RATIONALE
Early language intervention and early language support is extremely beneficial to our youngest students in order to prepare them for later success in school. Put simply, we know that more support is better than less support. Although this is always the case, this year districts will face unique difficulties given the effect of the pandemic on the identification process of Emergent Bilingual students.
First and foremost, there will be “logistical challenges due to the sheer number of students who were not screened during the pandemic and the large number of entering Pre-K or Kindergarten students” (Council of the Great City Schools, 2020, p. 13). With a greater number of new students who have never been screened for language in the school system before and the understanding that this screening necessitates the use of a lot of resources, districts are likely to seek ways to simplify the process and make it more efficient. In this way, instead of looking at each student on a case-by-case basis, there might be a tendency to batch students and determine qualification for Emergent Bilingual support based on this testing alone. Yet we know that there may be something beyond the testing and assessment that we want to consider. In particular, young students who have experienced disrupted and remote learning over the past year will have missed out on significant learning opportunities for developing their English language proficiency.
Research shows that it takes time for young students to gain English proficiency; it is not just a one year process, but instead a multi-year long journey(Slama et al., 2017). The earlier students begin this process, the better (Halle et al., 2012). With even greater need and more available resources, the time is now to really provide the early bilingual language scaffolding and support services for these students.
“ELLs who were proficient in English by kindergarten entry kept pace with native English speakers in both reading and math initially and over time; ELLs who were proficient by first grade had modest gaps in reading and math achievement compared to native English speakers that closed narrowly or persisted over time; and ELLs who were not proficient by first grade had the largest initial gaps in reading and math achievement compared to native speakers but the gap narrowed over time in reading and grew over time in math. Among those whose home language is not English, acquiring English proficiency by kindergarten entry was associated with better cognitive and behavioral outcomes through eighth grade compared to taking longer to achieve proficiency.”
DISTRICT-LEVEL
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Prepare for Additional Language Screening
With a large number of students who will need language screening (including new Pre-K students and many Kindergarten students who were not assessed last year), be prepared for more staff (especially bilingual staff) to be needed to conduct screeners with students in order to determine whether they qualify for entry to the Emergent Bilingual program. Staff campuses accordingly.
2. Ensure Student-First Placement Decisions
Empower Campus Advisory Teams to make placement decisions that are student-first in order for more students who may benefit greatly from bilingual instruction to receive this impactful support
Consider providing early grade bilingual support for students who come from predominantly non-English speaking households and who are close to the cutpoint on screeners/LEP assessments as they may need more support (such as instruction in a bilingual classroom) even if they technically had a passing score.
CAMPUS-LEVEL
RECOMMENDATION
1. Campus Advisory Team Make-up
Ensure strong Bilingual/ELL representation on the Campus Advisory Team with participation from Bilingual/ELL faculty and parents
Encourage Team members to meet regularly in order to identify needs of Emergent Bilingual students and advocate on their behalf.
Learn about the positive and lasting academic outcomes for students with English language proficiency in Kindergarten as opposed to those who developed proficiency later on in Halle et al.’s (2012) article: Predictors and Outcomes of Early vs. Later English Language Proficiency Among English Language Learners