논문 작성 팁
논문 작성 팁
띄어쓰기(특히 괄호 뒤)
예: Country (e.g., Korea)
약어 사용
처음 정의할 때만 full name 기재, 이후에는 약어(Acronym) 사용
2번 이상 사용되는 경우 약어 정의
예: Convolutional neural network (CNN)
줄임말 표현
i.e. / e.g. / cf.
예: Neural networks (e.g., convolutional networks)
논문 논리 흐름 구성
Big problem - Specific challenge - Your approach
Abstract 작성 요령
Importance (연구의 중요성)
Research gap (문제 제기)
Objective (목적)
Method (방법론)
Key findings and Implications (검증 및 결과)
예:
Empirical risk minimization (ERM) provides a principled guideline for many machine learning and data mining algorithms. Under the ERM principle, one minimizes an upper bound of the true risk, which is approximated by the summation of empirical risk and the complexity of the candidate classifier class. To guarantee a satisfactory learning performance, ERM requires that the training data are i.i.d. sampled from the unknown source distribution. However, this may not be the case in active learning, where one selects the most informative samples to label, and these data may not follow the source distribution. In this article, we generalize the ERM principle to the active learning setting. We derive a novel form of upper bound for the true risk in the active learning setting; by minimizing this upper bound, we develop a practical batch-mode active learning method. The proposed formulation involves a nonconvex integer programming optimization problem. We solve it efficiently by an alternating optimization method. Our method is shown to query the most informative samples while preserving the source distribution as much as possible, thus identifying the most uncertain and representative queries. We further extend our method to multiclass active learning by introducing novel pseudolabels in the multiclass case and developing an efficient algorithm. Experiments on benchmark datasets and real-world applications demonstrate the superior performance of our proposed method compared to state-of-the-art methods. (Excerpt from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2700408)
Introduction 작성 요령(4가지 핵심 요소 포함)
Scope of work
Importance
Background knowledge
Organization of the paper
Conclusion 작성 요령(기본 4문단 구성)
Summary of the work
제안한 방법 설명(Step-by-step으로)
Case study 및 실험 결과 정리
Future work
잡다한 팁들
Such as / Which / Since 앞에는 꼭 쉼표(,) 사용
예: countries, such as Korea
논문 전체에서 일관된, 통일성 있는 표현을 사용(불필요한 표현의 variation은 지양)
This work / This study / This paper / This research 중 하나로 무조건 통일
Proposed method / Proposed framework 중 하나로 무조건 통일(+ Methodology는 X)
3인칭 사용 X
되도록 현재 시제(현재 완료 포함) 사용
Not only "~" but also "~": "~"에 Noun이 오면 가운데 쉼표 사용 X / Clause가 오면 쉼표 사용 O
A lot of 는 사용 지양 / A large number of 등의 표현으로 대체
Because는 이유/원인이 중요 vs. Since는 결과가 중요
여러 논문을 한번에 괄호안에 넣을때에는 시간 순 / 저자 순으로
논문에서는 축약형 표현 사용 지양
예: Do not contain (vs. Don't contain)
숫자 천의 자리마다 쉼표 표기
예: USD 400,000
그래프 왼쪽 및 오른쪽 끝과 그림 모서리 맞추기(빈 공간 없도록)
Novelty 강조
예: The primary novelty comes from the scheduling of the weights for mixing the pseudo-labels
Elsevier 계열 저널들 그림 내 Font: Gulliver