Download Root Supersu

I am currently able to get root access in my app on a rooted device using SuperSU. When my app requests root access a dialog from SuperSu is displayed which a user then clicks on "Grant" to allow the permissions.

I'm providing a device with the app, then users use the device (which I own). Just to provide more context, when I release the device it already has the app and it has already been granted root access by SuperSu. So what I'm trying to avoid is a case whereby the app might loose the permission and then ask for it again while its out there in the field. The users are not tech savvy and they will not know what the SuperSu dialog is or what to do with it.

Download File 🔥 https://bltlly.com/2y2PxY 🔥

You mentioned in the comments that your app will already have superuser permissions. You have root access, so you could change SuperSu's shared preferences to have your app always be granted access. Again, you implied that you own the device so you shouldn't need to modify SuperSu preferences programmatically.

SuperSU download is the best Superuser access management tool that developed for Android devices. Clearly, Superuser access is similar to the Administrator privilege on Windows computer. The users are allowed do almost anything on their Android smartphone or tablet under the root status

SuperSU APK v2.82 is the current latest which is allowed downloading for Android 2.3 to up. So enjoy SuperSU Root and manage all your superuser privileges correctly. And do not forget to give all thanks to Chainfire for developing such an amazing free app to take after root.

Hi .. !!! nI'm very clumsy ... nI can't root my Galaxy Core G360G nProbe with everything ... nWhen I run a program that tells me if I have root, it tells me not ... nAlthough I have an AppMgr lll prog...

SuperSU is one of the most useful tools to control the root settings on an Android device. Simply put, it is an app that allows for advanced management of superuser access on a rooted Android device. SuperSU may be popular, but like every other rooting tool, it does have its own advantages and disadvantages. They include the following:

That completes the process, and you should now see the SuperSU app on your device. You can test the success of the rooting procedure by installing an app that requires root access. A good example is "Greenify" or "Titanium Backup" When attempting to use one of these apps, a popup should appear requesting Superuser access. Tap "Grant" and when you see a "Success" message, the device has been successfully rooted.

After I noticed that SuperSU is not necessary I uninstalled it and I turned on root via apps and adb via the settings of CrDroid, but now it doesn't request me to grand root permissions to apps anymore.

I attempted to root my Motorola G 2nd Generation, and failed. I tried to remove everything and go back to normal, but the SuperSU app stayed. The phone stated it as an system app. I tried factory resetting, but SuperSU app was still there.

It's strange the your system contains SuperSU while it's not actually rooted. It usually requires root access to install any app to the system so you should just have a .bin file to update. Id you want to remove SU, you'll need to gain root access again and remove the apk after that... You obviously got a correct method of root, but didn't install SuperSU properly, So SuperSU can't manage root permissions, however the method you used to install it to system should be able to remove it as well

I did, however, find this resource that is mostly directed at explaining how to use the root privileges programmatically, but explained things fairly well. The article gives information about SELinux, but not so much how its enforcement is circumvented.

SuperSU is no more actively developed, the new prevailing standard is Magisk which was originally based on SuperSU (ideas and perhaps some code too) but now it has moved far ahead. So better go for a new actively maintained open-source solution wherever possible. Or if you want some adventure, try this: How to manually root a phone?.

Android is based on Linux kernel which, when starts at device boot, runs as root user. Kernel space is invisible to us - the userspace. init is the first process started by kernel which we can see, it also runs with root access. It starts many services/daemons (the OS), many of them also run with root privileges. Finally when all required processes are up, init drops us to a non-root (unprivileged) process - a shell on standard Linux OSes, a Launcher app or Lock Screen (which is also System UI app) on Android. Root is kernel's dear user - the Super User - identified by UserID 0. Kernel never restricts him doing any harm or good to anything on device. Non-privileged users are assigned UIDs 1 to 65534 (usually). Android divides these UIDs for different categories of apps and processes as explained here. Every process and every file has a UID, GroupID, supplementary groups and permission mode. These four parameters govern how a process accesses other processes and files. This whole phenomenon is called Discretionary Access Control.

If an unprivileged process wants to access some file or perform some action which is only allowed to root user, the former has to switch to the latter. It's done by executing a file (usually su) which is either set-user-id-root or has setuid/segid file capabilities. A capability is a subset of root user's authorities. Executed file makes setuid syscall so the kernel elevates unprivileged state to privileged. This is a simplification, in actual there are multiple other factors involved. But on Android, apps are run by dropping all capabilities and privileges in such a way that they can't elevate their privileges in any way (excluding vulnerabilities). So the unprivileged app requests some other already running privileged process to perform the privileged task on former's behalf. The privileged process is named daemonsu (or magiskd) and the request is forwarded when an app executes special su binary which interacts with SuperSU app to ask the human user for granting permission.

Other things which are directly related to rooting process include bootloader unlocking, boot.img unpacking/repacking, disabling Verified Boot (dm-verity) and FDE/FBE, patching kernel to boot different init (or to disable vendor specific security mechanisms), systemless rooting, (un)setting Android properties, bind-mounting directories, isolating mount namespaces etc.

Please enter the root/superuser password:

error: Password incorrect. 2 attempt(s) left.

Please enter the root/superuser password:

error: Password incorrect. 1 attempt(s) left.

Please enter the root/superuser password:

[unquote]

In my experience, because of proprietary plugin issues, installing my HP LaseJet P1005 via System Settings never worked satisfactorily.

However, executing ~$ hp-plugin and ~$ hp-setup commands never let me down before when using Maui, Mint KDE or neon (in one or two instances I used the hp commands in root:~# environment, I think).

Installing HP Printer to my desktop and laptop computers (Netrunner 19.01) was challenging but persistence finally paid off albeit some auxiliary printer functions are unavailable on my laptop.

After the executing the hp instalation commands three (3) times and providing the root/superuser password the error message relating to the key from key server did not show anymore and finished the installation process.

Okay, I will answer my question by myself. It is possible to still use the old Greenbone 3 command line inferface with gos-state-manager instead of gsm. This in mind it is easily possible to still activate the superuser/root for the shell.

Hello @janhe

I changed the superuser password using the above 3 commands but still unable to switch to root from Admin user as Admin user is not allowed to switch to root.

So how to switch to root and change host file for DNS issue. Pls help

Yes. As is pointed out by Rich Homolka in a comment, there's code in the kernel which explicitly checks for uid 0 when needing to check for the root user, which means that root always has at least uid 0.

No. root is just a name, listed in /etc/passwd or some other authentication store. You could just as well call the account admin, and the OS itself won't care, but some applications might not quite like it because they expect there to exist a privileged account named root. Calling the uid 0 account on a *nix root is a very strongly held convention, but it isn't required by the system (though it may be required by certain userland software, possibly including system administration utilities).

It's also worth noting that, as pointed out by Simon Richter, on BSDs there often exists a second uid 0 account, by convention named toor (which is "root" spelled backwards, and also lexically comes after root in a list sorted alphabetically). For example, FreeBSD uses it to provide a root user with a customized shell setting, leaving the root user with a default shell which is guaranteed to exist on the system's root partition (useful for recovery purposes).

2) uid 0 does not necessarily map to root. The best example is FreeBSD. It has two uid == 0 accounts, the difference being the shell. root has shell /bin/sh, which is a simple shell, useful for when your disks are bad and you need fsck /usr. toor uses tcsh, which is much more useful in non-emergency situations,since it has things like history, etc.

Another, more personal example; one job I had where they had a root equiv (i.e. uid=0) account over NIS. The password, blank! Because the new sysadmin couldn't remember the root password on the machines. I yelled about this for obvious reasons (NIS passwords by definition can not hide their blankness). I was not happy about this account. ff782bc1db