Been one of my absolute favorites since it debuted. I have had a dance to it choreographed in my mind for years. Just need someone to execute it. Maybe we can make it happen. And when I die, whenever that is, I want it played at my service too.
I have heard of thee by the hearing of the ear
From his ancestors, who in a traditionary way had handed down from one to another what they knew of God, his will and worship, his works and ways; and from those who had the care of his education, parents and tutors, who had instilled the principles of religion, and the knowledge of divine things, into him very early; and from such as might instruct in matters of religion in a public manner; and both by ordinary and extraordinary revelation made unto him, as was sometimes granted to men in that age in which Job lived; see ( Job 4:16 Job 4:17 ) ( 33:14-16 ) . Though he had heard more of God through his speaking to him out of the whirlwind than ever he did before, to which he had attentively listened; and the phrase, hearing by or with the hearing of the ear, denotes close attention; see ( Ezekiel 44:5 ) ;
Download Song My Eyes Have Seen My Ears Have Heard
DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://byltly.com/2y4yX0 🔥
but now mine eye seeth thee;
thy Shechinah, as Jarchi; thy divine glory and Majesty; the Logos, the Word or Son of God, who now appeared in an human form, and spake to Job out of the whirlwind; and whom he saw with the eyes of his body, as several of the patriarchs had seen him, and which is the sense of an ancient writer F14; though no doubt he saw him also with the eyes of his understanding, and had a clearer sight of his living Redeemer, the Messiah, than ever he had before; and saw more of God in Christ, of his nature, perfections, and glory, than ever he had as yet seen; and what he had heard of him came greatly short of what he now saw; particularly he had a more clear and distinct view of the sovereignty, wisdom, goodness, and justice of God in the dealings of his providence with the children of men, and with himself, to which now he humbly submitted.
I have talked about the babies but the reason why God sent me over here was to work with these precious Pastors that work with Arise Africa. I wish I could post every story, every miracle and every laugh that I have heard from these men but I cannot.
King James Bible
For since the beginning of the world men have not heard, nor perceived by the ear, neither hath the eye seen, O God, beside thee, what he hath prepared for him that waiteth for him.(Isaiah 64:4)
> But he also said: "Scripture says, `Our eyes have not yet seen, nor our ears
> heard, nor our minds imagined, what we can build.'" Now, this is not in my
> Bible. The closest there is comes from 1 Corinthians 2:9 which is rendered,
> "No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has
> prepared for those who love Him." The difference between what Clinton
> portrays as Scripture, and what it does indeed say, puts what we can build
> in the place of what God has prepared.
This is not necessarily correct.Mr Clinton was speaking, not writing; we do not know where his quote ended.
The intention may have been to end the Scriptural quote after `imagined'; that
is, instead of quoting the Bible to talk about human greatness, he quoted the
Bible's imagery for impact. I'm a bit uncomfortable with this kind of chop-
quoting, but Christians do it all the time.
Mr Weiss also writes about Clinton's use of `New Covenant', and some other
Scriptural allusions. While I think that some of this may have been
calculated, I doubt all of it was. Both Clinton and Gore are Baptists of
some flavor (I think they are both Southern Baptists). Many Baptist churches
put a strong emphasis on memorising Scripture verses (my wife Nancy is a
walking concordance 8-). I know quite a few people who grew up with Bible-
verse flash cards, and Sunday School classes with `Sword Drills'. Some of
them speak in Scriptural paraphrases; the number of allusions to Bible
passages in daily speech can be astonishing. (My father-in-law once talked
about adding on to his house so he'd have more room, and then said he felt as
if he were `building bigger barns'. This is a single example, but I can think
of many more.)I think we should be glad there's a candidate who can find Scripture passages
vaguely relevant to his ideas; I suspect that quite a few of them have more
dust on their Bibles than they'd care to admit.
Mr Weiss also commented on Mr Clinton's position on abortion, and his view of
homosexuals in the military. Without getting into these issues again, suffice
it to say that I believe Mr Weiss is unfairly pushing his own opinions as if
they were exactly equivalent to Christianity. As a Christian who disagrees
with Mr Weiss on both issues, I would appreciate it if we could all be less
judgemental and self-righteous. -- As an aside, I find it strange that conservative Christians favor a candidate
whose church ordains homosexuals and has female priests (Mr Bush is an
Episcopalian). While the other candidate's denomination just voted to kick
out any church which condoned homosexuality, and refuses to financially assist
any church with an ordained woman.It's similar to the amazement I felt in 1980. Jimmy Carter was a Baptist
Sunday School teacher for many years before he became president or even
started running, and he seriously tried to work for peace (he's the one who
got Egypt to recognise Israel). But when Ronald Reagan got elected, many
Christians called this an ideal opportunity -- even though Mr Reagan's group
(Presbyterian) has more ordained women than any other denomination, and was
working on a statement wildly revising their sexual ethics. (This report made
news several years later, and was rejected.)So far as I can tell, what somebody says about public policy is what matters
most -- not what he does, or what he endorses and supports. When Mr Bush was
told that an active lesbian had been ordained a priest, he said "I don't
think I'm quite ready for that" -- not "I think that was wrong" or "I'm off
to the Anglican Catholics". I don't usually trust politicians much (certainly
not in this age of spin doctors and media consultants). When somebody says
that certain things are immoral, but supports a church which endorses and
supports them, I get a bit suspicious.In fact, I think anti-abortion pro-legislation people don't really have a
presidential candidate this year. Mr Clinton said he is anti-abortion
pro-choice, and Mr Bush's actions seem to suggest that while he finds abortion
a useful campaign issue, he doesn't really care. In particular, he called the
recent Supreme Court decision a victory, even though they specifically refused
to overturn Roe v Wade. (Randall Terry had a somewhat different view of the
decision.) The President was more upset about striking down prayer at
graduation than he was about upholding abortion rights. His religious
denomination takes an official position in favor of keeping abortion legal,
and says the state should not remove a woman's right to choose -- how many of
you would remain in a church that took such a position? (Not entirely fair,
since Episcopalians tend to be very loyal.)As I recall, he used to be pro-choice and only `converted' when he ran with
Ronald Reagan -- this makes me doubt his sincerity. (Of course, I Could Be
Wrong.)
Darren F Provine / kil...@gboro.glassboro.edu
"Politician, n.: From the Greek `poly' (`many') and the French `tete' (`head'
or `face,' as in `tete-a-tete': head to head or face to face). Hence
`polytetien', a person of two or more faces." -- Martin Pitt
Amos 5:21-26 I hate, I despise your feast days, and I will not smell
in your solemn assemblies. Though ye offer me burnt offerings and
your meat offerings, I will not accept [them]: neither will I regard
the peace offerings of your fat beasts. Take thou away from me the
noise of thy songs; for I will not hear the melody of thy viols. But
let judgment run down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty
stream. Have ye offered unto me sacrifices and offerings in the
wilderness forty years, O house of Israel? But ye have borne the
tabernacle of your Moloch and Chiun your images, the star of your
god, which ye made to yourselves.Moloch (Molech) was the god of the Ammonites and Phoenicians to whom
some Israelites sacrificed their infants in the valley of Hinnom.Clinton has been announcing his vision of America, a pro-choice
America; for whom he will sign the Freedom of Choice Act into law.
He has been bearing this promise of an increase in the tabernacle
of Molech as a key campaign point. Then he declares that this and
other promises are to be considered a "New Covenant." The spirit of
Molech is to be considered part of a "New Covenant."Certainly God evaluates the sins of an individual; but God judges
nations for the corporate sins of that nation. Sodom was destroyed
for the corporate sins of the people... the Israelites, God's own
covenant people, were carried away in bondage for the corporate sins
that Israel committed. One of those sins was that they sacrificed
their children to Molech. And now, we have a man who wishes to further
our national disposition towards Molech under the banner of "New
Covenant."I'm grieved and astonished at this level of blasphemy. God help us.
God, heal our land. Awaken us from our slumbering and our sluggishness
and cause our hearts to turn back to you. Alert us to what is going on
in the spiritual and open our eyes. God help us. en agape,
Bob
>> But he also said: "Scripture says, `Our eyes have not yet seen, nor our ears
>> heard, nor our minds imagined, what we can build.'" Now, this is not in my
>> Bible. The closest there is comes from 1 Corinthians 2:9 which is rendered,
>> "No eye has seen, no ear has heard, no mind has conceived what God has
>> prepared for those who love Him." The difference between what Clinton
>> portrays as Scripture, and what it does indeed say, puts what we can build
>> in the place of what God has prepared. e24fc04721
download alkitab untuk pc windows 7
werewolf castle hindi dubbed download
happy birthday to you mom song mp3 download
download mp3 diana hamilton songs
sabah salum niacheni nijivune mp3 download