Exercise 10 - Design Analysis
2018-04-26
For Exercise #10, the team accomplished the following tasks:
With the conclusion of the rank-ordered design goals and Kepner-Tregoe decision matrix exercises, the decision to proceed with an uncollimated wide-beam system is confirmed in a quantifiable manner. The onmidirectional low-power system is viable, but potentially coverage-limited and could require extensive setup time at a new worksite. The beam-forming system is theoretically simpler to use, however much more difficult to develop and could potentially pose a hazard to entities swept by the high-power ultrasonic beam. The uncollimated widebeam optical system gives a very good usability and safety score, while also being achievable to develop.
* The LASER solution is a no-go, due to the fact that fine-aiming (≤0.25˚) is required for all targets. This constraint, when applied to a handheld platform with a moving receiver (other teammate, ship hull, etc.) in low-visibility water with currents and other ocean life, is not viable at this time. (Beam angle cone doubled from given land values to include particulate, refraction, and diffusion considerations. See references page for details.)
Exercises 8 & 9 - Ethics, Liability, and Hazards
2018-04-17
For Exercises #8 and 9, the team accomplished the following tasks:
------------------------------
Foreseeable misuses
Changes that may occur during the useful lifetime
Disposal after the useful life has ended
Exercise 7 - Synthesis
2018-04-05
For Exercise #7, the team accomplished the following tasks:
Exercise 6 - Abstraction and Modeling
2018-03-29
For Exercise #6, the team accomplished the following tasks:
Exercise 5 - Intellectual Properties
2018-03-22
For Exercise #5, the team accomplished the following tasks:
--------------------
Our team's results for technologies related to our proposal include:
Copyleft (CC-GPL hybrid):
Defined Commercial Terms of Use:
Patents:
Public Domain:
Standards:
Exercise 4 - Solution Devenlopment
2018-02-22
For Exercise #4, the team accomplished the following tasks:
Subdividing the Problem into Design Goals
General design goals (in order of precedence-effect importance)
Specific design goals
Solution Comparison Table
The team has compared the Dunker Diagram specific solutions to the Design Goals, assigning them to both enhancing and detrimental categories. Taking all of the Design Goals into account, as well as the current state-of-the-art with modular technology and development (and the team's abilities), the team has decided to pursue development of the following proposed solutions:
Collimated / LASER using Streaming and Uncollimated Light using Databurst
Exercise 3 - Problem Formulation
2018-02-15
For Exercise #3, the team accomplished the following tasks:
The initial Why-Why diagram, Dunker diagram, and Kepner-Tregoe analysis are shown below.
Kepner-Tregoe Problem Analysis
Exercise 2 - Identifying Problems & Needs
2018-02-08
For Exercise #2, the team accomplished the following tasks as-briefed during the class lecture:
The initial brainstorming process output is shown below, which was done prior to needs selection:
Process
The team began by brainstorming problems which society faces that have engineering solutions. They also looked at current engineering solutions to older problems that could be improved upon. After that, the team decided to make a list of personal projects they hoped to design at some point in their individual careers; ranging from microchips to underwater habitats. The team then decided to narrow the choices down to a single problem. The selection process centred around what problems the team believed they could reasonably solve, and if they could solve them, whether or not the project solutions contained a significant amount of challenging electrical or computer engineering. The problem that was chosen was the wireless transmission of information underwater. It aligned with all of the members' personal interests as of now, and is a complex yet solvable problem, where an innovative solution could be industry-disrupting.
Modern day divers are faced with a communications problem. Current methods of underwater communication are either unreliable (ultrasonic modulation), are physically difficult to operate (data-tether to the ship) , or are high latency (writing slates and sign language). The preliminary results of our problem / societal needs brainstorm were the wireless underwater communication bandwidth problem. A brief design proposal is detailed below, with particular emphasis placed on the fact that the problems and proposal are likely to change with major requirements, minor requirements, goals, and technical advancements.
Design Proposal
Objective and Background: Underwater communication between groups of divers, data collection systems, and audio/video transmissions, have all posed a problem for practical ad-hoc work on an underwater site. The current solution for these communication needs is either a hard-wired tether between devices and the surface or a short-range paired ultrasonic voice-network between dive masks. Both solutions are currently expensive and unreliable. The development of a solution to address underwater wireless transmission problems by increasing data rate and decreasing latency would allow divers to more effectively communicate with each other and the surface operations support, as well as stream audio, video, and sensor data. This would, in effect, free them in certain scenarios from the encumbrance of long and heavy tethering systems.
Methodology: From March 2018 to May 2019, the design and solution prototyping would be completed using the facilities and expertise of the Stevens ECE department, the diving test and training facility DiveSeekers, the Davidson Lab experiment testing tank, the research vessel of the Dive Voyager Expeditions team, and (for stress-testing) the Hudson river. Solution development would initially focus on the viability of optical burst and/or ultrasonic mesh networks in a field-friendly device.
Expected results: The solution is expected to make significant headway into practical wireless "set-and-forget" communications systems for divers, monitoring equipment, and surface support. Secondary effects may include greatly increased dive team productivity, reduced fatigue, greater personnel safety, and reduced error rates.
Costs: This project, based on initial calculations, is expected to cost $3,500 for all prototyping, training, facility, equipment, and testing requirements prior to final display at the Innovation Expo and field use.
Team Roster
Christopher Drew
Jie Dai
Joshua Gross
Scott Maslin
I pledge my honour that I have abided by the Stevens Honor System.