A DWI conviction comes with serious consequences, including fines, license suspensions, and jail time. If you have been arrested for DWI and are wondering about penalties in New Jersey, here is a breakdown of the state’s DWI laws.
A first offense DWI conviction carries a fine of up to $500 and up to 90 days in jail. However, if the defendant is convicted of a second DWI within a certain period of time (usually five years), the penalties can increase to a fine of up to $2,000 and up to 6 months in jail. A third DWI conviction within five years results in a fine of up to $3,000 and up to 1 year in jail.
The maximum sentence is 3 years of imprisonment and a $10,000 fine for a fourth DWI conviction within five years. A DWI conviction that results in death or serious injury to another person will result in a mandatory minimum sentence of 10 years in prison and a fine of $15,000.
Driving while intoxicated is illegal in New Jersey. It is a crime to operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or both. The legal limit in the state is 0.08 percent blood alcohol content (BAC) or more.
When someone is operating a motor vehicle while under the influence, they can be charged with a crime. The police may stop the vehicle and arrest the driver. Police may also issue a summons to appear in court. The police officer who stops the vehicle will provide the driver with a field sobriety test, which is designed to determine whether the driver was operating the vehicle under the influence.
If the driver refuses to submit to the field sobriety test, then the police officer is permitted to request a blood draw to determine the driver’s BAC. If the driver consents to the blood draw, the police officer must obtain the sample and the laboratory that tests the sample will determine the BAC level.
There are several ways to defend against a DWI charge. First, it is important to note that the police officer is required to have reasonable suspicion of driving while intoxicated. Reasonable suspicion means that the officer has “specific and articulable facts” that would cause a reasonable person to believe that the driver is under the influence.
Reasonable suspicion requires less evidence than probable cause. For example, the officer may simply ask the driver to step out of the car. The officer may also smell alcohol, see an open container of alcohol, or see signs of intoxication.
However, if the driver is stopped for any reason, the officer is permitted to conduct a field sobriety test. The officer may also request a blood draw if the driver refuses to submit to the field sobriety test.
It is important to note that the officer is not required to administer a field sobriety test or request a blood draw if the driver appears to be intoxicated, but there is some doubt as to whether he or she is intoxicated. If the officer does not have reasonable suspicion of driving while intoxicated, the driver cannot be charged.
However, if the officer has reasonable suspicion, then the driver will likely be arrested and charged with DWI. It is important to note that there are several defenses to a DWI charge.
To begin with, the driver may refuse to take the field sobriety test or consent to the blood draw. In that case, the driver is free to leave.
In addition, the driver may argue that the officer did not have reasonable suspicion to stop the vehicle. There are two types of traffic stops. A “routine” stop involves the officer stopping the vehicle for a violation that the officer has witnessed. The driver will likely be issued a summons to appear in court.
A “pretextual” stop occurs when the officer stops the vehicle for a reason that is unrelated to the suspected criminal activity, such as the officer’s concern about the safety of the driver. In that case, the officer will typically ask the driver to step out of the vehicle and perform the field sobriety test.
If the driver does not comply with the officer’s instructions, the officer will arrest the driver for resisting arrest. If the officer arrests the driver, the officer is required to read the Miranda warning, which states that the driver has the right to remain silent. The driver may choose to remain silent.
If the driver does choose to speak to the officer, the driver may not be compelled to answer the officer’s questions. The driver has the right to remain silent and not to incriminate himself. However, the driver may choose to speak with the officer. If the driver chooses to speak with the officer, he or she can refuse to answer the officer’s questions. The driver also has the right to consult with a lawyer before speaking to the officer.
However, it is important to note that the driver may not refuse to submit to a blood draw. If the driver refuses to submit to the blood draw, the driver is considered to have given consent.