Publications

Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Isaacs, M.W., Buxbaum, L.J., & Wong, A.L. (2022). Does spatial perspective in virtual reality affect imitation accuracy in stroke patients? Frontiers in Virtual Reality.

Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Isaacs, M.W., Buxbaum, L.J., & Wong, A.L. (2022). Action imitation via trajectory-based or posture-based planning. Human Movement Science, 83, 102951.

Schug, M., Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Stefanucci, J.K., Creem-Regehr, S.H., Olson, A.P.L., & Cashdan, E. (2022). Childhood experience reduces gender differences in spatial abilities: A cross-cultural study. Cognitive Science 46(2).


Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Meneghetti, C., Zhao, Y., Pazzaglia, F., & Creem-Regehr, S.H. (2021). Effects of home environment structure on navigation preference and performance: A comparison in Veneto, Italy and Utah, USA. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 74, 101580.


Creem-Regehr, S.H., Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Tarampi, M.R., Rand, K.M., & Legge, G. (2021). How can basic research on spatial cognition enhance the visual accessibility of architecture for people with low vision? Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications. 6(1), 1-18.

Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Stoker, J., Stefanucci, J.K., & Creem-Regehr, S.H. (2020). Using virtual reality to assess dynamic self-motion and landmark cues for spatial updating in children and adults. Memory & Cognition, 49(3), 572-585. 10.3758/s13421-020-01111-8

Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Creem-Regehr, S.H., Stefanucci, J.K., Gardner, J., Saccomano, T., & Wright, C. (2020). Spatial reference frame but neither age nor gender predict performance on a water level task in 8-11-year-old children. Perception, 49(11), 1200-1212.10.1177/0301006620964414

Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Stefanucci, J.K., & Creem-Regehr, S.H. (2020). A comparison of virtual locomotion methods in movement experts and non-experts: Testing the contributions of body-based and visual translation for spatial updating. Experimental Brain Research, 238(9), 1911-1923.

Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Rand, K.M., & Creem-Regehr, S.H. (2020). Does active learning benefit spatial memory during navigation with restricted peripheral field? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82, 3033-3047.

Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Rand, K.M., & Creem-Regehr, S.H. (2019). Navigating with peripheral field loss in a museum: Learning impairments due to environmental complexity. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 4(1), 1-10.

Barhorst-Cates, E.M. (2018). Spatial working memory is enhanced for movement experts in traditional and embodied tasks. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 19(1), 69-91.

Rand, K.M., Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Kiris, E., Thompson, W.B., & Creem-Regehr, S.H. (2018). Going the distance and beyond: Simulated low vision increases perception of distance traveled during locomotion. Psychological Research, 83(7), 1349-1362.

Barhorst-Cates, E.M., Rand, K.M., & Creem-Regehr, S.H. (2017). Let me be your guide: Physical guidance improves spatial learning for older adults with simulated low vision. Experimental Brain Research, 235(11), 3307-3317. 10.1007/s00221-017-5063-8.

Barhorst-Cates, E. M., Rand, K. M., & Creem-Regehr, S. H. (2016). The Effects of Restricted Peripheral Field-of-View on Spatial Learning while Navigating. PloS one, 11(10), e0163785.

Preprints