If you want a closed-back, portable listening setup for computer use, choose Focal AZURYS High-Fidelity Closed-Back; if you need an open-back wired headphone built around a planar magnetic driver, choose FiiO FT1. The key decision is isolation and mobility versus an open design and a stated frequency range reaching 40 kHz. Neither is a computer headset with built-in call or charging features.
Focal AZURYS High-Fidelity Closed-Back vs FiiO FT1 at a Glance
• Focal AZURYS High-Fidelity Closed-Back: Closed-back design, 40 mm Aluminum/Magnesium “M”-shaped drivers, and a stated response of 15 Hz–22 kHz. Trade-off: it is passive and wired, with a 3.5 mm jack rather than Bluetooth or USB-C charging.
• FiiO FT1: Open-back planar magnetic design, a 95 × 86 mm driver unit, and a stated range of 20 Hz–40 kHz. Trade-off: its open construction provides no noise control, making it less suited to shared or noisy spaces.
• Choose Focal for: listening where some isolation, a lightweight magnesium yoke, and a portable closed-back format matter.
• Choose FiiO for: home or studio listening where an open-back design and planar magnetic drivers are the priority.
Focal AZURYS is the more practical fit if your computer is in a shared room, a busy home, or a workspace where you would rather keep your listening more contained. Its closed-back construction is designed for sound isolation, and its 40 mm Aluminum/Magnesium “M”-shaped drivers are specified for hi-fi listening. The stated frequency response is 15 Hz–22 kHz, with harmonic distortion listed as less than 0.3% at 1 kHz and 100 dB SPL.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
The fit and materials are part of its appeal: Focal lists a genuine-leather headband, breathable braided textile, memory-foam earpads, and a magnesium yoke. The stated weight is 306 g. Those details point toward a headphone designed for longer listening sessions and use away from home, rather than a strictly stationary setup.
I would consider AZURYS if you want a wired, closed-back headphone for music at your computer and value isolation and portability. I would skip it if you need wireless playback, USB-C charging, a microphone for calls, or an open-back listening experience. The listed connection is a 3.5 mm jack; the product information does not establish Bluetooth or call features.
FiiO FT1 is aimed at a different kind of listening setup. It is an open-back, wired headphone with a planar magnetic driver. The driver unit measures 95 × 86 mm, and FiiO specifies a frequency range of 20 Hz–40 kHz. Its design information also describes a 1 μm diaphragm with sapphire and aluminum dual coating, plus a uniform magnetic-field design intended to support controlled diaphragm movement.
The product description emphasizes a wide lateral soundstage and detail. Those are design claims, not a guarantee that every listener or recording will produce the same impression. The practical point is that FT1 prioritizes an open planar design rather than the contained listening format of a closed-back headphone. It has a 3.5 mm connection and is wired.
I would choose FT1 for a home or studio computer setup where an open-back headphone suits the room and there is no need for noise control. I would pass if you need to limit sound leakage, listen near other people, or use headphones for calls. The supplied information lists no noise-control feature or microphone, and it does not describe wireless or USB-C charging.
Side-by-Side: Which Should You Choose?
• Best for an open-back planar magnetic design → FiiO FT1. Its driver is planar magnetic, with a stated range extending to 40 kHz.
• Best for portable listening → Focal AZURYS High-Fidelity Closed-Back. Focal describes it for home or on-the-go use and lists a lightweight magnesium yoke and 306 g weight.
• Best for a wired computer listening setup without a need for isolation → FiiO FT1. Its open-back design is a natural fit for a quieter room where outside sound is not a concern.
• Best for materials and comfort details spelled out in the specifications → Focal AZURYS High-Fidelity Closed-Back. Its listed details include memory-foam earpads, a genuine-leather headband, and breathable braided textile.
• Best for a larger planar driver unit → FiiO FT1. FiiO specifies a 95 × 86 mm unit, compared with Focal’s 40 mm drivers.
• Best for call-focused computer use → Neither, based on the listed features. Neither product sheet specifies a built-in microphone or call controls.
• Best if you specifically need a USB-C charging headset for computer → Neither. Both are described as wired headphones with a 3.5 mm jack; neither is listed as a charging headset.
The phrase “crystal clear calls bluetooth headphones for computer” describes a different category from these two products. AZURYS and FT1 are presented as wired listening headphones, not Bluetooth call headsets. Likewise, “best hifi stereo sleep headphones for computer” is not a close fit for either listing: the supplied information does not describe sleep-specific design features.
For computer listening, I would choose Focal AZURYS High-Fidelity Closed-Back if I wanted one of these two for a room where isolation and portability matter. Its closed-back design, stated 306 g weight, and comfort-focused materials make it the more flexible fit for that use. I would choose FiiO FT1 instead if my setup were a quiet room and an open-back planar magnetic design were the main priority.
FAQ
The listed connections are wired 3.5 mm jacks.
Neither is described as a charging headphone. Both are listed as wired, 3.5 mm models, so the supplied information does not support treating either as a USB-C charging headset.
FT1 is the open-back planar magnetic option, and FiiO describes it as having a wide lateral soundstage. AZURYS is the closed-back alternative, with 40 mm Aluminum/Magnesium drivers and a stated response of 15 Hz–22 kHz. Choose based on whether you prioritize an open design or isolation, rather than assuming the specifications alone settle sound preference.
• Amazon Renewed Beats Powerbeats Pro vs DEMICEA True
• yealink vs jabra headset comparison
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.