Project Guidelines
I- Research Prospectus
A significant step in writing a research paper is deciding on your topic and your research question. This is not an easy task; it is one that requires a lot of a priori thinking. In order to complete the course, students are required to find a topic that touches on a real-world issue related to the three departments.
You can start this process by brain storming. Get together with your group members and try to come up with dynamics, events, issues, problems that you face in your everyday life. Socio-economic and political problems do not have to be out there. There are two key considerations. First, you must be interested in the subject; you and your teammates must be curious about the particular phenomenon that you want to study. Second, you must find a real-world puzzle that you can relate to the economic, social, and/or political framework you will be using.
Let your curiosity guide you. A good project asks a “how” question. How does this process work? How can we make sense of this phenomenon? How does x affect y? ‘How’ questions try to understand the inner dynamics of an event, process, or trend. This is essential for social sciences. We try to understand how things work and make that information relatable to the general publics. The answer to your questions can be causal, correlational, or descriptive.
Every prospectus should include a thesis statement or if you are to use quantitative techniques you should provide a hypothesis. A thesis statement is a sentence (or two) that explain the argument that will be presented in your project in clearest, simplest and most direct way possible. Your team must establish your argument based on your collective perspective on the issue you will be addressing.
Once you have established your topic (i.e. the focus of your project), your research question, your thesis statement, or your hypothesis, you need to write an abstract that explains: why this topic is important and how it relates to the socio-economic, and/or political issues covered in your GE 400 course. A good abstract should (1) provide a (very) brief background information in order to contextualize the topic; (2) establish the empirical case (an event, process, trend etc.) to be addressed in the project; (3) present the research question; (4) present the thesis statement or a hypothesis and (5) provide a brief description of the type of method that you will use in this project. General method lectures that you have related with GE 400 will help you here.
II- Draft Report
Mainly in the Draft Report your research question, especially your hypothesis is analyzed with a help of a literature review and data analysis. The Draft Report is supposed to present a decent literature review as well as your preliminary data analysis and preliminary findings. It could be a good practice to include the parts/sections of Abstract, Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, Data, Results, Conclusion and Bibliography in your text. Still, as your project will be in progress as of the submission date of the Draft Report, Abstract, Introduction and Conclusion sections combined are better not to have a large volume, yet they should be well-placed in the text with backward and forward linkages, though.
II-a. Literature Review
A literature review is a survey of already published secondary sources. In an academic setting, secondary sources refer to journal articles, academic books, databases, surveys among others. Conducting a literature review presents an opportunity for you and your teammates to understand where your project fits in relation to the existing literature that is out there. As part of a literature review, you will try to demonstrate your grasp on the existing/current knowledge including substantive findings, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to a particular topic. In other words, a good literature review will present a map of the existing literature on your chosen topic. To present a comprehensive literature review you must sometimes go back as far as 20 years or so.
In writing a literature review, you must try and answer some important questions: What do other authors argue? What are different perspectives on this issue? How do these perspectives compare and contrast? What are some sources of agreements and disagreements? Answering these questions will help you understand common arguments and consensuses/disagreements in your area of research. Consequently, your literature review will not be an annotated bibliography. It should clearly include a comparison of various trends and analysis of different ideas. Finally, you should conclude with why you are embracing some of these ideas and not others. In what ways these theories, ideas etc. cast light on your topic.
Literature review forms an important part of your research project. As part of writing a literature review, you must:
1) Identify the parameters of your research (time period, sectors, actors etc.) and base your searches on these.
2) Identify important academic books.
3) Identify main arguments in each source and write down how these arguments differ/overlap etc.
Once you “map” out the literature and identify methodological/theoretical/empirical debates, agreements, disagreements in the literature then you can start writing your literature review section. For FEASS GE 400 course, your literature review should be approximately 1,500 words long, and cover at least 30 sources with a lower limit of 5 sources per each of the fields of ECON, IR and POLS.
As part of the literature review, you must present the reader:
1) The fit: Where does your project fit in relation to the existing works that have already been published?
2) The gap: What is the gap in the literature that you will be addressing? What is new about your project when compared to other works? If you do not fill a gap in the literature, you may give a summary of your contributions to the area with your project.
3) The summary: What are some main theoretical, empirical, methodological issues addressed in the existing literature and why?
4) The analysis: Where do you agree/disagree with the existing works, and why? Which parts of the existing work will help you and guide you in your research?
5) The bibliography: You should provide a bibliography at the end of your Draft Project literature review. In bibliography, you should list the resources, obeying the numerical lower limits explained above, that you referred in the literature review.
Upon completing your literature review, you must have a good knowledge of what you are studying and what others’ have said about that topic. Knowing where you are is important; it allows you to chart your way forward.
II-b. Introduction
Now you are ready to form your introduction of your Draft Report. You should not cut and paste all your research proposal and all your literature review to form the introductory parts of your Draft Report. Instead, if you want to use this past assignment as the introductory parts of your Draft Report, you should summarize them neatly by removing the unnecessary parts and including the parts that you will address in your project.
The second important issue is you should not separate and detach the three disciplines from each other by making headings and subheadings, such as: Economics part or International Relations part or Political Science and Public Administration part. On the contrary your headings or subheadings should be carefully chosen such that you can intertwine these disciplines.
II-c. Data Collection and Analysis
So far you have determined a nicely framed research question, your thesis statement and completed a literature review to see where you are standing theoretically. Now you should test/demonstrate/prove your point. Actually, this is an open-ended journey. With another saying, while you try to prove your point, you may realize that your hypothesis might be wrong (or correct) at the end of your data analysis. This result should be welcomed by you and you should write your Draft Report accordingly.
Data Collection and Analysis require you and your teammates to reflect on the process of data collection (How did you collect the primary data? Did you collect the secondary data? Where did you get the secondary data?). This requires you to answer where/how did you find the data (through interviews, archives, internet databases, reports by government agencies, non-governmental organizations, international organization, surveys, archival research)?
What is Data?
Data (plural form of datum) refer to a set of inputs that are of qualitative or quantitative nature. In essence, data is quantifiable reality. Data allows you to test your thesis statement. As social scientists, we need proof to make the arguments we make and we cannot simply make unsubstantiated claims. In this pursuit, identifying, tracing, accessing, and sorting data is one of the major challenges faced by all of us. Sometime data is not available, not accessible, or simply does not exist. This might mean two things, either you are wrong in your assumptions – there is no data to back your argument, or you are the first to gather data on your particular topic. While the former can be frustrating and disappointing, the latter can be exciting and demanding.
Data Collection
Data collection refers to the process of gathering and measuring information to substantiate/prove/answer your stated research question/hypothesis. Researching economic, social, and political realities is a messy process. What counts as data, what are facts? Where to find them? How to acquire enough information to substantiate your claims? Acquiring your own primary data may be very valuable for a successful GE 400 project. ‘Primary data’ refers to data that you collect, or acquire from already established databases, to support your arguments. Primary data forms the basis of the ‘facts’ you will use to build your argument. On the other hand, if we look at the binding constraints, such as bureaucratic necessities and time span of the course, correct usage (i.e., having the data from scholarly articles by citing) of secondary data is permissible as well. A combination of primary and secondary data might be a wise policy.
Successful completion of the abstract and the literature review may help you a lot in addressing your data needs. Before you start this process, keep one thing in mind: data is everywhere; all around us.
Primary data collection can be done through various methods: surveys, interviews, archival research, historical research, documentary research, polling, participant observation, database searches, among others helps you to collect data.
As part of the GE 400 course, you are expected to develop a research project that relies on primary data to some extent. So, you are supposed to go out into the ‘field’ and collect data first hand. ‘Going out to the field’ does not necessarily mean you need to go and do field research for days on end, rather it means that you need to get primary data from the original source of the data and not from other books or articles.
While data collection can be time consuming, challenging and at times frustrating, it is also extremely rewarding to see the real-world aspects of your project. Remember to be honest and ethical about this process. Do not manufacture data; do not change the result of your polls, surveys, interviews to fit the data into your argument. As a researcher it is your duty to reflect the ideas and views of others properly and without omissions.
Data Analysis
Collecting data, however, is only part of the process. You and your teammates need to analyze the data to make sense of all the information available. Data analysis requires you to inspect, transform, and model data in order to identify useful information and suggest conclusions. At this stage, the information you learned during your methods classes should help you. Consulting the following introductory methods textbooks may be useful:
Della Porta, Donatella and Michael Keiting. (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences: A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Moses, Jonathon W. and Torbjorn L. Knutsen (2007) Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan
As to data analysis, the content sessions will guide you through your project’s time span.
III- Final Report
After you have completed your Draft Report successfully, there is still some way ahead. As described earlier, the Draft Report (under the assumption of a standard student workload and tempo) is to include your in-depth review of the related literature and your preliminary data, analysis and findings. The Final Project, on the other hand, is supposed to polish and sharpen it in the light of your Supervisors’ criticisms. The polishing efforts are mainly aimed at:
Completing the diagnostic checks/tests required by the methodology and correcting the work
Completing the robustness analyses with respect to alternative data schemes and/or functional forms, where applicable, and dwelling on the power of the presented analysis
Completing the missing links in the text of Draft Report so as to make it a “meaningful whole” without redundancies
Completing the visual elements (tables and figures) so as to make them self-explanatory and fully compatible with the text
Fulfilling each and every point required earlier by your Content Supervisor and Language Supervisor.
https://w3.bilkent.edu.tr/www/koronavirus-ve-covid-19-hakkinda-bilgilendirme/