How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
If you want a pair of open-ear headphones you can actually wear in the water and load with your own offline music for laps or focus sessions, choose GREYOLK Swimming Headphones; if you need lightweight clip-on earbuds with marathon battery life for running, workouts and long study days on land, choose Boytond Open Ear Earbuds. I'll frame this whole comparison around the thing most buyers are really shopping for here: bluetooth headphones for running, and the everyday "for study" use that follows the same buyer around.
• GREYOLK's biggest strength: an IP68 waterproof build plus 32GB of built-in MP3 storage, so it keeps working where Bluetooth simply can't reach.
• GREYOLK's biggest trade-off: underwater you must switch to MP3 mode — Bluetooth doesn't work in the pool — and the 8-hour battery is modest next to the Boytond's case-backed runtime.
• Boytond's biggest strength: up to 10 hours per charge and roughly 50 hours total with the charging case, in a featherweight clip-on shape that never seals your ear canal.
• Boytond's biggest trade-off: no waterproof rating is stated, so it's a land-and-sweat headphone, not a swim headphone, and there's no built-in storage — it's Bluetooth-only.
• Who each pick is for: GREYOLK for swimmers and offline-music listeners; Boytond for runners, gym-goers and anyone who wants all-day awareness and battery.
The GREYOLK is built around one unusual idea: music without your phone. Inside the headset there's 32GB of memory — the spec sheet says that's room for around 6,000 songs across MP3, WMA, WAV, APE and FLAC. You load files over the included magnetic charging cable by plugging into a computer, then double-click the power button to flip between Bluetooth and MP3 mode. That's the whole trick. Underwater, Bluetooth can't travel, so the GREYOLK stops pretending to be a Bluetooth headphone and just plays the files you loaded. If you swim laps, snorkel, fish or boat, that's the feature that matters. The IP68 rating is the other half of the story: it's rated fully waterproof, sweatproof, rainproof and dustproof, and the brand notes it's designed to sit alongside a swim cap, goggles and earplugs.
On land it behaves like a normal open-ear bone conduction headphone. The wraparound titanium frame is meant to hold steady through hard training, the 15mm bone conduction driver covers a 20Hz–20,000Hz range, and at 34 grams it's light enough to forget. Bluetooth 5.4 is quoted for stronger interference resistance and a stable connection within about 10 metres. Battery life is 8 hours of playback or talk time after a 1.5-hour charge from the 150mAh cell, and there's active noise cancellation plus button controls. The open design keeps you aware of traffic and surroundings, which is exactly what you want on a run or a bike.
Who should buy it: swimmers, triathletes, surf-and-sand people, and anyone who wants a phone-free music player strapped to their head. Who should skip it: if you mostly run on roads and never go near water, you're paying for waterproofing and storage you won't use, and the 8-hour battery is the weakest number in this comparison. It's also worth checking the current price on Amazon, since the value math changes a lot depending on what you'd otherwise spend on a separate waterproof MP3 player.
The Boytond takes the opposite approach: it's a Bluetooth-only clip-on that lives in a charging case. Each bud hooks over your ear with flexible joints and lightweight, breathable grips, and because nothing seals the ear canal, air keeps moving — the design is explicitly aimed at better ventilation and less sweat buildup over long sessions. That's the same reason open-ear designs get recommended for long listening: your ears don't get hot and itchy the way they can with sealed in-ears, and you can still hear a coach, a car, or a roommate talking to you without pulling anything out.
Sound comes from a 16.3mm dynamic driver, which is a big driver for this category, and the brand pitches it for stereo separation and clear call pickup. Connectivity is Bluetooth 5.3 with a quoted 33-foot (about 10 metre) range, plus auto-on-and-connect so the buds pair as soon as they leave the case. Controls are touch-based, and there's no active noise cancellation — that's deliberate, since the whole point is staying aware of your surroundings.
The headline number is battery: up to 10 hours on a single charge, roughly 40 more from the case for about 50 hours total, and a fast-charge trick that gives an hour of playback from five minutes plugged in. That combination — light, secure, all-day, no ear fatigue — is what makes it a sensible pick for runners logging daily miles, gym sessions, and long study blocks where you want background audio without blocking the world out. The trade-off is honest: no stated waterproof rating and no onboard storage, so it's not a swim headphone and it needs your phone nearby. A 365-day no-reason return and warranty is the stated support policy.
• Best for swimming → GREYOLK Swimming Headphones. IP68 waterproofing plus MP3 mode is the only way either of these plays music underwater.
• Best for running → Boytond Open Ear Earbuds. The clip-on hook shape, breathable grips, 10-hour battery and sweat-friendly open design fit daily road and trail miles better.
• Best battery life → Boytond Open Ear Earbuds. 10 hours per charge and about 50 hours with the case versus 8 hours total on the GREYOLK.
• Best for phone-free listening → GREYOLK Swimming Headphones. 32GB of onboard storage means no phone, no signal, no problem.
• Best for long study sessions → Boytond Open Ear Earbuds. The charging case and lightweight hook make multi-hour wear far less of a hassle; if you'd rather have sealed isolation for study, look at noise cancelling in ear earbuds instead, since neither of these blocks sound.
• Best for calls → Boytond Open Ear Earbuds. Its 16.3mm drivers are specifically pitched for clear voice capture; the GREYOLK lists ANC and a talk-time figure but not call clarity.
• Best for awareness and safety → either, by design. Both are open-ear, so traffic, voices and surroundings stay audible.
• Best for durability in water and dust → GREYOLK Swimming Headphones. The IP68 rating covers water, sweat, rain and dust; the Boytond has no stated waterproof rating.
If I had to pick one, I'd buy the Boytond Open Ear Earbuds (ASIN B0H67KTLHW) — for running, workouts and the "for study" stretches where I want music for hours without my ears feeling plugged. The 50-hour case-backed runtime, the 10-hour single-charge figure and the featherweight clip-on fit are the numbers that decide it for me, and the open design is genuinely the right call for outdoor training. I'd only switch to the GREYOLK if swimming or phone-free offline playback were non-negotiable, because that's the one job it does that the Boytond can't. In my opinion, most buyers shopping for bluetooth headphones for running will get more everyday use out of the Boytond.
FAQ
what are the best bluetooth headphones for running
what are the best bluetooth earbuds for running
Look for a secure hook or clip fit, sweat-friendly ventilation and long battery. The Boytond hits all three with 16.3mm dynamic drivers, breathable grips and a charging case. If your runs happen near or in water, the GREYOLK's IP68 rating and 32GB MP3 mode give it an edge Bluetooth-only buds can't match.
Only the GREYOLK does. It's rated IP68 and can run in MP3 mode from its 32GB storage, since Bluetooth doesn't transmit underwater. The Boytond has no stated waterproof rating, so treat it as a sweat-and-splash headphone for land use.
The Boytond. It quotes up to 10 hours per charge and roughly 40 extra hours from the charging case, with an hour of playback from a five-minute top-up. The GREYOLK gives up to 8 hours of playback or talk time after a 1.5-hour charge. For marathon days, the Boytond wins on stamina.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.
See also: bmanl Earbuds vs Btootos Earbuds: Wireless Headphones, our Sennheiser ACCENTUM vs ACER Gaming Headset pick, Philips A1105 vs QUMIIRITY Noise Reduction Gaming: Slim on, Philips Computer Headset vs Hyyeosd ERAZER X8