The information presented in this section was collected via in-store and online research. Our focus was to explore small-scale energy-generating or energy-storing technologies.
The Negative:
We found that most solutions used only one form of energy to generate electricity, limiting their applications. Additionally we found that these small, single-source generators tend to be extremely inefficient. These two factors combined to make most solutions unreliable and economically irresponsible.
The Positive:
We found that combining energy sources appeared to partially solve some of the common reliability issues. We also found that there are some concepts, such as vortex shedding and piezoelectricity, that are less-researched but appear to be promising. Below are several examples of the patents and products we looked at.
Other methods to encourage microgeneration technologies, such as government incentives and subsidies, have been investigated. We found evidence which indicated that, although these methods encourage people to consider microgeneration, they did not offset the initial cost enough and thus did not significantly improve the uptake of microgeneration technologies in the United States. Additionally, government subsidies and incentives are not within the scope of this project.
Patent Number: 20130136958
Date of Patent: 2011
Summary: The device quickly dissipates heat from batteries, resulting in longer battery life.
Pros:
compact design
increased efficiency and life of batteries
simple design
Cons:
material can get hot to the touch
Patent Number: 14473755
Date of Patent: 2014
Summary: This is a power generation system that uses a combination of wind and solar to produce electricity. It is should be placed on the roof of a building for maximum exposure to wind and solar energy.
Pros:
combines different energy sources
minimal likelihood of interference with wildlife
large batteries minimize reliability issues
Cons:
complicated design - hard to fix, expensive
still dependent on weather
Patent Number: 4857887
Date of Patent: 1989
Summary: This keyboard generates electricity when keys are pressed using the piezoelectric effect. (The piezoelectric effect occurs when a material generates a surface charge from mechanical deformation.)
Pros:
electricity eliminate need for external electricity to actuate keystrokes
excess electricity can be stored
Cons:
low power output
complex design - difficult to fix, expensive
Patent Number: 5347186
Date of Patent: 1994
Summary: This device uses magnets and coils to produce electricity using electromagnetism. Springs are used to keep maintain equilibrium of the piston. When the device is shaken the piston moves from the equilibrium position which then generates electricity.
Pros:
has battery to store electricity
generates electricity from otherwise wasted motion
Cons:
low power output due to few coils
too large for intention (using it while running)
Patent Number: EP1067206B1
Date of Patent: 2001
Summary: This is a steam turbine blade that uses martensite steel to provide high strength and durability when compared with other similar blades. This blade was used in a low pressure steam turbine generating plant.
Pros:
strong and durable
3600 RPM max speed
long blades improves thermal efficiency
Cons:
loses lots of energy to friction
high input velocity needed
Patent Number: 04016885
Date of Patent: 2004
Summary: This is a system that cools a turbine through the use of nitrogen. This system is intended to decrease the downtime for maintenance and an overall more efficient machine. This decreases the overall cost of running the turbine.
Pros:
improves turbine efficiency and life
has many emergency valves for safety
reduces stress on the turbine
Cons:
can overheat
needs constant supply of nitrogen
takes up extra space
Patent Number: 10079530
Date of Patent: 2002
Summary: This miniature wind turbine uses the air flowing over the top of a car to generate electricity.
Pros:
passive energy generation
simple design - easy to fix
Cons:
not aesthetically pleasing
creates drag force - decreases car efficiency
Price: ~ $500-1000 depending on vehicle
Features:
wheel rotation generates electricity
copper coils
Pros:
50-75% efficiency depending on quality
easily accessible
Cons:
dependent on single source of energy (rotation)
can be quite expensive
friction or high-temps can be problematic
Company Name: Tesla
Price: $500
Features:
indoor/outdoor installation
charger for Tesla Model S, Model 3, Model X, and Model Y
up to 11.5 kW / 48 amp output
compatible with any home electrical system
Pros:
easy to use
no direct carbon emissions
fully charged overnight
Cons:
high initial investment
only compatible with Tesla vehicles
Company Name: SaveMore4u
Price: $13
Features:
rated 12 volts
place in pipe to generate electricity
Pros:
easily installable
cheap
reviews indicate it is durable
Cons:
low power output
reviews indicated that it was unreliable
Company Name: Scott Hydroelectric
Price: $3900
Features:
non-corrosive material
designed to be mostly maintenance-free
high-voltage AC output
Pros:
can power entire house
low volume of water needed
Cons:
expensive
installation needed
potential damage to wildlife
at least 20 foot drop needed
Company Name: Pavegen
Price: quote needed
Features:
generates electricity from foot traffic
uses a combination of the piezoelectric effect and electromagnetism
Pros:
not dependent on weather conditions
no net carbon emissions
several case studies underway
Cons:
little research publicly available (case study information not available)
dependent on applications of force (people walking)
Company Name: DiPole
Price: quote needed
Features:
generates electricity from movement
uses the piezoelectric effect
Pros:
flexible
not dependent on weather conditions/resources
Cons:
extremely low energy output
constant application and reapplication of force needed
Price: ~35$
Features:
portable solar charger
multiple ports
Pros:
long battery life on full charge
portable
Cons:
single source of energy (solar)
bulky
Company Name: Makemu
Price: $545
Features:
rated 500W
vertical axis wind turbine
Pros:
theoretically more efficient than horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) of same size
Less noise pollution than HAWT of same size
Cons:
wind speed limitations - high wind speeds needed
blades break easily
much less efficient than advertised (advertised on theoretical efficiency)
potential issues with land regulations
potential damage to wildlife
Company Name: Vortex Bladeless
Price: quote needed
Features:
uses turbulent airflow (vortex shedding) to generate electricity
lightweight materials
Pros:
usable in urban areas
will not harm wildlife
can be placed near other units
adjusts quickly to changes in airflow
Cons:
limited research available
not as efficient as normal turbines
Company Name: Waterlily
Price: $170
Features:
mini-turbine for electrical output
converts rotational energy from wind or water into electricity
Pros:
compatible with wind, water, or hand-crank
can charge small devices
unlikely to harm wildlife
Cons:
low power output
expensive considering low power output
relies mostly on weather conditions (wind/water movement)
Company Name: Greenergy Star
Price: $190
Features:
rated 350W
pelton-type hydro generator
Pros:
efficient
midrange power output
good price
Cons:
friction in bearings caused failure