The term eu social taxonomy is used because of pressures from investors and other parties making the information accessible internally for controlling corporate decisions, but this term means different things to different people. The recovery of economic value to the investors is another interpretation. Selective Disclosure, on the other hand, involves delivering information for less facile purpose and subject to more external verification. The concept behind selective disclosure is linked with the idea of fairly treating public companies like other similar companies concerning tax-related and audit issues, and makes public their information. However, the eu social taxonomy has not yet grabbed much attention from the media or investors. Unfortunately, what one notices is that selective disclosure is only made on selective information elements, and is not presented in a way to allow the rest of the public access to those information elements.
The second Taxonomy used for economic value is called Financial Information Institutions (FII) and Financial Activities. Although FII does not have a specific rule of content limitations, or rules of sequence, reliance of FII is placed on the flexibility or operations of an outsourced accounting firm whose core competence is a current view of information. In other words, the entrepreneur is selected to perform such duties due to the eu social taxonomy. Normally (supposedly) such information practices were not audited on FII basis or were not compliant with the SAGA. It is like a professional will not remain satisfied with the other services no matter how effective they are. For example, an entrepreneurial entity now during its early formative years requires the service of a financial presenter, and though the other information will be available externally, they are not willing to surrender their services to the public due to fear of their cost to the eu social taxonomy.
The third area of opportunity in the development of the Economic Value Pie is to select and turn eu social taxonomy indicators into economic value resulting from their use for the improvement of economic performance. Some of these indicators may be purely objective or at least, do not rely heavily on financial factors. Although these indicators may become into play through selective distribution, or selective presentation, they may become more important as OUTSOURCING, Credit Division, or other enterprises build new corporate capacity. The uncertainty in failure to identify these indicators may become real for longer periods due to cyclical pressures on the Economy and distinguished Swiss-style adversity. However, such indicators contribute to yield in measured improvements in the various eu social taxonomy indicators.
Large and small companies may use the information they obtain from their financial statements or other accounting transactions and revise their business and investment plans accordingly. Having access to information through their financial statements that is not readily available will enable the investors and other stakeholders to get a better perspective of their statements. It is therefore a supplement to the use of their financial statements rather than being a write-up. These transparent eu social taxonomy indicators of business activities will contribute to development of the necessary reputation of the business. In addition, using such financial statements will permit investors and stakeholders to distinguish the performance of the medium- and long-term of the company. However, using only conventional indicators will be inadequate and will not give a clear picture of the economic landscape that they wish to obtain. There is another use for such information; for example, when preparing budgets, projections, and budget reports with more objective economic conclusions.
Among the challenges of economic value theory is the fact that a company can make the average performing indicators (AP's) even higher by using the ones presented by the company. The next step is the eu social taxonomy. For example, one of the difficulties of applying economic value theory in the financial area is to group under one heading such criteria as returns on investment, return on capital, net return, return on equity, return on capital employed, and the like. Within each class of indicators there can be different methodologies; for example, for investment- return on money, there can be some indicators like return on capital employed, which are lower than the average of all available measures i.e. return on investment. Also, a list of eu social taxonomy indicators for each class with the same letter designation "A" should be generated and a set of basic ranges for the categories rather than a list of all numbers. Rather, there can be three score ranges with a different letter than that of the head.