Austin, C. C. (2020). The Open Science Ecosystem: A Systematic Framework Anchored in Values, Ethics, and FAIRER Data. SSRN Preprint. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3654298
Austin, C. C., Bernier, A., Bezuidenhout, L., Bicarregui, J., Biro, T., Cambon-Thomsen, A., Carroll, S. R., Cournia, Z., Dabrowski, P. W., Diallo, G., Duflot, T., Garcia, L., Gesing, S., Gonzalez-Beltran, A., Gururaj, A., Harrower, N., Lin, D., Medeiros, C., Méndez, E., … Uhlmansiek, M. (2021). Fostering global data sharing: Highlighting the recommendations of the Research Data Alliance COVID-19 working group. Wellcome Open Research, 5, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.12688/WELLCOMEOPENRES.16378.2
Bakos, A., Miksa, T., & Rauber, A. (2018). Research data preservation using process engines and machine-actionable data management plans. 11057 LNCS, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00066-0_6
Benhamed, O. M., Burger, K., Kaliyaperumal, R., da Silva Santos, L. O. B., Suchánek, M., Slifka, J., & Wilkinson, M. D. (2023). The FAIR Data Point: Interfaces and Tooling. Data Intelligence, 5(1), 184–201. https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00161
Blumesberger, S., Ganguly, R., Gänsdorfer, N., Gergely, E., Gruber, A., Hasani-Mavriqi, I., Kalová, T., Ladurner, C., Macher, T., Miksa, T., Solís, B. S., Schranzhofer, H., Stork, C., Stryeck, S., & Töricht, H. (2021). FAIR data Austria – aligning the implementation of FAIR tools and services. VOEB-Mitteilungen, 74(2). https://doi.org/10.31263/voebm.v74i2.6379
Canada (2022). National Security Guidelines for Research Partnerships. Government of Canada. https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/safeguarding-your-research/guidelines-and-tools-implement-research-security/national-security-guidelines-research-partnerships
Canada (2023). Mitigating Your Research Security Risks. Government of Canada. https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/safeguarding-your-research/guidelines-and-tools-implement-research-security/mitigating-your-research-security-risks
Cardoso, J., Castro, L. J., Ekaputra, F. J., Jacquemot, M. C., Suchánek, M., Miksa, T., & Borbinha, J. (2022). DCSO: towards an ontology for machine-actionable data management plans. Journal of Biomedical Semantics, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-022-00274-4
Cardoso, J., Garcia Castro, L. J., Ekaputra, F. J., Jacquemot-Perbal, M.-C., Miksa, T., & Borbinha, J. (2020). Towards semantic representation of machine-actionable Data Management Plans. 9. https://doi.org/10.4126/FRL01-006423289
Cardoso, J., Proença, D., & Borbinha, J. (2020). Machine-actionable data management plans: A knowledge retrieval approach to automate the assessment of funders’ requirements. 12036 LNCS, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45442-5_15
CINECA, Goisauf, M., Fériol, L., Rial-Sebbag, E. (2023). First recommendations for implementation in IT Framework, including a Data Management Plan (Deliverable D7.3). Common Infrastructure for National Cohorts in Europe, Canada, and Africa. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7680754
CODATA (2019). The Beijing Declaration on Research Data. International Science Council (ISC), Committee on Data. https://codata.org/events/science-and-policy-workshops/codata-and-codata-china-high-level-international-meeting-on-open-research-data-policy-and-practice/the-beijing-declaration-on-research-data/
DFO (2019). Fisheries and Oceans Canada National Policy for Science Data. https://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/about-notre-sujet/publications/science/datapolicy-politiquedonnees/index-eng.html
Foidl, R., Brugger, L. S., & Miksa, T. (2021). Automating Evaluation of Machine-Actionable Data Management Plans with Semantic Web Technologies. 13. https://doi.org/10.4126/FRL01-006429413
Fraga-González, G., van de Wiel, H., Garassino, F., Kuo, W., de Zélicourt, D., Kurtcuoglu, V., Held, L., & Furrer, E. (2025). Affording reusable data: Recommendations for researchers from a data-intensive project. Scientific Data, 12(1), 258. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-04565-0
G7 OSWG (2023). Interoperability and Sustainability of Infrastructures. G7 Open Science Working Group (Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The European Union is also represented). Final approval pending.
GoFAIR (2018). FAIR Principles. https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/
Hettne, K. M., Magagna, B., Gambardella, A. A., Suchánek, M., Schoots, F., & Schultes, E. (2023). FIP2DMP: Linking data management plans with FAIR implementation profiles. FAIR Connect, 1(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.3233/FC-221515
IRiDiuM (2025). International Research Data Management glossary. https://fairerdata.github.io/IRiDiuM-Glossary/
ISED (2023). Security risk assessment form. Innovation, Science, and Economic Developmentof Canada,. https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/safeguarding-your-research/guidelines-and-tools-implement-research-security/national-security-guidelines-research-partnerships/national-security-guidelines-research-partnerships-risk-assessment-form
ISED (2024). Conducting Open Source Due Diligence for Safeguarding Research Partnerships. Innovation, Science, and Economic Developmentof Canada,. https://science.gc.ca/site/science/en/safeguarding-your-research/guidelines-and-tools-implement-research-security/guidance-conducting-open-source-due-diligence/conducting-open-source-due-diligence-safeguarding-research-partnerships
Kim, S. (2020). Machine-actionable Data Management Plans Model Analysis and Improvement Direction. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 8(4), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1633/JISTaP.2020.8.4.2
Miksa, T., Cardoso, J., & Borbinha, J. (2018). Framing the scope of the common data model for machine-actionable Data Management Plans. 2733–2742. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8622618
Miksa, T., Chodacki, J., Suchánek, M., Praetzellis, M., Papadopoulou, E., Jacquemot, M.-C., & Kevin, A. (2024). Salzburg Manifesto on machine actionable Data Management Plans. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10658522
Miksa, T., Jaoua, M., & Arfaoui, G. (2020). Research Object Crates and Machine-actionable Data Management Plans. 10. https://doi.org/10.4126/FRL01-006423291
Miksa, T., Neish, P., Rauber, A., & Walk, P. (2018). Defining Requirements for Machine-actionable Data Management Plans. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/CGP86
Miksa, T., Oblasser, S., & Rauber, A. (2022). Automating Research Data Management Using Machine-Actionable Data Management Plans. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1145/3490396
Miksa, T., Simms, S., Mietchen, D., & Jones, S. (2019). Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans. PLoS Computational Biology, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006750
Miksa, T., Suchánek, M., Slifka, J., Knaisl, V., Ekaputra, F. J., Kovacevic, F., Ningtyas, A. M., El-Ebshihy, A., & Pergl, R. (2023). Towards a Toolbox for Automated Assessment of Machine-Actionable Data Management Plans. Data Science Journal, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2023-028
Miksa, T., Walk, P., Neish, P., Oblasser, S., Murray, H., Renner, T., Jacquemot-Perbal, M.-C., Cardoso, J., Kvamme, T., Praetzellis, M., Suchánek, M., Hooft, R., Faure, B., Moa, H., Hasan, A., & Jones, S. (2021). Application profile for machine-actionable data management plans. Data Science Journal, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/DSJ-2021-032
NASEM (2019). Reproducibility and Replicability in Science. National Academies of Sciences and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303
NASEM (2025). U.S. Research Data Summit: Strengthening Cooperation Across Organizations and Sectors: Proceedings of a Workshop. National Academies of Sciences, Medicine, and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.17226/29064
Oblasser, S., Miksa, T., & Kitamoto, A. (2020). Finding a Repository with the Help of Machine-Actionable DMPs: Opportunities and Challenges. International Journal of Digital Curation, 15(1), Art. 1. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v15i1.704
OECD (2022). Integrity and security in the global research ecosystem. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/06/integrity-and-security-in-the-global-research-ecosystem_2bd8511d/1c416f43-en.pdf
Papadopoulou, E., Kontopidi, M., Miksa, T., & Romero, A. (2025). D3.1 DMP Evaluation Rubric and Service Specifications. https://zenodo.org/records/14795222
Philipson, J., Hasan, A., & Moa, H. (2023). Making Data Management Plans Machine Actionable: Templates and Tools. Data Science Journal, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2023-029
RDA, Miksa T, Walk P, & Neish P (2020a). RDA common Standard for machine-actionable Data Management Plans (maDMPs). https://doi.org/10.15497/rda00039
RDA, Miksa T, Walk P, & Neish P (2020b). RDA common Standard for machine-actionable Data Management Plans (maDMPs): Maintenance plan for the Standard. https://doi.org/10.15497/rda00039
Rezende, L. V. R., de Souza de Aguiar Monteiro, E. C., Stueber, K., da Silva, F. C. C., Grácio, J. C. A., & de Oliveira, A. F. (2023). Design of a Brazilian tool for the development of research data management plans: Challenges for the automatic plans model (maDMP). BiD, 50. https://doi.org/10.1344/BiD2023.50.07
Sauermann, S., Kanjala, C., Templ, M., Austin, C. C., & and the RDA-COVID19-WG. (2020). Preservation of individuals’ privacy in shared COVID-19 related data. SSRN Preprint. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3648430
Schultes, E., Magagna, B., Hettne, K. M., Pergl, R., Suchánek, M., & Kuhn, T. (2020). Reusable FAIR Implementation Profiles as Accelerators of FAIR Convergence. In G. Grossmann & S. Ram (Eds.), Advances in Conceptual Modeling (pp. 138–147). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65847-2_13
TBS (2019). Directive on automated decision-making. Treasury Board Secretariat. https://www.tbs-sct.canada.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32592
TBS (2019). Policy on service and digital. Treasury Board Secretariat. https://www.tbs-sct.canada.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=32603
TBS (2025). Be good data stewards. Treasury Board of Canada. https://www.canada.ca/en/government/system/digital-government/government-canada-digital-standards/be-good-data-stewards.html
U15 Canada (2024). Safeguarding Research in Canada: A Guide for University Policies and Practices. U15 Group of Canadian Research Universities. https://science.ised-isde.canada.ca/site/science/en/safeguarding-your-research/guidelines-and-tools-implement-research-security/guidance-research-organizations-funders-and-universities/safeguarding-research-canada-guide-university-policies-and-practices
Wellcome Open Research. Data guidelines. https://wellcomeopenresearch.org/for-authors/data-guidelines
Zoubek, F., Miksa, T., & Rauber, A. (2025). Conceptual service architecture to synchronise research data management services using machine-actionable data management plans. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3712014