Demarchi, S., Tomas, F., & Fanton, L. (2021). False Rape Allegation and Regret: A Theoretical Model Based on Cognitive Dissonance. Archives of Sexual Behavior. doi:10.1007/s10508-020-01847-z
Demarchi, S., Tomas, F., Franchi, A., & Fanton, L. (2020). Cognitive dissonance and false rape allegations: A case study. La Revue de Médecine Légale, 11(3), 122-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medleg.2020.04.004
Denault, V., Rioux-Turcotte, J, & Tomas F. (2019). La spontanéité du discours, un facteur déterminant la crédibilité des témoins. Scriptum (3).
Elissalde, B., Tomas, F., Delmas, H., & Raffin, G. (2019). Le mensonge: Psychologie, applications et outils de détection. Dunod
Fernandes, M., Jonauskaite, D., Michaud, N., Theubet, M., Tomas, F., & Mohr, C. (2025). High confidence, low accuracy: Younger and older adults overestimate lie detection performance. Psychology and Aging. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000948
Fernandes, M., Jonauskaite, D., Tomas, F., Laurent, E. & Mohr, C. (2023). Individual differences in self-reported lie detection abilities. Plos ONE.
Noc, M., Deslauriers-Varin, N., Tomas, F., & Ginet, M. (2025). Drawing Leads to Better Recall Than Written or Spoken Methods in the Cognitive Interview for Suspects. Psychology, Crime, and Law. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2025.2546386
Tomas, F., Dodier, O., & Demarchi, S. (2021). Baselining affects the production of deceptive narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 300-307.
Tomas, F., Dodier, O., & Demarchi, S. (2022). Computational Measures of Deceptive Language: Prospects and Issues. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 792378.
Tomas, F., Durand, T., Boulay, F., & Renard, T. (2021). Les «documenteurs», nouvelle arme dans la guerre de l’information. Revue internationale d'intelligence economique, 13(1), 119-142.
Tomas, F., Fernandes, M., Mohr, C., & Demarchi, S. (2025). Beliefs, Confidence, and Attribution Bias regarding Deception Cues in Police Officers and Lay People. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-025-09762-6
Tomas, F., Tsimperidis, I., Demarchi, S., & El Massioui, F. (2021). Keyboard dynamics discrepancies between baseline and deceptive eyewitness narratives. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 112-122.
Adams-Quackenbush, N. M., Horselenberg, R., Tomas, F., & van Koppen, P. (2019). Detecting guilt-presumption in a police-suspect interview: An evaluation of the questions in a murder case. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice 1, 10(1), 37-60.
Dodier, O., Tomas, F., Payoux, M., & Elissalde, B. (2019). Professional Experience in Investigative Interviews Does not Ensure Strong Knowledge about Memory. Psychological Research on Urban Society. (full text available on ResearchGate)
Dodier, O., & Tomas, F. (2018). When psychological science fails to be heard: The lack of evidence-based arguments in a ministerial report on child sexual abuse. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law.
Tomas, F., & Immerzeel, J. (2025). Chatbots in Eyewitness Interviews: Perceived Usefulness and Ease of Use Drive Intent to Use Conversational Agent. Journal of Criminal Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCP-11-2024-0110
Tomas, F., Poste, C., & Demarchi, S. (2021). Post-homicidal behaviors of intrafamilial crime authors in France: An archival study. European Review of Applied Psychology, 71(4).
Backus, A., Cohen, M., Cohn, N., Faber, M., Krahmer, E., Laparle, S., Maier, E., van Miltenburg, E., Roelofsen, F., Sciubba, E., Scholman, M., Shterionov, D., Sie, M., Tomas, F., Vanmassenhove, E., Venhuizen, N., & de Vos, C. (2023). MINDS: big questions for linguistics in the age of AI. Linguistics in the Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.00094.bac
Second prize (ex aequo) for underlining the crucial questions to be tackled by linguistics in the upcoming ten years awarded by The Netherlands National Graduate School of Linguistics (Landelijke Onderzoeksschool Taalwetenschap) and the General Association for Linguistics (Algemene Vereniging Taalwetenschap)
Braggaar, A., Tomas, F., Blomsma, P., Hommes, S., Braun, N., van Mieltenburg, E., van der Lee, C., Goudbeek, M., & Krahmer, E. (2022). A reproduction study of methods for evaluating dialogue system output: Replicating Santhanam and Shaikh (2019). In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Natural Language Generation: Generation Challenges (pp. 86-93).
Dupas, F. & Tomas, F. (2023). Êtes-vous capable de me lire ? Un regard sceptique sur le "langage du corps" [Can you read me? A skeptical look at "body language"]. Book-e-Book.
Hutin, M. & Tomas, F. (2025). The effect of cognitive load on linguistic fluency, lexical production, and emotional polarity: An exploratory study on self-directed French. Yearbook of the German Cognitive Linguistics Association. https://doi.org/10.1515/gcla-2025-0007
van Miltenburg, E., Braggaar, A., Braun, N., Damen, D., van der Lee, C., Tomas, F., & Krahmer, E. (2023). How reproducible is best-worst scaling for human evaluation? A reproduction of ‘Data-to-text Generation with Macro Planning’. In Proceedings of the 3rd Workshop on Human Evaluation of NLP Systems.
van Miltenburg, E., Braggaar, A., Braun, N., Goudbeek, M., Krahmer, E., van der Lee, C., ... & Tomas, F. (2024, May). ReproHum:# 0033-03: How Reproducible Are Fluency Ratings of Generated Text? A Reproduction of August et al. 2022. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Human Evaluation of NLP Systems (HumEval)@ LREC-COLING 2024 (pp. 132-144). https://aclanthology.org/2024.humeval-1.13
Sancar, I., Nera, K., Schöpfer, C., & Tomas, F. (2025). Advice-Taking in Carbon Footprint Assessments: How Psychological and Cultural Factors Shape Reliance on Experts' Advice. British Journal of Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.70026
Altay, S., Nera, K., Ejaz, W., Schöpfer, C., & Tomas, F. (2023). Conspiracy believers claim to be free thinkers but (Under)Use advice like everyone else. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(4), 1782-1797. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12655
Tomas, F. (2021). Dis c'est quoi l'esprit critique. La Renaissance du Livre.
Wortel, C., Vanwesenbeeck, I., & Tomas, F. (2024). Made with artificial intelligence: The effect of artificial intelligence disclosures in Instagram advertisements on consumer attitudes. Emerging Media, 2(3), 547-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/27523543241292096