Download Episode Free Premium Choices [TOP]

I like to scan my script and look for times the MC has been asked a question by another character. If I can think of a few different ways MC might possibly respond without her flat our rejecting the choice, I add some dialogue choices

Episodes is not mending from their diamond devouring ways. What frustrates me is you get 1! 1 diamond for completing a chapter/book! Why? And the cheapest diamond option is 19.

Choices have redeemed themselves though. 2 diamonds after completing a chapter and 15 for a book. You also get an extra for watching an add. So choices is so much better.

Download Episode Free Premium Choices

DOWNLOAD 🔥 https://shoxet.com/2y7XSx 🔥

episode was so enjoyable for me in 2014 but now all of the stories there are very cringy. like someone said, hella genderlocked books, the plots are all mostly the same and there arent many books where u can choose the gender u want to date

"Choices" is the nineteenth episode of season three of the television show Buffy the Vampire Slayer. It was written by David Fury, directed by James A. Contner, and first broadcast on May 4, 1999 on The WB.

Noel Murray of The A.V. Club described "Choices" as "an exciting episode, marked by an especially rousing score and some of the best fight scenes I've yet seen on the show". He went on to praise Willow's character development, and the way the episode "reinforced its theme in nearly every plot point, line of dialogue and set dressing".[1] A review for the BBC criticised the plot, particularly Willow being kidnapped and staying to read the Books of Ascension rather than escaping, but praised the character interactions and Alyson Hannigan's performance.[2]

In today's episode, we learn to make decisions like an economist. We learn a few of the fundamental concepts of economics, then watch them in action. Our reporter applies the concept of opportunity cost to her dating life, and shrugs off the sunk cost fallacy. We put a deal for chicken nuggets to the test of marginal cost and marginal benefits, and we take Uber for a ride to cost-benefit test.

"Choices"Production informationSeriesStar Wars: Tales of the Jedi[1]Season1Episode3Air dateOctober 26, 2022[1]Run time16 minutesDirector(s)Charles Murray[1]Writer(s)Charles Murray[1]lan Murray[1]Episode chronologyTimelineBetween 50 BBY and 42 BBY[2]Previous episode"Justice"Next episode"The Sith Lord"[Source]

"Choices" is the third episode in the first season of the anthology animated television series Star Wars: Tales of the Jedi. The episode was directed by Charles Murray, written by Charles and lan Murray, and aired on October 26, 2022.

"Choices" is the nineteenth episode of the third season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer and the fifty-third episode in the series. Written by David Fury and directed by James A. Contner, it was originally broadcast on May 4, 1999, on The WB network.

Bonus Choices:

- I was brutal on the guy. I wanted Bane on my side, and I kind of wanted to show my worth. I knew that Bruce wasn't going to kill the guy... right?

- I don't think I was flirtatious with Harley. I'm not sure what choice this refers to, as I don't have these choices appearing in my account. I'm just basing this off of other people's responses. I told her in the elevator "Now's not the time for this" or something like that. I'm sure I denied her.

- I pushed the elevator button. I had new friends to impress and trusted that they didn't kill him. Didn't feel any good about it as I pushed the button, though.

- I told Harley to back off. No one was going to treat my employees like that, not my chairpeople like that, no one. Not even my Fashion Consultants can do that. Plus, I had a reputation on the line there. It was not good.

Amazing episode, the fight with Bane was intense and there was a lot going on in terms of relationships with other characters. By far my favorite choices were a) getting John to lie about Tiffany's presence and b) slipping Bane the counter venom and seeing him grow weak and yell while he is surrounded by agents. GLORIOUS.

Honestly this might be the first ep in telltale history where I'm seriously considering to replay it to make better choices. First of I didn't know that the whole Bane/Harley situation at the end means that the other gets taken. I thought Bane would make more damage to the guys but in hindsight, Bane doesn't like me and I'm stuck with him. Plus, my choice broke poor John Doe's heart

Choices and Consequences are a main gameplay element in Life is Strange. The protagonist, Max Caulfield, is presented with different choices in the form of available action or dialogue options and optional interactions which can stop the scene and freeze time if it is a major choice. A butterfly symbol will appear at the top of the screen after the choice is made, and Max will usually make a comment regarding her decision; she will then have the option to rewind to make a different choice, or progress further into the story and usually reach a save checkpoint location. The choices made during the episode, along with comparisons with friends and global statistics on choices made will be revealed to the player at the end of each episode. The associated consequences will often be revealed later on in the same or in subsequent episodes.

To delve into these concerns, Darrell West is joined by Sarah Bender, a JD candidate at the University of Michigan, who has extensively studied AI and its implications for election administration. In this episode of the TechTank podcast, they explore the potential transformative effects of AI on future elections. Listen to the episode and more from the TechTank podcast on Apple, Spotify, or Acast.

Brown, B. (Host). (2021, February 24). Bren with Dr. Edith Eger on Recognizing the Choices and Gifts in Our Lives. [Audio podcast episode]. In Unlocking Us with Bren Brown. Parcast Network. -with-dr-edith-eger-on-recognizing-the-choices-and-gifts-in-our-lives/

You are welcome to share an excerpt from the episode transcript (up to 500 words but not more) in media articles (e.g., The New York Times, LA Times, The Guardian), in a non-commercial article or blog post (e.g., Medium), and/or on a personal social media account for non-commercial purposes, provided that you include proper attribution and link back to the podcast URL. For the sake of clarity, media outlets with advertising models are permitted to use excerpts from the transcript per the above.

There have been countless battles for the right to properly educate, give agency to, and give education access to Black children. In this episode, Dr. Howard Fuller joins the conversation. Dr. Fuller is a former superintendent of the Milwaukee Public Schools and founder of the Black Alliance for Educational Options, a national pro-voucher and school choice group.

Russ Roberts: This book tied together a number of issues I've been thinking about lately related to rationality, decision-making, data, evidence, how to live your life. And it did so in some very delightful and unexpected ways. It's hard to believe, but in the entire EconTalk archive of over 700+ episodes, I have never had a guest talk about being a vampire. But that streak is over. I want to start with how you start your book, with a seemingly silly question, turns out not to be silly. But, the question is: Should a person become a vampire? Why is that hard decision?

But, as--these decisions are very, very different from what to have for dinner and where to go on vacation. Right? A lost, horrible vacation that you're not enjoying, you could end. These are things that are typically no-return choices, or if return, very high cost.

Russ Roberts: I think you used the phrase, 'Science has not created a sufficiently fine-grained source of data yet.' But I would go as far as to say that it is beyond the scope of social science to do that, or science generally. It's not a scientific question, ultimately. In a recent episode with Peter Singer, when I suggested that we would never have a science of happiness, he would say we're not there yet but that we're making progress. I said, 'We'll never get there.'

And, you know, in that situation, I think we're troubled by that. The vampire one is kind of silly. We have trouble thinking about it. But, when I talk about this decision to have children, and listeners know I've been talking episodically about this on various episodes, about whether this is an analytical decision or not, should it be an analytical decision--and one of the things I've suggested was, 'Well you're a different person after you've had kids.' Anybody who has had kids knows that.

But, historically, all these things--nobody worried about these. Nobody agonized over them. They were easy. They just were done. And that change is part of the power and extraordinary nature of modernity to see ourselves as a blank slate that we can write on from scratch. And, I don't think we can; but certainly we have expanded the choices available to people and the cultural acceptability of all these choices. So, there are extraordinarily wonderful things about that, and there are costs to it. To me, it's a complicated question as to--it's not a complicated question. It's just a reality that the move away from religion, tradition, and norms as the way to solve these unanswerable questions brings a bit of angst that you've really chronicled in your book.

L.A. Paul: Yes. I think it does bring angst. Also, norms are constantly changing. We face new situations as well, like climate change or new technology that requires developing new norms. And so, we can't just follow--new choices confront us. We have much more flexibility, and we can't just follow the old norms. And, arguably, we shouldn't. Because another thing that happens is we recognize that some of those old norms really--

In the process of putting together their applications, students make countless choices. To help applicants understand which choices are more or less likely to help their candidacies, Hannah and Mark invite their colleague John to join in a game of up-voting and down-voting common application choices. While none of these choices will make or break an application, the officers explain why certain choices are more or less beneficial during the review process. Transcript 006ab0faaa