Truda Thurai: The Cinnamon-Peeler’s Daughter
Foreword
Having spent nine years researching and writing The Devil Dancers, a novel set in 1950s Ceylon, I was intrigued by Dickens’s reference to that country in Edwin Drood. This, for me, was the real mystery. I wondered what had inspired him. One might have expected a reference to India – or even the North West frontier – but why Ceylon?
I made several trips to Rochester and spent a considerable amount of time in the Cathedral, which was particularly close to Dickens’s heart (he wanted to be buried there), reading memorial plaques. I thought that these might provide a clue as Dickens had made a number of references to memorial tablets and inscriptions in the book: for example, the inscription for Mrs Sapsea’s monument and the inscription over the door of Mr Grewgious’s lodgings.
However, while I gained considerable insight into the connection between the Royal Engineers and Rochester (both Edwin Drood and his father were engineers), I could find no reference to Ceylon. However, a potential, albeit tenuous, link between Dickens and that country is provided by another memorial; a gravestone in a small Anglican cemetery in Kandy, Sri Lanka (formerly Ceylon). This commemorates William Charles MacReady (d. 1871), a civil servant and linguist whose father, a celebrated actor, was known to Dickens.
Having previously ignored memorial tablets and inscriptions, I now took them as my inspiration. The graveyard at Kandy provided another extraordinary story, that of Captain James McGlashlan. Much closer to home, a chance visit to the parish church of Chilham, Kent, revealed the extraordinary account of Frederick Lacy Dick, a district magistrate who was assassinated in Ceylon in 1847. The story on his commemorative tablet struck a chord with me. It was not only relevant to the period in which Dickens lived and worked, but it provided a fascinating insight into the life of a British civil servant in Ceylon. Although Dickens may never have seen this particular memorial, it was the link I was looking for and I used it as the basis for the character of Mr Diggory in my short story.
Finally, like many others who have been captivated by the Mystery of Edwin Drood, I have offered a solution to its central enigma.
T. Thurai
25th May 2012
*** *** ***
It is mid-summer, yet the sky begrudges its light; its dull and colourless surface unrelieved by the sun’s rays or the movement of clouds. But, beneath this lifeless expanse, the world bustles. A ship glides into port, churning the leaden water with its prow, its deck-hands scurrying about like monkeys, some with ropes, some with boat-hooks, yelling, scrabbling, easing the vessel into its berth. Soon she is at rest, rolling gently with the wash from other boats, rising slowly in the water as her holds are relieved of their barrels and crates.
Now, rocked by the gentle lapping of waves, she murmurs to the vessels alongside, using that curious clinking, clanking, tinkling speech in which boats exchange stories of high winds and high seas, boasting of their exploits and how they brought their cargo safely home despite the shortcomings of their human masters. The ship dreams of the sharp smack of salt water and the hot sun on her deck as sailors swarm about her, their cold, damp feet pattering down ladders into her hold, their quick, gnarled fingers tending her wounds. She slumbers while they swab her decks, mend her timbers and sew patches into her sails.
In a few hours, the ship’s keel will sink low in the cold, grey water, weighed down by a new cargo – and new passengers; one of whom is sitting in the parlour of one of the many inns and rest-houses ranged along the harbour, whose aim it is to provide sustenance, if not comfort, to the tide of voyagers that washes through the port.
Wrapped in a shawl, this traveller has sought privacy in a dark corner of the public-room where the door flies constantly open and shut, in response to the ebb and flow of customers. Seated at a table, she strives to write in the seam of light grudged by a small, grimy window. Before her is a plate of food, untouched and nearly cold, a slab of grey meat and a few, colourless vegetables congealed in gravy.
Heedless of the mayhem that surrounds her, the tramp of feet, the banging of the door, the inn-keeper shouting to his servant, she writes with desperate speed, her hand flying across the page, pausing occasionally at a word, then striking it out with a single deft stroke. Several sheets of paper, covered in her close, neat handwriting are arranged in a ragged pile. Her wrist is aching, but she cannot stop. The letter must be posted tonight. Furiously she writes, on and on, until another three sheets have been filled. Then, signing her name with a flourish, she sits back and sighs, staring out of the small grimy window whose single, warped pane looks out onto a narrow alley where tradesmen, sailors, travellers, pick-pockets and charlatans mingle together, all going about their business.
As she turns her head, the dim light reveals a face of unusual darkness and exotic beauty. Some of the inmates of that dark cavern are tempted to stare, but one glance from those fierce dark eyes repels them. There is something ferocious about this delicate creature; something of the huntress.
The ink on the last page has dried. She gathers up the sheets of paper, taps them into a neat pile, then examines the letter that she has been at such pains to write, her lips moving as she reads, as if she were reciting a prayer.
The Star and Anchor Inn, Southampton 21st May, 18..
From: Miss Helena Landless
To: The Reverend Septimus Crisparkle, Minor Canon of Cloisterham Cathedral
My dear Septimus,
I am writing to you from Southampton. Tomorrow, I shall embark on a packet-boat destined for Ceylon, the country of my birth. In the hours remaining before departure, I intend to set down the reason for my return – something which I have not yet fully explained to you and which, I know, has been the cause of much sorrow. Yet it is necessary if our lives are to follow the true and honest course which we both desire.
A few days ago, you offered me all that a woman could wish: marriage, respectability beyond my station and, above all, the lifelong companionship of one whom I consider to be not only a saint, but also my brother’s saviour. Yet, instead of the ready acceptance which you had every right to expect, you received a mystifying response: hesitation and a plea for more time in which to consider. By my apparent coolness, I fear that I have not only wounded you, but convinced you of my indifference.
Forgive me, dear sir, for my seeming reluctance and believe me when I say that my heart was both warm and willing – and always will be. But before I can give you a final answer, there is a matter that must first be resolved: that of my birth. For, as you know, Landless was the name of my stepfather – a cruel and brutal man. Although I know something of my real father’s history, I still do not know his name. For this reason, I am not only Landless, but Nameless also. It is a matter which I know to be of great concern to your mother – and rightly so.
By marrying you in this anonymous state, I risk causing division within your family as well as embarrassment within the wider world. This I am not prepared to do. My diffidence regarding your proposal was not a sign of disinterest but of my deep affection and respect for you.
We have recently endured many trials with regard to the matter of Mr Drood’s unfortunate disappearance. I must ask your forbearance to wait a little longer while I seek to solve another mystery – that of my father’s identity.
You know little of my life prior to my arrival in Cloisterham; except for what my brother, Neville, confided in you. From him you learned that our mother had died when we were young, entrusting us to a brutal stepfather whose pleasure it was to beat me while Neville looked on, helpless. You also know that we came from Ceylon. It is my intention, in this letter, to tell you as much as I know myself, in order to explain my reason for returning there.
So that you may better understand my motives, you must learn something of my mother’s history; painful as it is, for me to impart.
***
My grandfather was a salagama or cinnamon-peeler. He lived in a small village, near to the southern coast of the Island, with his wife and children. The bricks of their home were built of mud and cow-dung; the floor was made of compacted soil and the roof, thatched with palm leaves. In the dry season, the children would play outside, running and tumbling over the sun-baked earth while their mother cooked over a clay pot filled with embers. During monsoon, they sat inside, peering out at the rivers of mud that flowed up to the door and the great water-spouts that gushed from the roof, pouring down the ribs of the palm-fronds.
My country is one of extremes: tenderness and ferocity, fate and uncertainty, strength and weakness. It has but two seasons – wet and dry – and trees which, recognising no season, flower and fruit at the same time. Ceylon’s wealth has been both its strength and its frailty; a source of great riches and a lure to invaders. As kings fell to the foreign powers, so those of more humble origins attained an importance beyond their rank. So it was with my grandfather.
It was the foreign colonists, first the Portuguese and then the Dutch, who altered the course of generations and changed the fate of my grandfather and his forebears. To be born into a salagama family was not only to inherit a trade, but also a caste – a lowly one. Yet the traders’ weakness became our family’s strength.
The spice you call cinnamon, is called kurundu in my own tongue, Sinhalese. It is the inner bark of a tree, released from young branches by deft hammering; its fragrance is so strong that ships’ captains claim to smell it many miles out to sea. Perhaps it was this scent that haunted the dreams of traders, drawing them from the safety of their European homes, inspiring a reckless pursuit over land and ocean until, landing on our shores they built forts to protect the spice and fought bloody battles for its possession.
For centuries, cinnamon was Ceylon’s most precious commodity. Who would have thought that the fragrant bark of a tree would be more highly-prized than all the rubies, emeralds and sapphires extracted from our mines? Yet a crate of dried, brown cinnamon quills was worth more than its weight in gold. The fortunes of the Dutch East India Company depended upon its monopoly of the cinnamon trade and, for this reason, our Dutch rulers protected both the spice and its producers. Thus, despite his low caste, my grandfather – like all salagamas – enjoyed a special status.
But this all changed under the next wave of invaders. The British succeeded the Dutch and the principle of ‘laissez faire’ replaced the monopoly that had favoured cinnamon-peelers, assuring them of privileges and a comfortable life. New crops, such as coffee, began to appear and plantation farming with its vast acreages and requirement for cheap, unskilled labour superseded traditional methods of production.
When cinnamon was king, even those who were not cinnamon-peelers sought to be classed as salagamas. But now, it was the salagamas who sought a new identity, doing everything they could to release their children from the clutches of the Cinnamon Department.
As Ceylon changed hands, other changes also took place. My grandfather – a reluctant convert to the Dutch Reformed Church – reverted to Buddhism, the faith of his ancestors. However, as he neared the end of his life, a missionary convinced him of the error of his ways and he converted once more to the Christian faith; although, this time, it was a British rather than a Dutch strain of Protestantism.
My grandfather died leaving a wife and five children. Unable to sustain them all, my grandmother sent the eldest out to work as servants. My mother was taken in by the same missionary who had converted her father. Mr Sutherland and his wife were Scottish; a childless couple whose moral principles were as unyielding as the granite of their native land. Yet this severity was tempered by a love of little children; prompted, no doubt, by their own lack of them.
Although she began as a servant, my mother soon occupied the Sutherland home as its daughter, recommending herself to the couple’s affections, not only by her sweet nature, but also by her readiness to learn. An able pupil, she was quick at both letters and needlework; her mind as nimble as her fingers.
As her adoptive father’s sight failed, my mother would sit beside him on the verandah, describing the birds in the garden: the hoopoes, parrots and pigeons; the humming-birds sipping nectar from fragrant, trumpet-shaped flowers. Together they would watch the rapid sunset then, taking him by the arm, she would lead him indoors to his favourite chair. After making him comfortable, she would take her place at the table where, sharing the lamplight with Mrs Sutherland, she would read aloud from the Bible; her companion nodding her approval as she sewed.
As the reverend gentleman was no longer able to write, my mother became his amanuensis, committing the sermons that he dictated to paper and, when occasion and style required, tactfully editing them. Acting as his guide, she accompanied him to church, handing him the Bible or prayer-book from which he pretended to read, although he had long since committed their contents to memory. It was an innocent deception in which she readily participated for, as he told her, how could a blind preacher lead the heathen into light?
Among his many duties, Mr Sutherland was a regular preacher at the garrison church in Kandy. Situated next to the Temple of the Tooth, the solid square tower and grey stone of the Anglican church was a stark contrast to the curving lines and golden finials of its neighbour. No doubt the supplicants at each place of worship indulged in silent disapproval of the other, approaching their respective gods in a state of silent censure. Yet who can say if proximity to such gaudy and tantalising exoticism did not awaken something of the pagan in my mother. For it was here that she met my father, a young officer in the Royal Engineers.
Their attachment began innocently. After service, it was Mr Sutherland’s practice to engage his parishioners in lengthy conversation at the church door. Tiring of the endless litany of births, marriages and deaths, my mother would wander off into the churchyard to inspect the crop of headstones whose numbers grew steadily every week. Even in death, it seems, the English must stake a claim to land, if only to a plot the length and breadth of a man’s body.
She was deep in thought, contemplating the narrative on a young Captain’s grave, when a voice startled her.
“Extraordinary fellow!”
It was an exclamation wrapped around an interrogative. A statement that demanded an answer.
“Yes, indeed,” she murmured, her eyes still fixed upon the stone.
“I knew him, you know.”
With her hand shielding her eyes from the sun, my mother turned to her companion and was confronted by a young man of middle height and upright bearing, resplendent in a red tunic with a lieutenant’s insignia. The bright tropical sun glanced off his brass buttons, setting them a-twinkle so that they resembled small mirrors – the sort used by hunters to lure small birds from the safety of their perch.
With his yellow whiskers and tawny hair, there was something lion-like about this young soldier. My mother was both attracted and disturbed by him: re-assured by his strength, but also frightened by it. He seemed invincible.
With the ease of one practised in the art of pleasant conversation, he sought to engage her interest, pointing at the grave-stone.
“He died because of a wager.”
“A wager?”
“Yes. His brother officers challenged him to walk all the way down to Kandy from Trincomalee – nearly a hundred miles. It was a joke – ill-conceived, but a joke nonetheless. No-one expected him to take it seriously. But Captain James McGlashan was not one to accept defeat. Although only twenty-seven, he was already a veteran of Waterloo and the Peninsular War with a fierce reputation for bravery. He would have died rather than accept the taint of cowardice. Even for something as trifling as a bet.”
“What happened?”
“Although it was the rainy season, when snakes emerge from their hiding places to inhabit the tracks and highways, he set out alone, reckless of danger, determined to complete the march. Drenched by the monsoon rain, he slept in the open with only the trees for cover and his wet clothes clinging to his skin. Yet, despite hardship and the ceaseless torrent falling from the skies, he continued, ploughing along roads that had turned into rivers, a prey to mosquitoes and leeches. When he arrived in Kandy he was raving and out of his wits. For days, he burned with fever until, in a moment of clarity, he asked for a priest. After receiving the last rites, he fell into a deep sleep and died.”
“So sad!”
“Yes, but he won the wager.”
Looking into his eyes, she saw that he was laughing and allowed herself a smile.
“That’s better. Tell me, what is the attraction of a graveyard for such a beautiful young woman?”
Her skin darkened as the blood ran to her cheeks.
“I am the clergyman’s daughter,” she stammered. Then, seeing the ironic twist of his mouth, added: “His adopted daughter.”
“Delighted to make your acquaintance, Miss Sutherland,” said the Lieutenant with a low bow. “Allow me to escort you back to the church.”
Shyly taking his arm, my mother allowed herself to be led across the coarse-bladed grass, shuddering as she passed the gravestones of five little siblings, all laid out in a row like five stone bobbins. As they approached the church, she could see her father in the porch, searching for her with faded eyes.
“I will take my leave here, Miss,” said the soldier. Then leaning towards her, he whispered: “But I hope to see you again. Soon.”
Clicking his heels, he winked as he saluted her. And she was lost.
The grave of Captain McGlashan became their meeting place. While Mr Sutherland conversed with his parishioners, the Lieutenant courted his daughter with small gifts: a nosegay of jasmine to pin in her black hair; love-notes written on small scraps of paper that could be concealed within a prayer-book. She kept them all: the dried-up flowers, long since turned to dust, and the billets-doux, stored in a cigar box, which I inherited. I read them still, small scraps of yellow paper, mottled with age; brief messages – “Be Mine Forever”, “Marry me!” There is also the drawing of a heart, pierced by an arrow, bearing two names; Amelia and another which, crossed through with thick pen-strokes, has been obscured.
Under the blind gaze of Mr Sutherland, somewhere between the Te Deum and the Lord’s Prayer, the handsome Lieutenant persuaded my mother to run away with him. One day, after service, she slipped out of a side-door and into his arms, abandoning her former life and all who had shown her kindness. From that day, her reputation was destroyed, her disgrace complete. I have no explanation for her actions. Indeed, she never offered one. I can only assume that the tigerish prompting of her blood overcame all ties of duty and loyalty to her protectors.
The Sutherlands were left grieving and, in the Reverend’s case, obdurate. My mother was barred from their home forever, although, I believe that Mrs Sutherland secretly contrived a means of communication once she had discovered my mother’s whereabouts. But by then it was too late. My mother, having assumed matrimonial status, without the sanction of the church, had given birth to twins: my brother, Neville, and myself.
Despite many fine promises, my father never legitimised their union – or his children. My mother was an outcast, one of the growing legion of ‘native wives’, bound by affection – but not by law – to English men. In polite society, they were referred to as concubines; in less genteel circles, whores and prostitutes.
Seduced by empty promises, these women were simply another conquest, a further plundering of an island whose riches had been pillaged by successive waves of invaders. Gems, cinnamon, arrack and tobacco: extracted, refined, bottled and crated, then sent back home to Europe. All except the women. These, they left behind.
When Neville and I were still babies, my father’s regiment left for India. Assuring my mother that they would soon be reunited, my father arranged a temporary position for her as lady’s maid to Mrs Diggory, the wife of a magistrate. But, although he promised to send my mother money so that she could follow him, neither letters nor money followed. After waving him goodbye at the docks, she never saw nor heard from him again. Eventually, she prevailed upon the magistrate’s wife – a gentle soul – to make enquiries on her behalf.
One day, Mrs Diggory came to the room in which my mother was sewing and sitting beside her, took her hand.
“My dear, he is dead.”
Barely able to restrain her tears, the kindly woman told my mother what she had discovered. My father had died in the Western Ghats working on the construction of a railway. He lies there still, buried on a mountain slope in an untended, overgrown grave alongside others who succumbed to fever or who, like him, fell to their deaths from precarious footholds.
***
Yet this was the beginning, rather than the end, of my mother’s tribulations. She owed her position to my father’s friendship with Mr Diggory; a man who, despite his position of authority, was more liberal and compassionate than many of his compatriots. Although independent in his views, the magistrate was, nonetheless, a man of high moral standing, both incorruptible and courageous. But these admirable qualities were to be his undoing.
The magistrate was responsible for the coastal district just south of the sprawling metropolis of Colombo. The main town, Negombo, consisted of little more than a road running parallel to the beach where the harsh brilliancy of the sea rivalled that of the sun and the fronds of coconut trees rattled like bones in the breeze. Yet the warm saltiness of Negombo’s air offered a refuge from the stagnant vapours of the city and the pink and white villas of wealthy Britons sprang up amid the palm trees. Few gave any thought to the other Negombo: the lawless strand whose fleet of small wooden vessels served fishermen by day and smugglers by night. Its nameless alleys, straggling down to the beach, formed a highway for illicit trade and the hovels that lined them, a refuge for thieves and murderers.
There was one, in particular: Don Pedro, the master of Negombo’s criminal brotherhood.
A man of some learning – and even greater cunning – he was fluent in the native languages of Tamil and Sinhala as well as English. His origin was a mystery, although his name indicates some Portuguese ancestry. In our country, names often survive as the only legacy of a forgotten race: Pereira, Fernando, Cruz.
It was rumoured that Don Pedro remained loyal to the religion of his European forefathers, making generous donations on saints’ days and slipping into the local church at dusk to make his confession. Yet such observance marked the full extent of his godliness. In all other things, he led the life of a degenerate brigand.
As soon as Mr Diggory moved into the magistrate’s residence, he was besieged by local people requesting favours. Every morning, they would form a long queue at the gate, hoping for a glimpse of the magistrate as he left for court in his carriage and waiting until his return when, one by one, they were allowed through the gate by his servants to present their demands.
In the first weeks of his residency, Mr Diggory had been mystified by the daily visits of a particular supplicant: an angular, hawk-nosed fellow of sallow complexion and magisterial bearing, well-dressed although his costume was a curious mix of oriental and European. Evidently a man of some substance, his presence inspired the other petitioners with awe for, however long they had been waiting, they always accorded him first place in the queue.
Each day, after bowing deeply to the magistrate, this man would present him with a gift then leave without making any request. Soon, a tide of offerings threatened to overwhelm the house: bales of cloth, copper pans and sacks of rice flowed over from the outhouse into the scullery and two small goats gambolled about the yard, trying to eat the washing from the line while hens cackled in cages piled against a wall.
Puzzled by this behaviour and unable to engage with the man in conversation, the magistrate asked one of his servants to explain.
“Ah,” said the man, looking slyly at his master. “That is Don Pedro, sir. A very powerful man. He wishes to enter an agreement.”
“What sort of agreement?”
“He is a man of business. He wishes you to be his partner.”
“In return for what?”
“Your silence, sir,” the servant replied, simply.
“And what is Don Pedro’s business?” demanded the magistrate, his cheeks flushing angrily.
The servant shrugged as if no explanation were necessary.
“What sort of business?” demanded Mr Diggory.
“Buying, selling, contraband, all types of thievery.”
The man gave Mr Diggory a sideways grin and winked, slyly.
“How dare you! How dare you suppose …”
Furious, Mr Diggory raised his fist as if to strike the man. Quaking, the servant wrapped his arms about his head to shield himself from the blows. Confronted with this quivering, pathetic creature, the magistrate was moved to pity.
“The fault is mine,” he murmured, lowering his arm. “I have been a fool.”
The servant peeped out between his hands, curious to see what would happen next.
“I suppose,” ventured the magistrate, “that Don Pedro is your master?”
“Yes, sir. You and Don Pedro are both my masters,” affirmed the servant, wagging his head. “Both very good men,” he added, without a trace of irony.
“It says in the Bible that a man cannot serve two masters,” said the magistrate, sternly.
“I am Hindu, sir,” explained the servant, with a sideways nod of the head.
Sighing, the magistrate ordered the man to load all the gifts onto a cart and deliver them back to Don Pedro’s house. With a message.
“Tell him that I want none of his gifts or his business. Tell him also that I will put a stop to his nefarious trade and, if I catch him, he will hang.”
A few hours later, the servant was seen dragging a creaking handcart piled high with sacks and bundles along the lonely road that led through coconut groves and winding tracks to Don
Pedro’s residence.
He did not return. There was no reply from Don Pedro and, after that, no further visits.
But his temper was legendary and his rage at the magistrate’s rejection of his terms can only be imagined.
It was the beginning of a struggle that lasted many months, each man striving for mastery over the other. Mr Diggory contrived to end Don Pedro’s trade, leading armed patrols to disrupt the night-work of the smugglers, raiding illegal drinking dens, searching the houses of Don Pedro’s associates. The courts were constantly in session and the gaols overflowed with criminals of all kinds; each one a small thread in Don Pedro’s iniquitous web.
Eventually, it seemed that Don Pedro’s power was broken. So it came as no surprise when the master-criminal — who had hitherto directed the activities of his accomplices from a distance — was apprehended during the burglary of a house. Apparently, the disruption of his trade had been so effective, that he had been driven to commit a crime in person although, filled with bravado, he had performed the felony in broad daylight.
He was led in triumph to the court-house where, prior to appearing, he was kept under guard in a small ante-room. Dark and bare, its walls blackened with mildew, the room was lit by a single, barred window situated high overhead. It was barely large enough to admit a small child, even if it had been accessible from the ground, which made Don Pedro’s escape all the more remarkable – or, should one say, suspicious.
The guards swore that they knew nothing of his disappearance until one, in an act of compassion, had opened the door to offer the prisoner a glass of water. The bars, loosened from their sockets and lying on the floor, told their own story.
Infuriated by the loss of his prisoner and deafened by the hubbub in the courtroom, Mr Diggory ordered several members of the local police to ride with him in pursuit of Don Pedro. They galloped out of Negombo, along the single-track road, past the flickering sea flecked with tiny boats and the parched, yellow beach laced with drying nets; past palm trees and fishermen’s huts; the cemetery with its low wall and white bunting; past rattling carts laden with rice; into the mottled light of coconut groves where the sun throws patterned shadows over the red earth. On they rode, out into open country, where egrets wade through paddy fields and the air is mellow with the lowing of oxen. Until, at last, one of the men pointed to a narrow track.
“Along there, sir. That is where you will find him.”
“Follow me!”
Mr Diggory spurred his horse forward down the track. So eager was he to recapture his prey that he did not look back to see if his men had followed him. The track wound back and forth through densely overgrown scrubland, commonly called ‘jungle’; a landscape characterised by tall grasses and stunted trees, the haunt of many wild and dangerous animals.
After a mile or so, the track opened out onto a clearing at whose heart stood a low, sprawling building, more like a stable in construction than a house. The place was silent and appeared to be deserted. Having ridden into the clearing, Mr Diggory looked behind him to see his men advancing at a slow trot.
“Hurry up!” he ordered impatiently. “What is detaining you?”
But at the entrance to the clearing, the men stopped, staring at him sullenly.
“What is the matter with you?” demanded Mr Diggory. “Are you afraid?”
One of the men nodded, but no word was spoken. They just sat there, watching Mr Diggory, their horses stamping and snorting. He had ridden far out into the countryside, to a desolate place far from help. He must have cursed himself for his recklessness.
“Damn you,” he muttered. “I shall do the job myself.”
Cantering up to the building, he tried to peer in through the dark windows.
“Hello,” he shouted. “Hello.”
As he passed one of the windows, a hand appeared and pointed a pistol at his back. As the bullet pierced Mr Diggory’s heart, his horse reared and whinnied, throwing him to the ground.
This, at least, is the story told by the policemen when they arrived home that night with the magistrate’s body slung over the back of his horse. And yet, there were some things that were never explained. His companions insisted that he had been shot by an unseen hand. Yet why was the murderer not apprehended? Why was there no attempt to give chase?
At about the time the murder took place, Don Pedro took care to show himself in Colombo, many miles away. So it could not have been him — at least, not personally — although, I often wonder if one of the magistrate’s companions that day was not also the servant of two masters.
What is certain is the disastrous effect of her husband’s death on Mrs Diggory. She lost the son that she was carrying a few days after giving birth, having already lost her small daughter the year before. Thus, in the space of a few months, she buried her husband and both children.
Grief-stricken, she refused to return to England. Instead, forced to quit the magistrate’s residence and dismiss her servants, she sold most of her possessions and took a small house next to the cemetery where her husband and children were buried. I am told that she lives there still, immured with her grief, only venturing out to tend the graves of her loved ones.
***
After Mr Diggory’s death, my mother found herself, once again, without work or a home. Having rented a single room off a dark courtyard, she tried to support us by taking in needlework but could not earn enough to sustain us. Destitute and alone, she sought the company of men who, in her former life, she would have reviled. Eventually, she was taken on as a house-maid by Mr Landless, a minor clerk in the East India Company.
Still beautiful, she won his favour and, once more, became a ‘native wife’, gaining food and lodging for herself and her children. However, her position was little better than that of a servant and, in some ways, inferior; for her status was always uncertain and the work she performed, unpaid.
Being given to drink and ill-humour, Landless was not a kind man. At best, his attitude towards Neville and myself was grudging and, as we grew up, we did our best to stay out of his sight and the reach of his cane; a heavy Malacca stick tipped with silver that, when wielded in a drunken rage, would leave its mark for weeks.
You have often upbraided Neville for his propensity to clench his fist when angry, your reason being that you dislike this display of uncontrolled aggression. But, my dear, this is a misapprehension. Neville has learned to curb his temper through many hardships. What you observe is a sign of self-restraint, not lack of it.
When my mother, worn out and disillusioned, slipped from life, Neville and I were thrown on Landless’s mercy. In a gesture that others regarded as generosity, but which sprang from a mercenary nature, he adopted us as his children. In effect, we were his slaves, living in rags, sleeping on mats in the kitchen, cooking, cleaning and tending to his needs. His vicious temper was not improved by drink or the dwindling of his fortune. We became the butt of his sadistic humour.
“Landless you are and landless you shall be!”
And he had other, more painful taunts. He would beat me while Neville watched. Small though he was, my brother tried to protect me, launching himself at Landless on one occasion, biting and scratching, trying to restrain the hand that wielded the Malacca cane. But it only resulted in greater punishments. On that occasion, Landless beat me unconscious. Neville learned never to intervene, restraining himself by clenching his fists so that the nails bit into his flesh and drew blood.
We endured this cruelty for many years until Mr Landless died. But, even in death, he continued to torment us. The terms of his will dictated that we should be despatched to a land that we did not know and a man that we could not like. Our new guardian, Mr Honeythunder was a humanitarian of the philosophical kind: his good deeds being a matter of conjecture, rather than action. It was only when Mr Honeythunder brought us to Cloisterham that we discovered true friendship.
***
But the disappearance of Edwin Drood cast a long shadow over us: in particular, my brother who, due to the connivance of one man and the stupidity of others, was nearly hanged. It was only due to the good offices of yourself and Mr Grewgious, the lawyer, that Neville was finally cleared of the imputation of murder so diligently fostered by Edwin’s uncle, the Cathedral choirmaster John Jasper.
The rest you know. But, for the sake of posterity and those who, in future, may wish to understand my present actions, it is worth reciting the facts.
Seized by an unwholesome passion for Edwin’s fiancée, Rosa Bud, John Jasper sought a means of ridding himself of both young Mr Drood and my brother, both of whom he regarded as his rivals in love. It was well-known at the time that my brother Neville and Edwin Drood were on bad terms. Jasper sought to profit from this by engineering a meeting that would lead to the disappearance of one and the incrimination of the other.
On Christmas Eve, Jasper invited Neville and Edwin to supper at his lodgings in the Cathedral gatehouse. With Jasper’s subtle connivance, a previous meeting between these two young men had ended not only in hostility, but also in a violent show of temper by Neville.
However, on this occasion, Neville and Edwin resolved their differences and, leaving Jasper’s rooms together, walked first to the Cathedral and then to the river which was in furious spate, it being a wild and blustery evening. After staring into the whirling flood for a few minutes, the young men decided to return home, parting company at the door of your house where Neville was living as your pupil.
All this time, they had been observed by Jasper who had followed them from his lodgings, slipping unseen into the street from a small door that leads into the dark archway beneath the gatehouse. Wearing the dark pea-jacket and hat which he used to disguise himself for nocturnal sorties into the town, he crept softly through the shadows.
A dark and stealthy menace, he stalked the two young men to the Cathedral – eavesdropping on their conversation — then through Cloisterham’s empty, storm-swept streets, down to the wide sweep of the river. He then followed them back to your house and, having watched them bid goodnight, he fled back to the gatehouse where, concealed beneath the arch, he lay in wait for Edwin.
As soon as his nephew came into view, Jasper stepped out of the shadow and hurried towards him, his expression one of deepest concern.
“Ned, Ned, dearest boy, where have you been? I have been worried almost to distraction.”
At the word ‘Ned’, Edwin looked at his uncle askance. He had heard the name earlier that day from the lips of another who had warned him of a threat to one called ‘Ned’. But the meeting had been a chance one and Edwin had dismissed the warning as the confused ramblings of a vagrant.
Seeing a flash of suspicion on his nephew’s face, Jasper knew that he must act quickly.
There must be no delay, no hesitation.
A few days earlier, with copious amounts of wine and liberal flattery, Jasper had inveigled the stonemason Durdles to conduct him on a secret tour of the Cathedral. Telling Durdles that he wished to discover the mysteries and secret nooks of the great edifice, Jasper had plied the stonemason with alcohol, left him in a drunken stupor and briefly purloined his keys in order to unlock the crypt. The trap was set.
Now, with Edwin before him, Jasper made a show of avuncular concern, wrapping an arm around his nephew’s shoulders and affecting that low, sweet voice which was his particular gift.
In an instant, Edwin’s fear was allayed and his low spirits leavened by the tale of a fantastical discovery. Not untruthfully, Jasper recounted how Durdles, by tapping with his hammer on the cloistral pavement, had discovered the long-forgotten tomb of a Norman prelate.
“Shall we not see him? Let us be the first. Come, dearest boy.”
By this time, the rising wind of early evening had turned into a gale which, with the uncontrolled abandon of a gigantic child, was wilfully tearing branches from trees and flinging them across the sky. In the grasp of this preternatural force, Cloisterham was shaken to its ancient roots. In that state of self-pity which attends a surfeit of wine and rich food, Edwin ignored the whisperings of common sense and followed his uncle, eager for distraction and some shelter from the bone-biting chill.
Slipping silently through the Cathedral precincts — where nocturnal shadow lingers even in daylight — Jasper led his nephew between ancient headstones, their writing effaced by time and the restless elements; through the cloisters and down into the echoing crypt. Here, he enlisted his nephew’s help in pushing back the lid of the stone sarcophagus.
Although it was too dark to see into the tomb, his uncle’s vivid account had brought to life the vision of a prelate, magnificently preserved in all his medieval glory, a great golden crozier lying beside him, a ruby ring on his finger, his gloved hands pressed together in prayer. A captive to imagination, Edwin stared, transfixed, into the umbrous hollow.
“Wait while I fetch a candle,” murmured Jasper, treading softly back into the shadow.
Leaning over the tomb, Edwin did not hear his uncle approaching quietly from behind. Wielding an iron candlestick, Jasper dealt his nephew a single, violent blow that crushed his skull, killing him outright. Pausing only to remove the jewellery that Edwin was accustomed to wear – his shirt-pin, watch and chain – Jasper tipped the corpse, fully-clothed, into the tomb and, with an effort that left him weak at the knees, pushed the stone cover back into place.
A few days later, having assisted in the dragging of the river that followed Edwin’s disappearance and, having learned that the scope of this search would not be extended, Jasper threw the jewellery into the river some two miles away at Cloisterham Weir – a place in which you are accustomed to swim and from which you, yourself, retrieved the missing items.
In taking Edwin’s shirt-pin, watch and chain, Jasper believed that he had removed the only items by which the body could be identified if, in the unlikely event, it were to be discovered at some future date. However, he had overlooked one thing. He did not know that, when Edwin returned to Cloisterham that Christmas, he carried a ring, supplied to him by Rosa Bud’s guardian, Mr Grewgious.
This ring was bound up with tragedy, having been retrieved from the hand of Rosa’s mother after she had drowned. It had subsequently been entrusted to Mr Grewgious’s care with the intention of it being the ring with which Edwin proposed to Rosa (their fathers, being friends, having expressed a wish that their only children should marry each other). At the beginning of that fateful Christmas week, Mr Grewgious had released the ring to Edwin for this purpose. However, if Edwin failed to commit himself to Rosa, Mr Grewgious had laid upon him an undertaking with these portentous words: I charge you, by the living and the dead, to bring that ring back to me!
So, Edwin carried the ring, in its box, in the breast-pocket of his coat, back to Cloisterham where he arranged to meet Rosa with the intention of asking her to be his wife. However, she pre-empted his proposal, suggesting that they put off all idea of marriage and that their relationship should, instead, be that of brother and sister. Relieved of the heavy duty placed on them by their parents, they embraced affectionately, observed by Jasper who, having heard nothing of their conversation, assumed that their engagement, so long awaited, had been confirmed.
Hesitation now sealed Edwin’s fate. Unwilling to tell his uncle of their decision, he left Mr Grewgious to break the news to Jasper that the wedding would not take place. Thus, it was only after Edwin’s murder that Jasper learned the truth: a discovery that induced in him a violent, nervous collapse.
However, undeterred by the wicked and senseless murder one young man, Jasper now set about encompassing the life of another: my brother, Neville. Dear Septimus, it angers me to think how your decency and truthfulness were abused by that man to further his own wicked ends. For, after Edwin’s disappearance, you revealed to Jasper what he had not known before: the depth of my brother’s feelings for Rosa – the object of Jasper’s insane passion.
Having long maligned Neville as part of his plan to lay the blame for Edwin’s disappearance elsewhere, Jasper now redoubled his efforts. My brother’s utter disgrace was but the first step in Jasper’s plan to have him hung as a common criminal. And he may well have succeeded, had not Rosa, terrified by Jasper’s advances some months after Edwin’s disappearance, not run away to seek protection with her guardian, Mr Grewgious, convincing him of Jasper’s inherent wickedness and strengthening the suspicions that he already entertained on that score.
Determined to uncover the truth, Mr Grewgious employed an enquiry agent in Cloisterham whose investigations soon bore fruit. On the evidence of an opium-seller whose den he frequented – and to whom he had confessed when intoxicated – John Jasper was arrested for his nephew’s murder. The tomb was opened and the body, much decomposed, was discovered.
However, confident that he had removed all means of identification, Jasper denied any knowledge of the body – or that it was Edwin.
But he was undone. The ring, still in its box, was found in the corpse’s breast-pocket and, having been identified by Mr Grewgious, proved beyond doubt that the body was that of Edwin. Yet, Jasper still managed, in some degree, to elude justice. Faced with conclusive proof of his guilt and deprived of the drug on which he depended, he hanged himself from the bars of his cell with a long, black scarf that he had concealed upon him.
Edwin’s body was duly buried within the consecrated ground of the Cathedral graveyard.
Yet, despite the fact that all questions have been answered, there are many within the taverns and parlours of Cloisterham who still relish the mystery that accompanied his disappearance. And there are some who continue to profit from it, such as Durdles, the stonemason who, for the price of a pint of porter, will recount stories of ghostly screams and hauntings. Although the facts have been laid bare, theories still abound and Neville, although absolved of guilt, is still the victim of whispering and petty prejudice. I do not think that he will ever be able to return to Cloisterham.
For myself, I have done with mystery. I want no more of it. Puzzles and conundrums hold no fascination for me. I abhor half-truths and the shadows which breed them. I cannot tolerate concealment and can only thrive in the pure sunlight of truth.
It is for that reason, my love, that I am making this journey back to the country of my birth. For there is still one unsolved mystery that torments me. My father’s name. Out of loyalty, my mother always withheld it. But I cannot embark on a new life without a true knowledge of who I am.
I am, therefore, returning to Ceylon to see the only person who can unravel this enigma. Mrs Diggory. I am told that she is still living in the small house by the cemetery in which her husband and children are buried. God willing she still has her wits about her and will be able to throw light on the mystery of my birth. She, alone, can answer the questions that have tormented me for years. Only then, when all my self-doubt has been laid to rest, will I be truly free to return and accept your offer of marriage.
For that reason, dear Septimus, I beg you most earnestly to pray for my success.
My heart will be, forever, yours,
Helena
Historical sources for The Cinnamon Peeler’s Daughter:
1. Captain James McGlashan (d. 1817) is buried in the British Garrison Cemetery near to the Temple of the Tooth in Kandy, Sri Lanka (formerly Ceylon). His extraordinary trek from Trincomalee on Ceylon’s North-East coast to Kandy is a matter of record. His tombstone was transferred to this cemetery in the 1880s.
2. The story of Mr Diggory was inspired by the memorial tablet to Frederick Lacy Dick (d. 1847) in Chilham parish church, Kent. This monument records in extraordinary detail the circumstances of Mr Dick’s assassination “by an unseen hand” when he was serving as a District Magistrate at Negombo, Ceylon. The story was also reported in The Times (October 26, 1847).
3. Rochester Cathedral (aka Cloisterham) contains over 25 memorial tablets to members of the Corps of Royal Engineers and the building has enjoyed a particularly close relationship to military engineers since the time of Bishop Gundulf (d. 1108) who not only re-built the cathedral but oversaw construction work on Rochester Castle. Many of these memorial plaques tell stories of the bravery, sickness and sheer bad luck of soldiers who died overseas when the British Empire was at the height of its power in the 19th century. The men who died were extremely young by our standards and the commemorative inscriptions provide a fascinating, if sobering, insight not just into the deaths, but also into the lives and work of those employed in various overseas postings. These monuments also give an idea of the geographical extent of the Empire during this period, with references to places as diverse as Afghanistan, Africa and Canada.