Helene Mass

I am a postdoctoral researcher at the Institute for Microeconomics of the University of Bonn.

My research interest is Microeconomic Theory, in particular Information Economics, Mechanism Design, Social Learning, and Auction Theory.

Publications


Learning what unites or divides us: information acquisition in social learning Journal of Economic Theory, 2022 (with Nina Bobkova)

We analyze a social learning model where the agents' utility depends not only on an unknown common component but also on an unknown idiosyncratic component. Each agent splits a learning budget between the two components. We characterize the optimal learning decisions and find necessary and sufficient conditions for complete learning. As agents learn from the decisions of previous agents, information about the common component is never fully aggregated unless agents do not have to give up any information about the idiosyncratic component to learn marginally more about the common component. Allowing agents to communicate their signals accelerates learning but does not change the learning outcome asymptotically.


Imitation perfection - a simple rule to prevent discrimination in procurement, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2020 (first author, with Nicolas Fugger, Vitali Gretschko, and Achim Wambach)

Procurement regulation aimed at curbing discrimination requires equal treatment of sellers. However, Deb and Pai (2017) show that such regulation imposes virtually no restrictions on the ability to discriminate. We propose a simple rule – imitation perfection – that restricts discrimination significantly. It ensures that in every equilibrium bidders with the same value distribution and the same valuation earn the same expected surplus. If all bidders are homogeneous, revenue and social surplus optimal auctions which are consistent with imitation perfection exist. For heterogeneous bidders however, it is incompatible with revenue and social surplus optimization. Thus, a trade-off between non-discrimination and optimality exists.

Working Papers


First-price auctions under uncertainty - maximin selection from rationalizable strategies

I investigate the strategic problem of a player in a first-price auction who faces uncertainty about the other bidders' strategies and valuation distributions. I propose a new method to derive strategies in such a setting -- the rational maximin criterion -- which works in two steps. First, the player assumes rationality and common belief in rationality and eliminates all strategies that are not rationalizable. Second, the player applies the maximin criterion. Under a common prior and strategic uncertainty, the criterion induces pure strategies and efficient outcomes. If in addition, distributional uncertainty is present, bidders adopt mixed strategies causing inefficient outcomes.


Worst-case subjective-belief equilibria in first-price auctions, R&R at Theoretical Economics, (with Vitali Gretschko)

Bidding in first-price auctions crucially depends on the beliefs of the bidders about their competitors’ willingness to pay. We analyze bidding behavior in a first-price auction in which the knowledge of the bidders about the distribution of their competitors’ valuations is restricted to the support and the mean. That is, the information of the bidders is consistent with multiple distributions. We use the concept of symmetric subjective-believe equilibrium to solve the first-price auction under such uncertainty. Given the uncertainty, many such equilibria may arise in the first-price auction. Thus, we provide an equilibrium selection criterion based on worst-case reasoning. We show that the selected equilibrium is efficient, unique, insures bidders against being mistaken about the choice of equilibrium, and maximizes the seller’s pay-off among all efficient and symmetric subjective-belief equilibria.

Work in Progress


Optimal transparency in task design (with Claudia Herresthal)

A principal has to select an agent among a group of agents. The agents exert costly effort to obtain knowledge on some subject and the principal's obejctive is to maximize how much the selected agent has learnt. The principal can observe how much agents have learnt but once she observed it, she cannot commit to not to choose the agent who has the learnt the most. However, the principal can let the agents work on a task and commit to observe only the results of the task. The principal can determine the transparency of the task, i.e., how informative the results are about the agents' knowledge. The principal can also determine the difficulty of the task, i.e., how the results on the task depend on how much agents have learnt. We characterize the optimal choice of transparency and difficulty given that agents get a utility from being selected and a utility from good results on the task.


Optimal committee with costly information acquisition (with Ludmila Matyskova)

Contact Information

University of Bonn | Institute for Microeconomics

Adenauerallee 24-42 | 53113 Bonn

hmass@uni-bonn.de | +49 228 7362183