The facts relevant to the matter of an injunction against ICE, are proven greater than 6 LODs. which is equivalent to 6 sigma or beyond reasonable doubt of success

• The base 10 log of the odds ratio of favorable over unfavorable are the logarithmic long odds (LODS) based on a gaussian distribution (like a bell curve) of self-verified beliefs. 

It is my belief that the only way to demote our de Facto emperor back to the president is with overwhelming facts & logic that have a depth and breadth that strains the credulity of common sense. 

• Before depositions and expert testimonies for and against, the LODs of the truthfulness are negative 12.  

  • This is my honest assessment of the bleakness of public perception.  

• Yet I still claim an 18-point change in the LODs to standby my first statement. 

• The odds get updated with each new fact in favor of my claims. 

A lawyer will need to rephase the following sentiments:

• Have ICE return to patrol the middle of the Rio Grande for 30 or more days while the facts are considered

• Consider disarming them. 

• Consider using them to detain illegal immigrants in other locations

• Some of our allies have larger illegal immigrant issues

  •  What about Crimea, as their new location to patrol?

The Senate has not Declared that we are at War

And it is more likely than not that, 

• • The US Constitution is structured philosophy for ethical governance providing goals to be achieved

    • And a contract between the governed and every level of US government

    • And failure to try for more perfect is criminally reckless

    • And lack of sound reasoning is misadministration

  • Where precepts are as flexible as the constitutional amendments and reality allows

    • Note: publication of Quanti Theory of Everything has been held in abeyance for this moment

    • Quanti Theory of Everything substantial validation only requires an engineering expert in fiber optics

      • Quantum physicists do not take classes in material sciences. They missed a flaw in the experiment setup. 

  • And where Madison's 12 proposed amendments were already included

And I know how words are stored in human memory and what they mean when used

• Each word includes a Gaussian distribution of all of the concepts associated with a past use of the word in the context of the perceived topic in question. 

  • This fact only depends on 

    • the acceptance of a neural network model

    • the ability to see the contradictions in other people's rhetoric

    • the objectivity to realize how adept we are at deceiving ourselves

  • Support includes:

    • The philosophic statements of Betrand Russell on the Theory of Descriptions 

    • Part 2 through 4 of theAmericaProblem Report

Knowing:

• This is page 2 of 8 of a summary

  • There are 60 more pages on the website

  • There are additional references 

• From a retired introvert

• PMP #1478098 Project Management Professional

  • Certification expired in January 2015

Update the odds to be >50/50.   

• This is either crazy or substantially correct. 

0 LODs and 6 LOD more to go 

• < 10 pages per LOD

The people vote to decide

The basis for this drawing is in a later section. 

Key term of art - the people 

While it appears obvious on the drawing persistent denial of its meaning is a barrier. 

See:

The.America.Problem - History Thought Experiment  

Governmental Terms

Authorizations Delivered

The basis for this drawing is in a later section.  

Please note:

•  the Senate controls every decision directly or indirectly except the budget. 

• the Senators were extensions of the state government prior to the 17th amendment

Therefore, the state governments had political control over the cabinet 

• Age of Reason Philosopher's generally found property rights immediately followed human rights in priority of importance.

• Adam Smith and his economic theories where key figures in the Scottish Enlightenment 

  • • Taxes paid for government services

Therefore, Tax payments made a person a citizen of the government.

When did that change?

War or Budget

Additional basis for this drawing is in a later section. 

This implies.

• Cabinet votes dictate actions for the President to take when the nation is at peace

  • For this to be found true, examples of the first presidents acting in a way opposite their previously stated position 

    • See Examples on 26Jan2026 these are simply 11 phrases indicating possible as yet unresearched examples

New Concepts

An office or agency can have unlimited obligations and responsibilities to their jurisdiction's constituents but have not have the authority or power to take a specific corrective action.  Even if that agency is the executive branch of the federal government. 

The first test for conflicts is the supremacy of actions because those are realized i.e. real.   The conflicts in strategy are theoretical.  How is the selected strategy the only one to consider?   When a civilized township pushes back on the federal government the larger government has the almost impossible task of showing the delayed enforcement for 1000 people is significant relative to the consistent enforcement for 330 million.   However, when the 1000 people are manufacturing weapons of mass destruction the enforcement action benefits the entire population.  There are no substitutes allowed for rational thinking. 

What do you think the LODs are now?

The America Problem    is an in-depth analysis with a final report (prepared January 2026).  Under the Organize tab, the Logical Case page directly applies to being able to understand James Madison's definition of "the people".    Logical Case

• No two people have the exact same definition of any word (Gaussian Distribution like a bell curve).  Communication works when the definitions are close enough to not impact the actions.   

• For the zealous ratifiers, the people as a group (like a church congregation) included the concept of replacing the connection to their God  

  • A role that the King, their former sovereign, had provided before the revolution. 

• For the more pragmatic, the people were the voters plus the individuals the voters cared about.

• Every individual included a little of each of these depending on who they were talking to.

• They did not need a more accurate definition because these two were close enough. 

Sovereign

• First rule for America, no individual is or can be sovereign. Individuals are too flawed. 

  • For groups of individuals amongst the rabble and the disreputable to become sovereign

    • The individuals need a social contract where they each consent to be governed by the group vote.  

      • And the subsequent decisions made by processes which includes votes 

    • In theory, the invisible hand will guide the group to the right action

      • Gaussian definitions include a little of everything vaguely relevant 

    • And the individuals forming the social contract needs to be deemed capable of that consent

      • Non-voters are both part of the people and not part of the people. 

        • Depending upon which one works better for the speaker of the words

• Second rule, the group must have a recognized legal identity 

  • Sovereignty applies to both friendly sovereigns and enemy sovereigns.

  • Governments can refuse to recognize the legality of claims. 

  • The sovereign must have a head which speaks for the body of the group composed of individuals.  

    • A Drawing of a People

• Third rule, none of man's creations can be sovereign

  • Governments are created by humans 

  • The government has no intrinsic authority 

  • The authority is added by the constituents consenting to be governed by their elected representatives.

• Fourth rule, sovereigns can delegate authority, responsibilities and immunities indirectly

  • Sovereigns can change their mind. 

    • To function effectively, someone must document what changed in mind of the sovereign

  • Governments can enjoy periods of time when immunities apply.

• Fifth rule, sovereigns cannot remove the human right to think or try

  • All liberties enabled by human endeavors are civilization supplied

  • And sovereigns determine what is civilized. 

Validation of the above 

• Depends on coherence to known fact 

• No text written in 1790 is using modern English words. 

• Actions are more accurate than words.

Note: the similar validation techniques were used to develop Quanti Theory. 

Goals of Protection

• The "right" to enslave from the Federal Government 

  • No President ought to be able to act like a Kingly moral authority

• Slave states from future external armed and organized abolitionist threats

  • Quakers (the Society of Friends) were active threats

    • Meeting houses spanned the nation 

      • including Geogia and Darke County, Ohio

    • Regular in person reports were required 

    • Women of all ages traveled long distances

      • Dressed so that no skin was visible

    • What at the odds that those women wrote down everything they were doing? 

    • Actions speak louder than words. 

• Slave owner communities from future external armed and organized abolitionist threats

• All community's rights to be tyrannical with 

  • sound reasoning 

  • & a self-righteous premise

    • Includes Puritans, Pilgrims and Salem witch trials

Communities were not required to be tyrannical 

The freedom to be progressive was also secured.

Pennsylvania ratified

• That action required the Society of Friends to concur. 

1. State governments are not sovereign.  

   1. The state government is an agency that has been delegated to work for the sovereign. 

   2. The state's sovereign immunity comes from the 11th amendment.

2. The people of the state are, as a group, the sovereign of the area that has been incorporated as a state.

3. The federal government is not sovereign. 

   1. The government is an agency that has been delegated to work for the sovereign that has been incorporated into a nation.

4. The city government of Minneapolis is not sovereign. 

   1. The government is an agency that has been delegated to work for the sovereign as part of the incorporated city government.

5. The people of the city, as a group, are the sovereign for the city. 

6. Sovereigns are greater than agencies. 

7. Only one agency ought to be assigned supremacy over any responsibility in the hierarchy of governments.

   1. The founders of the constitution knew this

   2. This is how republics must work to avoid internal fighting

   3. One supremacy per responsibility 

Therefore: When the sovereign of Minneapolis (aka the people of) has given supremacy to their local police to patrol their streets 

 by electing their city officials which in turn provided the authority to the local police.

The local police have greater authority; they have supremacy, on this specific responsibility, over the agency which is the federal government. 

The founders wanted:

1.  There to be no king like ultimate authority except in times of war. 

2. That the authority to be govern should come from the people. 

The founders were capable of finding the only solution which can guarantee no individual can be the ultimate authority without the Senate's concurrence. 

Therefore: The founders would agree with the suppositions. 

Legislation documents what the responsibilities and obligations are for each office.   

1. The office holder needs to receive authorizations specific to those responsibilities.   

2. The Senate holds the authority for cabinet members.  

   1. Only until confirming the authority upon the nominee

3. The law does not give the Senate the authority to use the cabinet's authority. 

The letters (P, V & H) in the drawing below represent the authority from the Federal election process run by the state:

1. P is for president

2. V is for Vice President

3. H is for each member of the House of Representatives

The letters (S, J, C & W) below represent the authority from the State election process used to authorize the state government's officials:

Note: This changed with the 17th amendment.

1. S is for the Senators from the state

2. J is for each Judge and Justice in the Judicial system.

3. C is for each Executive branch Senate confirmed position.

   1. The authority is specific to the responsibility 

4. W is for the authority to wage war.  

   1. The Senate holds this authority until the process for declaring war is complete. 

   2. Repeating, the president did not have this authority by virtue of being elected

   3. The cabinet members did not have this authority

it did not meet the goals of those that did not vote to ratify.   Obviously, it did not meet the goals of Patrick Henry, who never voted to ratify or serve as Governor after it was ratified.  This arrangement did take each Governor's authority and gave to the voters. 

In his place, I might substitute former Justice Breyer's sentiments.  It needs to be a government that the people want.  The individuals most adversely impacted were those with the best chance to become tyrannical at the top of the hierarchy of responsibility.   The one's that benefited the most were the small property owners. 

Using Age of Reason philosophy definitions:

Federal Legislation has:

1.  the authority of the ultimate supreme responsibility or agency

   1. Authority flows down amongst agencies for the sole purpose of correcting errors

   2. If the authority is needed for another purpose, there was an error in a piece of legislation.

      1. Responsibilities should not overlap and the Supreme Court Justices ought to resolve what is just.

         1. When in error, the confines of the letter of the law could be paradoxical 

         2. In a stoke of good fortune, Marbury v Madison (1803) occurred

            1.  amongst parties that all knew this philosophy. 

            2.  Madison's proposed 6th amendment: 

               1. "the civil rights of none ....or on any pretext, infringed." 

               2. Was rejected, despite being logically required 

                  1. without checks of errors, errors can only accumulate over time

               3. my guess is that some conflated civil rights and human rights. 

2. and is subordinate to the least incorporated sovereignty

   1. But the federal government is not subordinate to any individual

      1. This is a reaffirmation of no kings 

   2. Authority must flow up the hierarchy because 

      1. the people (when incorporated as group) are at the foundational bottom

Amendments not just legislative is required for changes impacting the sovereigns. The sovereign could also be described as a social incorporation for a jurisdiction.  

It's easier to say, "the people". 

Only the 13th amendment changed a constitutional guarantee taking something away from the sovereign. 

If you ask why we forgot, who would have taught this confusing and complex system in the wake of the civil war? 

The Southern State Governors wanted their authority back.  The Federal government could not promote the people of the Klan being sovereign.  

The Department of Homeland security is an agency with supremacy over other agencies.  But, 

• The Department is not sovereign. 

• The people of the community is sovereign within their physical jurisdiction 

• The people of the state is sovereign within their physical jurisdiction 

1. Congress has not given the department, the responsibility to patrol the streets of Minneapolis. 

   1. ICE does have the authority to detain individuals to investigate documentation issues specific to immigration. 

      1. But not just anywhere.  IRS agents could hang around tax accountant facilities using similar justification

      2. And also, not as a safety patrol. 

         1. Only one government agency per specific responsibility. 

         2. Because the people as the sovereign have authorized the issuing of investigatory warrants within their jurisdiction. 

            1. ICE has the same criteria and process requirements as the local police

         3. Federal arrest warrants have a specific authorization

            1. Making it a separate responsibility

2. There is also the question of de facto citizenship granted by the sovereign of a community

   1. The 14th amendment added a method to become a citizen

      1. It did not remove any of the paths to citizenship. 

      2. Simple legislation could not remove any of the paths to citizenship

   2. When our governments accepted their money, was there a social contract consent to be governed? 

      1. If they also attempted to become a legal resident or citizen, there could be no false pretense. 

   3. When they bought property, did they succeed at becoming a citizen of their community? 

      1. Voters with property ownership legitimized the government with the first Constitutional election.  

         1. When did property ownership get stripped of the civil right to reside and participate in community governance? 

      2. If they are citizens of their community, should they be deported from federal jurisdiction to community jurisdiction to await the red tape resolution? 

   4. The issuance of passports for use overseas, is a process question for id validation.   Paperwork records document the situation.  The destruction or loss of a document does not change the real status; it just changes the ability to verify it.   

      1. Verification being the control of legal reality is the present controlling the past.  It is a paradox that opens a gap in the confines of the law. 

This is not a proper legal filing.   This is ought to be enough.