Design requirements were generated based on a variety of resources including experts, scholarly articles, and the examination of other products. Our emails with blindness technology expert James Gagnier helped us to flesh out some basic requirements of a device. The major requirement he pointed out was that the device needs to be portable enough to fit into a bag or pocket and that it would need to emboss between 3 to 4 braille cells to convey the value of the note. Further design requirements were generated through research where it was found that on average people with visual impairments have a lower income than people without visual impairments and set the bar for speed and accuracy. In examining other products it was noted that most products used haptic feedback to aid people who died and that they posed a variety of user feedback to aid in the use of the device.
Users: the visually impaired
Buyers: the US government, visually impaired/caretakers
Sellers: Amazon, Orbit Research, Freedom Scientific, AbilityOne, MaxiAids
Manufacturers: Orbit Research, MaxiAids, Freedom Scientific, Skilcraft
Google Form: https://forms.gle/2u7EBftnC9pwcBae7
This survey was sent to the stakeholders of this project; including Shakopee School staff, Design Engineers, and a blind person as our expert. The form lets the experts rank the most important to least important features to add to a device and let the experts give feedback on the team's designs and sketches.
Chart 1: Experts listed features from most important (10) to least important (1). These charts show that our experts think that accuracy and stamping braille are the most important features when designing our device. Other things to consider is portability, rechargeability, repairability, and the cost of the device to consumers.
note: the 3rd picture of the results was done in the opposite way; 1 is the most important and 10 is the least important
Question 3:
Chart 2: We asked this question to get a quantifiable requirement for the accuracy needed for the device to be useful expecting results like 99%. But these results have proven to us that any identification technic we imply must never malfunction during the service life of the product. This has also shifted our #1 requirement from portability to accuracy.
List from highest to lowest priority. What is most important?
accurate
stamp braille
announce value of bill
user feedback if device worked
portable
toggle between voice only, stamping and voice, or only stamping
repairable
rechargeability
How will you know if your product is successful?
Design requirements were generated based on a variety of resources including experts, scholarly articles, and the examination of other products. Our emails with blindness technology expert James Gagnier helped us to flesh out some basic requirements of a device. The major requirement he pointed out was that the device needs to be portable enough to fit into a bag or pocket and that it would need to emboss between 3 to 4 braille cells to convey the value of the note. Further design requirements were generated through research where it was found that on average people with visual impairments have a lower income than people without visual impairments and set the bar for speed and accuracy. In examining other products it was noted that most products and software used haptic feedback to aid people who are deaf. Our research found that most physical reading devices had an average total id time of under 30 seconds (https://www.bep.gov/media/881/download?inline) which is an important benchmark to reach as if this time is not reached people will just use a pocket money brailler. Finally, a fair amount of requirements such as identifying the value of the currency and adding braille were added due to our problem statement and rest on the validity of our problem.
The specifications google form was unsuccessful as the question that we wrote was clearly confusing (and potentially inaccessible) to some of our experts and poorly worded making our main ranked importance of requirements question worthless. Also with our small pool of experts, we have failed to capture meaningful data from that question. However, other questions like the time it should take to identify a bill and the minimum accuracy of the device rendered useful results allowing us to put a measurable number on these requirements. This is the first section of our form was not successful however the second half of our form which described and showed our sketches rendered useful results. The phone-based device seemed to be the one our experts thought was best with one of our experts commenting that they would rather not carry around an extra device if they have their phone on them. As a result, our second iteration of brainstorming was all around phone-based devices Meaning that this section will probably have to be revisited and updated to account for this change in tack once these ideas of more fleshed out.
Study to address options for enabling the blind and visually impaired community to denominate U.S. currency. (2009, July). Department of the Treasury Bureau of Engraving and Printing. Retrieved February 15, 2023, from https://www.bep.gov/media/881/download?inline