Michael T. Griffith

When the true history of our world is written, the theory of evolution, as embodied in macroevolution, will go down as one of the biggest hoaxes ever foisted on humanity.

Few people question microevolution, which is merely the development of new species within a genus due to breeding or mutations, such as new species of dogs, cats, mice, bacteria, etc. The issue is macroevolution.

Macroevolution assumes that life somehow came from non-life, although there is no evidence that such a thing is even possible, and that new genera somehow developed via random, undirected processes. In addition, macroevolution has no credible, sensible theory to explain how the massive, complex information needed for life could have come into being by random events.

Macroevolution assumes that "natural selection" somehow "selected" components for complex functions that did not yet exist, even though the very concept of the functions was unknown by anyone or by any kind of sentient entity when they were supposedly "selected." Then, the story goes, those components were somehow assembled in the correct order and manner to perform complex functions. Macroevolution says this scenario occurred untold numbers of times entirely by accident and without any direction from any kind of intelligence.

According to macroevolution, many species evolved into new or different genera, evolving from being in one genus into a different kind of being in a different genus. To put it in simple terms, macroevolution argues that many living things became different kinds of living things. For example, some creatures that lived underwater in the sea supposedly somehow became creatures that lived on land. Some amoebas (single-celled organisms) supposedly, over billions of year, became humans. The fossil record does not support this claim.

Evolutionists still repeat the myth that humans and chimpanzees share 98-99% of the same DNA, that human DNA and chimp DNA are 98-99% similar. However, evolutionists fail to explain that this similarity is based on only 2% of the DNA in humans. When all of human DNA is considered, human DNA and chimp DNA are quite different. 

The evidence from biology, astronomy, geology, archaeology, etc., literally screams that our planet and the life forms on it were created by intelligent design. However, secularists will not acknowledge this because intelligent design would require an intelligent designer, which would imply the existence of a supreme being.

Evolutionists tell us that our universe began with a "big bang," but they cannot tell us where or how the matter and energy needed for such an explosion came into being. They were "just there," we are told. Science knows of no explosion that has ever created complexity and order.