What do safety reps and workers say?
During 2020-2021 GMHC surveyed workers across the North West there were some interesting results:
Two thirds said they had heard of Toxic Use Reduction
One third didn't know if there were any COSHH assessments on any work activity or substance they worked with
Substances which they knew they were at risk from:
Asbestos
Off gassing
Dust
Fumes
Smoke
External traffic pollution
Reproductive toxins
Two thirds had had COSHH training
Half of the safety reps were not consulted or involved in the organising of COSHH training
Just over a third had seen a safety data sheet for all the substances they used and two thirds either hadn't seen a safety data sheet for all the substances or for any of the substances they used.
Two thirds were working to safe systems of work
Over half wore PPE at work
Three quarters knew what all the hazardous substances signs meant
A quarter knew that substances they used had been replaced on health grounds
Alternatives were selected by:
Looking at least damaging chemical
Alternative processing methods
Hazardous equipment replaced
Choosing a similar substance with reduced toxicity
Advice from CLEAPSS (Consortium of Local Education Authorities for the Provision of Science Services) https://science.cleapss.org.uk/Resources/Useful-Links/
Consulting more experienced colleagues
Choosing a substance not containing allergic substance
Replacing textile binder with less toxic alternative
Identifying non-toxic alternative from chemical safety profiles
Procured through central purchase system
Doing a different activity
There was some evidence of greater risks from substitution/new materials but the majority didn't know
A third of respondents had been treated for health conditions related to work
Health conditions included:
Asthma/other breathing, lung
Skin conditions
Heart disease
Digestive system problems
Other organ diseases
Immune disease
Reproductive issues
Cancers
Other health issues
A minority were not aware of any health conditions
Half of responses said their possible health associations had been investigated
Four responded that they had been exposed to toxic substances in multiple jobs
Less than half of responses said they kept a record of all the employers and substances they had been exposed to
Return to Content Page