ACSAI is a women-led nonprofit focused on child sexual abuse prevention. This study evaluates whether users can easily and confidently complete the donation process.
As a student of Prof. Dani's Interaction Design & Usability Testing and intern for ACSAI, I completed a solo capstone project.
Wireframing, Prototyping, Usability Testing, Formative Research, Design System, Heuristic Evaluation
15 weeks
Feb 2025 - May 2025
Overview:
Unmoderated usability test of ACSAI's donation flow to uncover pain points.
Goals:
Improve usability of ACSAI’s donation workflow.
Reduce user confusion and friction in form interactions.
Evaluate how difficult users perceive the donation process using SEQ.
Research Questions
Will users find the donation process easy to do?
What pain points exist in the current donation workflow?
How can the design be imroved to increase donor conversion?
Design:
Formative, one sample, remote usability test (desktop & mobile)
Format:
Unmoderated, Single-Ease Questionnaire (1-7 Scale)
Recruiting:
32 participants (mix of CGU students & CSUF students)
20+ years old with prior-online donation experience
Convenience & Snowballing method
*Recommended at least 7 participants to achieve a 95% confidence interval with at least a 1-point margin of error*
Quantitative: Task-success via mean SEQ score (95% Confidence Interval).
Qualitative: Thematic analysis of debrief comments
Tasks:
Locate "Donate" button.
Enter donation amount.
Submit donation.
Post-task SEQ & open-ended feedback.
Using the SEQ scale (1 = very difficult to 7 = very easy), thirty-two participants (n = 32) evaluated the live ACSAI website’s donation workflow, yielding a mean score of 6.16 (SD = 1.14; 95% CI [5.74, 6.57]).
This indicates a generally easy process with only minor issues uncovered via a find-and-fix approach.
This limitation hindered users from easily finding the donate button, making users search across the page and create frustration
This helps eradicate the necessity to search the menu and enhance efficiency.
Current homepage of ACSAI
This increased user's cognitive load on why their donations are important
This increased the likelihood of abandoning out of frustration.
Utilizing Miller's Law, chunking donor impact into bullet points limits working memory while helping mange donation information.
Current donate page.
This friction makes donors face decision fatigue and uncertainty about how their gift will be used.
Options like Apple Pay, PayPal, ACH, and other options increase website trust and donation completion.
Current payment screen.
By administering the SEQ scale to 32 participants, I was able to pinpoint and prioritize specific pain points—like dense text blocks and unclear donation impacts—that guided our next round of design refinements.
In the future, I hope to recruit more Nigerian participants, include competitive analysis, and A/B testing to gain more comprehensive insights for better design decisions.
After conducting this pilot study with American students, I hope to work with more participants from the target population of ACSAI to yield better internal validity.