In the fast-changing world of software testing, choosing the right automation tool is critical for efficiency and accuracy. Two major players dominate the test automation space,TOSCA Software Automation and UFT (Unified Functional Testing). Each tool has strengths, weaknesses, and unique features that cater to different testing needs.
But when it comes to automation tool TOSCA vs. UFT in 2025, which one should you choose? As technology evolves, organizations look for smarter, faster, and more scalable automation solutions. In this article, we will compare Testing Tool TOSCA and UFT across various factors, including features, usability, performance, cost, and industry adoption.
If you're planning to upskill in test automation, understanding these tools will help you make the right choice. Let’s dive deep into the TOSCA vs. UFT comparison and determine which one suits your testing needs in 2025.
Before comparing both tools, let’s understand what they are and their core functionalities.
TOSCA (by Tricentis) is a codeless test automation tool that supports continuous testing and Agile methodologies. It is widely recognized for its model-based test automation approach, which eliminates scripting needs and accelerates test execution.
Key Features of TOSCA:
Model-based testing – Uses business-readable models for test automation.
Codeless automation – Reduces dependency on programming skills.
AI-powered testing – Uses artificial intelligence for self-healing tests.
Robust integration – Supports DevOps, CI/CD, and cloud environments.
End-to-end testing – Covers web, mobile, API, and enterprise applications.
UFT (Unified Functional Testing), formerly QTP (QuickTest Professional), is an automation tool by Micro Focus (formerly HP). It is known for its script-based automation using VBScript. UFT provides a comprehensive solution for functional, regression, and API testing.
Key Features of UFT:
VBScript-based automation – Requires programming knowledge.
Object recognition mechanism – Identifies UI elements for automation.
Data-driven testing – Supports Excel and database integrations.
Cross-browser testing – Works on multiple browsers and platforms.
Integration with ALM – Works well with Micro Focus Application Lifecycle Management.
TOSCA: Codeless approach makes it user-friendly, even for non-programmers.
UFT: Requires VBScript knowledge, making it harder for beginners.
👉 Winner: TOSCA (Codeless automation makes it more accessible.)
TOSCA: No scripting required, thanks to its model-based approach.
UFT: Uses VBScript, requiring coding expertise.
👉 Winner: TOSCA (Eliminates scripting efforts.)
TOSCA: Faster execution due to AI-powered optimizations.
UFT: Slower compared to TOSCA because of script-based execution.
👉 Winner: TOSCA (AI-driven execution speeds up testing.)
TOSCA: Supports web, mobile, API, SAP, and enterprise applications.
UFT: Primarily supports Windows-based applications but also covers web and mobile.
👉 Winner: TOSCA (Broader application support.)
TOSCA: Strong integration with Jenkins, Azure DevOps, and cloud platforms.
UFT: Supports CI/CD tools but requires extra setup.
👉 Winner: TOSCA (Better DevOps and cloud compatibility.)
TOSCA: Uses AI for self-healing scripts and smart automation.
UFT: Limited AI-based automation features.
👉 Winner: TOSCA (AI-driven automation improves efficiency.)
TOSCA: Expensive due to enterprise-level capabilities.
UFT: Comparatively cheaper but still costly for smaller teams.
👉 Winner: UFT (More affordable for small businesses.)
TOSCA: Widely used in large enterprises, SAP testing, and Agile teams.
UFT: Still popular but losing ground to modern tools like TOSCA.
👉 Winner: TOSCA (Higher adoption in Agile and enterprise testing.)
TOSCA is ideal for:
✅ Enterprises using SAP, Salesforce, or large-scale applications.
✅ Agile and DevOps teams needing continuous testing.
✅ Testers who prefer codeless automation for faster execution.
✅ Companies focusing on AI-powered automation and self-healing tests.
Example: A banking firm using SAP can leverage TOSCA to automate regression testing without scripting, reducing manual efforts by 60%.
UFT is better for:
✅ Organizations with existing VBScript-based test frameworks.
✅ Teams working on Windows applications with object recognition.
✅ Companies looking for a cost-effective alternative to TOSCA.
✅ Testers experienced in script-based automation.
Example: A healthcare company using legacy Windows applications can use UFT for regression testing with minimal infrastructure changes.
With codeless automation, AI-driven testing, and DevOps integration, TOSCA is becoming the preferred choice for modern enterprises. While UFT still has a place in traditional setups, it is slowly being replaced by more scalable, AI-enabled solutions.
✅ Codeless automation simplifies test creation and maintenance.
✅ AI-based testing enhances efficiency and reduces manual effort.
✅ Stronger cloud and DevOps support makes it ideal for modern businesses.
✅ Broader application coverage supports SAP, mobile, and enterprise apps.
👉 Verdict: If you're investing in test automation for 2025 and beyond, TOSCA is the smarter choice.
Choosing between TOSCA Software Automation and UFT depends on your business needs, team expertise, and testing goals. If you prioritize codeless, AI-driven automation with strong DevOps integration, then Automation Tool TOSCA is the best choice. However, if your team is comfortable with script-based testing using VBScript, UFT remains a reliable option.
For those looking to upskill in TOSCA, investing in TOSCA training can open doors to high-paying automation jobs. As the demand for Testing Tool TOSCA grows, mastering it will keep you ahead in the automation industry.
Get started with a TOSCA Automation Tool Training today and take your automation skills to the next level!