the Frontline Health Care in Canada: Innovations in Delivering Services to Vulnerable Populations (2006) report, there is also a political determinant that cannot be forgotten. There is jurisdictional ambiguity in the division of power when it comes to indigenous health, a tug-of-war between federal, provincial and territorial governments.
As stated by The Assembly of First Nations (AFN) in the Health Transformation Agenda (2017) approximately 1.5 million people live on reserves and in urban and rural areas in Canada. The AFN is a national body representing First Nations governments and recommends federal, provincial and territorial governments adopt a cross-ministerial “Health in All Policies” approach. The World Health Organization (WHO) states in Health in All Policies Training Manual (2015):
Health in All Policies is an approach to public policies across sectors that systematically takes into account the health implications of decisions, seeks synergies and avoids harmful health impacts in order to improve population health and health equity. It improves the accountability of policy-makers for health impacts at all levels of policy-making. It includes an emphasis on the consequences of public policies on health systems, determinants of health and well-being.(p.34)
Comparing numbers
Looking at access to take care, 80% of First Nations reported having a medical doctor, compared to 85% of the total population of Canada. 14% of First Nations experienced a time when they felt they needed health care but did not receive it, compared to 11% of the total population.
First Nations suffer disproportionately high rates of chronic disease such as higher rates of diabetes, and infant mortality when compared to non-Indigenous people. Infant mortality rate is defined by the total infant deaths per 1,000 live births and is considered “the single most comprehensive indicator of the level of health in a society (...) providing an important measure of the well-being of infants, children and their families.”
According to The Chief Public Health Officer's report of 2008 the infant mortality rate among First Nations is estimated at 7 deaths per 1,000 live births, whereas for Canada the 2018 statistics indicated 4.7.
The First Nations Health Transformation Agenda (2017) discusses the topic of child and family health and mentions that:
First Nations children under one year of age are hospitalized 50 times more frequently with streptococcal pneumonia and 80 times more frequently with chicken pox than non-Aboriginal children. For on-reserve children, immunization rates are 20% lower than the general population. Overall, 44% of First Nations children off-reserve have chronic health conditions. (p.74)
Chronic disease prevention and management is at the forefront of a modernized public health system. When looking at First Nations and/or Indigenous peoples' right to adequate public health services there needs to be
Strong and effective relationships between First Nations and all levels of government (...). Effective cross-jurisdictional and cross sectoral relationships are also necessary to address the complex interplay of the determinants of health (e.g. food security, mental health, housing and public infrastructure, and poverty) which contribute to the development of chronic disease (p.72).
To conclude, Richmond and Cook (2016) stated:
there remains a fundamental advantage (...) that the jurisdictional ambiguity established (...) continues to exist. Within this context, there is little clarity on land and treaty rights and the federal government maintains that their delivery of service to First Nations and Inuit people is a policy decision, not a legislative directive (p.10).
References
Canada. (2016). A REPORT OF THE CHIEF PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICER Health Status of Canadians 2016. https://healthycanadians.gc.ca/publications/department-ministere/state-public-health-status-2016-etat-sante-publique-statut/alt/pdf-eng.pdfTopics: Canadian Quality & Patient Safety Framework for Health Services / McGill Model of Nursing / the Safety Competencies
Continuing from Unit 4: Multilevel approaches to understanding health, this is part 2.
The Canadian Quality & Patient Safety Framework for Health Services (2020) has identified five(5) main goals that I have briefly summarized and contextualized in my professional nursing practice.
Goal 1: People-centered care
Health services are provided with humility in a holistic, dignified, and respectful manner.
respect for a patient’s culture and beliefs and incorporating their values into their treatment plan
Involve patients and families in planning treatment and improving health services
Goal 2: Safe Care
across the continuum of health services and settings
active role in creating a safe and supportive environment for patients
implement evidence-based practices and report outcome trends to proactively drive safe practices.
Safe care is addressed as a public health concern.
Goal 3: Accessible Care
Care, diagnostics, and services are accessible for all people in an equitable and timely manner.
Goal 4: Appropriate Care
Care is evidence-based and people-centred.
Goal 5: Integrated Care
Health services are continuous and well coordinated, promoting smooth transitions.
Putting this framework into context.
Goal 1: People-centered care. I work and also trained as a nurse at the McGill University Health Center (MUHC). During my nursing training years and up to not so long ago, the nursing model used was the McGill Model of Nursing:
pioneered by McGill nurses back in the 1950s, … the idea that nurses, patients and families are equal partners in providing support, information, and advocacy. Patients and families are treated with respect, and listened to as individuals with personalities, preferences and histories of their own.
Being respectful of patients values and beliefs, treating the whole person with respect and dignity is the essence of my professional nursing practice. As an example, a family comes to the OR, their child needs a surgical procedure under general anesthesia. The family is very religious and requests that a religious artefact be placed by their child at all times. Not long ago, we would have told the parents that we could not bring something from the outside into the OR for sterility reasons. Nowadays, no one would argue or question such a request. On the contrary, we ask the family where best to place the object and that we consider it as part of the child.
Goals 2&4: Safe & Appropriate Care. I believe that nurses are the gatekeepers of safety in the OR; even though safety is everyone’s business. In the operating room, all healthcare professionals are guided by the standards and guidelines of the operating room, the institution's policies and their professional bodies. Evidence-based approach is at the core of every healthcare professionals practice.
Goal 3: Accessible Care. From an OR perspective, the Accessible Care goal is fully integrated. Another example, if during surgery x rays are needed then we call the radiology department, technicians and equipment are sent to the operating room and x rays can be taken during the case. In our center, we also have an integrated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan as part of the neurology theatre so that scans can be performed intraoperatively, that is during the surgery while remaining sterile. This saves valuable time.
Goal 5: Integrated Care. This concept is already present in the perioperative setting. That is, to give report to the nurse coming to relieve me at the end of my shift, or when transferring the patient from the OR to the post anesthesia care unit (PACU) after surgery; accurate concise communication is fundamental to continuity of patient care.
The Canadian Patient Safety Institute further developed the Safety Competencies framework for healthcare professionals revised in March 2020. A more indepth tool where six(6) domains have been identified: 1-Patient Safety Culture, 2- Teamwork, 3-Communication, 4-Safety, Risk & Quality Improvement, 5-Optimize Human and System Factors, 6- Recognize, Respond to and Disclose Patient Safety Incidents. Each domain proposes a series of key competencies labelled “knowledge (K), skills (S), and attitudes (A)” to allow the key competencies to be put into practice.
When choosing a multilevel health framework related to my professional interest, I had in mind the topic of patient safety. However, I had no idea how much the subject had evolved either from a healthcare professional perspective or from the patient/end-user’s view. I am quite optimistic that more integrated and comprehensive actions will continue to take place, and I am very proud to be part of it.
Topics: key elements of Determinants of health / County Health Rankings Model / Canadian Quality & Patient Safety Framework for Health Services
The fundamental premise of all multilevel models of health is health equity. Defined by the Government of Canada as “(the) absence of unfair systems and policies that cause health inequalities. Health equity seeks to reduce inequalities and to increase access to opportunities and conditions conducive to health for all.”
The use of a model or framework is to structure and determine actions and/or interventions concerning the determinants of health. As noted by the Canadian Council in A Review of Frameworks on the Determinants of Health, there are 6 key points that have been identified “as relevant to advancing action on the determinants of health”. These are: the use of a 1- holistic and 2- intersectoral approach; 3- the recognition of social exclusion; 4- the role of individuals and communities; 5- the importance of upstream action; and 6- the clear identification of interactions between determinants. Magna (2017) discusses in Social Determinants of Health 101 for Health Care: Five Plus Five, that
In our endeavour to create models that help us determine the effectiveness and efficacy of social health interventions, we must take into consideration not to turn every program or action into a medical approach; instead community or local based interventions may ultimately prove to be more cost-effective.
Furthermore, we must also clearly establish for “what purpose having data for measurement and evaluation of interventions is essential.”
Canada's health care system has been faced with challenges that will persist in the near future. These factors are the delivery of services, the financial weight of those services, the aging of our population, and “the cost of new technology”. In order to confront these challenges, four(4) directions have been defined:
1- primary care :
"reforms have focused on primary health care delivery, including setting up more community primary health care centres that provide on-call services around-the-clock; creating primary health care teams; placing greater emphasis on promoting health, preventing illness and injury, and managing chronic diseases; increasing coordination and integration of comprehensive health services; and improving the work environments of primary health care providers."
2- ehealth or electronic health records (EHR);
3- reducing the wait times for access to acute care,
4- patient safety: “including the avoidance of medical errors or adverse events, is one of the most significant issues facing health systems globally”.
In the course of this unit learning activity, I had initially intended on using the County Health Rankings Model as a multilevel framework. The model looks at two(2) main health outcomes: length of life and quality of life, and their interconnectedness. It is the first model that I have seen where health outcomes have been quantified, that is given an actual percentage (%) value, as well as for each health factor. The global message of this framework is what can be done today for healthy outcomes by the community. According to the County Health Rankings Model, “Health Factors represent those things we can modify to improve the length and quality of life for residents. They are predictors of how healthy our communities can be in the future.” Unfortunately, the model does not take into consideration elements such as genetics, gender, and race|culture and views health factors as modifiable agents.
When looking at the different multilevel frameworks of health determinants, I wanted to focus on two(2) core values that are fundamental to my professional practice: having a holistic approach to patient care, and patient safety. As described earlier by the Canadian Council, the first key element for a multilevel model of health should be the use of a holistic approach. In nursing, a holistic approach focuses on helping patients maintain a lifestyle that contributes to their own satisfaction or definition of what health is, according to their values, beliefs, and experiences. According to Selman and Andsoy (2011), in a perioperative setting this translates into:
help(ing) surgical patients experience fewer problems (eg, surgical trauma, pain, anesthetic complications), reach discharge more quickly, attain satisfaction with health care, and more easily resume normal activities…. Successful surgery for the patient means not only recovering but physical, mental, and spiritual health as a whole.
And so upon further investigation, I have discovered the Canadian Quality & Patient Safety Framework for Health Services (2020). This model is the result of collaborative work between the Canadian Patient Safety Institute (CPSI) and the Health Standard Organization (HSO) in order to address “Patient safety incidents are the third leading cause of death in Canada”.
This people-centred framework defines five goal areas designed to drive improvement and to align Canadian legislation, regulations, standards, organizational policies, and public engagement on patient safety and quality improvement. It includes action guides and resources customized for each stakeholder group to support you in putting the goals into practice. (p.3)
The framework is encompassing health care professionals, policy makers, organizations and patients. I invite you to have a look at the model, you will certainly find it useful.
Quebec’s health ministry 2020 mission statement “ to maintain, improve and restore the health and well-being of Quebecers by providing access to a range of quality and integrated health and social services, thereby contributing to the social and economic development of Québec.”
The conceptual framework for health and its determinants encompasses four areas : global context, systems, environment or life settings and individual characteristics; with the main focus being the health status of the population.
Population health status encompasses global health, physical, mental and psychosocial factors.
Individual characteristics
Genetics : age, sexe, ethnicity, etc.
Skills developed during lifespan physical, cognitive, emotional, social, resilience, health knowledge, feeling of being in control, etc.
Lifestyle & behavior
Socioeconomics
Environment or Life settings
Family
Daycare & school
Work
Housing
Community & neighborhood
Systems
Education
Health & social
Territory (rural, urban)
Social programs
Global context
Political & legislative
Economic
Demographics
Social & cultural
Science & technology
Natural environment & ecosystems
Because of the complexity of causality between health determinants and health issues there must be a series of interventions undertaken at different levels and different spheres of activities. Together, individual and collective interventions maximizes health gains.
It is recognized that actions looking into health behaviours are more effective when strategizing from a global approach, while focusing on life settings and state systems.
Considering that the reduction of health gaps in the population guarantees better overall health for the population; it is therefore important to act on health determinants effectively as early as childhood and throughout life.
The cumulated efforts of different players is as determinant to reduce social health inequalities and thus, enhance globally the health of our population.
Before this course, my professional media presence was exclusively via LinkedIn. As far as I was concerned, it did the job. I can control the extent to which I want others to see me, what I define as visibility; and, I can look up job postings, courses offered, follow interesting people and subjects, to me, this is professional development.
Now, for the purpose of this course I opened a Twitter account. I am following a few classmates, our instructor and a few professional organisations of interest and relevant to my profession such as ORNAC, AORN, CNA, OIIQ. My first impression of Twitter is not too enthusiastic. I can appreciate the fast, real-time interactions but for some reason it does not appeal to me. Maybe my generation X upbringing is not so hardwired for instant gratification !
Based on the class discussion about social-digital media presence, it seems that most people differentiate between personal and professional accounts, and use different platforms accordingly. When the topic first came up in our discussion forum I had to look up the definition of a social media presence. I came across a short article that in my opinion summed it up nicely. According to Haley Schluter (2014), there are three elements to one’s social media presence: frequency, content and engagement. Looking at the course content, I suspect that the creation of a professional eportfolio will be the perfect venue to practise my social media presence!
Considering that my intentions are to make use of this eportfolio for educational purposes, and who knows maybe eventually for professional reasons; I strongly believe that a critical assessment and judgement of its content is paramount. Hence making use of my professional codes of ethics is fundamental and must guide every image and word that is published onto my page.
Looking into my own professional order of nurses, article 36 of the Code of ethics of nurses of Québec (2015) clearly stipulates “A nurse shall not hold or participate in indiscreet conversations, including on social networks, concerning a client and the services rendered to such client.”(p.14). In addition, article 68, does not permit the use of any form of advertising that would tarnish the reputation of the profession (p.19). I would argue that this statement encompasses the public speaking arena and thus, any outspoken criticism could be construed as “tarnishing the reputation of the profession”?
Perspective about being a nurse in Quebec
As a nurse in Quebec, one must obtain a permit strictly issued by the Ordre des Infirmiers et Infirmières du Québec (OIIQ). According to the OIIQ, there are over 78,000 nurses registered at the moment which makes it the largest professional order in the province. I have been a member of the OIIQ since 2007, the year I wrote my exams and received my permit or as we like to call it, a license.
The Professional Competence value of our Code of ethics of nurses (2015) ‘’ refers to nurses’ responsibility to maintain and update their knowledge and skills…’’ (p.7). Therefore, I have a professional obligation to complete a minimum of 20 hours of continuing education and renew my permit, on a yearly basis.
The OIIQ is not a union and does not determine working conditions of employment; that aspect is strictly orchestrated by the unions, and there are a few in the healthcare sector. The largest union group in healthcare is named Fédération Interprofessionnelle de la santé du Québec (FIQ) with more than 75 000 members from various healthcare disciplines: nurses, nurse assistants, respiratory therapists, and perfusionists. The fundamental role of the union is to protect its members interests, and indirectly, that of the public.
I am also certified in perioperative nursing by the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA). I would define this certification as a national professional recognition program of expertise. In certain areas of the country, it is well recognized even mandatory in order to work in an operating room, and premiums are offered. However, in Quebec although recognized within the perioperative community it has no financial impact. This certification is renewed every five (5) years either by examination or continuing education (100 credited hours).
The nursing profession is so vast and spreads into some many diverse spheres that in my opinion, it is the core of healthcare. In my practice, as an operating room nurse, I have the opportunity to interact on a daily basis with surgeons and anesthesiologists from the medical profession, respiratory therapists, patient attendants or orderlies, radiology technicians, and vendors.
The operating room is a unique environment where different healthcare professionals come together as a team for the benefit of the patient. We have an interdependent relationship; we all need each other; we cannot work in silo. These professional interactions are always patient-centered, that is, we all work together to make patients better.