Upon receipt of the application, an initial screening is conducted to ensure the completeness of the submitted documents. A detailed technical screening will be carried out at the secretariat level within 15 working days from the day of the receipt of the application. Based on this screening, ERB decides on one of the following three routes for further processes (see Figure 1):
Exempted review: Research proposals that pose no potential risks to participants may qualify for exempted review. Examples of such proposals include systematic reviews and meta-analyses, research proposals solely based on secondary data, and research activities that are planned to be conducted in natural and commonly accepted educational settings.
Expedited Review: Research proposals involving low or minimal risks and not involving vulnerable populations may qualify for the expedited review. Research proposals based on non-invasive sampling techniques, studies that do not require biological samples, descriptive studies, observational studies, and research proposals based on unpublished secondary data might fall under this category.
Full Review: A full review is conducted for research proposals that involve invasive sampling techniques and procedures that may cause physical and mental harm to research participants, as well as those involving vulnerable and disadvantaged populations and minors. Proposals requiring biological samples, experimental research proposals, action research proposals, collaborative research proposals, archival resource-based research proposals, and any other research proposals that do not fall under the category of exempted and expedited review categories undergo a full review process.
Following the expedited or full review by subject experts, ERB may decide on one of the following outcomes:
Approved as Submitted: In this case, the applicant may proceed with the proposed research without any revisions.
Conditionally Approved with Revisions: The applicant is required to address the review comments and revise the proposal accordingly. The revised proposal must then be resubmitted to the ERB secretariat for reevaluation. The ERB may approve the revised proposal if the revisions are deemed satisfactory.
Disapproved: The applicant is not permitted to proceed with the proposed research proposal due to significant ethical concerns.