_________________
_________________
by Keli Trumpler
Overview: This project...
Text
Text
Figure X. Link to Slideshow overview of project.
Firstly the data was reorganized and projected from its coodinate system NAD83 long/lat to
From the data set provided, I used the following files as follows:
Set X (raster) → used as Y
Set A (point) → used as B
To ensure proper downstream analyses, I projected all of the data from NAD 1983 to UTM Zone 19...
Euclidean distance was used on three data layers to represent points of interest in the remote area and slope was determined for the elevation which was treated as sea conditions. These four were then reclassified to be evaluated by the same scale and then combined into a weighted overlay to determine a cost surface map, whereby weights were assigned as follows: 10% sea conditions, 30% protected areas, 30% reefs and 30% shipwrecks.
Figure 1. Full Model Builder workflow for project.
Two main loops were used in the python script:
Loop 1: Determining XYZ
Loop 2: Retrieving ABC
In the initial model builder processes, the data which collectively represented feature points of interest for the dive expedition had to be classified in a way that enabled a cost surface to be generated through the use of first euclidean distances (Fig. 2-4) and reclassification (Fig. 5).
Figure 2. caption.
Figure X. Caption.
Figure X. Caption.
Figure X. Caption.
Figure 6. Final result.
Text
Figure 7. Final text file output from python script ...
Text
Step 1.
Step 2.
During this project, I ran into many limitations and challenges.
Limitations:
1. Lim 1 (Fig. 8)
Root of issue: Text
Solution: Text.
Challenges:
1. Challenge 1.
Root of issue: Text
A solution: Text
2. Challenge 2
Root of issue: Text
A solution: Text
Figure X (below). Link or paste of script.
# Import arcpy module
import arcpy
# Local variables: #set from MB output