"We don't redesign assessments to outsmart AI. We redesign them so student thinking remains the most visible evidence of learning." Fabiola Torres
AI changed what students can produce. It didn't change what we want them to learn.
That's where we begin.
We already know our students, our disciplines, and what meaningful learning looks like. What has changed is the environment we're designing for—and some of our assessments need to change with it.
This space was created to help us do that. Not with more surveillance. Not with generic AI solutions. And not by replacing our professional judgment.
Instead, we'll use research, learning science, and what we already know as educators to rethink assessment—one assignment at a time.
Because the goal isn't to outsmart AI. It's to design learning where student thinking still matters most.
We know AI can generate essays, answer prompts, and produce polished work in seconds. That reality isn't going away—and it invites us to rethink how we assess learning.
The question isn't how we keep AI out of our classrooms. It's how we design learning experiences where students' thinking, judgment, and voice are the evidence of learning.
This isn't a new idea. Educators committed to equity, liberatory pedagogy, and authentic learning have long designed assessments that make student thinking visible. Today's research points in the same direction: when AI does the thinking, students miss the opportunity to develop the knowledge and skills that matter most.
Together, we can design assessments where AI supports learning—but never replaces it. Because the goal has never been the finished product. It's the thinking that gets students there.
Edna is an AI-powered bot built in PlayLab and grounded in research. She was designed around one simple belief: faculty are the most important factor in whether AI helps—or hinders—student learning.
Inspired by Edna Mode from The Incredibles, Edna doesn't believe in one-size-fits-all solutions. Edna asks thoughtful questions, challenges assumptions, and helps us design assessments that fit our students, our disciplines, and our learning goals.
Rather than redesigning an assignment for us, Edna guides us through a research-informed process to make student thinking more visible and learning more authentic. Along the way, she'll generate a Canvas-ready, accessible HTML version of the redesigned assignment. Final edits are always yours.
Edna amplifies our expertise. She never replaces it.
We have the superpowers. Edna helps us build the suit.
Edna runs on a framework called Friction by Design. The process is intentionally challenging—but always in service of better learning.
Together, we'll examine questions that matter:
What is this assessment really measuring?
Where is student thinking visible?
Does the design invite learning or simply evaluate completion?
Some of these questions may feel uncomfortable, and that's okay. Growth often begins with productive discomfort.
Edna also distinguishes between two kinds of friction.
Unproductive friction—confusing directions, unnecessary busy work, or unclear expectations—gets in the way of learning, so we work to remove it.
Productive friction asks students (and us) to think more deeply, reflect more carefully, and engage more meaningfully. That's the kind of challenge we want to preserve.
This isn't a form to complete. It's a conversation designed to help us rethink our assessments—so student thinking becomes the most visible evidence of learning.
One real assignment you already use
The Student Learning Outcome that assignment is supposed to assess
Patience and a willingness to sit with hard questions
A redesigned assessment where student thinking is visible and irreplaceable
A Canvas-ready HTML version of that assessment, formatted for immediate use. I highly recommend using your favorite Accessibility Tool to double check the Canvas page formatting.
A clearer sense of your own design reasoning — something you can carry into every assignment you build from here
This work asks something of us, and that deserves to be acknowledged.
Reflecting on our teaching takes courage. Some of Edna's questions may challenge familiar assumptions—and that's part of the process.
If the conversation slows down, you're probably working through an important design decision, not going in circles. If you need a break, take one—but keep your PlayLab Edna session open. Simply leave the browser tab open and return when you're ready so you don't lose your progress.
There is no expectation of perfection. Our goal is to engage honestly in the work of designing learning experiences where student thinking is visible and meaningful.
The best assessment redesign doesn't begin with the perfect answer. It begins with an honest question.
Edna can't know your students the way you do. She can't draw from your disciplinary expertise, your teaching experience, or the moments that have shaped who you are as an educator. She can't bring your values, your community, or your purpose for teaching into the conversation.
That expertise is uniquely yours.
Edna's role is to help you design more intentionally by asking thoughtful questions, offering research-informed guidance, and providing practical support—including generating Canvas-ready HTML designed with accessibility in mind. Accessibility support is built into the process, but your review and final decisions always matter.
Edna doesn't replace your professional judgment. She helps strengthen it.
Like Edna Mode in The Incredibles, she doesn't make superheroes. The superheroes were already there. She simply builds the suit to match their strengths.
Start by exploring the site. When you are ready to work with Edna directly, you will find her on the Play With Edna page — along with everything you need to get started.