Are you ready to take action? Stay in the know with the resources below!
Public charge is a term in immigration law that describes a person who is primarily dependent on the government for support. Some people who apply for a lawful permanent residence or a visa to enter the U.S. must pass a “public charge” test – which looks at whether the person is likely to use certain government services in the future.
In January 2017, the Trump administration issued the first in a series of efforts to expand the definition of public charge under the longstanding 1999 Field Guidance. Leaked drafts threw threw both immigrant communities and immigration rights advocates into a state of alarm and confusion.
The final rule was published on August 14, 2019. Despite the much smaller and focused instances where an immigrant’s use of benefits could harm them, the fear of using any kind of benefit had been installed.
March 2021: The Biden Administration announced that the 2019 Public Charge Rule would no longer be in effect.
The long-standing 1999 field guidance replaced the 2019 rule. This guidance made it clear that the use of most public benefits programs, such as health, nutrition, and housing programs, will not have an impact on an individual’s immigration status.
September 2022: USCIS published a final public charge rule that is largely similar to the 1999 field guidance. This new regulation includes critical protections for immigrant families and makes it more difficult for future presidents to radically change public charge policy. It will take effect on December 23, 2022.
Public charge is a term in immigration law that describes a person who is primarily dependent on the government for support.
Some people who apply for lawful permanent residence or an immigrant visa to enter the U.S. must pass a “public charge” test, which looks at whether the person is likely to use certain government services in the future.
As part of this test, the immigration officer will consider the immigrant's:
Health
Age
Income/resources
Education and skills
Family support and sponsor
Public Charge Test: Use of certain public benefits (Public Charge Rule)
The immigration officer weighs all the factors above to decide if the person is "likely to become a Public Charge.” However, immigration officers will weigh favorably an Affidavit of Support that meets the income and assets requirements.
It’s Important to Know: Most public benefits are NOT considered in the public charge determination and WILL NOT IMPACT the application for immigration status.
Most public benefits DO NOT affect a person's application for immigration status.
The following benefits ARE NOT CONSIDERED in a public charge test:
A child’s or other family member’s use of federal safety net programs never affects the applicant’s immigration application.
Nutrition and housing assistance programs including SNAP, WIC, School meals, Section 8, and Public Housing;
Cash payments for a specific purpose like home energy assistance or childcare;
Emergency disaster relief, including pandemic and COVID-19 assistance such as COVID-19 testing, treatment, vaccines, economic impact payment checks (stimulus checks), one-time financial assistance, and food programs like P-EBT;
Community-based services like food banks, shelters, and financial assistance regardless of the source of funding;
Medicaid and other health care programs are only considered if the government is paying for long-term care, like in a nursing home;
“Earned” benefits like Social Security, retirement, and veteran’s benefits.
The following benefits MAY BE CONSIDERED in a public charge test for people who live in Texas:*
Cash assistance that is intended to pay for ongoing living expenses, like SSI or TANF; and
Long-term institutional care paid for by Medicaid or another government program.**
*Most immigrants who face a Public Charge test are not eligible for the benefits that are considered in this test. For more information, talk to a legal aid lawyer. Need help? Find Immigration Assistance and Legal Aid resources here!
**If you have used these specific programs in the past, you still have a chance to show that you are not likely to become a public charge in the future. Immigration officials must look at all of your circumstances when they review your green card or visa application.
Public Charge DOES apply to:
Immigrants applying for Lawful Permanent Residence (Green Card) through a family-based petition
Lawful Permanent Residents who leave the U.S. for more than 6 months and seek to re-enter the U.S.
A slightly different rule applies to some "non-immigrants" applying to change or extend their student visas (example: student visas).
Public Charge DOES NOT apply to:
U.S. Citizens
Lawful Permanent Residents (Green Card holders) applying for citizenship or green card renewals
Refugees applying to change status to Lawful Permanent Residents.
Asylees applying to change status to Lawful Permanent Residents.
TPS: people applying for initial or re-registration of Temporary Protected Status
DACA: people applying to renew Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals
SIJS: children applying for Special Immigrant Juvenile Status or applying for a Green Card after having been approved for SIJS
U Visa: people applying for a U visa or U visa holders applying for a Green Card
T Visa: people applying for a T visa and T visa holders applying for a Green Card
VAWA: people self-petition for immigration relief under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), and people with VAWA who are applying for a Green Card
People applying for withholding of removal or under the Convention Against Torture
Cubans applying under the Cuban Adjustment Act;
Amerasians who are applying for admission
SIV: Afghan and Iraqi interpreters and translators who are applying for special immigrant visas
Registry: People applying for registry (lived in the U.S. since January 1, 1972)
NACARA: People applying for green card under Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act
HRIFA: People applying for green card under Haitian Relief and Immigrant Fairness Act (HRIFA)
Lautenberg parolees - individuals from the former Soviet Union, Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos who were paroled into the U.S. and are applying for green cards
Certain other "humanitarian" immigrants
The new regulation:
Clarifies what is and is not considered in a public charge determination:
A child’s or other eligible family member’s use of federal safety net programs will not be considered in a public charge assessment.
Medicaid will not be considered unless the person is receiving long-term institutional care (short term rehabilitative care and home and community based services do not count).
SNAP, WIC, Section 8, and other “non-cash” federal programs are not counted in a public charge test.
The new regulations direct immigration officers who are making public charge determinations to consider all of an applicant’s circumstances (age, health, income, education, and family size), as well as an Affidavit of Support, when required.
There are only two types of government programs that could contribute to a determination that the applicant might become a public charge: cash assistance for income maintenance (SSI, TANF, state or local General Assistance programs); and government funded long term institutional care (not short-term rehab or home- and community-based services, or imprisonment).
These factors will be balanced - No one factor alone will make someone likely to become a public charge.
Confirms that eligible immigrant families can use health care, nutrition, and housing programs without public charge concerns, and
Makes it harder for future presidents to radically change public charge policy.
It is likely that the public charge rule will be challenged in court, but there are solid grounds for a court to uphold the rule. The Biden administration took the proper notice and comment steps in issuing the final rule. The policy is consistent with the field guidance that had been in effect for 20 years.
The public charge rule in immigration law is racist and harmful, and we must continue to push our leaders to repeal it. The 1882 public charge provision, enacted alongside the Chinese Exclusion Act, has been biased since the beginning against low-income immigrants of color, and no regulatory reform can change that. We will continue urging leaders to strike public charge from the immigration law and eliminate other barriers to the health and social services safety net.