My NewHome Journey
@
E'island Lake Haven
A frustrated buyer — now paying for two homes every month.
A frustrated buyer — now paying for two homes every month.
My SPA Front Page
November 2020 — a date I still remember vividly. It was the day I signed the Sales & Purchase Agreement (SPA) at the lawyer’s office, filled with hope and excitement for the home I was about to own.
Like many first-time buyers, I imagined moving in within the promised timeline, decorating the space, and building memories with my loved ones. Unfortunately, what followed was a long and exhausting wait, filled with uncertainty, unanswered questions, and growing frustration. What should have been a joyful milestone slowly turned into a test of patience and endurance.
Developer: AQRS The Building Company Sdn Bhd (a subsidiary of Gabungan AQRS Berhad / GBG Property)
CEO: Dato' Azizan bin Jaafar
Project Type: Leasehold condominium / serviced residence (Strata Title)
Address: Taman Putra Perdana, 47130 Puchong, Selangor
Coordinates: 2.95374384 (Lat), 101.59911261 (Long)
Land Area: Approximately 19 acres
GBG Sales Agent Words & Promises
I first discovered the E’island Lake Haven project through ads on social media promoting a new residential development in the Puchong area. The marketing was attractive — it promised semi-furnished units, cashback offers (actually is excess loan - include in buyer loan), RM15k Harvey Norman & IKEA vouchers, free 2-year maintenance fee, 360 lake view, exclusive access roads, and most importantly, Vacant Possession (VP) by December 2023. Intrigued by the offer, I reached out to the GBG sales agent, who confidently assured me that all these benefits were guaranteed and that the project was progressing smoothly.
At the time, everything sounded ideal — especially for a first-time buyer. The agent’s words were persuasive and reassuring, creating an impression of a well-managed and timely project.
Looking back, I now realize that I made a common mistake among first-time homebuyers — I didn’t perform any background checks on the developer. I was so focused on the excitement of owning my first home, trusting the marketing materials and the sales agent’s words, that I didn’t take the time to verify the developer’s track record, past projects, or potential red flags.
At the time, I didn’t know how important it was to check things like:
1) Whether the developer had any history of project delays
2) The actual legal entity behind the project
3) Reviews or complaints from buyers of previous developments
4) Whether the marketing materials (like brochures or ads) match the actual site progress and facilities
5) Whether there's a mock-up unit or physical show unit to inspect — relying 100% on digital brochures or promises without seeing anything physical can be risky
It’s a hard lesson learned, and one I hope other buyers can avoid by being more informed and cautious from the beginning.
December 2023 - First VP date lapsed
As November 2023 approached, I started to feel uneasy — there was no official notification about my unit’s Vacant Possession (VP), even though it was supposed to be handed over by December. Out of concern, I reached out directly to the developer via WhatsApp at 013-8980 899.
The admin confidently replied that VP would still happen in December 2023, assuring me that everything was on track. However, not long after, I came across some recent photos of the site — and I was shocked. The construction clearly wasn’t near completion, and it didn’t look like handover was realistically possible within that month.
Wanting to verify the situation, I did more digging — and that’s when I discovered a WhatsApp group created by fellow homebuyers. The group was not managed by the developer, and it became a valuable space where buyers shared real updates, frustrations, and photos.
What surprised me most was that the VP date was only shared via WhatsApp — and only if a buyer personally asked for it. There was no official communication via email, letter, or any formal notice, which was extremely unprofessional for such a major milestone.
First EOT Letter due to COVID-19
On 1st December 2023, I finally received a formal letter from the developer — but instead of a VP notice, it was an Extension of Time (EOT) letter. According to the letter, my new Vacant Possession (VP) date was pushed to 5th January 2025.
However, through discussions in the homebuyer WhatsApp group, I found that other buyers received different VP dates — even though we all signed similar agreements. This inconsistency clearly shows that the developer doesn’t have a firm or consistent timeline for handing over the units.
The developer claimed this new date was calculated based on:
45 months given under the SPA for project completion, plus
An additional 153 days extension due to COVID-19-related site closures
To make things even more confusing, the developer previously told buyers in a WhatsApp group created on 16th November 2023 — which included the Developer’s Sales Manager, Alex Tang — that the VP was targeted for July 2024. This was shared informally through chat messages, without any formal confirmation or follow-up. The conflicting information between the letter (stating January 2025) and the WhatsApp message (promising March 2024) further highlights the lack of transparency, consistency, and reliability in the developer’s communication with buyers.
In the end, many of us decided to trust that July 2024 target — holding on to what turned out to be nothing more than false hope. The lack of firm updates and shifting promises left buyers confused, anxious, and increasingly frustrated.
WhatsApp Communication with GBG Sales Manager
After the initial target VP date was missed, GBG agreed to send their representative — Alex Tang, the Sales Manager for this project — to join our community WhatsApp group, which had been created on 16th November 2023 by concerned buyers.
The purpose of the group was to:
Receive real-time updates on the site’s construction progress
Clarify any uncertainties related to offers and promises made by the sales agents
Track changes to the VP date and hold the developer accountable for timely communication
While this was a positive step at first, many buyers were still cautious, hoping that the presence of an official representative would finally bring clarity — but the inconsistencies continued.
Despite the presence of Alex Tang in the group, the VP date has been delayed multiple times and, up until today, none of the VP dates he shared have been fulfilled. Each time a new target was mentioned, buyers held on to hope — only to be disappointed again as deadlines came and went without any formal explanation or proper follow-up from the developer.
Here are the VP dates that were promised verbally or through the group:
July 2024 / 3rd quarter 2024
December 2024 / 4th quarter 2024
March 2025
June 2025
No new date provided until today
This ongoing cycle of shifting timelines has not only caused stress and uncertainty among buyers, but also raised serious concerns about the credibility of the information provided by the developer’s representative.
During in Quarter 2 of 2025, Alex Tang informed the group that the Certificate of Completion and Compliance (CCC) would be issued on the same date as the Vacant Possession (VP) — 30th June 2025.
This announcement came as a shock to many of us. Up until that point, we had expected the CCC to be obtained prior to or well before the VP date, as is standard practice in most developments. The fact that both were now expected to happen simultaneously raised even more doubts about the readiness of the project and whether the handover would meet proper compliance and safety requirements.
Once again, this update was shared casually in the WhatsApp group — not through any official letter or formal announcement — reinforcing the pattern of poor communication and lack of professionalism from the developer.
Changes On Facilities
Another unexpected change we discovered was related to the project’s facilities. In the original brochure provided during the sales period, the development clearly listed only a Kids' Pool as part of the amenities. However, in recent updates, the developer has changed this to “Kids & Adult Pool.”
While this might sound like an upgrade on paper, the change was made without any formal notification, email, or written consent provided to existing buyers. For many of us, this raises concerns about what else might be changed without proper disclosure — especially since facilities play an important role in a buyer’s decision-making process.
Changes like this — even if seemingly positive — should be communicated transparently and with official documentation, not silently adjusted after commitments have been made.
In addition to the earlier pool facility change, several other facilities were altered or downgraded before the VP (Vacant Possession) date — without any written notice or formal communication to buyers. Our own access road as promised, instead we need to enter other Taman Perumahan road, La Cottage.
When questioned, the developer’s response was that the brochure was “for illustration purposes only.” While we understand that most brochures include a disclaimer, it’s important to note that:
Many buyers based their purchase decisions on the features and facilities clearly showcased in the official sales materials.
The brochure was used as a key marketing tool, and changes to those promised features should have been communicated transparently and in writing.
A general disclaimer does not justify silently changing key amenities after buyers have signed the SPA.
Such changes, whether minor or major, impact the value and expectations tied to the property. Buyers deserve clarity, consistency, and timely updates — not last-minute surprises backed by fine print.
A = Kids Pool
B = Adult Pool
This also includes a complete redesign of the lobby areas across all four blocks, which turned out to be entirely different from what was shown in the original brochure — both in layout and overall finish. Additionally, there were unexpected changes to the building’s external paint colour and even the main signage displaying the condo’s name.
These visible elements, which form part of the project’s identity and appeal, were altered without any formal notification or explanation to buyers. While some may consider them minor details, for many of us who purchased based on the developer’s visual promises and branding, these changes feel misleading and dismissive of buyer expectations.
Changes on Brochure Disclaimer
While reviewing the latest brochure published on the official E’island website, I noticed something concerning — the developer had quietly updated the document to now include the phrase “Tarikh Jangka Siap: December 2025.”
This was never stated in the original brochure many of us received when we first expressed interest or signed the SPA. Back then, the brochure heavily promoted with offers like semi-furnished units, cashback, and private access roads.
The sudden change in the completion date raises several important questions:
Why was this change made silently and without informing existing buyers?
Does this reflect the developer’s actual internal timeline from the beginning?
Was the original completion date ever realistic, or was it simply a marketing hook?
This quiet revision of publicly available materials without clear disclosure to signed buyers undermines trust even further and gives the impression that the developer is trying to shift the narrative post-delay — without accountability.
Based on the Sales & Purchase Agreement (SPA), buyers are entitled to Liquidated Ascertained Damages (LAD) if the developer fails to deliver the unit within the stipulated time — in this case, 45 months plus a 153-day Extension of Time (EOT). As this period has clearly been exceeded, early-bird buyers, including myself, are now legally entitled to LAD compensation.
We raised this issue multiple times with the developer's representative, Alex Tang, through the WhatsApp group. He stated that 1 to 4 weeks after key collection, a lawyer appointed by the developer would contact buyers to discuss LAD matters.
However, what came as a shock to us was when Alex Tang openly informed the group that the developer would not be paying LAD as stated in the SPA (10% per annum). Instead, he proposed that if buyers agree to a lower LAD amount, the payment process could be expedited. But if we chose to insist on the rightful amount stated in the SPA, we were told to bring the matter to the Housing Tribunal (Tribunal Tuntutan Pembeli Rumah) — a process that typically involves long waiting times, document preparation, and legal delays.
This response feels like a pressure tactic, forcing buyers to choose between:
Accepting less than they are legally entitled to, or
Facing a lengthy and stressful legal process just to get what is rightfully owed
This has further damaged trust between the developer and buyers, and raised serious concerns about how fairly and lawfully the developer is handling its obligations under the SPA.
Even though the VP date kept getting pushed back, Alex Tang repeatedly reassured us not to worry, saying that a longer delay would simply mean a higher LAD payout, as per the SPA — as if it were something beneficial to us. At first, many buyers took comfort in those words, trusting that the compensation would be honoured fairly.
However, as the situation unfolded, it became clear that these reassurances were more about managing buyer frustration than reflecting actual developer intentions. This was further confirmed during our meeting at the GBG Sales Gallery in late June 2025, where Alex Tang repeated the same claim — and we have this documented via phone call recordings and voice memos taken during the discussion.
Despite this verbal assurance, what followed later contradicted those promises — reinforcing the growing sense of distrust and lack of accountability from the developer’s side.
Purchasing a home is one of the most meaningful milestones in life — especially your first. For me, what began in November 2020 with excitement and hope has turned into a difficult journey marked by uncertainties, delays, and unmet promises.
Throughout the process with the E’island Lake Haven project, I’ve experienced:
Multiple delays in the VP (Vacant Possession) date, with shifting targets that were never fulfilled
Inconsistent communication, mostly through informal WhatsApp updates instead of proper formal notices
Changes in facilities and project specifications that were not clearly disclosed, despite earlier commitments in brochures
Frustrating discussions around LAD (Liquidated Ascertained Damages), where buyers were told to either accept less than entitled or go through the time-consuming tribunal route
Despite having verbal reassurances — some of which were recorded during our meeting with the developer at their GBG Sales Gallery in June 2025 — the reality has often contradicted those words.
Even, on 10 February 2025, YB Datuk Hajah Aiman Athirah binti Sabu from KPKT visited the site. During this visit, the developer publicly committed to delivering VP by 30 June 2025.
That promise has now been broken.
This not only shows blatant disrespect to buyers, but also to the Ministry of Local Government Development (KPKT) itself — exposing a serious lack of integrity from the developer.
Until TODAY, while buyers have received several updates on site progress, there has never been any formal apology or clear explanation of the actual reasons behind it. This lack of transparency and accountability has only added to the frustration we've endured throughout this journey.
This experience has taught me the importance of being a well-informed buyer. So here’s my sincere advice to anyone looking to purchase a home — especially from this developer:
Do your research — Look up the developer’s past projects and delivery records
Never rely solely on brochures or verbal promises — Always request written confirmation
Understand your SPA (Sales & Purchase Agreement) — Know your rights, timelines, and remedies
Join or form buyer groups early — Collective awareness makes a difference
This post is not written to damage anyone’s reputation, but to share a personal, truthful experience. At the end of the day, buyers deserve to be treated with transparency, fairness, and respect. And as a buyer — you have the right to choose who you trust with your future home.
TO BE CONTINUE - sharing our experience during our VP (key collection) includes Excess Loan, Vouchers, LAD, Defect, etc.
Sincerely,
A concerned and frustrated buyer of E’island Lake Haven
Date: 1 July 2025