(An older version circulated as “A Sharing Model of the Household: Explaining the Deaton-Paxson Paradox and Contesting the Collective Model”)
This paper presents a model of the household, which most distinctive feature is the presence of common-pool goods (rival and non-excludable) previously ignored in the literature. Under regularity conditions, the model can be interpreted as a hybrid between non-cooperative and collective models of the household. The derived household demand system is capable of explaining consumption regularities that existing models cannot describe. Empirically, the paper proposes and implements a new method to compute the elusive indifference scales coefficients.(An older version circulated as “Do fertility preferences pass from parents to children? Evidence from the 1966 Romanian abortion ban”)
This paper analyzes to what extend fertility preferences correlates across generations, dealing with a largely understudied dimension of the demand for children. The paper exploits the abrupt implementation of the 1966 Romanian anti-abortion decree that discontinuously changed the composition of mothers in relation to their `taste’ for children. Using multiple Censuses, second-generation men and women born around the policy implementation are followed over their lives to study how the socio-economic status and fertility preferences of their parents affect their own reproductive behavior. Methodologically, the paper combines elements of the regression discontinuity design and the Heckman’s selection model. Results indicate that the intergenerational fertility correlation ranges from 0.15 to 0.25. One-third of this correlation is explained by inherited socio-economic status and two-thirds by `inherited’ preferences.