This showcase presents work that I completed during my Master’s program in Educational Technology, including projects from my student teaching experience, as well as my graduate certificate in K–12 Computer Science Education. While in the program, I focused on deepening my understanding of how students learn through a critical pedagogy lens, strengthening my skills in teaching with technology, and finding practical ways to bring computational thinking into core subjects.
These artifacts are organized around three main themes. Understanding Learners & Learning shows how I create meaningful, equitable learning experiences for all. Computational Thinking highlights how I integrate CT into core subjects to help students develop critical problem-solving, analytical, and creative thinking skills. Evolving Literacy Practices demonstrates growth in my understanding of teaching reading and writing, and how I apply research-informed best practices to continually improve my teaching.
The foundation of teaching is understanding who students are and how they learn. This section highlights my focus on creating classrooms that are responsive to both students’ cognitive and emotional needs.
Through my graduate work, I explored a wide range of learning theories and research. This artifact demonstrates my new understanding of key learning theories, and reflects on approaches I resonate with most, including behaviorism, information processing, sociocultural theory, constructivism/constructionism, culturally relevant pedagogy, affirmation, inquiry, explicit teaching, and my own trauma-informed approach. I believe students learn best when they are emotionally regulated, affirmed, and actively engaged. Creating this theory helped me understand how to consider both the cognitive and emotional needs of learners and how to design learning experiences that truly help all students access, engage with, and retain knowledge. Through this process, I developed skills in understanding the psychology of learning, connecting theory to practice, informing my future instruction.
This artifact is a research project exploring the misconception that gifted students can succeed on their own in general education classrooms. In this artifact, I demonstrate my ability to analyze research data, challenge misconceptions, and apply findings to instructional practice. Inspired by Heacox and Cash’s framework for differentiation for gifted learners, this research deepened my understanding of how to meet gifted students’ diverse needs effectively. My research focused on two questions: to what degree do teachers hold this misconception, and to what degree are these misconceptions influenced by standardized testing, fixed mindsets, and lack of training. This topic felt especially important to me because many gifted students have needs that often go unmet in classrooms. Through this project, I learned that many participants do not rely on standardized test scores to guide instruction, few recognize that gifted students require additional support, and very few teachers in Michigan have received training in gifted education. Because I had not received any formal skill-building in gifted education in either my undergraduate or graduate coursework, this project was especially valuable in helping me build the knowledge and practical strategies needed to better support gifted learners.
During my student teaching, my peers and I wanted to better understand students with emotional disturbance (ED), a highly misunderstood exceptionality. This artifact highlights my ability to synthesize research and collaborate with colleagues to create practical tools for teachers. My group researched evidence-based strategies, learn about legal responsibilities for IEPs and 504 plans, and explored supports from in-school resources to behavioral interventions. It is a reflection of my commitment to using research and best practices to create safe, equitable, and responsive learning environments for all students. I gained experience identifying and supporting students with diverse needs, deepened my understanding of the 504 and IEP referral process, and learned to collaborate effectively with support staff to ensure students receive appropriate services.
Computational thinking is a passion I discovered as an undergraduate learning and research assistant, and it continues to shape how I teach today. It is a problem-solving process that draws on the skills computer scientists use, such as breaking down complex tasks and designing logical, step-by-step solutions, but it is valuable for everyone, not just in coding. In this section, I share projects that show how CT can be integrated into core subjects to strengthen students’ problem-solving and creativity.
In designing this activity I demonstrate my ability to integrate computational thinking into science instruction and apply the TPACK framework to lesson design. This artifact showcases a physical computing activity I designed using the Micro:Bit to explore how the brightness of stars relates to their distance from Earth (5-ESS1-1). Students would tinker with sensors, design experiments, and present their findings using Scratch and Google Sheets, combining data collection with creative computing. In designing this project, I focused on integrating computational thinking into science, supporting problem-solving, data analysis, and creative expression, while ensuring multiple access points so all learners could engage fully with the concepts despite their prior knowledge in coding.
This artifact highlights how I design authentic learning experiences that connect coding to students’ lives and promote ownership in problem-solving. I designed this project to teach decomposition, a key computational thinking skill, through real-life measurement conversions in 5th grade math. Students could create a Scratch calculator that solves a problem meaningful to them, giving them ownership over their learning and connecting coding to their daily lives. For my exemplar, I built a calculator to adjust recipe measurements for smaller portions, which is especially helpful for me since I often cook ¼ of a recipe for just one or two people. This project highlights how students can break complex problems into manageable steps and translate their thinking into code, using Scratch to turn their ideas into real tools. In designing and implementing this activity in my classroom, I demonstrate skills in teaching computational thinking and creating activities that allow students to utilize their funds of knowledge.
My computational thinking pieces showcase my ability to design learning experiences that make abstract CT concepts relevant and practical for students. The first, Shop Like a Computer Scientist, has students practice decomposition, pattern recognition, abstraction, and algorithm design through grocery shopping. This activity was inspired by my discovery that strengthening my computational thinking skills has made me a more organized and functional adult. The second, Algorithms and Executive Functioning, looks at how CT skills connect to executive functioning, helping students plan, organize, and get things done more effectively. Teaching at a gifted school with many twice-exceptional students inspired this activity, and both projects reflect my passion for helping students build thinking skills they can actually use in school and in life. Developing these activities strengthened my ability to design lessons that integrate computational thinking strategies with real-world problems to support students in applying abstract concepts in practical ways.
Although science is my passion, I believe literacy is the foundation for all knowledge and subjects. In this section, I share artifacts that reflect my growth in applying best practices to help students develop as readers, writers, and communicators.
For this artifact, I explored Published Writers as Models, a best practice strategy from Best Practices in Literacy Instruction, Seventh Edition (Morrow, Morrell, & Casey, 2023), to help students grow as readers and writers. I compared the Wit and Wisdom curriculum I currently use with the strategies in the book and noticed that while my curriculum included a novel written in verse, it offered few opportunities for students to engage with that writing style. I designed a lesson using free-verse poetry to show how line breaks, sensory details, and repetition convey emotion, helping students connect more deeply to the text while emphasizing author’s craft. Rather than writing a formulaic paragraph, students practice imitating authors’ techniques to express emotion and perspective in their own voice. This project allowed me to reflect on how to adapt existing materials to align with research-based literacy strategies. This exploration reflects my ability to adapt curriculum materials using research-based strategies to strengthen student engagement and voice.
This artifact demonstrates how I can apply data analysis and culturally responsive practices to design literacy instruction grounded in students’ strengths and experiences. During my student teaching, I observed my mentor teacher’s literacy instruction and took detailed notes to connect what I was learning in class to how it actually looks in a classroom. I focused on how he used data from NWEA, running records, and WIDA scores to guide small group instruction. I also created student literacy profiles, paying attention to their interests, funds of knowledge, and literacy strengths and areas for growth. Seeing what students already knew and cared about really highlighted how instruction can connect to their experiences. This project helped me understand that literacy teaching isn’t just about the skills. It is about blending assessment, responsive instruction, and students’ lived experiences to help them grow in literacy. I developed skills in analyzing student data, creating individualized learning profiles, and designing instruction that is both responsive and culturally relevant.
AI Transparency Statement: ChatGPT was used to check the contents of this page for grammar mistakes.