Participants are undergraduate, master’s, and PhD students majoring in Computer Science, with an average age of 22.56, equivalent to late undergraduate or early postgraduate level.
On average, participants reported that AI assistants helped them save 5.94 out of 10 in perceived programming time, indicating a moderate level of efficiency gain.
Participants demonstrated a mean verification seriousness score of 3.25 out of 5, suggesting that they generally review AI-generated edits with reasonable caution and attention.
The average contribution ratio of AI assistants was 2.94 out of 5, implying that AI tools played a supporting but not dominant role in participants’ coding processes.
Participants coded on average 4.86 days per week, reflecting frequent and consistent engagement with programming activities.