|BEST| Download Twitter Version 5.0 4

Today, September 20th, 2020, we introduce Version 8 of the Twitter Ads API, designed to introduce new Tailored Audiences functionality, increase feature parity with ads.twitter.com, and improve your developer experience.

Since we announced Twitter Cards in June for twitter.com (and in July for Twitter for iPhone and Twitter for Android), we have seen tremendous response; more than 400 developers and publishers are participating in the program, distributing content through expanded Tweets. And over the next several quarters we will introduce new ways for developers to build content experiences and applications into Twitter, through Twitter Cards. Finally, we are hard at work on a new set of features for Twitter for Websites, to enable web developers to easily embed real-time Twitter content on their own sites.

Download Twitter Version 5.0 4

Download 🔥 https://fancli.com/2y2N5C 🔥

Starting today, Twitter Lite is available globally by visiting mobile.twitter.com on your smartphone or tablet. You can find more information about Twitter Lite at lite.twitter.com. A more in-depth look at how we built Twitter Lite can be found here.

Note: related to Click ID, if you are using a "Content-Security-Policy" (CSP) header on your website, ensure that you're allowlisting "ads-twitter.com", "ads-api.twitter.com", and "analytics.twitter.com" in "img-src" and "connect-src" directives in order to continue to see results with the X Pixel.

Go to apps.twitter.com and hit the "Create New App" button there. Fill out the form to give your app a name, description, and website. These can be quite simple and can always be changed later. The app's name needs to be unique, so you can name it the same it based on your bot.

This is the legacy version of twitter.com. We will be shutting it down on 15 December 2020. Please switch to a supported browser or device. You can see a list of supported browsers in our Help Center.

2. The counter point here is there are a lot of people who use this module, and we wouldn't want them to have to rebuild their site's twitter implementation. We'd at the very least need to provide a simple way to transition to the twitter module.

There is a couple of things you should keep in mind.

1. You will need to have the twitter module installed, enabled and configured for this patch to do anything at all.

2. You will have to have at least one valid twitter user association for it to work.

Hopefully this gives us a path to move forward. I want to leave this issue open as I think that the instructions by ditcheva are very helpful (thank you) and that many people who are using twitter pull should move to using Twitter in the future.

While this approach works there is a down side...this module in and of itself has no dependencies at the moment, the above patch changes this in a major way. Obviously the dependency on the Oauth Module makes total sense but by using the twitter module there is an implicite dependency on views eventhough this module does not make usage of view in any way shape or form. Now you may say every site uses views but this is not in fact the case. I would ask you to reconsider the approach taken and with the following solution

* Make this module dependent on the Oauth module

* Have explicit keys for the user name being used by twitter pull

* Provide integration directly with the Oauth rather than via the twitter module.

I agree with marcingy, so I've used the api from the oauth module and I've got it working with twitter_pull. I just need to better integrate the code I've written into the twitter_pull modules twitter_puller class and hopefully I'll have a patch we can test, and also, will need to store the consumer key/secret and the access token/token secret somewhere. I was thinking, a place to set these values could be part of the formatter settings for twitter pull under the manage display options.

It would be great to have the twitter module restructured. I would like to see it expose it's API and drop the views and user account integration for the base module and move those features/requirements to sub-modules. The twitter module, as it is, encourages every twitter related module to take it's own approach and re-implement it's own twitter API which is somewhat less than optimal. The approach I took here is considered to be a quick fix so most folks that are using this module aren't left stranded. If anyone else is interested in a better twitter module api, you can add your ideas to this thread: .

So here are my patches which integrates the OAuth modules api into the twitter_pull module.

This patch twitter_pull-oauth-integration-config-form-for-module-1781024-19.patch needs to be patched against twitter_pull.module

This patch twitter_pull-oauth-integration-for-class-inc-1781024-19.patch needs to be patched against twitter_pull.class.inc

A patch I haven't created which will probably be necessary, is for the .info file to make a dependency on the OAuth module.

So to get this working;

* download and install the OAuth module,

* apply the patches,

* log into your twitter account and create a new application to generate the consumer key/secret and the access token/token secret. The patch to the .module file will have created a configuration form which can be found under the menu Configuration->Web services->Twitter pull (admin/config/services/twitter-pull-config). This configuration form is then used to fill in the consumer key/secret and the access token/token secret, which you should have from creating your twitter application.

The immediate thing that worries me about the above patch is that the admin screen asks for all of the user twitter ouath tokens and secrets, by my understanding with Oauth only consumer token should need to be provided?

Update on further reading of the code in the twitter module I see that basically it does store the info after doing a retrieval so this is simply missing out that initial step. However providing all this information to a user still bothers me.

I hear what you're saying marcingy. Basically, by providing the access token you don't have to do the complete "dance".

But using this module (and I'm probably wrong on this) you're only going to be using you're own twitter account which reflects what is said on the application settings on twitter,

But I know what you mean, by twitter allowing you to have the access token you're neither doing a two-legged or three-legged oauth authentication. If we remove the need for the access token the code will need to complete a two-legged authentication dance to get an access token, I would need to have a look at how to do that with the OAuth modules api.

But besides that, what's the decision on all of this? Do we just want a dependency on the oauth module and don't have to worry about setting up a drupal user (just have to get the consumer and access keys from an valid twitter account), which is this solution, or, do we want the other solution to install the twitter and oauth module and the need to create a drupal user to generate the access token from the consumer key of a valid twitter account?

The dev version seems to be working, except it isn't adding in link / info for the twitter account, such as the twitter-author.

I have to make a decision in about 10 min as to whether or not to go live with this module tomorrow... is that a bug that's being worked on?

Changes

I put the URL of the config page to: admin/config/services/twitter_pull, that way you can see the twitter_pull configuration link on the admin/config page (under 'Web Services', which is also where the config for the regular twitter module is).

Drush integration

Also, I put in a little drush integration to download the api - the command is drush twitter-pull-download. This command clones the master branch from the repo, puts it in sites/all/libraries/twitter-pull-api (or anywhere with an optional argument), and then removes the .git cruft. I know I have more than a couple sites to update and I'm thinking this integration would be handy.

Testing

I tested the changes with this new API integration (lightly) and everything is working great for me! I think this is an excellent direction for the module now that the twitter API is changing and I fully agree about twitter and oauth being just too much - it would really kill the spirit of this module IMHO.

@justindodge: i think you forgot to include a copy of twitter_pull.admin.inc plus your drush file in that last patch.

also, you should either list libraries as a dependency or check that it's available before calling libraries_get_path().

If the twitter module was broken up a bit more so that different components can be used when desired then it may make sense that this module depends on (or gets merged into) the twitter module. However that's probably a completely different topic.

There are many reason to use the twitter pull module over the twitter module. For many of my sites it is the simplicity, size and performance of the twitter pull module vs the twitter module. Twitter pull also offers features that twitter doesn't. Making a dependency on the twitter module feels like the wrong approach to take especially when the sole reason is to gain access to the OAuth module.

I really don't think any of the patches or approaches should be seen as a long term solution worth maintaining (and I don't see anyone particularly excited about maintaining them). Think of these patches as bandaids to not force you to completely abandon this module and start over with your twitter integration on your current site.

The twitter module is bulky and does a lot of stuff. For anyone wanting to provide lists of tweets based on different search criteria this is the best module for that. It's lightweight, at least compared to the twitter module. It sucks that twitter is now requiring authentication but just because twitter did that doesn't mean we should abandon this module for a heftier module. ff782bc1db