If you want a call-focused headset with three AI-powered microphones, a boom mic and easy-to-reach controls for glasses wearers, choose EPOS Impact 1060T; if you need longer stated battery life and fuller call-and-music versatility, choose Jabra Evolve2. For glasses wearers who spend much of the day in meetings, I’d lean toward the EPOS for its work-centered design, while the Jabra has a stronger case if unplugged time and listening beyond calls matter more.
• EPOS Impact 1060T strength: Three beamforming microphones with EPOS AI noise cancellation, plus an inline controller for quick call adjustments. Trade-off: The listed battery details do not give a runtime figure.
• Jabra Evolve2 strength: Up to 37 hours of battery life, 40 mm speakers, and memory foam padding designed for passive noise reduction. Trade-off: Its noise reduction is passive, and its feature set is less centered on call-floor controls.
• For EPOS: Choose it if your day revolves around professional calls and you value microphone features, a visible busylight and fast access to mute and volume.
• For Jabra: Choose it if you want a headset for calls and music, with a specified long battery life and a USB Bluetooth adapter included.
• Both are on-ear wireless headsets, so neither is an in-ear option. That matters if you’re searching for in ear earbuds for glasses wearers: these products are a different category, with earcups resting on the ears rather than small earpieces sitting inside them. The more useful comparison here is how each headset’s fit and work features align with your routine.
The EPOS Impact 1060T is built around professional calling. Its three digital beamforming microphones use EPOS AI noise cancellation, and the headset is described as certified for Microsoft Teams. The double-sided, on-ear design pairs soft memory foam earpads with a lightweight frame. For someone who wears glasses during long calls, that combination is worth considering, though the provided specifications do not establish how a particular frame will feel under the earcups.
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
Updated: 2026-10-15 · 6 min read · Independent comparison
Its practical strengths are the controls and call-status cues. The inline controller sits close to the headset, with volume, mute and call-answer functions. A 360-degree busylight signals availability, and a light at the microphone tip indicates mute status. Those details may be useful in a shared office, where a glance or a quick button press can be easier than reaching for a computer.
I’d choose EPOS if voice calls take priority over music playback and you want a headset designed around a steady flow of conversations. Skip it if a stated battery runtime is essential to your decision: the provided details do not specify one. Its on-ear design also means it is not the right fit for someone specifically seeking earbuds.
The Jabra Evolve2 65 makes a broader case for mixed work and listening. It has 40 mm speakers for calls and music, a three-microphone call system, and memory foam padding with an angled design intended to reduce surrounding noise passively. It is optimized for Microsoft Teams and is described as compatible with leading unified communications platforms.
Battery life is its clearest practical advantage on paper: Jabra specifies up to 37 hours on a charge, with a 15-minute charge described as providing up to eight hours of use. The included Link 380a USB-A Bluetooth adapter gives you another way to connect to a computer. For someone moving between meetings and other audio, that mix of stated runtime, speakers and adapter is appealing.
For glasses wearers, the memory foam cushions and on-ear design are relevant, but comfort will still depend on how the headset and your frames meet. I’d favor Jabra if you want one wireless headset for calls and music and want a clear battery figure before choosing. If your priority is a microphone-centered setup with a nearby inline controller and dedicated mute and availability indicators, EPOS is more specifically equipped for that workflow.
• Best for call-focused microphone features → EPOS Impact 1060T. Its three digital beamforming mics are powered by EPOS AI noise cancellation, and its design emphasizes professional calls.
• Best for a specified long battery runtime → Jabra Evolve2. Jabra lists up to 37 hours, plus up to eight hours of use from a 15-minute charge.
• Best for quick physical call controls → EPOS Impact 1060T. Its inline unit handles volume, mute and answering, while the mic-tip LED helps show when you are muted.
• Best for visible availability cues → EPOS Impact 1060T. The 360-degree busylight is intended to signal whether you are available.
• Best for calls and music in one headset → Jabra Evolve2. Its 40 mm speakers are specified for both, giving it a broader stated listening role.
• Best for a supplied USB Bluetooth adapter → Jabra Evolve2. The Link 380a USB-A adapter is included.
• Best for a contact-center-style workday → EPOS Impact 1060T. The double-sided design, call controls and busylight suit repeated calls and shared workspaces.
• Best for buyers comparing headsets for glasses wearers → Neither has a guaranteed fit advantage. Both are on-ear with memory foam, so the better choice depends on how the cushions sit around your frames.
Neither product is an obvious answer for someone searching for the best gaming headset for glasses wearers. The listed features focus on business calls, work connectivity and general audio, not gaming-specific functions. If gaming is the main use, these specifications do not provide enough to establish either as a specialized gaming pick.
The distinction is less about one headset being universally better and more about what you want to notice during a workday. EPOS foregrounds call handling: reach the controls, see mute status, and signal that you are busy. Jabra foregrounds endurance and versatility: a stated battery runtime, speakers for music as well as calls, and an included adapter. For glasses wearers, neither sheet supplies information about clamp force or frame compatibility, so those details should not be assumed from the padding alone.
I’d choose the EPOS Impact 1060T for a call-heavy workday because its microphone system, inline controls and visible call-status cues are closely matched to that use. For glasses wearers, I’d treat the on-ear fit as something to weigh carefully rather than assuming memory foam guarantees comfort. If I wanted longer stated battery life and more emphasis on music listening, I’d choose the Jabra instead.
Both are on-ear headsets with memory foam earpads or cushions. Neither product’s listed details specify how it fits around glasses frames, so there is no clear fit winner from the available information.
Jabra lists up to 37 hours of battery life and says a 15-minute charge can provide up to eight hours of use. The provided EPOS details do not include a battery runtime, so a direct runtime comparison is not possible.
It has a strong call-focused feature set: three digital beamforming microphones powered by EPOS AI noise cancellation, an inline controller, a mute indicator and a busylight. Jabra also has a three-microphone call system, so the choice depends on whether you prioritize EPOS’s call controls or Jabra’s stated battery life and broader music use.
Jabra explicitly lists 40 mm speakers for calls and music, making it the more clearly specified choice for both uses. EPOS is presented as a professional call headset, with its listed features centered on voice communication and call handling.
• our CXLWZ Guitar Amp 20 vs AJGJF Neck Fans that pick
• ZNXZXP Classroom Headphones Bulk vs CNSZSLZ 50
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.