Demonstrate the ability to develop and implement policies and procedures for safe and secure educational environments;
Demonstrate the ability to formulate safety and security plans to implement security procedures including an articulated emergency chain of command, safety procedures required by law, law enforcement assistance, communication with the public, and evacuation procedures;
Demonstrate the ability to identify areas of vulnerability associated with school buses, buildings, and grounds and formulate a plan to take corrective action;
Demonstrate understanding of procedural predictabilities and plan variations where possible;
Demonstrate the ability to develop plans that connect every student with a school adult, eliminate bullying and profiling and implement recommended threat assessment procedures.
My coursework introduced foundational concepts related to school safety, emergency planning, threat assessment, and procedures that support safe learning environments. During my practicum, I gained practical experience implementing safety procedures in special education settings, supporting crisis planning, and ensuring predictable routines for students with significant needs. Working in a center-based program also gave me insight into transportation vulnerabilities, supervision needs, and the importance of structured safety protocols.
While I am still developing full competency in building-wide emergency planning, my practicum experiences helped me understand how safety systems operate within a school and how administrators lead these efforts. I strengthened my ability to identify vulnerabilities, implement corrective actions, and support staff in maintaining safe environments. These experiences—combined with coursework—provide a strong foundation as I continue building expertise in schoolwide safety and security.
The Ukeru Staff Survey Results, administered by our district BCBAs, provided meaningful insight into how staff perceive the effectiveness, safety, and trauma-informed components of Ukeru after participating in the spring training sessions. The quantitative data from the first page show consistently high agreement scores, generally between 4.3 and 4.8 out of 5, indicating that staff feel safer and more confident when using the blocking pads and that the trauma-informed education embedded in the training has strengthened their understanding of student behavior during moments of escalation. Building-level averages on the second page further affirm this positive perception, with each site reporting high levels of agreement, suggesting districtwide trust in the Ukeru model and consistency in how staff experienced the training across settings.
The open-ended responses included later in the report add depth to these findings. Staff described feeling better prepared, more knowledgeable, and more capable of supporting students in a safe, therapeutic manner. Many noted how the trauma-informed content positively shifted their perspective, helping them approach dysregulated students with increased empathy and fewer reactive responses. The feedback also surfaced important questions and considerations for future planning, such as training timing and implementation challenges, which provide helpful direction for ongoing professional development and system refinement. Reviewing these results has informed my follow-up conversations with staff and strengthened my understanding of how leaders can use both qualitative and quantitative data to guide decisions, support staff effectively, and create environments grounded in safety, consistency, and trauma-informed care.