HIFI WALKER makes my pick for earbuds behind the ear for cycling, with an open-ear fit that keeps your ear canals clear. Jesebang is the runner-up if you prefer ear hooks, included eartips, and a charging case.
earbuds behind the ear at a Glance
• HIFI WALKER Bone Conduction Headphones — best for cycling and other outdoor exercise; pick this if you want an open-ear design, an adjustable tension band, and Bluetooth or built-in MP3 playback.
• Xmenha Flat Sleep Mini — best for side sleeping and compact everyday listening; pick this if you want two styles of earbuds, including a flat, non-in-ear pair.
• Xmenha Flat Sleep Mini — best for side sleeping with a white finish; pick this if you want the same dual-earbud setup with Bluetooth 5.3 and a 10-meter stated range.
• Jesebang Earbuds — best for workouts that call for a stay-put fit; pick this if you want flexible ear hooks, three eartip sizes, and a charging case.
HIFI WALKER’s T10 Air uses bone conduction and sits around the ear rather than sealing the ear canal. That makes it the clearest fit here for a cyclist who wants audio while keeping the ears physically open. Its adjustable tension band is intended to help hold the headphones in place during movement, while the open design can let surrounding sounds remain audible.
Bluetooth 5.3 supports wireless listening for rides and general workouts. There’s also a built-in 32GB MP3 player, which is useful when bringing a phone is inconvenient. The product information specifically notes that Bluetooth does not work underwater, so swimming requires MP3 mode instead. For cycling, the two listening options mean you can choose between a connected phone and stored audio.
The stated battery life is up to eight hours, and charging takes two hours. Tactile buttons and a swimming-mode lock are included, giving the controls a more physical approach than touch-only earbuds. The listed IPX8 rating also makes this model relevant to water sports, though that feature is not a substitute for checking how and where you plan to use it.
How We Research
We compare products from their published specs and features; the verdicts below are our independent editorial opinions.
The trade-off is the open, bone-conduction style: it is not designed to seal out ambient sound, and it may not suit someone who wants the more isolated presentation of an in-ear pair. In my opinion, that’s a sensible compromise for cycling, where awareness matters. I’d choose it when an open ear and the option of phone-free playback matter more than a conventional earbud fit.
This Xmenha set is unusual because it includes two types of Bluetooth earbuds: a very small mini pair and a flat, non-in-ear pair intended for sleeping. The flat shape is designed to sit comfortably for side sleepers, while the smaller earbuds are positioned for discreet use and exercise. That makes the set more of a general-purpose choice than a dedicated cycling design.
The mini earbuds are described as lightweight and shaped to stay relatively unobtrusive in the ear. The flat pair avoids entering the ear canal, which may appeal to people who dislike the feeling of an in-ear tip or want to listen while lying on their side. Bluetooth 5.3 and a stated 10-meter range cover ordinary listening with a nearby phone or other compatible device. Battery life is listed at four hours, with a charging time of 1.5 hours.
There is an important sound-and-fit trade-off between the two pairs. The product description says the smaller mini earbuds use a smaller driver, while the larger flat sleep pair houses a more powerful speaker. In practical terms, the compact pair prioritizes a small form, while the sleep pair is the more appropriate option for relaxed listening in bed.
For cycling, I would not put this ahead of the open-ear HIFI WALKER or the hook-style Jesebang. The Xmenha set is not described with an earhook or adjustable sports band, and its main design focus is sleeping and discreet listening. I’d consider it if side-sleeping comfort and having two distinct earbud styles are more useful to you than a specialized cycling fit.
Xmenha Flat Sleep Mini
This listing has the same Xmenha name and dual-earbud concept: one mini pair and one flat, non-in-ear pair. Its product information gives the finish as white, whereas the other listing is listed as skin-colored. Both are intended to cover different situations, from discreet everyday listening to lying on your side.
The flat pair’s low-profile shape is meant to reduce pressure when the ear is against a pillow. The mini pair is the smaller option, with a compact fit intended for exercise and small ears. Both connect over Bluetooth 5.3, and the stated Bluetooth range is 10 meters. The listed battery life is four hours, with a 1.5-hour charging time.
The product description distinguishes the smaller mini earbuds from the larger flat pair: the mini design uses a smaller driver, while the flat sleep earbuds are described as having a more powerful speaker. That gives shoppers a straightforward choice within the set: prioritize the smallest form for the mini pair, or use the flat pair for sleep-oriented listening.
As with the other Xmenha option, the trade-off for cycling is that the listed design does not include a hook or an adjustable band to secure the earbuds around the ear. The product information also presents this as a sleep-and-compact-listening set, not an open-ear cycling headset. I’d choose this version over the other Xmenha listing only if the white finish is the one you prefer; the main use case and core features are otherwise very similar.
Jesebang’s S75 is an in-ear wireless earbud set with soft, flexible earhooks. Those hooks are designed to help the earbuds stay put during movement, making this the most conventional sports-earbud option in the group. Three sizes of eartips are included, which gives you some flexibility to find a fit that feels secure.
The earbuds use Bluetooth 5.4 and have a stated range of 15 meters. Their 14.2mm dynamic drivers are specified alongside a charging case with a dual LED display. The listed listening time is up to 10 hours on a single charge, with up to 50 hours total when the case is included. Those figures may make the set appealing for longer stretches between opportunities to recharge.
Jesebang also lists an ENC microphone for calls and an IPX7 waterproof rating for sweat and water exposure. Touch controls cover playback, volume, calls, and voice-assistant access. For cycling, the hooks offer a stable-fit alternative to an open-ear band, but the in-ear design is a key distinction: unlike HIFI WALKER, this pair does not leave the ear canal open.
That difference matters if you want to hear more of your surroundings while riding. In my view, Jesebang is the better fit for someone who prioritizes a hooked, in-ear hold and longer combined listening time, while HIFI WALKER is the more considered choice when open ears are central to the decision. The case and included eartips add versatility, but the in-ear fit may not suit every cyclist.
How We Picked
We compared the published designs, connectivity, battery information, and stated use cases for each product.
No brand paid for placement.
They may suit riders who want an open-ear design rather than earbuds that seal the ear canal.
Fit, awareness, and how you plan to carry or connect a phone are useful considerations. An adjustable band or earhooks can help keep headphones secure, while an open-ear design leaves the ear canal uncovered.
No. Its product information says Bluetooth is not supported underwater. Use the built-in MP3 mode for swimming instead.
In my opinion, HIFI WALKER is the best fit if you want open-ear listening and Bluetooth plus stored MP3 audio. Choose Jesebang instead if you prefer in-ear earbuds with flexible hooks and multiple eartip sizes.
• headset only playing in one ear
• blueear Helmet Headphones Motorcycle vs MINISO MS120
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon and affiliated sites.
When you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon or its affiliates. This site is an independent third-party review and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Amazon or the product brands mentioned.