Filezilla Server 9.41 Download

I've set up Jenkins server in the office (1 master server@Windows server 2012 R2 & 2 nodes@Windows 10 Professional 64bits) for deploying web applications automatically. Web applications are deployed to IIS Server via FTP (FileZilla Server v0.9.41 beta, I know it's old but the administrator doesn't allow me to update the version).

Recently, after uploading files to server, sometimes few files (larger than 8k bytes) are corrupted. Sometimes they are binary files (dll files) and sometimes they are text files (Javascript files). The only observation I found is that the missing bytes in those corrupted files are 8K bytes times.

Download File 🔥 https://urloso.com/2y7PBF 🔥

For instance, upload 3 files: A.dll (100K bytes), B.js (25K bytes), C.dll (200K bytes).First time the corrupted file may be A.dll and its size is only 84K bytes at server.Next time the corrupted file may be B.js and its size is only 17K bytes.The missing bytes are not the beginning or end parts in those corrupted files, they may occur in any position in files.

I have set up FTP-server (Filezilla), when I try to connect to it I get asked for login, so I log in, then I can see the connection is entering passive mode..... and nothing happens. (I can see in the Server Interface when incorrect login params are entered, this is not the case.)

I had the same problem - one of my colleagues works at home and she was unable to get the directory listing. She waited 15 minutes and still nothing. When she's lucky and gets the directory listing, she can download files at a relatively high speed. In my case I have to wait about 15 seconds to get directories, so the connection worked between my home computer and the server.

The server is running FileZilla v0.9.41 beta on Windows XP, the client is Total Commander v8.0 on Windows 7. She has a 120 Mbps connection. After reading some articles I changed the server's parameters as follows:

Servers and telecommunications companies rely heavily on 10GbE and up (40GbE, 100GbE, 200GbE, and more) because they must transfer copious volumes of data. The everyday user does need these speeds, so 10GbE is plenty. The more elaborate server hardware is not required.

This is what SFP is all about. Change the transceiver, and you change the medium. Other SFP exists, such as QSFP (Quad SFP) and OSFP (Octal SFP), but these are specialized server standards that go far above anything we are doing. Most of the time, you will see SFP+.

After watching System Monitor on Computer B during iperf3 tests, all of its CPU cores were running around 90-100%. It turns out that Computer B had an A10-7860K APU, and that is too slow to handle a full 10GbE throughput. Computer E used an i7-4770, and it had no problem returning 9.41 Gb/s results. The speed of the processor matters. Upgrading to 10GbE alone will not guarantee 10GbE network transfers if the CPUs are too slow to process the higher speed.

You will not see 10 Gb/s reported by iperf3 due to overhead. 9.41 Gb/s translates to ~944 MB/s, not 1000MB/s like we would expect on paper, and this is normal. I confirmed these numbers with other online results, and a properly working 10GbE network should test at ~9.41 Gb/s with iperf3.

The tests so far measured single transfers between two computers at a time. 10GbE provides plenty of throughput for multiple connections. If several transfers are occurring simultaneously between multiple clients and a server, such as a media server, then those transfers can max out the 10GbE throughput. For example, two clients with SSDs each downloading at 450 MB/s can cause the 10GbE network to actually reach 900 MB/s total providing the server can supply data at that rate.

I watched multiple guides and have googled an epic ton and believe i have setup everything properly but i am only able to get a speed of 400+ MB/s capping at 500. I have setup a ramdisk on the windows pc and tried transferring between a Unassigned Devices SSD, and have tried transferring between an SSD on the windows PC and an SSD on the unRAID server. i have also setup iperf3 and run the necessary test's and am only getting about maybe 3.89 to 4 GB bandwith speed. I have tweaked the settings of the MTU/jumbo frames and it absolutely makes no difference, what is it that i am missing ?

For the windows PC the card is in a PCIE x16 slot and the same for the unRAID server the windows PC is the P8Z77-WS with 32 gigs of ram I7 3770k processor. unRAID server is supermicro X9DRI-LN4F+ with 64 GB of ECC ram and 2x INTEL XEON E5-2680V2 10 CORE 2.80GHz

that makes sense which is why spaceinvaderone used 2 ramdisks in his tutorial. but then my question is why do i get these speeds using iperf3 which ignores hard drives. my PC on the left unRAID server on the right

So i have replaced the broadcom cards with Mellanox MCX311A-XCAT CX311A ConnectX-3 EN 10G Ethernet 10GbE SFP+ x2 I have created a ramdisk in windows 10 and also unraid. I have 64GB of ddr3 ecc memory in unraid server 32 GB of ram in windows machine. i could be wrong but wouldnt this test ignore any hardware limitations and yield better results ?

So after some times i have made numerous changes and seem to still be having an issue, i have changed the mellanox card in the server to Mellanox MCX312A-XCBT CX312A ConnectX-3 EN 10GbE SFP+ Dual-Port PCI-E NIC. I have also purchased 2x Samsung 970 EVO Plus SSD 250GB - M.2 NVMe Interface Internal Solid State Drive with V-NAND Technology one in the desktop one in the desktop one in the server as an unassigned device. MTU settings 9014 on both cards. on the windows side both send and receive buffers 4096, interruption moderation disabled, receive side scaling enabled.

So an update. to further try and resolve this i ended up transferring the card into a shuttle PC which is currently running windows 7 and when doing speed tests the cards gave me 1GB going both directions between the server and client. and then thought to myself something must be wrong with my windows 10 install, I made a partition backup and re-installed the OS and tested the speed and speed was great this time between the original machine and server. I began to install programs one by one testing transfer speed immediately afterwards, when i finally got to my antivirus (avast) I found that when installed it slows down my LAN transfers to about 300MB/s and 200 going back to client PC even trying to add the network shares to be excluded from the program entirely it made no difference im not sure whats up with their firewall but i have googled and found multiple posts regarding this. and have not found what the solution could be

Well, VNC connections run nicely as well, to my experience. I use it to access my server too, as it runs on Linux. Some say that in a Windows machine VNC takes up more resources than RDC though, but I have not compared them side-by-side. It was just easier to get this Vista workstation to enable its broken RDC service than get it to allow incoming VNC connections, or that was how it was for me.

I established today a Mac-to-Vista connection from my livingroom Mac Mini, and rather than using the native Mac VNC implementation, or the open source version (Chicken of the VNC), I ended up using RealVNC for this (launch it in server, rather than service form in Vista, then install and use the Mac version of RealVNC viewer, available from: -bin/download.cgi?product=enterprise4/vncviewer/macosx ).

I used termsrv before SP1 and it worked, until I read this forum I did not know that SP1 could clobber RDP server, it did.

Downloaded and ran termsrv.sp1 worked perfectly first time. RDP server is now working on my Vista Home Prem SP1.

Thanks for the excellent work.

while you are at it you may as well configure your router to forward all incoming connections for TCP 3389 to the desktop you want to connect to. to do this you will need to go into your routers configuration page which can usually be accessed through a web browser by inputting the IP address of your router which can be found on the bottom of the device itself ( usually 192.168.0.1 for Netgear routers). You will then need to add a service: in this case we are adding a service for incoming connections on TCP 3389 (starting and ending on 3389). When the service is made we need to apply it by going into firewall rules and adding it an inbound serviceby selecting add> select the service you just made in the last step>allow it always>send to LAN server ( this is the local IP address of your pc which you can find out by pressing the windows button+R> type cmd> type ipconfig and look for IPv4 address), then select to apply the rule back in the routers config page.

Since you have done so much research already, could you help me figure out how to get audio from RDP connection? I managed to get my vista premium act as a Host and I am able to use my xp desktop client to connect to vista premium host machine. Only problem, no audio even though I checked the bring over audio option on the client. There is a setting called Audio Mapping that needs to be enabled and its on the terminal server config. Unfortunately, vista premium does not have that utility. Nor do I know which registry entry to change for this. Any idea? I would love to get the Audio brought over from my vista premium host.

In that case you will have change the port number that the rdp server on your computer listens to match the value you choose for x. The only way I know how to that is by editting in the registry. Maybe it can be done with group policy in ultimate. Good old editting the registry is much easier then that policy crap.

My next step is to grab a snapshot once an hour (during daylight hours). Taking advice from here, I ssh into my HA server (RPIv4):, but even though ffmpeg is part of the HA install, I can not find the executable command.

Hi I have 2020 Yi Home 1080p Camera with yi-hack-AllWinner. I try to upload motion video to FTP server. I have written coretly FTP configuration in Motion Events Sheet and nothing happends, the video is still only on camera sd card 006ab0faaa