Download Trainer Jump Force

for wemod (edit i verifyed the files and got the easy anti cheat back i got the jump force . exe thats used for it but it does take awhile to load but cheats work idk i know the money one works just got it fixed

Jump Force is a stat that determines the height that you can jump, along with your flight speed and damage with the Jump Force Skills. It increases your fly speed every time you train your jump force.

Download File 🔥 https://bytlly.com/2y3BOW 🔥

Similarly to speed, you can use weights to increase jump power faster. The weights are unlocked in the 6th Main Quest. Note: These are only the average number needed to use weights. It might not be 100% accurate. If it doesn't work try getting 0.1 more

One example of explosive weight training that has been the focus of several research papers is the jump squat exercise. Here, a loaded bar is held on the shoulders and the individual squats down prior to rapidly extending the legs and torso to finally leave contact with the floor. The load used during jump squat training seems to be an important consideration for training outcomes. Following the law of specificity, training with lighter loads improves power at the high velocity end of the force-velocity curve, whereas higher loads improves power at the high force end of the force-velocity curve (McBride et al., 2002; Smilios et al., 2013).

In studies where the load that maximizes mean power output (calculated without the inclusion of body mass) has been calculated there seems to have been more consistent simultaneous improvement in maximum and rapid force production, as well as sprint and jump performance (Lamas et al., 2012; Newton et al., 1999; Smilios et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 1993). Nevertheless, use of loads that maximize mean power output has not been studied in depth. Given that maximum mean power output may shift slightly during training with different loading schemes (McBride et al. 2002; Smilios et al., 2013), it may be pertinent to assess what load maximizes power output and train according to that load in order to develop global improvements in neuromuscular performance.

Improvements in both CMJ and SJ were evident after the entire power training period in EXP, and these findings were similar to previous studies involving explosive weight/power strength training or in combination with heavy strength training (Lamas et al., 2012; Lyttle et al., 1996; Smilios et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 1993). In the present study, the magnitude of improvements in CMJ was 10 % and in SJ 16 % after pre- to mid-training (4 weeks) and during the next training period no further significant improvements were observed (i.e. improvements plateaued). Interestingly, percentage improvements in CMJ and SJ were 18 % and 15 % from pre- to post-training (10 weeks) in a study by Wilson et al. (1993). Thereafter, a plateau in SJ performance was observed after mid-training (5weeks) but significant improvements in CMJ continued throughout the jump squat training period, which is in a contrast to our results.

The main difference between the study of Wilson et al. (1993) and the present study is the load used during the jump squats. It may be that use of lighter loads (e.g. 30% 1-RM) have greater efficacy to improve CMJ performance than the medium loads used in the present study (approx. 50-60% 1-RM). Some findings suggest that improvements in loaded jump squat performance are specific to light loads when training is conducted using lighter loads (McBride et al., 2002; Smilios et al., 2013). In contrast, heavy resistance training only has been shown to improve SJ performance over the whole training period (Lamas et al., 2012; Wilson et al., 1993), while in some instances light load jump squat training has not been able to improve SJ performance (e.g. Cormie et al. 2010). Some evidence to support this claim may be indicated by the positive associations in increased Fmax and SJ performance but not between Fmax and CMJ in the present study. Hence, the importance of different neuromuscular qualities on SJ and CMJ performance (Bobbert et al., 1996) may require more targeted training procedures to these specific vertical jumps if continued improvement is desired.

In contrast to vertical jump performance, improvements in isometric maximal force production (Fmax) were significant from pre- to mid-training and also from mid- to post-training. The magnitude of improvements from pre- to mid-training was ~14 % and ~5 % from mid- to post-testing. Short-term jump squat training has been observed to improve maximum strength (either dynamic or isometric testing) (Lamas et al., 2012; McBride et al., 2002; Smilios et al., 2013), however, some studies using light load (0-30% 1-RM) jump squats have not observed improved maximum strength performance (Cormie et al., 2010; Wilson et al., 1993). Furthermore, in studies comparing heavy strength training to jump squat training greater improvements in maximum strength occurred using higher loads (Cormie et al., 2010; Smilios et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 1993). In addition to the positive association between Fmax and SJ improvements, there were also negative associations between Fmax and 50 m sprint time. These findings suggest that improving maximum strength favorably influences some elements of explosive athletic performance. Thus, one possible training strategy for athletes with limited time to improve athletic performance (e.g. team sports) would be to perform jump squats with Pmax loads until a plateau is reached (e.g. approx. 4 weeks and/or 13 sessions) and then use lighter and heavier loads periodically to further increase specific performance. Further research is required to confirm this hypothesis, however.

Previous studies have reported that maximal force production can be increased through muscle activation, as well as increases in cross-sectional area and muscular power following heavy strength training (Kaneko et al., 1983; MacIntosh and Holash, 2000; Shoepe et al., 2003). Following jump squat training, two studies have measured maximum muscle activity using EMG during isometric contraction. There were no changes in VL or VM EMG activity following jump squats with loads of 0-60% 1-RM (Cormie et al., 2010; Lamas et al., 2012). These findings, although limited to 2 studies, would suggest that the improved Fmax in the present study originated from mechanisms other than improved muscle activation. Consequently, morphological or architectural changes within the muscle may have contributed to increases in Fmax. Lamas et al. (2012) observed smaller, but selective increases in type IIa (~15%) and IIx (~19%) fiber cross-sectional area following jump squat compared to heavy strength training. Also, Moss et al. (1997) observed ~3 % (p < 0.05) increase in cross-sectional area of the elbow flexors following explosive training. Although Cormie et al. (2010) did not observe hypertrophy at the whole muscle level (assessed by DXA and ultrasound), the authors observed significantly increase pennation angle that was in-line with the heavy strength training group. These previous findings suggest that perhaps alterations in; muscle size, relative fiber distribution, and/or pennation angle could have contributed to the gain in Fmax in the present study.

The subjects in the present study improved force-time characteristics (i.e. RFD100) from pre- to mid-training and also mid- to post-training. Jump squat training with low loads have led to significantly increased EMG rate of rise during CMJ (Cormie et al., 2010) suggesting that neural adaptations are specific to rapid force production. The increased EMG rate of rise observed by Cormie et al. (2010) was accompanied by significant improvements in maximum isometric RFD. It should be noted that interpreting rapid force production and the factors that influence RFD is complex. For example, conflicting data exist regarding the efficacy of explosive power training to induce improvements in RFD with some studies showing no increases (Lamas et al., 2012; Wilson et al., 1993) and others showing improved performance (Hkkinen et al., 1985; Kyrlinen et al., 2005; Winchester et al., 2008). Perhaps one issue is that the test is isometric while the training is performed dynamically, and may lack sensitivity to detect changes due to training (Abernethy and Jrime, 1996; Murphy and Wilson, 1996). It may be also that certain exercises are better suited to assess potential improvements in dynamic performance using isometric tests, as Haff et al. (1997) observed strong relationships in the mid-thigh pull exercise (r > 0.84). Further complicating this issue is the observed relationship between improvements in Fmax and RFD100 (r = 0.38-0.39, p = 0.019-0.023) at pre- to mid-training and mid- to post-training in the present study. Although this relationship may be considered weak to moderate, it indicates that both rapid and maximum force production share some common neuromuscular features. Finally, factors such as different training backgrounds, exercise and test selection, training duration, as well as different assessment of RFD (i.e. force-time, maximum RFD) may have influenced the findings in the literature.

In 50 m sprint time, significant improvements from pre- to mid-training (-1 %, p = 0.02), as well as from mid- to post-training (-1.9 %, p < 0.001) were observed in the present study. Numerous studies found significant improvements in sprint time after jump squat training over distances ranging from 5 to 40 m, as well as in an agility test (Cormie et al., 2010; Harris et al., 2008; Loturco et al., 2015a; 2015b; McBride et al., 2002; Wilson et al., 1993). To our knowledge no study examined the effect of jump squat training at the distance of 50 m. It is difficult to determine whether these changes are due to improvements in the early (acceleration) or later (maximum speed) phase of running because no split times were measured in the present study. Nevertheless, given the abundance of improved sprint performance over short distances (i.e. 5-30m), the data seem to suggest that the greatest improvements occurred during the acceleration phase of sprint running. Furthermore, in the study by Sleivert and Taingahue (2004), a relationship between maximal concentric jump power and sprint acceleration was found. This is perhaps logical since longer ground contact time is needed during the acceleration phase of running compared to maximum running speed (Weyand et al., 2000) and therefore, concentric force production of the knee and hip extensors could be the main factors affecting performance (Dorn et al., 2012). The only conflicting data that we are aware of is presented by Cormie et al. (2010), whereby significant improvements were not observed over 10m but after 20m of sprint running. As we observed an association between improved Fmax and 50m sprint performance, it may be that heavier loads are needed to improve maximum force production and sprint acceleration in moderately trained subjects. It could be suggested that future studies focus on different split times and whether improvements are observed following different jump squat loads. With particular reference to team sports, the most optimal loading strategy may be that which targets improvement in neuromuscular features that improve sprint running over 5-30m distances. 2351a5e196